Mathematics · Ch 3 — Trigonometry
Conditional Trigonometric Identities
Conditional Trigonometric Identities
An identity in the usual sense (like ) is true for every admissible value of the angle, with no extra assumption needed. A conditional trigonometric identity, by contrast, is a relation between trigonometric functions of several angles that is true only when those angles satisfy some extra stated condition — most commonly that they are the three angles of a triangle, so (or, in radian problems phrased slightly differently, , or a symmetric perimeter-style condition like ). Take away the condition and the "identity" is simply false for generic .
The one trick that proves almost all of them. Whenever (or any fixed constant), you can always eliminate one angle in favour of the other two — e.g. , so and ; or, working with half-angles, , so and . Substituting one of these relations into the sum-to-product identities of §3.5.3 is what turns a three-angle expression into a compact product — this section is really an extended workout of that one substitution idea.
Cosine sum for a triangle. For , group first via the sum-to-product rule, giving ; since , this is . Writing (the double-angle form) turns the whole sum into ; replacing once more by and combining the bracket with another sum-to-product step collapses everything to
Two useful corollaries follow immediately. First, setting and re-expressing it (again via a product-to-sum step, this time treating it as a quadratic in ) shows the quadratic's discriminant must be non-negative for a real solution to exist, which forces — i.e. . Second, combining with the identity above (and the fact that for a genuine triangle, since every half-angle lies strictly between and ) sandwiches the cosine sum: .
Sine of the half-angles. A parallel computation — this time starting from , rewritten as a sum of cosines via the complementary-angle swap , then grouped and reduced exactly as above but at the quarter-angle level — shows
The mechanics are identical to the cosine-sum proof, just carried out one level down (working with quarter-angles rather than half-angles), which is why the same "convert to a sum-to-product pattern, then substitute the triangle condition" strategy reappears.
Sum of squared cosines. For , first double every term using , so the sum becomes . Converting to a product gives , and since we have ; substituting and simplifying (using once more) collapses the whole expression to …