Q.Read the following statements : Assertion (A) and Reason (R). Choose the correct alternative given below : Assertion (A): Goods and Services Tax (GST) was implemented by the Government of India on 8th November, 2016. Reason (R): GST was introduced to implement a unified indirect tax system in India. Alternatives : (A) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of the Assertion (A). (B) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of the Assertion (A). (C) Assertion (A) is true, but Reason (R) is false. (D) Assertion (A) is false, but Reason (R) is true.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Goods And Services Tax
Goods and Services Tax (GST)
Start with what you already know
Walk into any shop — a chemist, a mobile store, a restaurant — and look at your bill. At the bottom, you will see a line: GST @ 5% or GST @ 12% or GST @ 18%. That extra amount is not pocketed by the shopkeeper. It goes to the government. But why is there a separate tax called GST, and not just "sales tax" or "VAT" like before?
The answer lies in a simple problem: before GST, every state had its own tax system. A truck carrying goods from Maharashtra to Karnataka would be stopped at checkposts, pay entry tax, octroi, and state VAT — each time adding cost and delay. GST was designed to make India one unified market.
The precise meaning
Goods and Services Tax (GST) is a comprehensive, multi-stage, destination-based indirect tax levied on every value addition in the supply chain — from manufacture to final consumption.
Let me unpack each part of that definition.
Comprehensive — It replaced a dozen central and state taxes (excise duty, service tax, VAT, octroi, entry tax, luxury tax, etc.) with a single tax.
Multi-stage — A product passes through several stages: raw material → manufacturer → wholesaler → retailer → consumer. GST is collected at every stage where value is added.
Destination-based — The tax revenue goes to the state where the goods are consumed, not where they are produced. If a car is made in Gujarat but sold in Bihar, Bihar gets the GST.
Value addition — This is the key idea. A manufacturer buys steel for ₹100, pays 18% GST (₹18). He uses the steel to make a machine and sells it for ₹200. He collects 18% GST (₹36) from the buyer. But he does not pay ₹36 to the government — he pays only ₹18 (₹36 minus the ₹18 he already paid on steel). This is called Input Tax Credit (ITC).
Input Tax Credit is the heart of GST. It prevents "tax on tax" (cascading). Under the old system, a manufacturer paid tax on his inputs, then paid tax again on the full selling price — effectively taxing the tax. GST eliminates this.
How GST works: a simple chain
Imagine a wooden chair.
-
Logger sells timber to a furniture maker for ₹1,000. GST @ 18% = ₹180. Logger deposits ₹180 with the government.
-
Furniture maker uses the timber, adds value (labour, design), and sells the chair to a wholesaler for ₹2,000. GST on sale = ₹360. But he claims ITC of ₹180 (the tax he already paid on timber). He deposits only ₹180 (₹360 − ₹180).
-
Wholesaler sells to a retailer for ₹3,000. GST = ₹540. ITC = ₹360. Deposits ₹180.
-
Retailer sells to you, the consumer, for ₹4,000. GST = ₹720. ITC = ₹540. Deposits ₹180.
Total tax collected = ₹180 + ₹180 + ₹180 + ₹180 = ₹720 — exactly 18% of the final price ₹4,000.
Notice: the government collects the same total tax (₹720) whether it collects it in one lump from the retailer or in four small instalments from each stage. The difference is that everyone in the chain is incentivised to maintain proper invoices because they need ITC. This reduces tax evasion.
Why GST matters for the economy
Removed cascading — Earlier, a product bore "tax on tax". A study by the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy estimated that cascading added 25–30% to the final price of many goods. GST removed that.
Made India a common market — Before GST, a truck moving from Delhi to Chennai spent 60–70 hours at state borders in paperwork. After GST, interstate checkposts were dismantled. Logistics costs fell.
Increased tax base — Because every business wants ITC, they must file returns and show purchases from registered suppliers. This pulls informal businesses into the tax net.
Simplified compliance — Instead of filing separate returns for excise, service tax, and VAT, a business files one GST return.
The three-tier structure
GST in India is not a single rate. It has three components:
| Component | Levied by | Applies to |
|---|---|---|
| CGST (Central GST) | Central Government | Intra-state sales |
| SGST (State GST) | State Government | Intra-state sales |
| IGST (Integrated GST) | Central Government | Inter-state sales |
For a sale within the same state (say, a shop in Delhi selling to a customer in Delhi), the total GST is split equally: 9% CGST + 9% SGST = 18% total.
For a sale across states (Delhi to Mumbai), only IGST is charged (18%). The central government collects it and later transfers the state's share to Maharashtra (the destination state). …
The Assertion states that GST was implemented on 8th November, 2016. That date is incorrect — GST was actually launched at midnight on 1st July, 2017. So Assertion (A) is false.
