Q.Differentiate w.r.t. x: 2cos2x.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Derivative Evaluation
Derivative Evaluation
To evaluate a derivative means to find f′(a) — a single number that tells you how fast f is changing right at x=a. Think of a speedometer: it doesn't report how far you've travelled, only how fast your position is changing at this instant. That instantaneous rate of change is exactly what f′(a) measures.
The geometric picture
On the curve y=f(x), pick a point P and a nearby point Q. The straight line through them — the secant — has slope equal to the average rate of change between P and Q. Now slide Q toward P: the secant rotates into the tangent line that just touches the curve at P, and its slope is f′(a).
f′(a) is the slope of the tangent to y=f(x) at x=a — how steep the curve is right there.
The limit definition
f′(a)=limh→0hf(a+h)−f(a)
Here h is a tiny step from a to a+h, the numerator is the matching change in height, and the ratio is a secant slope. As h→0 the secant becomes the tangent. An equivalent form is
f′(a)=limx→ax−af(x)−f(a).
When this limit exists, f is differentiable at a (which forces continuity there).
Continuity alone is not enough. f(x)=∣x∣ is continuous at 0, but its left slope −1 and right slope +1 disagree, so f′(0) does not exist — a corner has no single tangent.
A worked evaluation
For f(x)=x2 at x=3:
f′(3)=limh→0h(3+h)2−9=limh→0(6+h)=6.
So the tangent at x=3 has slope 6.
From a number to a function …
Concept: Derivative Evaluation — Use the chain rule with an exponential base a.
Let y=2cos2x.
Take log both sides: logy=cos2x⋅log2.
Differentiate: y1dxdy=log2⋅2cosx⋅(−sinx)=−log2⋅sin2x. …
The derivative of 2cos2x is found by rewriting it as ecos2x⋅log2 and applying the chain rule. The result is −log2⋅sin2x⋅2cos2x.
Concept and Intuition
When you see a function like af(x) — a constant base raised to a variable exponent — the standard approach is to use the exponential form. Why? Because the derivative of ax is axloga, but that rule only works when the exponent is exactly x. Here, the exponent is cos2x, a function of x, so we need the chain rule.
The cleanest way is to rewrite 2cos2x as ecos2x⋅log2. This turns the problem into differentiating eu(x), where u(x)=cos2x⋅log2. The derivative of eu is eu⋅u′, and then we just need u′.
A shortcut: the derivative of af(x) is af(x)loga⋅f′(x). This works because af(x)=ef(x)loga, so the derivative is ef(x)loga⋅loga⋅f′(x)=af(x)loga⋅f′(x). Memorise this pattern — it saves time.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Rewrite in exponential form Let y=2cos2x. Then
y=ecos2x⋅log2.
- Differentiate using the chain rule The derivative of eu is eu⋅dxdu. Here u=cos2x⋅log2, so
dxdy=ecos2x⋅log2⋅dxd(cos2x⋅log2).
- Factor out the constant log2 is a constant, so
dxdy=ecos2x⋅log2⋅log2⋅dxd(cos2x).
- Differentiate cos2x …
Method: Differentiating af(x) — Constant Base, Variable Exponent
Use this method whenever you must differentiate an expression of the form af(x), where a is a fixed positive constant (not e) and the exponent f(x) is itself a function of x.
Steps
Step 1: Recognise the exponential form and convert the base
The direct formula dxd(ax)=axlna only applies when the exponent is exactly x. When the exponent is a function f(x), rewrite af(x) in base e:
af(x)=ef(x)lna
(equivalently, take logarithms of both sides — this is logarithmic differentiation applied to a single exponential term).
Step 2: Differentiate the exponential using the chain rule
dxdeu=eu⋅dxdu,u=f(x)lna
Since lna is a constant, dxdu=lna⋅f′(x).
Step 3: Differentiate the inner function f(x) on its own …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Forgetting the lna factor entirely
Why it's wrong: students often treat 2cos2x the same way as ecos2x, whose derivative needs no extra constant. But the base here is 2, not e, so a factor of ln2 is unavoidable in the derivative — omitting it gives an answer that is off by a constant multiple everywhere. Correct approach: always convert af(x) to ef(x)lna (or explicitly recall dxdau=aulna⋅u′) before differentiating.
