Define the law of multiple proportions. Explain it with two examples. How does this law point to the existance

NCERT Exemplar · Q44

Q. Define the law of multiple proportions. Explain it with two examples. How does this law point to the existance of atoms?

Sikkim CbseLong· 3mImportance★★★★★est

99% · 88/89 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Unit Conversion

Unit Conversion: Why 1 Metre and 100 Centimetres Are the Same Thing

Imagine you're measuring the length of your desk. You pull out a ruler marked in centimetres and find it's 120 cm long. Your friend, using a metre stick, says it's 1.2 m. You're both right — you've just used different units to describe the same physical length.

That's the core idea: unit conversion is the process of changing how you express a quantity without changing the quantity itself.

The Intuition: Same Quantity, Different Labels

Think of a pizza. Whether you call it "one pizza" or "8 slices," the amount of pizza hasn't changed. You've just used a different unit (pizza vs. slice) to describe it.

Similarly, 1 metre and 100 centimetres are the same length — just like 1 pizza and 8 slices are the same amount. The number changes (1 becomes 100, or 1 becomes 8), but the actual thing being measured stays identical.

Note

This is the most important idea to hold onto: conversion changes the number, not the quantity. If you ever feel like the quantity has changed, you've made a mistake.

The Precise Statement

Unit conversion is the multiplication of a quantity by a conversion factor — a fraction equal to 1 — that cancels the old unit and introduces the new one.

A conversion factor looks like this:

\frac{\text{new unit}}{\text{old unit}} = 1

For length: $\frac{1 \text{ m}}{100 \text{ cm}} = 1$ and $\frac{100 \text{ cm}}{1 \text{ m}} = 1$ .

Why are these fractions equal to 1? Because 1 metre is 100 centimetres. The numerator and denominator describe the same physical length, so their ratio is exactly 1.

How to Convert: The Only Rule You Need

Multiply by a conversion factor that cancels the unit you have and leaves the unit you want.

Let's convert 120 cm to metres:

Start with what you have: $120 \text{ cm}$
Choose the conversion factor that has "cm" in the denominator (to cancel it) and "m" in the numerator: $\frac{1 \text{ m}}{100 \text{ cm}}$
Multiply:

120 \text{ cm} \times \frac{1 \text{ m}}{100 \text{ cm}} = \frac{120}{100} \text{ m} = 1.2 \text{ m}

The "cm" units cancel just like numbers do: $\frac{\text{cm}}{\text{cm}} = 1$ .

Tip

Always write the units explicitly. If the units don't cancel correctly, you've used the wrong conversion factor. This catches 90% of conversion mistakes.

The Reverse: Metres to Centimetres

Now convert 1.2 m to cm. This time, you want "cm" to remain and "m" to cancel. Use $\frac{100 \text{ cm}}{1 \text{ m}}$ :

1.2 \text{ m} \times \frac{100 \text{ cm}}{1 \text{ m}} = 1.2 \times 100 \text{ cm} = 120 \text{ cm}

Notice: when going from a larger unit (m) to a smaller unit (cm), the number gets larger (1.2 → 120). When going from smaller to larger, the number gets smaller (120 → 1.2). This is a useful sanity check.

Common Conversion Factors You'll Use

Quantity	Relationship	Conversion Factors
Length	1 m = 100 cm	$\frac{1 \text{ m}}{100 \text{ cm}}$ , $\frac{100 \text{ cm}}{1 \text{ m}}$
Mass	1 kg = 1000 g	$\frac{1 \text{ kg}}{1000 \text{ g}}$ , $\frac{1000 \text{ g}}{1 \text{ kg}}$
Time	1 h = 60 min	$\frac{1 \text{ h}}{60 \text{ min}}$ , $\frac{60 \text{ min}}{1 \text{ h}}$
Speed	1 km/h = $\frac{1000}{3600}$ m/s	$\frac{1000 \text{ m}}{1 \text{ km}} \times \frac{1 \text{ h}}{3600 \text{ s}}$

Why this formula?

Dimensional Analysis: Why the Key Principles Hold

Dimensional Analysis is a powerful tool in physics and engineering that lets us check the consistency of equations, derive relationships, and convert units. But why does it work? Let's build the reasoning from the ground up.

1. The Core Idea: Physical Quantities Have Dimensions

Every physical quantity (like length, time, mass) can be expressed in terms of fundamental dimensions. The most common set in mechanics is:

L = Length
M = Mass
T = Time

For example:

Speed has dimensions $[L T^{-1}]$
Force has dimensions $[M L T^{-2}]$
Energy has dimensions $[M L^2 T^{-2}]$

Why this matters: Two quantities can only be meaningfully compared or equated if they have the same dimensions. You cannot add apples to oranges — and you cannot add length to time.

2. The Principle of Dimensional Homogeneity

The key formula that underpins everything is:

Every valid physical equation must be dimensionally homogeneous.

This means: the dimensions on the left-hand side must equal the dimensions on the right-hand side.

