Q.Evaluate the following limit:
[!FORMULA]
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Standard Limits
A Toolkit of Named Limits
Some limits recur so often across problems that it is worth memorising their values outright, along with the one theorem that proves the trickiest of them: the Sandwich (Squeeze) Theorem.
The Sandwich Theorem
Theorem 9.5. If for all near (except possibly at itself), and if
then too — is "squeezed" between two functions that agree in the limit, so it has no room to do anything else.
Illustration: to show , note that is always between and , so . Since both and tend to as , the Sandwich Theorem forces the middle expression to as well — even though on its own does not exist (it oscillates wildly), so the product rule alone could never have been applied directly.
This is exactly why the Sandwich Theorem is indispensable rather than a curiosity: whenever one factor oscillates without a limit but is bounded, and the other factor is squeezed to zero, the ordinary product law (Concept 2) is not applicable — you need the sandwich.
The two flagship trigonometric limits
Result 9.1.
Part (a) is proved geometrically by sandwiching between and using the areas of a triangle, a sector, and a larger triangle built on the unit circle; since both bounding functions tend to as , so must . Part (b) follows algebraically from (a) by writing and splitting the quotient into a -over-argument piece (which uses part (a)) times a factor that vanishes.
A direct corollary worth keeping separate: , obtained from the sandwich .
The full standard-limit toolkit (§9.2.10)
Alongside the trig pair above, these are worth having on instant recall — none require anything beyond algebra and substitution to use (their proofs, where given, lean on the exponential/log relationship or on the trig pair):
And the three equivalent forms of the number as a limit:
is a transcendental number — it never satisfies any polynomial equation with rational coefficients. That's part of why it shows up as a genuinely new limiting constant here rather than something expressible in simpler closed form.
The recognise-and-substitute pattern
Nearly every "hard-looking" limit in this section is really one of the above standard forms in disguise, reached via a clean substitution chosen so that (or ) exactly when does. The book's worked examples all follow this shape:
- Spot the shell. Identify which standard form the expression resembles — a shape signals ; a shape signals Result 9.1(a); a shape signals Result 9.3.
- Substitute for the "" so the expression matches the standard form exactly, tracking what as .
- Apply the standard limit to the -expression, then (if the exponent or coefficient outside doesn't vanish) combine using the power/product rules from Concept 2. …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.