The Reason says GST was introduced to create a unified indirect tax system in India. That is exactly right — GST replaced a host of central and state taxes with a single, nationwide tax structure. So Reason (R) is true. …
The Assertion is factually wrong about the date of GST implementation, while the Reason correctly states the purpose of GST. Therefore, the correct choice is (D).
The question tests your grasp of two things: the exact date of a major tax reform and the core reason behind it. Let’s take them one at a time.
Assertion (A) claims that GST was implemented on 8th November, 2016. That date is actually famous for a different event — the demonetisation of ₹500 and ₹1000 notes. GST, on the other hand, was rolled out much later. The Goods and Services Tax came into effect across India on 1st July, 2017, after a long legislative journey that began with the 101st Constitutional Amendment Act, 2016. So the date given in the Assertion is incorrect.
The confusion often arises because both demonetisation and GST were major economic reforms announced by the same government in quick succession, but they are separate events with different dates.
Reason (R) states that GST was introduced to implement a unified indirect tax system in India. This is entirely accurate. Before GST, India had a complex web of central and state taxes — excise duty, service tax, VAT, octroi, and many more — each with its own rules, rates, and compliance burdens. GST replaced all these with a single, nationwide tax on the supply of goods and services, based on the principle of ‘one nation, one tax’. Its goal was to eliminate the cascading effect of taxes (tax on tax), simplify compliance, and create a seamless national market. …
- CA Foundation 2026Set jan-20261 markMCQQ.Which of following taxes has not been replaced by the Goods and Service Tax? (A) VAT (B) Income Tax (C) Excise duty (D) Service Tax
›Reveal solutionSolution
GST is an indirect tax that merged many indirect levies; Income Tax is a direct tax and continues to exist independently.
Reasoning
- GST replaced central and state indirect taxes such as Central Excise Duty (C), Service Tax (D), and VAT (A), among others (CST, entertainment tax, octroi, etc.).
- Income Tax is a direct tax on income, outside the scope of GST, and was never subsumed. …
- PSEB Punjab Class 12 (Commerce) 2026Set ANNUAL1 markQ.Source / Case Study based question. Read the following paragraph and answer the question given below : When the Goods and Services Tax (GST) was first introduced in 2017, it was considered a major tax reform in India since independence. It integrated several indirect taxes like excise, service tax and VAT into a single unified tax system. But with the passage of time, this tax system also needed to be changed. GST 1.0 included 5 major tax rates - 0%, 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% as well as additional cess on items such as luxury goods, tobacco and expensive cars. Though it was aimed at increasing revenue in an affordable manner, the GST 1.0 rates were criticised for being complex and putting an additional burden on small enterprises. Traders found it difficult to classify goods accurately, which often led to corrections and confusion. But GST 2.0 offers a streamlined tax system. The government has significantly reduced the number of rates and product categories for clarity. There are now rates of 0%, 5%, 18% and 40% for commodities. By eliminating the 12% rate and imposing a special higher rate of 40% on luxury goods, GST 2.0 removes ambiguity. It makes a clear distinction between necessities, simple and luxury goods. Essential items like butter, utensils, sewing machines and toothpaste will be cheaper. Now there will be no tax on rubber, notebooks, pencils, maps and health services. The new rates are effective from September 22, 2025. The revenue shortfall on account of rate cut will be around Rs. 93,000 crore but the revenue gain on luxury goods at the rate of 40% will be around Rs. 45,000 crore. Q: What do you mean by GST 2.0 ?
›Reveal solutionSolution
GST 2.0 = the simplified, reformed GST with fewer rates (0%, 5%, 18%, 40%).