Why must this hold?

Consider an equation like:

v = u + at

Left side: $[v] = L T^{-1}$
Right side: $[u] = L T^{-1}$ , $[at] = (L T^{-2})(T) = L T^{-1}$

Both sides have dimensions $L T^{-1}$ . If they didn't match, the equation would be physically meaningless — you'd be comparing quantities that cannot be equal in any real experiment.

Reasoning: Physical laws describe relationships between measurable quantities. If the dimensions don't match, the equation cannot represent a real physical relationship, because the numerical value would depend on the arbitrary choice of units.

3. The Buckingham Pi Theorem: Why We Can Derive Relationships

This is the deeper mathematical reason. The Buckingham Pi Theorem states:

If a physical problem involves $n$ variables and $k$ fundamental dimensions, then it can be reduced to $n-k$ independent dimensionless groups (called $\pi$ groups).

Why does this work?

Imagine you have a relationship:

f(Q_1, Q_2, \dots, Q_n) = 0

where each $Q_i$ has dimensions. Because the equation must be dimensionally homogeneous, we can rearrange it into a function of dimensionless products only:

F(\pi_1, \pi_2, \dots, \pi_{n-k}) = 0

The reasoning: Dimensions act as constraints. Each fundamental dimension (M, L, T) gives one constraint. So if you have $n$ variables and $k$ constraints, you only have $n-k$ independent dimensionless combinations.

Example: For a simple pendulum, the period $T$ depends on length $L$ , mass $m$ , and gravity $g$ . That's 4 variables with 3 dimensions (M, L, T). So $4-3 = 1$ dimensionless group: $\pi = \frac{T^2 g}{L}$ . This tells us $T \propto \sqrt{L/g}$ without solving any differential equation.

4. Why We Can Convert Units Using Dimensional Analysis

The conversion factor formula:

\text{Value in new unit} = \text{Value in old unit} \times \left(\frac{\text{old unit}}{\text{new unit}}\right)^{\text{dimension exponent}}

Why this works: …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The law of multiple proportions states that when two elements form more than one compound, the masses of one element that combine with a fixed mass of the other are in a ratio of small whole numbers. This law is explained using examples of carbon‑oxygen compounds and nitrogen‑oxygen compounds, and it provides strong evidence for the existence of atoms because such simple ratios arise naturally from indivisible particles combining in fixed numbers.

1. What the law says — and why it matters

The law of multiple proportions was first clearly stated by John Dalton in 1803, as part of his atomic theory. It deals with a situation where the same two elements can combine to form different compounds. For instance, carbon and oxygen can form both carbon monoxide (CO) and carbon dioxide (CO₂). The law tells us that the masses of one element that combine with a fixed mass of the other element are in a ratio of small whole numbers.

If element A combines with a fixed mass of element B to form two different compounds, then the masses of A in those compounds are in a ratio of small whole numbers.

This is not a coincidence — it is a direct consequence of atoms being indivisible and combining in fixed, integer ratios.

2. Example 1: Carbon and oxygen

Carbon and oxygen form two common compounds:

Carbon monoxide (CO): 12 g of carbon combines with 16 g of oxygen.
Carbon dioxide (CO₂): 12 g of carbon combines with 32 g of oxygen.

Now fix the mass of carbon at 12 g (the same in both). The masses of oxygen that combine with it are 16 g and 32 g. Their ratio is:

\frac{16}{32} = \frac{1}{2}

That is a simple whole‑number ratio (1 : 2). This is exactly what the law predicts.

Watch out

A common mistake is to compare the masses of carbon instead of oxygen. Always fix the mass of one element and compare the masses of the other.

3. Example 2: Nitrogen and oxygen

Nitrogen and oxygen form several oxides. Let’s take two of them:

Nitric oxide (NO): 14 g of nitrogen combines with 16 g of oxygen.
Nitrogen dioxide (NO₂): 14 g of nitrogen combines with 32 g of oxygen.

Again, fix the mass of nitrogen at 14 g. The masses of oxygen are 16 g and 32 g. Their ratio is:

\frac{16}{32} = \frac{1}{2}

Once more, a simple 1 : 2 ratio.

If we consider other oxides like N₂O (nitrous oxide) and N₂O₃ (dinitrogen trioxide), the ratios remain small whole numbers. For example, with 28 g of nitrogen fixed:

In N₂O: 28 g N combines with 16 g O.
In NO: 28 g N combines with 32 g O (since 14 g N needs 16 g O, 28 g N needs 32 g O).
In N₂O₃: 28 g N combines with 48 g O.

The oxygen masses are 16, 32, and 48 — ratio 1 : 2 : 3.

4. How this law points to the existence of atoms

This is the deeper question. Why should the masses be in small whole‑number ratios? Dalton’s insight was that this pattern makes perfect sense if matter is made of atoms — indivisible particles that combine in fixed numbers.