Mistake 2: Differentiating only the outer exponential and forgetting the inner chain rule on cos2x …
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 on this concept.
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-02-FN1 markMCQQ.If f(x)=cos−11−x2, then f′(21)= (A) π2 (B) 2π (C) −π2 (D) −2π
›Reveal solutionSolution
For x≥0, cos−11−x2=sin−1x, so f(x)=sin−1x and f′(21)=π2 — option (A).
Simplify. For 0≤x≤1, let θ=cos−11−x2∈[0,2π]. Then cos2θ=1−x2, so sinθ=x and θ=sin−1x. Hence
f(x)=sin−1x.
Differentiate.
f′(x)=2sin−1x1⋅1−x21.
Evaluate at x=21. sin−121=6π and 1−41=23: …
- TG EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-12-FN1 markMCQQ.If the slope of the tangent drawn to the curve y=ea+bx2 at the point P(1,1) is −2, then the value of 2a−3b is (A) 5 (B) 6 (C) 7 (D) 8
›Reveal solutionSolution
b=−1, a=1, so 2a−3b=5.
The curve is y=ea+bx2 and P(1,1) lies on it:
1=ea+b⋅12⟹a+b=0.
Differentiate:
dxdy=ea+bx2⋅(2bx)=y(2bx).
At P(1,1) the slope is −2: …
- TG EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-19-AN1 markMCQQ.If x=loge(cot(4π+θ)), then limθ→0(sinhx)(coshx)θ= (A) 0 (B) −21 (C) −2 (D) 1
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to simplify x using log properties and trig identities, then rewrite the limit in terms of θ using hyperbolic function definitions. The limit evaluates to −21, so option (B) is correct.
We start with the given expression:
x=loge(cot(4π+θ)).
The goal is to find limθ→0(sinhx)(coshx)θ.
The presence of sinhx and coshx suggests we should first simplify x itself. The argument of the log involves a cotangent of a sum, which often simplifies using trigonometric identities. Once x is expressed in terms of θ, the hyperbolic functions become manageable, and the limit reduces to a standard form.
-
Simplify x using a trig identity.
Recall that cot(4π+θ)=1+tanθ1−tanθ.
This comes from cot(A+B)=cotA+cotBcotAcotB−1, but a quicker route:
cot(4π+θ)=sin(4π+θ)cos(4π+θ), and using cos(4π+θ)=21(cosθ−sinθ), sin(4π+θ)=21(cosθ+sinθ), the ratio gives cosθ+sinθcosθ−sinθ=1+tanθ1−tanθ.
So x=loge(1+tanθ1−tanθ).
-
Rewrite x using log properties.
x=loge(1−tanθ)−loge(1+tanθ).
For small θ, tanθ≈θ, so we can expand:
loge(1−θ)≈−θ−2θ2−⋯ and loge(1+θ)≈θ−2θ2+⋯.
Thus x≈(−θ−2θ2)−(θ−2θ2)=−2θ, ignoring higher-order terms.
More precisely, x=−2θ+O(θ3) as θ→0.
-
Express sinhx and coshx in terms of θ.
For small x, sinhx≈x and coshx≈1+2x2.
But here x≈−2θ, so sinhx≈−2θ and coshx≈1+2(−2θ)2=1+2θ2.
Therefore (sinhx)(coshx)≈(−2θ)(1+2θ2)=−2θ−4θ3.
-
Form the limit expression.
(sinhx)(coshx)θ≈−2θ−4θ3θ=−2−4θ21. …
-
- TG EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-18-AN1 markMCQQ.If ∫excosxdx=2ex(cosx+sinx) and ∫(3−2x)2cos(log(3−2x2x+3))dx=24f(x)[cos(g(x))+sin(g(x))]+c then g(1)= (A) 5 (B) logf(2) (C) logf(1) (D) 0
›Reveal solutionSolution
This problem requires recognizing a pattern in the given integral formula to evaluate a more complex integral. By identifying the correct substitution, the complex integral transforms into the standard form, allowing us to determine g(x) and f(x). We find g(1)=log5, which matches logf(1). The correct option is (C).
