Why is the mass determined by measuring a colligative property in case of some solutes abnormal? Discuss it wi

NCERT Exemplar · Q62

Q. Why is the mass determined by measuring a colligative property in case of some solutes abnormal? Discuss it with the help of Van't Hoff factor.

Sikkim CbseLong· 3mImportance★★★★★

98% · 128/131 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — VanT Hoff Factor Association

The Intuition: What Happens When Particles Stick Together?

Imagine you're counting people in a room. You see 100 chairs, each with one person. That's 100 individuals. Now imagine those same 100 people decide to pair up — every two people hold hands and become a "couple." Suddenly, the number of independent moving units in the room drops from 100 to 50.

That's exactly what association does in a solution. When solute particles (molecules or ions) associate, they clump together into larger clusters. The number of independent particles floating around decreases. And since colligative properties (freezing point depression, boiling point elevation, osmotic pressure) depend only on the number of particles — not their identity — the observed effect becomes smaller than expected.

Note

Association is the opposite of dissociation. In dissociation, one particle breaks into many (e.g., NaCl → Na⁺ + Cl⁻). In association, many particles combine into one (e.g., two acetic acid molecules dimerise).

The Van't Hoff Factor: The Correction Number

The Van't Hoff factor, denoted by $i$ , is defined as:

i = \frac{\text{Actual number of particles in solution after association}}{\text{Number of particles if no association occurred}}

For a non-electrolyte that does not associate or dissociate, $i = 1$ .

For association, $i < 1$ — because the actual particle count is less than what you started with.

A Concrete Example: Acetic Acid in Benzene

Acetic acid ( $\text{CH}_3\text{COOH}$ ) in benzene forms dimers — two molecules stick together via hydrogen bonding:

2\,\text{CH}_3\text{COOH} \rightleftharpoons (\text{CH}_3\text{COOH})_2

Suppose you dissolve 100 molecules of acetic acid. If no association occurred, you'd have 100 particles. But if all of them dimerise, you get only 50 dimers. So:

i = \frac{50}{100} = 0.5

In reality, association is never 100% complete — it's an equilibrium. So $i$ lies between 0.5 and 1.

Watch out

A common mistake: thinking $i$ can be negative. It cannot. For association, $0 < i < 1$ . For dissociation, $i > 1$ . For no change, $i = 1$ .

The General Formula for Association

Let’s say $n$ molecules of a solute associate to form one associated particle:

nA \rightleftharpoons A_n

Let $\alpha$ be the degree of association — the fraction of original molecules that have associated.

Initially: 1 mole of A (i.e., $N$ molecules)
Moles that associate: $\alpha$
Moles that remain as single A: $1 - \alpha$
Moles of associated particles formed: $\frac{\alpha}{n}$ (because $n$ molecules make 1 associated unit)

Total moles after association:

(1 - \alpha) + \frac{\alpha}{n}

The Van't Hoff factor is:

i = \frac{\text{Total moles after association}}{\text{Initial moles}} = \frac{(1 - \alpha) + \frac{\alpha}{n}}{1} = 1 - \alpha + \frac{\alpha}{n}

Simplify:

i = 1 - \alpha\left(1 - \frac{1}{n}\right)

For the common case of dimerisation ( $n = 2$ ):

i = 1 - \alpha\left(1 - \frac{1}{2}\right) = 1 - \frac{\alpha}{2}

So if $\alpha = 0.6$ (60% association), then $i = 1 - 0.3 = 0.7$ .

How Association Affects Colligative Properties

All colligative properties are multiplied by $i$ :

Property	Formula without association	Formula with association
Relative lowering of vapour pressure	$\frac{p^\circ - p}{p^\circ} = x_B$	$\frac{p^\circ - p}{p^\circ} = i \cdot x_B$
Elevation in boiling point	$\Delta T_b = K_b \cdot m$	$\Delta T_b = i \cdot K_b \cdot m$

Why this formula?

Van't Hoff Factor for Association: Why the Formula Holds

The Van't Hoff factor ( $i$ ) for association describes how solute particles combine in solution, reducing the effective number of particles. Let's build the reasoning step-by-step.

1. The Core Idea: What Changes?

When a solute associates (e.g., two acetic acid molecules dimerize in benzene), the number of particles in solution decreases. The Van't Hoff factor is defined as:

i = \frac{\text{Actual number of particles in solution}}{\text{Number of particles if no association}}

For association, $i < 1$ .

2. Setting Up the Association Process

Consider a solute that associates to form $n$ molecules per aggregate (e.g., $n=2$ for dimerization). Let:

Initial moles of solute = $1$ mole (for simplicity)
Degree of association = $\alpha$ (fraction of solute that associates)

What happens to the particles?

Moles that associate = $\alpha$ (these combine into aggregates)
Moles that remain free = $1 - \alpha$

Each associated group of $n$ molecules becomes 1 aggregate particle. So:

Number of aggregates formed = $\frac{\alpha}{n}$
Number of free molecules = $1 - \alpha$

3. Total Particles After Association

Total moles of particles in solution:

\text{Total} = \underbrace{(1 - \alpha)}_{\text{free}} + \underbrace{\frac{\alpha}{n}}_{\text{aggregates}}

If no association ( $\alpha = 0$ ), total = $1$ mole of particles.

