Q.Show that the lines 2x−1=3y−2=4z−3 and 5x−4=2y−1=z intersect. Also, find their point of intersection.
Concept understanding — Skew Lines
Skew Lines
In a plane, two straight lines have only two possibilities: they meet, or they are parallel. In three dimensions a third possibility appears — lines that neither meet nor run parallel. These are skew lines.
What Makes Lines Skew
Two lines in space are skew if they are not parallel and do not intersect. The deeper reason is that skew lines do not lie in the same plane — they are non-coplanar. Parallel lines and intersecting lines always share a plane; skew lines never do.
A classic picture: one edge along the top of a room and a different edge along the floor, running in a different direction. Extend them forever and they still never touch, yet they are clearly not parallel.
The Three Cases in Space
| Lines | Directions | Do they meet? | Coplanar? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intersecting | different | yes, at one point | yes |
| Parallel | same (proportional) | no | yes |
| Skew | different | no | no |
How to Test for Skew Lines
Take two lines r=a1+λb1 and r=a2+μb2.
- Not parallel: b1 and b2 are not proportional (so b1×b2=0).
- Do not intersect: no values of λ,μ make the points coincide.
Both conditions are captured by one scalar triple product. The lines are skew exactly when
(a2−a1)⋅(b1×b2)=0.
If this value is zero, the lines are coplanar (they intersect or are parallel); if it is non-zero, they are skew.
Shortest Distance Between Skew Lines
Because skew lines miss each other, there is a well-defined shortest distance between them, measured along their common perpendicular:
d=∣b1×b2∣∣(a2−a1)⋅(b1×b2)∣.
The numerator here is exactly the skew-test triple product. So d=0 precisely when the lines are coplanar — the same condition, seen as a distance.
The Takeaway
Skew lines are the genuinely 3D case: non-parallel, non-intersecting, and non-coplanar. Test for them with the scalar triple product of the join vector and the two direction vectors, and when it is non-zero the same expression (divided by ∣b1×b2∣) gives the shortest distance between them.
Skew lines are a signature topic of the NCERT Class 12 Three Dimensional Geometry chapter, and "shortest distance between skew lines formula" is one of the most searched queries among CBSE board and JEE Main aspirants. This scalar-triple-product test is also the standard way boards ask students to distinguish skew lines from parallel or intersecting ones.
Concept: Angle Between Lines — but here we only need to check intersection, so we equate parametric forms.
Step 1 – Parametric form
First line:
2x−1=3y−2=4z−3=λ
⇒x=1+2λ,y=2+3λ,z=3+4λ
Second line:
5x−4=2y−1=z=μ
⇒x=4+5μ,y=1+2μ,z=μ
Step 2 – Equate coordinates
From z: 3+4λ=μ
From x: 1+2λ=4+5μ
Substitute μ: 1+2λ=4+5(3+4λ)
⇒1+2λ=4+15+20λ
⇒1+2λ=19+20λ
⇒−18=18λ⇒λ=−1
Then μ=3+4(−1)=−1
Step 3 – Verify with y
y from first: 2+3(−1)=−1
y from second: 1+2(−1)=−1 — consistent.
Thus the lines intersect at the point corresponding to λ=−1 (or μ=−1).
The lines intersect at (−1,−1,−1).
The two lines intersect because they are not parallel and a common point satisfies both equations. The point of intersection is (−1,−1,−1).
Concept and Intuition
Two lines in 3D can be parallel, skew (non-parallel and non-intersecting), or intersecting. To check for intersection, we need two conditions:
- The lines must not be parallel — their direction vectors should not be scalar multiples.
- There must exist a point that lies on both lines — we find this by equating parametric forms and solving for the parameters.
The key insight: if the lines intersect, the parameters t and s we introduce for each line will give the same coordinates when plugged in. If the system of equations has a consistent solution, the lines meet; if not, they are skew.
A common mistake is to assume lines are skew just because they look "different" in symmetric form. Always check the direction vectors first — if they are not parallel, the lines could still intersect.
