Q.If y=sin−1x, show that (1−x2)dx2d2y−xdxdy=0.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Successive Differentiation
Successive Differentiation — Repeated Slopes
Differentiate a function, then differentiate the result, then differentiate that, and so on. Each pass produces a new function describing a deeper layer of change. The physics picture makes it concrete: position → velocity (1st derivative) → acceleration (2nd) → jerk (3rd). Every step asks the same question: "how does the previous rate of change itself change?"
The definition and notation
If y=f(x), its successive derivatives are written y1,y2,…,yn, equivalently f′(x),f′′(x),…,f(n)(x) or dxdy,dx2d2y,…,dxndny. Each one is the derivative of the previous:
dxndny=dxd(dxn−1dn−1y).
| Order | Leibniz | Lagrange | Newton |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | dxdy | f′(x) | y˙ |
| 2nd | dx2d2y | f′′(x) | y¨ |
| nth | dxndny | f(n)(x) | — |
Seeing the pattern
Take y=x4: y1=4x3,y2=12x2,y3=24x,y4=24,y5=0. Each differentiation drops the degree by one, so a degree-n polynomial has a constant nth derivative and vanishing higher ones. Other families behave differently: eax never dies out (dxndneax=aneax), and sinx cycles every four steps (sin→cos→−sin→−cos).
Power rule applied n times: dxndn(xm)=m(m−1)⋯(m−n+1)xm−n for n≤m.
dx2d2y is not (dxdy)2 — a second derivative is not the square of the first derivative. …
Concept: Leibniz Notation Derivatives — we differentiate sin−1x twice and substitute into the given expression.
Step 1: First derivative.
If y=sin−1x, then
dxdy=1−x21.
Step 2: Second derivative.
Differentiate again using the chain rule:
dx2d2y=−21(1−x2)−3/2⋅(−2x)=(1−x2)3/2x.
Step 3: Substitute into the left-hand side. …
Using Leibniz notation, we differentiate y=sin−1x twice, then substitute into the given expression. The result simplifies to zero, confirming the identity.
The key insight here is that when you have an inverse trigonometric function, its derivative is a rational expression involving a square root. Differentiating that derivative gives a second derivative that, when combined with the first derivative, cancels out neatly. This is a classic verification problem — it tests your comfort with chain rule and algebraic manipulation in Leibniz notation.
Let’s work through it step by step.
- First derivative Given y=sin−1x, we know
dxdy=1−x21
This is valid for ∣x∣<1. The domain matters because the square root must be real.
- Second derivative Differentiate dxdy with respect to x. Write it as (1−x2)−1/2 for easier differentiation:
dx2d2y=−21(1−x2)−3/2⋅(−2x)
The −2x comes from the derivative of (1−x2) by the chain rule. Simplify:
dx2d2y=(1−x2)3/2x
- Form the expression We need to compute (1−x2)dx2d2y−xdxdy. Substitute the derivatives:
(1−x2)⋅(1−x2)3/2x−x⋅1−x21
-
Simplify term by term
First term: (1−x2)⋅(1−x2)3/2x=(1−x2)1/2x=1−x2x
Second term: x⋅1−x21=1−x2x
-
Subtract
1−x2x−1−x2x=0 …
Method: Differentiating an Inverse Trig Function Twice and Verifying a Relation
This method applies whenever y is an inverse trigonometric function (like sin−1x) and you must show a given combination of y, dxdy, and dx2d2y equals a specific value (often 0).
Steps
Step 1: Write down the known first-derivative formula
For y=sin−1x:
dxdy=1−x21=(1−x2)−1/2.
Recasting the square root as a negative fractional power makes the next differentiation cleaner.
Step 2: Differentiate again using the chain rule
Differentiate (1−x2)−1/2 by bringing down the power, reducing the exponent by 1, and multiplying by the derivative of the inner function (1−x2), which is −2x: …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Losing track of the sign when differentiating (1−x2)−1/2
Why it's wrong: the power rule contributes a negative sign (from the −1/2 exponent) and the chain rule contributes another negative sign (from the derivative of 1−x2 being −2x) — the two negatives multiply to a positive, but it is common to keep only one of them and end up with the wrong overall sign on dx2d2y. Correct approach: write both negative signs out explicitly, side by side, before multiplying them.