The core idea here is to recognize that the second integral's structure is a generalized form of the first integral. The given formula ∫excosxdx=2ex(cosx+sinx) provides a template. When we see the result of the second integral in the form 24f(x)[cos(g(x))+sin(g(x))], it strongly suggests that g(x) is the argument of the cosine function in the integrand, and f(x) is related to eg(x). Our strategy will be to make a suitable substitution to transform the second integral into the standard form ∫etcostdt.
-
Identify the potential g(x):
The argument of the cosine function in the second integral is log(3−2x2x+3). Given the form of the result, it is highly probable that this expression is g(x).
Let g(x)=log(3−2x2x+3).
-
Calculate the derivative of g(x):
We can rewrite g(x) using logarithm properties: g(x)=log(2x+3)−log(3−2x).
Now, differentiate g(x) with respect to x:
g′(x)=dxd(log(2x+3))−dxd(log(3−2x))
g′(x)=2x+31⋅(2)−3−2x1⋅(−2)
g′(x)=2x+32+3−2x2
Combine the terms:
g′(x)=2(2x+31+3−2x1)
g′(x)=2((2x+3)(3−2x)(3−2x)+(2x+3))
g′(x)=2((2x+3)(3−2x)6)
g′(x)=(2x+3)(3−2x)12
-
Determine eg(x):
From g(x)=log(3−2x2x+3), we have:
eg(x)=elog(3−2x2x+3)=3−2x2x+3.
-
Relate eg(x)g′(x) to the integrand:
Let's multiply eg(x) and g′(x):
eg(x)g′(x)=(3−2x2x+3)⋅((2x+3)(3−2x)12)
eg(x)g′(x)=(3−2x)212.
Now, observe the integrand of the second integral: (3−2x)2cos(log(3−2x2x+3)).
We can rewrite this using g(x) and the expression for eg(x)g′(x):
(3−2x)2cos(g(x))=cos(g(x))⋅121((3−2x)212)
(3−2x)2cos(g(x))=121cos(g(x))eg(x)g′(x).
-
Perform the integration:
The integral becomes:
∫121eg(x)cos(g(x))g′(x)dx
Let t=g(x). Then dt=g′(x)dx.
The integral transforms to:
121∫etcostdt.
Using the given formula ∫excosxdx=2ex(cosx+sinx): …
-
- TG EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-18-AN1 markMCQQ.
[!FORMULA] 4(ex−e−x)2e4x+e−4x+14=
(A) sinh2x+coth2x (B) sinh2x+sech2x (C) cosh2x+sech2x (D) cosh2x+tanh2x›Reveal solutionSolution
The problem asks us to simplify an expression involving exponentials and match it with an equivalent expression in terms of hyperbolic functions. By expressing the numerator and denominator in terms of (ex−e−x)2 and then using the definitions of sinhx and cothx, we find the expression simplifies to sinh2x+coth2x.
The core idea here is to recognize that expressions involving ex and e−x can often be simplified using the definitions of hyperbolic functions. The given expression has terms like ex−e−x in the denominator and e4x+e−4x in the numerator. Our strategy will be to transform these exponential terms into their hyperbolic function equivalents.
The fundamental definitions of hyperbolic sine and cosine are:
sinhx=2ex−e−x
coshx=2ex+e−x
From these, other hyperbolic functions are defined:
tanhx=coshxsinhx=ex+e−xex−e−x
cothx=sinhxcoshx=ex−e−xex+e−x
sechx=coshx1=ex+e−x2
cosechx=sinhx1=ex−e−x2
We will also use the fundamental identity relating cothx and cosechx:
coth2x−cosech2x=1
Let's simplify the given expression step-by-step.
-
Simplify the denominator:
The denominator is 4(ex−e−x)2.
From the definition of sinhx, we know ex−e−x=2sinhx.
