Q.Evaluate (x,y)→(0,0)limcos(x+y+2x3+y2), if the limit exists.
Tamil Nadu DgeTextbookSubjectiveImportance★★★★★est
20% · 20/99 Questions
✓ Free question
Concept understanding — Functions of Several Variables & Limits
A function of one variable y=f(x) traces a curve in the xy-plane. A function of two variables F(x,y) is visualized by graphing z=F(x,y), which traces a surface in xyz-space: the point (x,y,F(x,y)) sits F(x,y) units above (or below) the point (x,y) in the xy-plane.
Fixing one variable slices the surface with a plane and produces a curve: for g(x,y)=30−x2−y2, holding y=3 gives g(x,3)=21−x2 (a parabola, the intersection of the surface with the plane y=3), and holding x=2 gives g(2,y)=26−y2. The surface z=30−x2−y2 itself is called a paraboloid. This is the natural generalization from one to several variables: profit as a function of the units of two products, or volume as a function of length, width and height, are genuinely functions of more than one variable and cannot be reduced to a single-variable picture.
Neighbourhoods in R2. To define limits and continuity for F(x,y), replace the one-variable interval-neighbourhood (x0−δ,x0+δ) by an open disc:
Br((u,v))={(x,y)∈R2∣(x−u)2+(y−v)2<r2}
— the set of points strictly within distance r of (u,v). Removing the centre gives a deleted neighbourhood.
Definition (Limit of a Function of Two Variables).F has limit L at (u,v), written (x,y)→(u,v)limF(x,y)=L, if for every neighbourhood (L−ε,L+ε), ε>0, of L there exists a δ-neighbourhood Bδ((u,v)) of (u,v) such that (x,y)∈Bδ((u,v))∖{(u,v)}⇒F(x,y)∈(L−ε,L+ε).
Definition (Continuity).F is continuous at (u,v) if (1) F(u,v) is defined, (2) (x,y)→(u,v)limF(x,y) exists, and (3) that limit equals F(u,v) — exactly the same three-part test as one variable, now over R2. All the standard limit theorems (limits of sums, products, quotients, composition with a continuous function) carry over unchanged from one variable to several.
Watch out
The crucial new subtlety: (x,y) must approach (u,v) along every possible path, not just straight lines, for the limit to exist. A classic failure is f(x,y)=x2+y2xy at the origin — along the line y=mx the value is the constant 1+m2m, which is different for different slopes m, so the two-variable limit does not exist even though every straight-line limit does. Checking finitely many paths can only ever disprove a limit (by finding two paths that disagree); it can never by itself prove the limit exists, since some other, non-linear path (e.g. a parabola y=kx2) might still disagree.
Working method to evaluate a limit / test continuity at (u,v):
If F is built from continuous pieces (polynomials, sin,cos,e(⋅),log, ...) by algebraic combination or composition, and the denominator (if any) is nonzero at (u,v), substitute directly — the limit is F(u,v).
If the expression is a genuine 00 form, try to factor/simplify algebraically (e.g. rationalizing x−y via (x−y)(x+y)=x−y) so the singular factor cancels.
If simplification is not obvious, use a squeeze/bound argument: show ∣F(x,y)−L∣≤ (something that visibly →0), often using 2∣xy∣≤x2+y2 (which follows from (x−y)2≥0).
To show a limit does not exist, compute the limit along two different paths (e.g. y=mx for varying m, or a line vs. a parabola y=kx2) and exhibit disagreement.
Denominator x+y+2→2=0 at (0,0), so substitute directly: cos(20+0)=cos0.
✓Final answer
The limit exists and equals 1
The inner rational function x+y+2x3+y2 has denominator →2=0 at (0,0), so it — and hence cos(⋅) of it — is continuous there; substitute directly.
Step 1. Check the denominator at (0,0).x+y+2→0+0+2=2=0.
Step 2. The inner function is continuous at (0,0) (polynomial numerator, nonvanishing polynomial denominator), so (x,y)→(0,0)limx+y+2x3+y2=20+0=0.
Step 3. Compose with the continuous function cos. Since cos is continuous everywhere, (x,y)→(0,0)limcos(x+y+2x3+y2)=cos(0)=1.
✓Final answer
The limit exists and equals 1
Direct substitution inside, then composition with the continuous function cos
Assuming the limit doesn't exist just because the expression looks complicated, without first checking the denominator is nonzero
Forgetting to apply cos to the INNER limit, stopping at the value 0 instead of cos(0)=1