Mistake 2: Exponent arithmetic error going from −21−1 to −23 …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-09-FN1 markMCQQ.If dxd(secx−tanxsecx+tanx)=k at x=4π, then 22k−22= (A) 52 (B) 122 (C) 3 (D) 9
›Reveal solutionSolution
The derivative simplifies to 2secx(secx+tanx), which at x=π/4 gives k=22(2+1), and then 22k−22=3, so the answer is (C).
Concept and Intuition
The expression inside the derivative looks like a ratio of two trigonometric terms that are actually conjugates in disguise. Instead of diving straight into the quotient rule (which would be messy), we can simplify first by multiplying numerator and denominator by something clever, or by noticing a known identity:
secx+tanx=secx−tanx1
This is because (secx+tanx)(secx−tanx)=sec2x−tan2x=1.
So the fraction is actually
secx−tanxsecx+tanx=(secx+tanx)2
That’s much easier to differentiate.
Step-by-step
- Simplify the fraction Using the identity sec2x−tan2x=1, we have
secx−tanxsecx+tanx=(secx+tanx)2
because multiplying numerator and denominator by (secx+tanx) gives
sec2x−tan2x(secx+tanx)2=(secx+tanx)2
- Differentiate Let f(x)=(secx+tanx)2. Then
f′(x)=2(secx+tanx)⋅(secxtanx+sec2x)
Factor secx from the derivative of the inside:
secxtanx+sec2x=secx(tanx+secx)
So
f′(x)=2(secx+tanx)⋅secx(secx+tanx)=2secx(secx+tanx)2
- Evaluate at x=π/4 At π/4, secx=2 and tanx=1, so
secx+tanx=2+1
Hence
k=f′(π/4)=2⋅2⋅(2+1)2
Compute (2+1)2=2+22+1=3+22.
So
k=22(3+22)=62+8 …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-02-FN1 markMCQQ.If y=f(coshx) and f′(x)=log(x+x2−1) then dx2d2y= (A) sinhx+xcoshx (B) xsinhx (C) log(x+x2+1) (D) x2−1(x2+x2−1)x(2x2−1+1)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Using f′(x)=cosh−1x and cosh−1(coshx)=x, we get dx2d2y=sinhx+xcoshx — option (A).
Given y=f(coshx) with f′(x)=log(x+x2−1)=cosh−1x.
First derivative (chain rule). With g(x)=coshx,
dxdy=f′(coshx)⋅sinhx.
Since f′(t)=cosh−1t and cosh−1(coshx)=x (for x≥0),
f′(coshx)=x,sodxdy=xsinhx.
Second derivative (product rule). …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-03-AN1 markMCQQ.If y=log(x2+1)+log(x2+1)+log(x2+1)+…∞, ∣x∣<1, then dxdy= (A) 2y−1x2+1 (B) 2y−12x (C) (x2+1)(2y−1)1 (D) (x2+1)(2y−1)2x
›Reveal solutionSolution
The infinite nested radical simplifies to a quadratic in y, which we differentiate implicitly to find dxdy. The result is dxdy=(x2+1)(2y−1)2x, matching option (D).
The key insight: an infinite nested radical of the form
y=u+u+u+⋯
can be rewritten as y=u+y, because the pattern repeats indefinitely. This turns an intimidating infinite expression into a simple algebraic equation, which we can then differentiate.
Here, u=log(x2+1). So we have:
y=log(x2+1)+y.
- Square both sides to remove the square root:
y2=log(x2+1)+y.
- Rearrange to isolate the logarithmic term:
y2−y=log(x2+1).
- Differentiate implicitly with respect to x. Remember that y is a function of x:
dxd(y2−y)=dxdlog(x2+1).
This gives:
2ydxdy−dxdy=x2+11⋅2x.
- Factor out dxdy on the left:
(2y−1)dxdy=x2+12x.
- Solve for dxdy:
dxdy=(x2+1)(2y−1)2x.
--- …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-03-FN1 markMCQQ.If y=sec−1x, then dx2d2y= (A) x2(x2−1)231−x2 (B) x∣x∣(x2−1)231−2x2 (C) x∣x∣(x2−1)231+2x2 (D) −x2(x2−1)231−x2
›Reveal solutionSolution
The second derivative of y=sec−1x is found by differentiating the known first derivative dxdy=∣x∣x2−11 using the chain rule and careful handling of the absolute value, leading to the result x∣x∣(x2−1)3/21−2x2, which matches option (B).
The key idea is that the derivative of sec−1x has a standard form involving an absolute value, because the range of sec−1x is chosen to make the function one-to-one. When we differentiate a second time, we must treat ∣x∣ correctly — it is not simply x, and its derivative introduces a sign factor. The algebra then simplifies to one of the given forms.