Step-by-step solution
1. Write each line in parametric form.
For the first line:
2x−1=3y−2=4z−3=t
This gives:
x=1+2t,y=2+3t,z=3+4t
For the second line:
5x−4=2y−1=1z=s
This gives:
x=4+5s,y=1+2s,z=s
2. Check if the lines are parallel.
Direction vector of line 1: d1=(2,3,4)
Direction vector of line 2: d2=(5,2,1)
Are these scalar multiples? If d1=kd2, then 2=5k, 3=2k, 4=k. From 4=k we get k=4, but then 2=5(4)=20 — false. So the lines are not parallel, meaning they could intersect or be skew.
3. Equate the parametric forms to find intersection.
If the lines intersect, there exist parameters t and s such that:
1+2t=4+5s(1)
2+3t=1+2s(2)
3+4t=s(3)
4. Solve the system.
From equation (3): s=3+4t
Substitute into equation (1):
1+2t=4+5(3+4t)
1+2t=4+15+20t
1+2t=19+20t
1−19=20t−2t
−18=18t
t=−1
Now s=3+4(−1)=3−4=−1
5. Verify with the remaining equation.
Check equation (2): 2+3(−1)=2−3=−1
Right side: 1+2(−1)=1−2=−1
Both sides equal −1, so the solution is consistent.
Always verify with the unused equation — if it fails, the lines are skew. Here it works perfectly.
6. Find the point of intersection.
Using t=−1 in the first line:
x=1+2(−1)=−1
y=2+3(−1)=−1
z=3+4(−1)=−1
Using s=−1 in the second line as a check:
x=4+5(−1)=−1
y=1+2(−1)=−1
z=−1
Both give the same point (−1,−1,−1).
The lines intersect at the point (−1,−1,−1).
Method: Testing whether two lines intersect (and finding the point)
Use this to decide whether two lines meet and, if so, where.
Steps
Step 1: Parametrise each line with its OWN parameter.
Set the first line's equal ratios to λ and the second's to μ — two DIFFERENT parameters. Using one symbol for both is the classic error, because the lines reach a common point at generally different parameter values.
Step 2: Equate coordinates and solve two of the three equations.
Match x, y, z to get three equations in λ,μ. Solve any two for λ and μ.
Step 3: Verify with the third equation.
Substitute λ,μ into the unused equation. If it holds, the lines intersect — put the value back to get the point. If it fails, the lines are skew and there is no intersection.
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Using the SAME parameter for both lines.
Why it's wrong: the two lines reach a common point at generally different parameter values, so they need independent parameters λ and μ. Correct approach: set line 1 =λ, line 2 =μ, then equate coordinates.
Mistake 2: Concluding intersection from only two equations.
Why it's wrong: values of λ,μ solving the x and z equations may fail the y equation, in which case the lines are skew. Correct approach: always verify with the third equation before declaring they intersect.
Mistake 3: Misreading 5x−4=2y−1=z.
Why it's wrong: the bare z means 1z−0, so z itself equals the parameter. Correct approach: treat the z direction ratio as 1, giving z=μ.
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-04-AN1 markMCQQ.Consider the following Assertion (A): The two lines r=a+t(b) and r=b+s(a) intersect each other. Reason (R): The shortest distance between the lines r=p+t(q) and r=c+s(d) is equal to the length of projection of the vector (p−c) on (q×d) The correct answer is (A) Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A) (B) Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A) (C) (A) is true, but (R) is false (D) (A) is false, but (R) is true
›Reveal solutionSolution
Both statements are true and the reason correctly explains the assertion, so the answer is (A).
Assertion (A) — do the lines intersect?
The lines are r=a+tb and r=b+sa. For a common point set them equal:
a+tb=b+sa⇒(1−s)a=(1−t)b.
For non-parallel a,b this forces s=1 and t=1, giving the common point
a+b.
So the two lines do intersect — (A) is true.
Reason (R) — is the shortest-distance statement correct?
For r=p+tq and r=c+sd, the shortest distance is
d=∣q×d∣(p−c)⋅(q×d),
which is exactly the length of the projection of (p−c) onto q×d. (R) is true.
Does (R) explain (A)?
Applying (R) to the lines in (A) with p=a, q=b, c=b, d=a:
(a−b)⋅(b×a)=a⋅(b×a)−b⋅(b×a)=0−0=0,
so d=0. A zero shortest distance between non-parallel lines means they intersect — which is precisely what (A) asserts. Hence (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
✓Final answerBoth (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A) — option (A).