4. The Van't Hoff Factor Formula

By definition:

i = \frac{\text{Total particles after association}}{\text{Total particles if no association}} = \frac{(1 - \alpha) + \frac{\alpha}{n}}{1}

Thus:

\boxed{i = 1 - \alpha + \frac{\alpha}{n}}

5. Why This Makes Physical Sense

If $\alpha = 0$ (no association): $i = 1$ — particles behave independently.
If $\alpha = 1$ (complete association): $i = \frac{1}{n}$ — all molecules form $n$ -mers, so particle count drops by factor $n$ . …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

When a solute associates or dissociates in solution, the number of particles changes, making the observed colligative property abnormal. The Van’t Hoff factor $i$ corrects for this, so the experimentally determined molar mass is either higher (association) or lower (dissociation) than the true molar mass.

The problem asks: why does the mass determined by measuring a colligative property sometimes come out abnormal? And how does the Van’t Hoff factor explain this?

Let’s start with the core idea. Colligative properties — like freezing point depression, boiling point elevation, and osmotic pressure — depend only on the number of solute particles in solution, not on their identity. When you dissolve a substance, you expect a certain number of particles based on its formula mass. But some solutes behave differently.

For example, sodium chloride ( $\text{NaCl}$ ) in water splits into $\text{Na}^+$ and $\text{Cl}^-$ ions. One formula unit gives two particles. So the actual number of particles is more than expected. Conversely, benzoic acid in benzene forms dimers — two molecules stick together, so the number of particles is less than expected.

Because colligative properties are proportional to particle count, an abnormal particle count gives an abnormal reading. If you then use that reading to calculate molar mass (using the usual formulas), you get a value that is not the true molar mass — it’s an apparent or abnormal molar mass.

The Van’t Hoff factor $i$ is the tool that quantifies this deviation.

i = \frac{\text{observed number of particles}}{\text{expected number of particles (if no association/dissociation)}}

For a non-electrolyte that neither associates nor dissociates, $i = 1$ . For dissociation, $i > 1$ ; for association, $i < 1$ .

Now, the relationship between observed molar mass ( $M_{\text{obs}}$ ) and true molar mass ( $M_{\text{true}}$ ) is:

i = \frac{M_{\text{true}}}{M_{\text{obs}}}

Why? Because colligative properties are inversely proportional to molar mass. If the observed colligative effect is larger than expected (more particles), the calculated molar mass comes out smaller. So $M_{\text{obs}} < M_{\text{true}}$ , and $i > 1$ . If the effect is smaller (fewer particles), $M_{\text{obs}} > M_{\text{true}}$ , and $i < 1$ .

Let’s walk through the reasoning step by step.

Recall the basic colligative formula. For freezing point depression, $\Delta T_f = K_f \cdot m$ , where $m$ is molality. Molality is moles of solute per kg of solvent. If you know $\Delta T_f$ and $K_f$ , you can calculate $m$ , and from $m$ and the mass of solute used, you get the molar mass: $M = \frac{\text{mass of solute}}{m \times \text{kg solvent}}$ .
Now introduce the abnormal behaviour. Suppose the solute dissociates. The actual number of particles in solution is greater than the number of formula units dissolved. So the observed $\Delta T_f$ is larger than expected for the given mass of solute. Plugging this larger $\Delta T_f$ into the formula gives a larger $m$ , and therefore a smaller calculated molar mass — $M_{\text{obs}}$ is less than $M_{\text{true}}$ .
For association, the opposite happens. Fewer particles mean a smaller $\Delta T_f$ , a smaller $m$ , and a larger calculated molar mass — $M_{\text{obs}}$ is greater than $M_{\text{true}}$ .
The Van’t Hoff factor corrects this. The true colligative property is related to the observed one by:

\Delta T_f (\text{observed}) = i \cdot \Delta T_f (\text{expected})

Since $\Delta T_f \propto \frac{1}{M}$ , we get:

i = \frac{M_{\text{true}}}{M_{\text{obs}}}

Watch out

A common mistake is to think $i = M_{\text{obs}} / M_{\text{true}}$ . Check: if dissociation occurs, $M_{\text{obs}}$ is smaller, so $i$ should be greater than 1. The correct relation is $i = M_{\text{true}} / M_{\text{obs}}$ , which gives $i > 1$ when $M_{\text{obs}} < M_{\text{true}}$ . …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Van't Hoff Factor & Abnormal Molar Masses (Association)

Why is the mass "abnormal"?

When we measure a colligative property (like freezing point depression or osmotic pressure) to find the molar mass of a solute, we assume the solute particles behave independently in solution.

However, for some solutes (like benzoic acid in benzene or acetic acid in benzene), the molecules associate (stick together) to form dimers or larger clusters. This means:

Fewer particles are present in solution than expected.
The colligative property (which depends on number of particles) is smaller than expected.
The calculated molar mass comes out higher than the actual molar mass.

This is called an abnormal molar mass.