- Recall the first derivative. For y=sec−1x, the derivative is
dxdy=∣x∣x2−11,∣x∣>1.
The absolute value appears because the inverse secant is defined with range [0,π/2)∪(π/2,π], and the slope of the tangent must be positive for x>1 and negative for x<−1.
- Rewrite the absolute value for differentiation. A useful trick: ∣x∣=x2. Then
dxdy=x2x2−11=x2(x2−1)1.
This avoids piecewise cases during differentiation, but we must remember that x2=∣x∣, not x.
- Differentiate again using the chain rule. Let u=x2(x2−1)=x4−x2. Then
dxdy=u−1/2.
So
dx2d2y=−21u−3/2⋅dxdu.
Compute dxdu=4x3−2x=2x(2x2−1).
- Substitute back.
dx2d2y=−21⋅(x2(x2−1))3/21⋅2x(2x2−1).
The factor −21⋅2=−1, so
dx2d2y=−(x2(x2−1))3/2x(2x2−1).
- Simplify the denominator.
(x2(x2−1))3/2=(x2)3/2⋅(x2−1)3/2=∣x∣3⋅(x2−1)3/2.
Since ∣x∣3=∣x∣⋅x2 (because ∣x∣3=∣x∣⋅x2), we have
dx2d2y=−∣x∣3(x2−1)3/2x(2x2−1)=−∣x∣⋅x2(x2−1)3/2x(2x2−1).
- Handle the sign from x/∣x∣. Notice x/∣x∣=sgn(x), but here we have x/∣x∣3=∣x∣⋅x2x=x2sgn(x)? Wait carefully:
∣x∣3x=∣x∣⋅x2x=x2sgn(x).
But we want the expression in the form given in the options. Multiply numerator and denominator:
dx2d2y=−x2∣x∣(x2−1)3/22x2−1⋅∣x∣x?No, let’s do it cleanly.
Actually, from step 5:
dx2d2y=−∣x∣3(x2−1)3/2x(2x2−1).
Write ∣x∣3=∣x∣⋅x2 (since ∣x∣3=∣x∣⋅x2 for all real x). Then
dx2d2y=−∣x∣⋅x2(x2−1)3/2x(2x2−1).
Now x/∣x∣=sgn(x), so
dx2d2y=−x2(x2−1)3/2sgn(x)(2x2−1).
But the options have x∣x∣ in the denominator, not x2 times a sign. Multiply numerator and denominator by ∣x∣:
dx2d2y=−x∣x∣(x2−1)3/2(2x2−1).
Because x2⋅∣x∣=∣x∣3? Wait: x∣x∣ in denominator times ∣x∣ gives x∣x∣2=x⋅x2=x3? That’s messy. Let’s check directly: …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-03-FN1 markMCQQ.If y=log(x2+1)+log(x2+1)+log(x2+1)+…∞, ∣x∣<1, then dxdy= (A) 2y−1x2+1 (B) 2y−12x (C) (x2+1)(2y−1)1 (D) (x2+1)(2y−1)2x
›Reveal solutionSolution
The infinite nested radical simplifies to a quadratic in y, which we differentiate implicitly to find dxdy. The result is (x2+1)(2y−1)2x, matching option (D).
The key insight is that an infinitely nested expression like this is self‑referential: the whole infinite chain equals y, and the part after the first square root is the same infinite chain again. That lets us replace the infinite tail with y itself, turning a scary infinite radical into a simple algebraic equation.
- Set up the self‑referential equation Since the pattern repeats infinitely, we have
y=log(x2+1)+=ylog(x2+1)+log(x2+1)+….
Therefore
y=log(x2+1)+y.
- Square both sides Squaring removes the outer square root:
y2=log(x2+1)+y.
Rearranging gives
y2−y−log(x2+1)=0.
- Differentiate implicitly Treat y as a function of x. Differentiate term‑by‑term:
dxd(y2)−dxd(y)−dxd[log(x2+1)]=0.
Using the chain rule:
2ydxdy−dxdy−x2+11⋅2x=0.
- Solve for dxdy Factor out dxdy:
- TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-10-AN1 markMCQQ.If y=log(x−x2−1), then (x2−1)y′′+xy′+ey+x2−1= (A) 0 (B) 1 (C) x2−1 (D) x
›Reveal solutionSolution
The two derivative terms cancel: (x2−1)y′′+xy′=0, and ey+x2−1=x, so the whole expression equals x.