Tip

Think of it like Lego bricks. If you have red bricks (element A) and blue bricks (element B), and each compound is a fixed combination of bricks, then the masses of blue bricks needed for a fixed number of red bricks will always be in whole‑number ratios — because you can only add whole bricks, not fractions.

Here’s the logical chain:

If atoms exist, each element has atoms of a fixed mass.
In a compound, atoms combine in a fixed ratio of whole numbers (e.g., 1 : 1 for CO, 1 : 2 for CO₂).
Therefore, for a fixed mass of one element (i.e., a fixed number of its atoms), the mass of the other element must be a whole‑number multiple of the mass of a single atom of that element.
That gives a ratio of small whole numbers — exactly what the law states. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept: Law of Multiple Proportions (Dalton's Atomic Theory)

Method: Ratio-of-Masses Method

This method compares the masses of one element that combine with a fixed mass of another element in different compounds. The key is to fix one element's mass and see if the other element's masses form a simple whole-number ratio.

Steps

Identify the two elements forming different compounds.
Fix the mass of one element (say, Element A) to the same value in all compounds.
Find the masses of the other element (Element B) that combine with that fixed mass of A.
Calculate the ratio of these masses of B (smallest whole numbers).
Check if the ratio is a simple whole-number ratio (e.g., 1:2, 2:3, 1:3). If yes, the law holds.

Example 1: Carbon and Oxygen

Compound	Mass of Carbon (g)	Mass of Oxygen (g)
CO	12	16
CO₂	12	32

Fix carbon at 12 g.
Oxygen masses: 16 g (in CO) and 32 g (in CO₂).
Ratio of oxygen masses = $16 : 32 = 1 : 2$ .

This is a simple whole-number ratio (1:2).

Conclusion: The law of multiple proportions is satisfied.

Example 2: Nitrogen and Oxygen

Compound	Mass of Nitrogen (g)	Mass of Oxygen (g)
NO	14	16
NO₂	14	32
N₂O	28	16

Fix nitrogen at 14 g. For N₂O, 28 g N combines with 16 g O → so 14 g N combines with $16 \times \frac{14}{28} = 8$ g O.
Oxygen masses (for 14 g N):
- NO: 16 g
- NO₂: 32 g
- N₂O: 8 g …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Common Mistakes on the Law of Multiple Proportions

Mistake #1: Confusing it with the Law of Definite Proportions

The error: Students often mix up the two laws. The Law of Definite Proportions says a compound always has the same elements in the same mass ratio (e.g., water is always 1:8 by mass H:O). The Law of Multiple Proportions compares different compounds made from the same two elements.

How to avoid: Remember the key trigger phrase: "same two elements, different compounds." If the question involves only one compound, it's the Law of Definite Proportions. If it involves two or more compounds (like CO and CO₂), it's the Law of Multiple Proportions.

Mistake #2: Forgetting to fix one element's mass constant

The error: Students compare raw mass ratios without first making the mass of one element the same in both compounds. For example, in CO (12 g C : 16 g O) and CO₂ (12 g C : 32 g O), if you compare 16 g O vs 32 g O directly, you miss the pattern.

How to avoid: Always fix the mass of one element (usually the one present in smaller amount or the non-oxygen element) to a constant value. Then compare the masses of the other element. The ratio should be small whole numbers.

Example (correct method):

CO: 12 g C combines with 16 g O
CO₂: 12 g C combines with 32 g O
Fix carbon at 12 g → oxygen masses are 16 g and 32 g → ratio = 16:32 = 1:2 (small whole numbers)

Mistake #3: Using incorrect examples

The error: Students give examples where the law doesn't apply (e.g., NaCl and KCl — different elements) or give only one compound.

How to avoid: Your examples must involve two different compounds formed by the same two elements. Classic correct examples:

CO and CO₂ (carbon and oxygen)
H₂O and H₂O₂ (hydrogen and oxygen)
SO₂ and SO₃ (sulfur and oxygen)

Mistake #4: Vague or incorrect explanation of how the law implies atoms

The error: Students say "the law proves atoms exist" without explaining the logic. Or they say "atoms combine in whole numbers" without connecting it to the mass ratio.

How to avoid: Use this clear logical chain:

The law shows that masses of one element combining with a fixed mass of another are in small whole number ratios (e.g., 1:2, 2:3).
This is exactly what you'd expect if matter is made of indivisible particles (atoms) that combine in fixed, whole-number ratios.
If matter were continuous (not atomic), you could have any ratio — not just small whole numbers.
Therefore, the law strongly suggests (points to) the existence of atoms as discrete units. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

←Previous questionQ43 — Calcium carbonate reacts with aqueous HCl to give CaCl₂ and CO₂ accord…→Next questionQ45 — A box contains some identical red coloured balls, labelled as A, each …

Q.Define the law of multiple proportions. Explain it with two examples. How does this law point to the existance of atoms?

1. What the law says — and why it matters

2. Example 1: Carbon and oxygen

3. Example 2: Nitrogen and oxygen

4. How this law points to the existence of atoms

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Unlock everything free for 14 days