To define sec−1x we ask: for which values of x does the equation secθ=x have a solution? The answer is the domain of inverse secant, and it looks quite different from the domain of sin−1 or cos−1.
Why ∣x∣≥1
Recall secθ=cosθ1, and cosθ always lies in [−1,1]. Taking reciprocals:
when ∣cosθ∣≤1, we get ∣secθ∣≥1.
So secant never outputs a value strictly between −1 and 1. There is simply no angle whose secant is, say, 0.5. Therefore
Domain of sec−1x:∣x∣≥1,i.e. (−∞,−1]∪[1,∞).
The interval (−1,1) is excluded — this is the single most-tested fact about inverse secant.
The matching range
Like every trig function, secant repeats, so we must restrict it to make it one-to-one before inverting. The conventional principal-value choice keeps θ in
[0,π]∖{2π}.
We remove θ=2π because cos2π=0, so sec2π is undefined. On [0,2π) secant runs from 1 up to +∞, covering [1,∞); on (2π,π] it runs from −∞ up to −1, covering (−∞,−1]. Together these give exactly ∣x∣≥1 — matching the domain above. …
The inverse secant function sec−1(x) is defined only for ∣x∣≥1. Since 21 lies outside this domain, sec−1(21) has no real value — the set of values is the empty set ∅.
The key here is not to start calculating — it’s to check whether the input is even allowed. Many students rush to find an angle whose secant is 21, but that misses the fundamental restriction on the domain of sec−1.
1. Recall what sec−1 actually means
The inverse secant function, sec−1(x), answers the question: “What angle θ (in the principal range) has secθ=x?”
But secθ=cosθ1. Since cosθ is always between −1 and 1, its reciprocal secθ can never lie between −1 and 1 (excluding the endpoints). In other words:
secθ∈(−∞,−1]∪[1,∞)
So secθ is always either ≤−1 or ≥1. It can never be, say, 21.
2. The domain of sec−1(x) follows from this
Because secθ only outputs values with ∣x∣≥1, the inverse function sec−1(x) is defined only when∣x∣≥1. That is:
Important
The domain of sec−1(x) is (−∞,−1]∪[1,∞).
If you plug in any number between −1 and 1 (exclusive), there is no real angle whose secant equals that number.
The second derivative of sec−1x is found by differentiating the known derivative ∣x∣x2−11 using the chain rule and careful handling of the absolute value, leading to the result x∣x∣(x2−1)3/21−2x2, which matches option (A).
We start with the function y=sec−1x. The key idea is to recall the derivative of the inverse secant and then differentiate again, being meticulous about the domain and the absolute value that appears. The absolute value is not just a decoration—it affects the sign of the derivative and must be handled algebraically.
Step-by-step derivation:
Recall the first derivative.
For y=sec−1x, the standard formula is
dxdy=∣x∣x2−11,∣x∣>1.
The absolute value arises because the range of sec−1x is [0,π] excluding π/2, and the derivative must be positive for x>1 and also positive for x<−1 (since the function is decreasing there, but the derivative formula with ∣x∣ corrects the sign).
Rewrite the derivative without the absolute value using a piecewise approach or a clever identity.
A useful trick: ∣x∣=x2, but that can be messy for differentiation. Instead, note that
∣x∣1=x⋅sgn(x)1,
but a cleaner method is to write
dxdy=xx2−11for x>1,
and
dxdy=xx2−1−1for x<−1.
However, we can unify these by observing that
dxdy=xx2−11for x>1,
and for x<−1, x is negative, so 1/x is negative, but we need the derivative to be positive. Actually, check: For x<−1, sec−1x is in (π/2,π], and its derivative is positive. If we used xx2−11, then x negative gives a negative value—wrong. So the absolute value is essential.
The unified form ∣x∣x2−11 is correct for all ∣x∣>1.
Differentiate again using the chain rule.
Let
dxdy=(∣x∣)−1(x2−1)−1/2.
But differentiating ∣x∣ directly is tricky. Instead, write ∣x∣=x2, so
The key is to express tanhx in terms of sinhx using the identity tanhx=1+sinh2xsinhx, then substitute sinhx=tanA and simplify to get ∣tanhx∣=∣sinA∣, so the correct option is (A).
The problem gives sinhx=tanA and asks for ∣tanhx∣ in terms of A. The core idea is to relate hyperbolic functions through their fundamental identity: cosh2x−sinh2x=1. This is the hyperbolic analogue of cos2θ+sin2θ=1, and it lets us express tanhx purely in terms of sinhx (or coshx). Once we do that, substituting sinhx=tanA turns the expression into something involving only trigonometric functions of A, which simplifies neatly.
Recall the definition of tanhx
tanhx=coshxsinhx.
So to find ∣tanhx∣, we need coshx in terms of sinhx.
Use the hyperbolic identity
cosh2x−sinh2x=1⇒cosh2x=1+sinh2x.
Since coshx≥1 for all real x, we take the positive square root:
coshx=1+sinh2x.
Express tanhx
tanhx=1+sinh2xsinhx.
Substitute the given sinhx=tanA
tanhx=1+tan2AtanA.
Simplify the denominator using a trigonometric identity
Recall: 1+tan2A=sec2A.
So 1+tan2A=sec2A=∣secA∣ (the absolute value is needed because secA can be negative, but the square root gives a non-negative result).
Q.Let a>1 be a constant. If f:A→A and (x,y)∈f satisfy ax+ay=a, then A=
(A) (0,a]
(B) [0,a]
(C) (−∞,1)
(D) (−∞,a+1)
›Reveal solutionSolution
The condition ax+ay=a forces both x and y to be less than 1, and since a>1, the domain A must be (−∞,1) for the relation to be possible for all pairs in f.
The key idea here is that f is a function from A to A, meaning every x in A pairs with some y in A such that (x,y)∈f. The given equation ax+ay=a must hold for these pairs. Since a>1, the exponential at is strictly increasing, and its range is (0,∞). We need to find the largest set A such that for every x in A, there exists a y in A satisfying the equation — and vice versa, because f is a relation on A×A.
Let’s work through the constraints step by step.
Rewrite the condition.
From ax+ay=a, we get ay=a−ax. Since ay>0 for any real y, we require a−ax>0, i.e., ax<a. Because a>1, the exponential function is increasing, so ax<a implies x<1. Similarly, by symmetry, y<1 as well. So both coordinates must be strictly less than 1.
What about lower bounds?
There is no lower bound from positivity alone: ax can be arbitrarily close to 0 as x→−∞, and then ay=a−ax approaches a, so y approaches 1 from below. Conversely, if x is very close to 1 from below, ax is just under a, making ay very small, so y→−∞. So x and y can each be any real number less than 1, with no minimum.
Check the endpoints.
Can x=1? Then ax=a, so ay=0, which is impossible because ay>0 for all real y. So 1 is not allowed. Can x be exactly 0? Yes, a0=1, then ay=a−1>0, so y=loga(a−1), which is a real number less than 1. So 0 is fine. Similarly, any negative number works.