Skip to content
Question of 55

Q.A moving charge can produce :

(a) Only electric field
(b) Only magnetic field
(c) Both electric & magnetic field
(d) None of these
Rajasthan RbseRajasthan Board Senior Secondary Examination 2022MCQ· 1mImportance★★★★★
0% · 0/55 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Biot-Savart Law

From Coulomb’s Law to Currents: The Intuition

You already know that a stationary charge creates an electric field that falls off as 1/r21/r^2 and points radially away from the charge. But when that charge moves — when it becomes a current — something new appears: a magnetic field. The question is: how does a tiny piece of current produce a tiny piece of magnetic field?

Imagine a very short segment of wire carrying a steady current II. Let its length be dldl — so small that we can treat it as a point-like source. This little current element, I dlI\,d\mathbf{l}, is the magnetic analogue of a point charge in electrostatics. Just as Coulomb’s law gives the electric field from a point charge, the Biot-Savart law gives the magnetic field from a current element.

But there’s a crucial difference. The electric field from a point charge points along the line joining the charge to the observation point. The magnetic field from a current element points perpendicular to both the direction of the current and the line joining the element to the point. This perpendicular nature is the heart of magnetism.

The Precise Statement

Consider a current element I dlI\,d\mathbf{l} located at some point. Let r\mathbf{r} be the position vector from the element to the point PP where we want the magnetic field. Then the infinitesimal magnetic field dBd\mathbf{B} at PP due to this element is:

dB=μ04πI dl×r^r2d\mathbf{B} = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi} \frac{I\,d\mathbf{l} \times \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2}

Here:

  • μ0=4π×10−7 T⋅m/A\mu_0 = 4\pi \times 10^{-7} \, \text{T·m/A} is the permeability of free space — a fundamental constant.
  • dld\mathbf{l} points along the direction of the current.
  • r^\mathbf{\hat{r}} is a unit vector pointing from the current element to the observation point.
  • The cross product dl×r^d\mathbf{l} \times \mathbf{\hat{r}} gives both the magnitude and direction.

What the Cross Product Tells You

The magnitude of the cross product is ∣dl×r^∣=dl⋅1⋅sin⁡θ|d\mathbf{l} \times \mathbf{\hat{r}}| = dl \cdot 1 \cdot \sin\theta, where θ\theta is the angle between dld\mathbf{l} and r^\mathbf{\hat{r}}. So the magnitude of dBd\mathbf{B} is:

dB=μ04πI dlsin⁡θr2dB = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi} \frac{I\,dl \sin\theta}{r^2}

This is exactly the form you mentioned: proportional to I dlsin⁡θ/r2I\,dl \sin\theta / r^2. The sin⁡θ\sin\theta factor means:

  • When the current element points directly toward or away from PP (θ=0\theta = 0 or π\pi), sin⁡θ=0\sin\theta = 0 — no magnetic field is produced along that line.
  • When the current element is perpendicular to the line joining it to PP (θ=90∘\theta = 90^\circ), the field is maximum.

The direction of dBd\mathbf{B} is given by the right-hand rule: curl the fingers of your right hand from dld\mathbf{l} toward r^\mathbf{\hat{r}}, and your thumb points in the direction of dBd\mathbf{B}. This direction is always perpendicular to the plane containing dld\mathbf{l} and r\mathbf{r}.

Watch out

A common mistake is to think dBd\mathbf{B} points along r\mathbf{r} or along dld\mathbf{l}. It does neither — it is perpendicular to both. If you ever find yourself drawing dBd\mathbf{B} in the plane of the page when dld\mathbf{l} and r\mathbf{r} are also in the page, you are wrong: dBd\mathbf{B} comes out of or goes into the page.

Why the 1/r21/r^2 Dependence?

Just like Coulomb’s law, the Biot-Savart law has an inverse-square dependence on distance. This is not a coincidence — both laws emerge from the same underlying structure of electromagnetism. Unlike Coulomb's law, this 1/4π1/4\pi prefactor is not because the field spreads uniformly over a sphere -- the sin⁡θ\sin\theta factor above already shows the elemental field is NOT isotropic, it circulates around the current direction instead. The 1/(4π)1/(4\pi) here is simply a consequence of the SI 'rationalized' unit convention, chosen so that μ0\mu_0 appears without a 4π4\pi in Ampere's circuital law, ∮B⃗⋅dl⃗=μ0Ienc\oint \vec B \cdot d\vec l = \mu_0 I_{enc}.

The Total Field: Integration

The Biot-Savart law gives you the field from a single infinitesimal current element. To find the total magnetic field from a complete circuit (a wire of any shape), you must integrate over the entire path: …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.