ANSWER: A
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-04-AN1 markMCQQ.The number of common tangents that can be drawn to the curves 16x2−9y2=1 and x2+y2=16 is (A) 0 (B) 1 (C) 3 (D) 2
›Reveal solutionSolution
The problem asks for the number of common tangents to a hyperbola and a circle. By analyzing the relative positions and sizes, we find that the circle lies entirely inside the hyperbola’s branches, so no common tangents exist. The answer is 0.
We have two curves:
- Hyperbola: 16x2−9y2=1 (center at origin, transverse axis along x-axis, a=4, b=3).
- Circle: x2+y2=16 (center at origin, radius R=4).
The key idea: Common tangents exist only if the curves are positioned so that a line can touch both. For a circle and a hyperbola centered at the same point, the number of common tangents depends on whether the circle lies inside, touches, or crosses the hyperbola’s asymptotes or branches.
Intuition: The hyperbola opens left and right, with asymptotes y=±43x. The circle of radius 4 is centered at the same origin. Since the hyperbola’s vertices are at (±4,0), the circle passes exactly through the vertices. But the hyperbola’s branches curve away from the center, so the circle is actually inside the hyperbola’s “bow” near the vertices, but outside near the asymptotes? Let’s check carefully.
-
Understand the shapes and boundaries
- Hyperbola: vertices at (±4,0). For any point on the hyperbola, x2/16−y2/9=1 implies x2=16+(16/9)y2≥16. So ∣x∣≥4.
- Circle: x2+y2=16 implies ∣x∣≤4 and ∣y∣≤4.
- At x=±4, the hyperbola gives y=0; the circle also gives y=0. So the circle and hyperbola intersect only at the two vertices? Let’s check: For any other point on the circle, ∣x∣<4, but hyperbola requires ∣x∣≥4. So indeed, the only intersection points are (±4,0).
-
Relative position: Is the circle inside or outside the hyperbola?
- For a fixed x with ∣x∣<4, the hyperbola has no real y (since y2=(9/16)(x2−16)<0). So the hyperbola’s branches exist only for ∣x∣≥4.
- The circle exists for all ∣x∣≤4. So for ∣x∣<4, the circle’s points are between the two branches of the hyperbola. But the hyperbola’s branches are at ∣x∣≥4, so the circle is entirely inside the region bounded by the two branches? Actually, the hyperbola’s branches are separate; the circle is a closed curve around the origin. Since the circle’s radius is 4, it touches the hyperbola at the vertices but otherwise lies inside the “gap” between the two branches? Let’s visualize: The hyperbola’s left branch is at x≤−4, right branch at x≥4. The circle is centered at origin with radius 4, so its leftmost point is (−4,0) and rightmost (4,0). So the circle is entirely contained in the vertical strip −4≤x≤4. The hyperbola’s branches are outside that strip except at the vertices. So the circle lies between the two branches, touching them only at the vertices.
-
Implication for common tangents
- A common tangent must touch both curves. Since the circle is inside the region between the hyperbola’s branches, any line that touches the circle will either cross the hyperbola’s branches or miss them entirely.
- At the vertices, the circle and hyperbola share a point, but the tangent to the circle at (4,0) is vertical line x=4. Does that also touch the hyperbola? The hyperbola’s tangent at (4,0) is also vertical (since derivative gives slope infinite). So x=4 is a common tangent? Wait: At (4,0), the circle’s tangent is vertical. The hyperbola’s tangent at its vertex is also vertical. So the line x=4 touches both curves at that same point. That is a common tangent? Actually, a common tangent is a line that touches both curves (possibly at different points). Here it touches both at the same point, so it is a common tangent. Similarly, x=−4 is another. So that gives 2 common tangents? But careful: Are these considered tangents? Yes, they are. So we have at least 2.
-
Check for other common tangents
- Could there be a line that touches the circle at one point and the hyperbola at another? For a line to be tangent to the hyperbola, its distance from the center must satisfy certain conditions. The hyperbola’s tangent lines have equations of the form y=mx±16m2−9 (for slopes where 16m2>9). For the circle x2+y2=16, a line y=mx+c is tangent if ∣c∣/1+m2=4. So we need c=±41+m2. For it to also be tangent to the hyperbola, we need c=±16m2−9. Equating: 41+m2=16m2−9 gives 16(1+m2)=16m2−9 → 16=−9, impossible. So no non-vertical common tangents.