Substituting this into the denominator:
4(ex−e−x)2=4(2sinhx)2=4(4sinh2x)=16sinh2x.
-
Simplify the numerator:
The numerator is e4x+e−4x+14.
We want to express e4x+e−4x in terms of (ex−e−x)2.
Let A=ex and B=e−x. Then the numerator is A4+B4+14.
We know that A4+B4=(A2+B2)2−2A2B2. Since AB=exe−x=e0=1, we have A2B2=1.
So, A4+B4=(A2+B2)2−2.
Now, let's express A2+B2 in terms of (A−B)2:
A2+B2=(A−B)2+2AB=(A−B)2+2.
Substitute this back into the expression for A4+B4:
A4+B4=((A−B)2+2)2−2.
Let X=A−B=ex−e−x.
Then e4x+e−4x=(X2+2)2−2.
Expand this: (X2+2)2−2=(X4+4X2+4)−2=X4+4X2+2.
Now, add the constant term from the numerator:
Numerator =(X4+4X2+2)+14=X4+4X2+16.
-
Combine and simplify the expression:
The original expression is 4(ex−e−x)2e4x+e−4x+14. …
-
- TG EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-18-AN1 markMCQQ.If tanhx=21 then sinh2x−sech2x= (A) 1529 (B) 1511 (C) 3 (D) 15−13
›Reveal solutionSolution
Use the given tanhx=21 to find sinh2x and \sech2x via hyperbolic identities, then subtract to get 1529.
The core idea here is that hyperbolic functions obey identities very similar to trigonometric ones, but with sign differences. Given tanhx, you can find sinhx and coshx using the fundamental relation cosh2x−sinh2x=1, then compute double-angle forms. The trick is to avoid solving for x directly — work algebraically with the ratios.
- Find coshx and sinhx from tanhx. Let tanhx=coshxsinhx=21. So sinhx=21coshx. Use cosh2x−sinh2x=1:
cosh2x−(21coshx)2=1⇒cosh2x−41cosh2x=43cosh2x=1.
Hence cosh2x=34, so coshx=32 (positive, since coshx>0 for all real x).
Then sinhx=21⋅32=31.
- Compute sinh2x. Using sinh2x=2sinhxcoshx:
sinh2x=2⋅31⋅32=34.
- Compute cosh2x and then \sech2x. Use cosh2x=cosh2x+sinh2x (note: plus sign, unlike cos2x):
- TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-09-FN1 markMCQQ.If 2x2−3xy+4y2+2x−3y+4=0, then (dxdy)(3,2)= (A) −5 (B) 75 (C) −2 (D) 72
›Reveal solutionSolution
Implicit differentiation gives dxdy=−3x+8y−3−(4x−3y+2), and at (3,2) this evaluates to 4−8=−2. Answer: (C).
Concept
For a curve given implicitly, differentiate every term with respect to x treating y=y(x) (chain and product rules), then collect and isolate dxdy.
Solution
1. Differentiate the relation 2x2−3xy+4y2+2x−3y+4=0:
4x−3(y+xdxdy)+8ydxdy+2−3dxdy=0.
2. Collect the derivative terms.
(−3x+8y−3)dxdy+(4x−3y+2)=0,
dxdy=−3x+8y−3−(4x−3y+2).
3. Evaluate at (3,2).
Numerator: −(4⋅3−3⋅2+2)=−(12−6+2)=−8,
Denominator: −3⋅3+8⋅2−3=−9+16−3=4,
dxdy(3,2)=4−8=−2. …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-09-AN1 markMCQQ.esinh−1(22)+ecosh−1(3)= (A) 2etanh−1(221) (B) 32e\cosech−1(3) (C) 2e\sech−1(31) (D) 31ecoth−1(22)
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to simplify the exponentials of inverse hyperbolic functions by converting them into algebraic expressions using the definitions of sinh−1 and cosh−1, then matching the result to one of the given options. The final value is 2etanh−1(1/(22)), which corresponds to option (A).