Differentiating y=log(x−x2−1).
Let u=x−x2−1, so y=logu. Then
u′=1−x2−1x=x2−1x2−1−x=x2−1−u.
Hence
y′=uu′=−x2−11=−(x2−1)−1/2.
Differentiate again:
y′′=−(−21)(x2−1)−3/2(2x)=(x2−1)3/2x.
Combining the derivative terms.
(x2−1)y′′=x2−1x,xy′=−x2−1x,
(x2−1)y′′+xy′=x2−1x−x2−1x=0. …
- TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-10-AN1 markMCQQ.The order and degree of the differential equation dxdy=(dx2d2y+2)1/2+dx2d2y+5 are respectively (A) 2, 1 (B) 2, 4 (C) 2, 2 (D) 2, 3
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to rewrite the equation so that the highest-order derivative appears with a positive integer exponent; after squaring to remove the radical, the order is 2 and the degree is 2, so the correct option is (C).
Concept and intuition
Order is simply the highest derivative present — here we see both dxdy (first derivative) and dx2d2y (second derivative), so the order is clearly 2.
Degree is trickier: it is the exponent of the highest-order derivative after the equation is made polynomial in derivatives (no radicals, no fractional powers). The given equation has a square root containing dx2d2y, so we must eliminate that radical before reading off the degree. Squaring will introduce a term like (dx2d2y)2, making the degree 2 — but we must check that no higher power appears.
Step-by-step solution
-
Identify the order
The highest derivative in the equation is dx2d2y. Therefore the order is 2.
-
Prepare to find the degree
The equation is
dxdy=(dx2d2y+2)1/2+dx2d2y+5.
The term (dx2d2y+2)1/2 is a radical involving the second derivative. To find the degree, we must rewrite the equation so that all derivatives appear with integer exponents.
- Isolate the radical Move the non‑radical terms to the left:
dxdy−dx2d2y−5=(dx2d2y+2)1/2.
- Square both sides Squaring eliminates the square root:
-
- TG EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-19-AN1 markMCQQ.dxd[(x25−x23+1)(x2−3x+5)]= (A) 29x27−14x25+20x23−215x2+2x−3 (B) 29x27−7x25+5x23−23x2+2x−3 (C) 9x27−14x25+20x23−15x2+2x−3 (D) 29x27−27x25+25x23−215x2+2x−3
›Reveal solutionSolution
Differentiate a product of two polynomials with fractional powers using the product rule, then simplify term by term. The derivative matches option (A).
The problem asks for the derivative of a product of two functions:
u(x)=x5/2−x3/2+1 and v(x)=x2−3x+5.
The product rule is the natural choice: dxd[u⋅v]=u′v+uv′.
We could expand the product first and then differentiate, but that would involve multiplying two polynomials with fractional exponents — messy. The product rule keeps the algebra cleaner because we differentiate each factor separately (both are straightforward power-rule jobs) and then combine like terms.
Let’s do it step by step.
-
Differentiate u(x)
u(x)=x5/2−x3/2+1
Using dxdxn=nxn−1:
u′(x)=25x3/2−23x1/2+0=25x3/2−23x1/2.
-
Differentiate v(x)
v(x)=x2−3x+5
v′(x)=2x−3.
-
Apply the product rule
dxd[uv]=u′v+uv′
=(25x3/2−23x1/2)(x2−3x+5)+(x5/2−x3/2+1)(2x−3).
- Expand the first product u′v
25x3/2⋅x2=25x7/2,25x3/2⋅(−3x)=−215x5/2,25x3/2⋅5=225x3/2.
−23x1/2⋅x2=−23x5/2,−23x1/2⋅(−3x)=29x3/2,−23x1/2⋅5=−215x1/2.
So u′v=25x7/2+(−215−23)x5/2+(225+29)x3/2−215x1/2
=25x7/2−9x5/2+17x3/2−215x1/2.
- Expand the second product uv′
x5/2⋅2x=2x7/2,x5/2⋅(−3)=−3x5/2.
−x3/2⋅2x=−2x5/2,−x3/2⋅(−3)=3x3/2.