Method: Van't Hoff Factor ( $i$ ) for Association

Name of method: Van't Hoff Factor correction for association.

Concept: The Van't Hoff factor $i$ is defined as:

i = \frac{\text{Observed colligative property}}{\text{Expected colligative property}} = \frac{\text{Normal molar mass}}{\text{Observed molar mass}}

For association, $i < 1$ .

Steps to solve a typical problem

Step 1: Write the association equilibrium

For example, if two molecules of solute $A$ associate to form a dimer $A_2$ :

2A \rightleftharpoons A_2

Step 2: Define degree of association ( $\alpha$ )

Let $\alpha$ = fraction of $A$ that associates.

Initial moles of $A$ = 1 (or $n$ )
Moles of $A$ that associate = $\alpha$
Moles of $A$ left unassociated = $1 - \alpha$
Moles of $A_2$ formed = $\frac{\alpha}{2}$ (since 2 molecules make 1 dimer)

Step 3: Calculate total number of particles after association

\text{Total moles} = (1 - \alpha) + \frac{\alpha}{2} = 1 - \frac{\alpha}{2}

Step 4: Apply Van't Hoff factor

i = \frac{\text{Observed number of particles}}{\text{Expected number of particles}} = \frac{1 - \frac{\alpha}{2}}{1} = 1 - \frac{\alpha}{2}

Step 5: Relate $i$ to molar masses …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Here’s a breakdown of the common mistakes students make on this topic, along with clear strategies to avoid them.

1. Confusing “Abnormal Mass” with “Wrong Experiment”

The Mistake:

Students often think “abnormal” means the lab experiment failed or the balance was faulty. They miss the core idea: the mass appears abnormal because the number of particles in solution is different from what we assumed.

Why it’s wrong:

Colligative properties depend only on the number of solute particles, not their identity. If a solute associates (forms dimers, trimers) or dissociates (breaks into ions), the actual particle count changes — so the calculated molar mass becomes “abnormal.”

How to Avoid:

Always ask: “Does this solute stay as single molecules in solution?”
Remember: Abnormal mass = calculated mass using colligative property ≠ theoretical molar mass because the particle count is different.

2. Forgetting the Van’t Hoff Factor Definition

The Mistake:

Students write $i = \frac{\text{Observed colligative property}}{\text{Expected colligative property}}$ but then plug in masses instead of particle numbers.

Why it’s wrong:

The Van’t Hoff factor $i$ is defined as:

i = \frac{\text{Actual number of particles in solution}}{\text{Number of particles if no association/dissociation}}

It directly links to molar mass:

i = \frac{\text{Normal molar mass}}{\text{Observed (abnormal) molar mass}}

How to Avoid:

Memorise the two equivalent forms of $i$ $i$ :
- For colligative property: $i = \frac{\text{Observed } \Delta T_f}{\text{Expected } \Delta T_f}$
- For molar mass: $i = \frac{M_{\text{normal}}}{M_{\text{observed}}}$
Practice converting between them.

3. Mixing Up Association vs. Dissociation

The Mistake:

Students treat association (e.g., benzoic acid dimerising in benzene) the same as dissociation (e.g., NaCl splitting into ions). They use the same formula for $i$ without adjusting for the number of particles formed.

Why it’s wrong:

Association → particles decrease → $i < 1$ → observed molar mass increases (appears heavier).
Dissociation → particles increase → $i > 1$ → observed molar mass decreases (appears lighter).

How to Avoid:

Draw a simple particle diagram before calculating.
For association: if $n$ molecules combine, $i = \frac{1}{n}$ (for complete association).
For dissociation: if one molecule gives $n$ ions, $i = n$ (for complete dissociation).

4. Using the Wrong Formula for Degree of Association/Dissociation

The Mistake:

Students directly write $i = 1 + (n-1)\alpha$ for dissociation but then use the same for association without changing the sign.

Why it’s wrong:

The correct formulas are:

For dissociation:

i = 1 + (n-1)\alpha

where $\alpha$ = degree of dissociation, $n$ = number of ions.

For association:

i = 1 - \left(1 - \frac{1}{n}\right)\alpha

where $\alpha$ = degree of association, $n$ = number of molecules that associate.

How to Avoid:

Write the chemical equation first (e.g., $nA \rightleftharpoons A_n$ ).
Count initial moles and equilibrium moles. Derive $i$ from the ratio — don’t memorise blindly.

5. Ignoring the Solvent’s Role

The Mistake:

Students assume association/dissociation happens the same way in every solvent. For example, they treat acetic acid in water (dissociates) the same as in benzene (associates).

Why it’s wrong:

Polar solvents (water) favour dissociation (ions stabilised).
Non-polar solvents (benzene) favour association (hydrogen bonding between solute molecules).

How to Avoid: …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

←Previous questionQ61 — How can you remove the hard calcium carbonate layer of the egg without…→Next questionQ1 — 50 mL of an aqueous solution of glucose C₆H₁₂O₆ (Molar mass: 180 g/mol…

Q.Why is the mass determined by measuring a colligative property in case of some solutes abnormal? Discuss it with the help of Van't Hoff factor.

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Unlock everything free for 14 days