The problem asks for the value of esinh−1(22)+ecosh−1(3). Instead of trying to compute the inverse functions directly, we can use the fundamental definitions: for any real x, sinh−1(x)=log(x+x2+1) and cosh−1(x)=log(x+x2−1) for x≥1. Then esinh−1(x)=x+x2+1 and ecosh−1(x)=x+x2−1. This turns the problem into simple arithmetic.
- Simplify esinh−1(22). Using esinh−1(x)=x+x2+1, with x=22:
esinh−1(22)=22+(22)2+1=22+8+1=22+3.
- Simplify ecosh−1(3). Using ecosh−1(x)=x+x2−1, with x=3:
ecosh−1(3)=3+9−1=3+8=3+22.
- Add the two results.
esinh−1(22)+ecosh−1(3)=(22+3)+(3+22)=6+42.
So the sum is 6+42.
- Match this to one of the given options. Each option is of the form k⋅esome inverse hyperbolic function. We need to see which simplifies to 6+42. Let’s test option (A): 2etanh−1(1/(22)). Recall that etanh−1(x)=1−x1+x for ∣x∣<1. Here x=221, so:
etanh−1(221)=1−2211+221.
Simplify the fraction inside:
1−2211+221=2222−12222+1=22−122+1.
Rationalize the denominator:
22−122+1×22+122+1=(22)2−12(22+1)2=8−18+42+1=79+42.
So etanh−1(1/(22))=79+42.
Then 2etanh−1(1/(22))=279+42. This does not look like 6+42 at first glance. But wait — we might have misapplied the formula. Actually, etanh−1(x)=1−x1+x is correct, but let’s check if this simplifies to 6+42 numerically: 2(9+42)/7≈2(9+5.656)/7=214.656/7=22.0937≈2×1.447=2.894, which is far from 6+42≈6+5.656=11.656. So option (A) seems wrong? Let’s re-evaluate.
Watch outThe formula etanh−1(x)=1−x1+x is correct only if we interpret tanh−1(x) as the inverse hyperbolic tangent. But here the exponent is tanh−1(1/(22)), and etanh−1(x)=1−x21+x? Actually, let’s derive properly: tanh−1(x)=21log1−x1+x, so etanh−1(x)=1−x1+x. That is correct. So option (A) gives about 2.894, not 11.656. Something is off — perhaps we miscomputed the sum? Let’s double-check the sum: 22+3 plus 3+22 is indeed 6+42≈11.656. So option (A) is not matching. Let’s test the other options quickly. …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-09-FN1 markMCQQ.If dxdy=(x3−x)−(1−3x2)tanx+(x3−x)tan2x and y(1)=0, then π64y(4π)= (A) 1 (B) π2+16 (C) π2−16 (D) 16π2
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key is to notice that the derivative simplifies to a perfect derivative of a product involving tanx and a polynomial, so we can integrate directly and then evaluate at x=π/4. The final value is π2−16, which corresponds to option (C).
We are given:
dxdy=(x3−x)−(1−3x2)tanx+(x3−x)tan2x
with y(1)=0, and we need π64y(π/4).
Concept and intuition:
The expression looks messy, but the presence of tanx and tan2x alongside a polynomial suggests it might be the derivative of something like (polynomial)⋅tanx plus something simpler. When we differentiate a product u(x)tanx, we get u′(x)tanx+u(x)sec2x. Since sec2x=1+tan2x, this can produce terms like u(x)+u(x)tan2x plus a u′(x)tanx term. That matches our structure perfectly.
Let’s try to match it.
- Guess the form Suppose y(x)=(x3−x)tanx+something. Differentiate:
dxd[(x3−x)tanx]=(3x2−1)tanx+(x3−x)sec2x.
Since sec2x=1+tan2x, this becomes:
(3x2−1)tanx+(x3−x)+(x3−x)tan2x.
- Compare with given dxdy The given derivative is:
(x3−x)−(1−3x2)tanx+(x3−x)tan2x.
Notice that −(1−3x2)=3x2−1. So the given derivative is exactly:
(x3−x)+(3x2−1)tanx+(x3−x)tan2x.
This matches the derivative we computed for (x3−x)tanx term by term.