1⋅2x=2x,1⋅(−3)=−3. …
-
- TG EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-20-FN1 markMCQQ.Let f(x) be a differentiable function such that f(0)=0 and f′(0)=20. For x∈(0,2π), if A(x)=2f(x)csc4x+4f(x)(cos2x+1)−4cos2x then limx→0A(x)= (A) 0 (B) 4 (C) 6 (D) 8
›Reveal solutionSolution
The limit reduces to a 0/0 form; applying L'Hôpital's rule and using the given f(0)=0 and f′(0)=20 yields the value 8.
We are given f(0)=0, f′(0)=20, and f is differentiable. The expression A(x) involves csc4x, which blows up as x→0, so the limit is not obvious by direct substitution. The key is to rewrite the trigonometric terms near x=0 and use the derivative condition.
- Rewrite A(x) in a form that exposes the limit. Since csc4x=sin4x1, we have
A(x)=sin4x2f(x)+4f(x)(cos2x+1)−4cos2x.
As x→0, sin4x∼4x, and f(x)∼f′(0)x=20x, so the first term behaves like 4x2⋅20x=10, which is finite. The other terms are finite too, so the limit exists.
- Combine terms to apply L'Hôpital's rule cleanly. Write
A(x)=sin4x2f(x)+4f(x)(cos2x+1)−4cos2x.
As x→0, sin4x→0 and f(x)→0, so the first term is 0/0. The rest are well-behaved. To handle the 0/0 part, we isolate it:
limx→0A(x)=limx→0sin4x2f(x)+limx→0[4f(x)(cos2x+1)−4cos2x].
- Evaluate the second limit directly. As x→0, f(x)→0 and cos2x→1, so
4f(x)(cos2x+1)−4cos2x→4⋅0⋅(1+1)−4⋅1=−4.
- Evaluate the first limit using L'Hôpital's rule. Since both numerator and denominator go to 0, …
- TG EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-05-AN1 markMCQQ.If x=a(t−sint) and y=a(1−cost) then dx2d2y= (A) 4asin4(2t)1 (B) 4asin4(2t)−1 (C) 4acos4(2t)1 (D) 4acos4(2t)−1
›Reveal solutionSolution
For parametric equations, the second derivative dx2d2y is found by differentiating dxdy with respect to t and dividing by dtdx. The result simplifies to −4asin4(t/2)1, which is option (B).
The core idea here is that when x and y are both given in terms of a parameter t, you cannot directly write dx2d2y as a simple ratio of second derivatives. Instead, you first find dxdy=dx/dtdy/dt, then differentiate that expression with respect to t, and finally divide by dx/dt again. This is because dx2d2y=dxd(dxdy)=dtd(dxdy)⋅dxdt.
The given equations describe a cycloid — the path traced by a point on a rolling circle of radius a. The trigonometric simplifications that follow rely heavily on half-angle identities, so keep those handy.
- Find dxdy. First compute the derivatives with respect to t:
dtdx=a(1−cost),dtdy=asint.
Therefore,
dxdy=dx/dtdy/dt=a(1−cost)asint=1−costsint.
- Simplify dxdy using half-angle identities. Recall sint=2sin(t/2)cos(t/2) and 1−cost=2sin2(t/2). Substituting:
dxdy=2sin2(t/2)2sin(t/2)cos(t/2)=sin(t/2)cos(t/2)=cot(2t).
This is a much cleaner form to work with.
- Differentiate dxdy with respect to t.
dtd(dxdy)=dtd[cot(2t)]=−csc2(2t)⋅21=−21csc2(2t).
- Apply the chain rule to get dx2d2y. …
- TG EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-06-FN1 markMCQQ.If y=x+tanx, then cos2xdx2d2y+2x= (A) −2y (B) 32y (C) 3y (D) 2y
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to compute the second derivative of y=x+tanx and substitute into the given expression, simplifying using trigonometric identities. The result simplifies to 2y, so the correct option is (D).
We start with y=x+tanx. The question asks for cos2xdx2d2y+2x, and we need to express this in terms of y alone. The presence of cos2x multiplying the second derivative hints that derivatives of tanx will produce powers of secx, which combine neatly with cos2x.
- First derivative Differentiate y with respect to x:
dxdy=1+sec2x
because dxd(tanx)=sec2x.
- Second derivative Differentiate again:
dx2d2y=0+2secx⋅secxtanx=2sec2xtanx
using the chain rule: dxd(sec2x)=2secx⋅(secxtanx)=2sec2xtanx.
- Multiply by cos2x Recall secx=cosx1, so sec2x=cos2x1. Then: cos2x⋅dx2d2y=cos2x⋅(2⋅cos2x1⋅tanx)=2tanx …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.