According to the paragraph, GST 2.0 is the revised, streamlined tax system that reduces the number of rates and product categories for clarity — with rates of 0%, 5%, 18% and 40% — eliminating the 12% slab and placing a special 40% rate on luxury goods, thereby removing the complexity an …
- PSEB Punjab Class 12 (Commerce) 2026Set ANNUAL1 markQ.Source / Case Study based question. Read the following paragraph and answer the question given below : When the Goods and Services Tax (GST) was first introduced in 2017, it was considered a major tax reform in India since independence. It integrated several indirect taxes like excise, service tax and VAT into a single unified tax system. But with the passage of time, this tax system also needed to be changed. GST 1.0 included 5 major tax rates - 0%, 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% as well as additional cess on items such as luxury goods, tobacco and expensive cars. Though it was aimed at increasing revenue in an affordable manner, the GST 1.0 rates were criticised for being complex and putting an additional burden on small enterprises. Traders found it difficult to classify goods accurately, which often led to corrections and confusion. But GST 2.0 offers a streamlined tax system. The government has significantly reduced the number of rates and product categories for clarity. There are now rates of 0%, 5%, 18% and 40% for commodities. By eliminating the 12% rate and imposing a special higher rate of 40% on luxury goods, GST 2.0 removes ambiguity. It makes a clear distinction between necessities, simple and luxury goods. Essential items like butter, utensils, sewing machines and toothpaste will be cheaper. Now there will be no tax on rubber, notebooks, pencils, maps and health services. The new rates are effective from September 22, 2025. The revenue shortfall on account of rate cut will be around Rs. 93,000 crore but the revenue gain on luxury goods at the rate of 40% will be around Rs. 45,000 crore. Q: Why high tax rates are imposed on tobacco and luxury goods ?
›Reveal solutionSolution
High taxes on tobacco/luxuries discourage their use and raise revenue.
High tax rates are placed on tobacco and luxury goods for two reasons: to discourage the consumption of harmful/demerit goods (like tobacco) and non-essential luxuries, and to raise additional government revenue from higher-income consumers who buy them (the passage notes the 40% luxury rate would yield about ₹45,000 crore). …
- PSEB Punjab Class 12 (Commerce) 2026Set ANNUAL1 markQ.Source / Case Study based question. Read the following paragraph and answer the question given below : When the Goods and Services Tax (GST) was first introduced in 2017, it was considered a major tax reform in India since independence. It integrated several indirect taxes like excise, service tax and VAT into a single unified tax system. But with the passage of time, this tax system also needed to be changed. GST 1.0 included 5 major tax rates - 0%, 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% as well as additional cess on items such as luxury goods, tobacco and expensive cars. Though it was aimed at increasing revenue in an affordable manner, the GST 1.0 rates were criticised for being complex and putting an additional burden on small enterprises. Traders found it difficult to classify goods accurately, which often led to corrections and confusion. But GST 2.0 offers a streamlined tax system. The government has significantly reduced the number of rates and product categories for clarity. There are now rates of 0%, 5%, 18% and 40% for commodities. By eliminating the 12% rate and imposing a special higher rate of 40% on luxury goods, GST 2.0 removes ambiguity. It makes a clear distinction between necessities, simple and luxury goods. Essential items like butter, utensils, sewing machines and toothpaste will be cheaper. Now there will be no tax on rubber, notebooks, pencils, maps and health services. The new rates are effective from September 22, 2025. The revenue shortfall on account of rate cut will be around Rs. 93,000 crore but the revenue gain on luxury goods at the rate of 40% will be around Rs. 45,000 crore. Q: What do you think of GST 2.0 ?
›Reveal solutionSolution
GST 2.0 is a beneficial reform — simpler, clearer and easier on small businesses.
This asks for a reasoned opinion. Based on the passage, GST 2.0 can be judged favourably because it:
- Simplifies the structure — fewer rates (0%, 5%, 18%, 40%) and product categories reduce confusion.
- Removes ambiguity and makes a clear distinction between necessities, simple goods and luxuries.
- Reduces the burden on small enterprises who earlier struggled with classification. …
- PSEB Punjab Class 12 (Commerce) 2026Set ANNUAL1 markQ.Source / Case Study based question. Read the following paragraph and answer the question given below : When the Goods and Services Tax (GST) was first introduced in 2017, it was considered a major tax reform in India since independence. It integrated several indirect taxes like excise, service tax and VAT into a single unified tax system. But with the passage of time, this tax system also needed to be changed. GST 1.0 included 5 major tax rates - 0%, 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% as well as additional cess on items such as luxury goods, tobacco and expensive cars. Though it was aimed at increasing revenue in an affordable manner, the GST 1.0 rates were criticised for being complex and putting an additional burden on small enterprises. Traders found it difficult to classify goods accurately, which often led to corrections and confusion. But GST 2.0 offers a streamlined tax system. The government has significantly reduced the number of rates and product categories for clarity. There are now rates of 0%, 5%, 18% and 40% for commodities. By eliminating the 12% rate and imposing a special higher rate of 40% on luxury goods, GST 2.0 removes ambiguity. It makes a clear distinction between necessities, simple and luxury goods. Essential items like butter, utensils, sewing machines and toothpaste will be cheaper. Now there will be no tax on rubber, notebooks, pencils, maps and health services. The new rates are effective from September 22, 2025. The revenue shortfall on account of rate cut will be around Rs. 93,000 crore but the revenue gain on luxury goods at the rate of 40% will be around Rs. 45,000 crore. Q: Give two examples of indirect taxes.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Indirect taxes: GST and excise duty.