- Conclusion about y(x) Hence,
dxdy=dxd[(x3−x)tanx].
Integrating both sides:
y(x)=(x3−x)tanx+C.
- Use the initial condition y(1)=0 gives:
0=(13−1)tan1+C=0⋅tan1+C=C.
So C=0, and
y(x)=(x3−x)tanx.
- Evaluate at x=π/4
- TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-10-AN1 markMCQQ.If ∫(cscx+1)dx=ktan−1(f(x))+c, then k1f(6π)= (A) 21 (B) 41 (C) −41 (D) −21
›Reveal solutionSolution
∫cscx+1dx=−2tan−1(cscx−1)+c, so k=−2, f(x)=cscx−1 and k1f(6π)=−21.
Evaluating the integral.
Write cscx+1=sinx1+sinx. We claim
∫cscx+1dx=−2tan−1(cscx−1)+c.
Verification by differentiation.
Let g=cscx−1, so g2=cscx−1 and 1+g2=cscx. Then
2gg′=−cscxcotx⇒g′=2g−cscxcotx.
dxd[−2tan−1g]=1+g2−2g′=cscx−2g′=gcotx=sinxsinx1−sinxcosx=sinx1−sinxcosx.
Since cosx=1−sin2x=1−sinx1+sinx, this reduces to …
- TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-10-AN1 markMCQQ.If Rolle's Theorem is applicable for the function f(x)={xplogx,0,x=0x=0 on the interval [0,1], then a possible value of p is (A) −2 (B) −1 (C) 0 (D) 1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Rolle’s Theorem requires continuity on [0,1] and differentiability on (0,1) with f(0)=f(1). For f(x)=xplogx (with f(0)=0), continuity at 0 forces p>0, so only p=1 works among the options.
The key idea is that Rolle’s Theorem is a three‑part contract: the function must be continuous on the closed interval, differentiable on the open interval, and take equal values at the endpoints. Here the only tricky part is the behavior at x=0, because logx blows up as x→0+. The exponent p must be strong enough to tame that blow‑up.
-
Check endpoint equality
We have f(1)=1plog1=0, and f(0)=0 by definition. So f(0)=f(1) holds for any p — no restriction yet.
-
Continuity on [0,1]
The only potential trouble is at x=0. For x>0, f(x)=xplogx. We need
limx→0+xplogx=f(0)=0.
Recall that logx→−∞ as x→0+, so xp must go to 0 fast enough to overpower it.
- If p>0, then xp→0 and xplogx→0 (a standard limit: xϵlogx→0 for any ϵ>0).
- If p=0, then f(x)=logx→−∞, so the limit is not 0.
- If p<0, then xp→+∞ and the product xplogx→−∞ (or +∞ depending on sign), so the limit is not 0. Hence continuity at 0 forces p>0.
- Differentiability on (0,1) …
-
- TG EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-04-AN1 markMCQQ.The point at which the tangent line to the curve of y=x16−x2 is horizontal, is (A) (2,4) (B) (−2,−12) (C) (1,15) (D) (−1,−17)
›Reveal solutionSolution
A horizontal tangent means the derivative is zero. Solving y′=0 gives x=−2, and the corresponding point is (−2,−12).
The key idea: a tangent line is horizontal exactly where the slope of the curve is zero. The slope of the curve at any point is given by the derivative dxdy. So we need to find where dxdy=0, then check which of the given points lies on the curve at that x-value.
- Find the derivative. The function is y=16x−1−x2. Differentiate term by term:
dxdy=−16x−2−2x=−x216−2x.
- Set the derivative equal to zero (horizontal tangent condition):
−x216−2x=0.
Multiply through by −1 to simplify:
x216+2x=0.
- Solve for x. Multiply both sides by x2 (note x=0 because the original function is undefined at x=0):
16+2x3=0⇒2x3=−16⇒x3=−8.
So x=−2 (the real cube root of −8).
- Find the corresponding y-coordinate. Substitute x=−2 into the original equation:
y=−216−(−2)2=−8−4=−12.
So the point is (−2,−12). …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.