- Vertical lines: x=±4 we already have. Are there any other vertical lines? A vertical line x=k tangent to the circle requires ∣k∣=4. For the hyperbola, vertical tangents occur only at vertices x=±4. So only those two.
-
Conclusion
- We have exactly 2 common tangents: x=4 and x=−4. But wait: The problem asks for the number of common tangents. Option (D) is 2. However, we must double-check: Are these lines actually tangent to both curves? At (4,0), the circle’s tangent is indeed vertical, and the hyperbola’s tangent is also vertical. So yes. So answer should be 2.
Watch outA common mistake is to think that because the circle lies inside the hyperbola’s branches, no tangents exist. But the vertices are points of contact, giving two vertical common tangents.
TipWhen two curves share a point and have the same tangent there, that line counts as a common tangent. Always check intersection points.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D).
ANSWER: D
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-04-FN1 markMCQQ.The number of common tangents that can be drawn to the curves 16x2−9y2=1 and x2+y2=16 is (A) 2 (B) 0 (C) 3 (D) 1
›Reveal solutionSolution
The problem asks for the number of common tangents to a hyperbola and a circle. By comparing the relative positions and sizes of the two curves, we find they intersect at two points, so they share exactly two common tangents. The correct option is (A).
We have two curves:
- Hyperbola: 16x2−9y2=1 (center at origin, transverse axis along x-axis, a=4, b=3).
- Circle: x2+y2=16 (center at origin, radius R=4).
The key idea: The number of common tangents between two curves depends on whether they intersect, touch, or are separate. For conics, common tangents are lines tangent to both. If the curves intersect, they share exactly two common tangents (the "external" ones). If one lies completely inside the other without touching, there are none. If they touch externally, there are three. If they are separate, there are four.
Let’s determine the relative position.
- Check if the curves intersect. Substitute the circle equation into the hyperbola: From x2+y2=16, we have y2=16−x2. Plug into hyperbola:
16x2−916−x2=1
Multiply by 144:
9x2−16(16−x2)=144
9x2−256+16x2=144
25x2=400⇒x2=16
So x=±4. Then y2=16−16=0, so y=0.
Thus the curves intersect at exactly two points: (4,0) and (−4,0).
-
Interpret the intersection.
The circle of radius 4 passes through the vertices of the hyperbola (since the hyperbola’s vertices are at (±4,0)). So the curves cross at those two points. They are not tangent there (the circle’s slope is vertical at those points; the hyperbola’s slope is also vertical? Let’s check quickly: For the hyperbola, implicit differentiation gives 8x−92yy′=0 → at (4,0), y′ is undefined (vertical tangent). For the circle, 2x+2yy′=0 → at (4,0), y′ is also undefined. So they actually share the same vertical tangent at each intersection? That would mean the curves are tangent at those points, not crossing. Let’s verify carefully.)
Watch outA common mistake: assuming intersection always means crossing. Here the curves actually touch at the vertices because both have vertical tangents at (±4,0). So they are tangent to each other at two points. That changes the count of common tangents.
-
Re-evaluate the tangency.
At (4,0):
- Circle: x2+y2=16 → derivative: 2x+2yy′=0 → at (4,0), 8+0=0 is impossible, so the tangent is vertical (infinite slope).
- Hyperbola: 16x2−9y2=1 → derivative: 162x−92yy′=0 → at (4,0), 168−0=0 → 21=0? That’s also impossible, so the tangent is vertical as well. So both have the same vertical line x=4 as tangent at that point. Hence the curves are tangent to each other at two points.
-
Count common tangents.
When two curves are tangent at two distinct points, the common tangents are:
- The two tangents at the points of contact (which are the same line for each curve at that point, so they count as one each? Actually, each point gives one common tangent line, so that’s two lines: x=4 and x=−4).
- Are there any other common tangents? For two conics that touch at two points, there are exactly two common tangents (the ones at the points of contact). No external tangents remain because the curves already meet.
TipA neat geometric fact: Two conics that intersect in two points (counting multiplicities) have exactly two common tangents. Here the intersection is double (tangency) at each of two points, so total intersection multiplicity is 4, but the number of common tangents is still 2.
Thus the number of common tangents is 2.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A).
ANSWER: A
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.