The passage mentions that GST integrated several indirect taxes like excise, service tax and VAT. So two examples of indirect taxes are GST (Goods and Services Tax) and excise duty (or …
- PSEB Punjab Class 12 (Commerce) 2026Set ANNUAL1 markQ.Source / Case Study based question. Read the following paragraph and answer the question given below : When the Goods and Services Tax (GST) was first introduced in 2017, it was considered a major tax reform in India since independence. It integrated several indirect taxes like excise, service tax and VAT into a single unified tax system. But with the passage of time, this tax system also needed to be changed. GST 1.0 included 5 major tax rates - 0%, 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% as well as additional cess on items such as luxury goods, tobacco and expensive cars. Though it was aimed at increasing revenue in an affordable manner, the GST 1.0 rates were criticised for being complex and putting an additional burden on small enterprises. Traders found it difficult to classify goods accurately, which often led to corrections and confusion. But GST 2.0 offers a streamlined tax system. The government has significantly reduced the number of rates and product categories for clarity. There are now rates of 0%, 5%, 18% and 40% for commodities. By eliminating the 12% rate and imposing a special higher rate of 40% on luxury goods, GST 2.0 removes ambiguity. It makes a clear distinction between necessities, simple and luxury goods. Essential items like butter, utensils, sewing machines and toothpaste will be cheaper. Now there will be no tax on rubber, notebooks, pencils, maps and health services. The new rates are effective from September 22, 2025. The revenue shortfall on account of rate cut will be around Rs. 93,000 crore but the revenue gain on luxury goods at the rate of 40% will be around Rs. 45,000 crore. Q: What are the advantages of the new tax system ?
›Reveal solutionSolution
New system is simpler, clearer, cheaper on essentials and easier for small businesses.
Based on the passage, the advantages of the new tax system (GST 2.0) are:
- Simplicity — fewer rates (0%, 5%, 18%, 40%) and fewer product categories.
- Clarity / removal of ambiguity — a clear distinction between necessities, simple goods and luxury goods.
- Cheaper essential goods — items like butter, utensils, sewing machines and toothpaste become cheaper, and rubber, notebooks, pencils, maps and health services are tax-free.
- Relief to small enterprises that earlier faced difficulty in classifying goods. …
- CA Foundation 2025Set jan-20251 markMCQQ.Which of the following is applied on inter-state movement of goods and services and on imports and exports ? (A) CGST (B) SGST (C) IGST (D) Income tax
›Reveal solutionSolution
IGST (Integrated GST) applies to inter-state supplies and to imports/exports; CGST and SGST apply only within a state.
Step 1 — The GST structure
- CGST + SGST are charged together on an intra-state (within one state) supply.
- IGST is charged on an inter-state supply and on imports and exports (treated as inter-state), and is collected by the Centre, then shared.
Step 2 — Match the stem
The question specifies inter-state movement and imports/exports — that is exactly the scope of IGST. …
- PSEB Punjab Class 12 (Commerce) 2025Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.Income Tax is a type of __________.(a) Indirect Tax(b) Direct Tax(c) Excise Tax(d) None of the above
›Reveal solutionSolution
The correct option is (b) Direct Tax.
Income tax is imposed directly on the income of an individual and is paid by that same person — its impact and incidence fall on the same person and cannot be shifted. Therefore it i …
- CA Foundation 2024Set sep-20241 markMCQQ.Under which Supreme Court verdict do the Union and State Legislatures have "equal, simultaneous and unique powers" to make laws on Goods and Services Tax (GST) ? (A) June 2020 verdict (B) July 2021 verdict (C) Feb. 2022 verdict (D) May 2022 verdict
›Reveal solutionSolution
The Supreme Court's May 2022 judgment recognised that the Union and States have equal, simultaneous and unique powers to make GST laws.
Step 1 — Recall the context
GST is a concurrent tax: both the Centre (CGST/IGST) and the States (SGST) legislate on it. A key constitutional question was whether GST Council recommendations bind the legislatures.
Step 2 — Identify the verdict …
- PSEB Punjab Class 12 (Commerce) 2023Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.A tax which cannot be shifted to others is direct tax. (True/False)(a) True(b) False
›Reveal solutionSolution
The statement is True.
A direct tax is levied on a person's income or wealth and is paid directly by that person to the government; its impact (who pays) and incidence (who finally bears the burden) fall on the same person, so it cannot be shifted to others — for example income tax or wealth tax. An indirect tax (GST, excise) can be shifted …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.