All energetically effective collisions do not result in a chemical change. Explain with the help of an example

NCERT Exemplar · Q41

Q. All energetically effective collisions do not result in a chemical change. Explain with the help of an example.

Telangana TsbieLong· 2mImportance★★★★★

77% · 90/117 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Arrhenius Equation

The Arrhenius Equation Plot: Why Temperature Changes Reaction Speed

You already know that heating things up makes reactions go faster. A cold chai takes forever to dissolve sugar; hot chai does it in seconds. But how much faster? And is there a pattern that holds for every reaction?

That pattern is the Arrhenius equation, and plotting it in a clever way reveals something fundamental about how molecules need to collide to react.

The core idea: an energy barrier

Imagine a ball sitting in a valley. To get to the next valley, it must first be pushed up over a hill. That hill is the activation energy ( $E_a$ ) — the minimum energy two molecules need to have when they collide, for the reaction to happen.

At a low temperature, most molecules move slowly. Only a tiny fraction have enough energy to climb that hill. Raise the temperature, and suddenly many more molecules have the required energy. The fraction of molecules with energy $\ge E_a$ is given by the Boltzmann distribution:

\text{fraction} = e^{-E_a / RT}

where $R$ is the gas constant and $T$ is the absolute temperature (in Kelvin). This exponential is the heart of the story.

The Arrhenius equation (precise statement)

The rate constant $k$ of a reaction depends on temperature as:

k = A \, e^{-E_a / RT}

$k$ = rate constant (how fast the reaction proceeds)
$A$ = pre-exponential factor (frequency of collisions, times a steric factor — how often molecules hit in the right orientation)
$E_a$ = activation energy (J/mol or kJ/mol)
$R$ = 8.314 J/(mol·K)
$T$ = temperature in Kelvin

Important

$k$ is not the reaction rate itself — it's the proportionality constant in the rate law. But for a fixed concentration, a larger $k$ means a faster reaction.

Why plot it? The linear trick

The equation $k = A e^{-E_a / RT}$ is exponential in $1/T$ . That's hard to eyeball. But take the natural logarithm of both sides:

\ln k = \ln A - \frac{E_a}{R} \cdot \frac{1}{T}

This is the equation of a straight line:

y = c + m x

where:

$y = \ln k$
$x = 1/T$
slope $m = -E_a / R$
intercept $c = \ln A$

So if you measure $k$ at several temperatures and plot $\ln k$ versus $1/T$ , you get a straight line — provided the reaction follows Arrhenius behaviour (most do, over moderate temperature ranges).

Tip

Always use Kelvin for $T$ . Celsius will give you a curved mess because $1/T$ is not linear in Celsius.

What the plot tells you

From the slope, you get $E_a$ :

E_a = - (\text{slope}) \times R

A steep negative slope means a large $E_a$ — the reaction is very sensitive to temperature. A shallow slope means a small $E_a$ — temperature doesn't affect it much.

From the intercept, you get $A$ :

A = e^{\text{intercept}}

This tells you about the collision frequency and orientation factor. A high $A$ means molecules are colliding often and in the right geometry.

A typical Arrhenius plot looks like this

$T$ (K)	$k$ (s⁻¹)	$1/T$ (K⁻¹)	$\ln k$
300	0.0012	0.00333	-6.72
310	0.0028	0.00323	-5.88
320	0.0061	0.00313	-5.10
330	0.0125	0.00303	-4.38

Plot $\ln k$ (y-axis) vs $1/T$ (x-axis). The points fall on a straight line. Draw the best-fit line, measure its slope, and compute $E_a$ . …

Why this formula?

Arrhenius Equation: Why It Holds

The Arrhenius equation is not a guess — it emerges from a deep physical picture of how molecules react. Let's build that picture step by step.

1. The Core Question

Why does reaction rate increase dramatically with temperature?

For many reactions, a 10 °C rise can double or triple the rate. This cannot be explained by simple kinetic energy arguments alone — the relationship is exponential.

2. The Key Insight: An Energy Barrier

Before molecules can react, they must collide — but not all collisions lead to products.

There is a minimum energy threshold called activation energy ( $E_a$ ). Only collisions with energy ≥  $E_a$ can break old bonds and form new ones.

Think of it like pushing a boulder over a hill:

The hilltop is the transition state (activated complex).
$E_a$ is the height of that hill from the reactant valley.

3. The Boltzmann Factor — The "Why" of Exponential Dependence

At temperature $T$ , the fraction of molecules with energy ≥  $E_a$ is given by the Boltzmann distribution:

\text{Fraction} = e^{-E_a / (RT)}

where:

$R$ = universal gas constant (8.314 J mol⁻¹ K⁻¹)
$T$ = absolute temperature (Kelvin)

Why this form?

The Boltzmann distribution tells us that the probability of a molecule having energy $E$ is proportional to $e^{-E/(k_B T)}$ .
For 1 mole of molecules, $k_B$ (Boltzmann constant) becomes $R$ via $R = N_A k_B$ .
So the fraction with energy ≥ $E_a$ is the integral of that distribution from $E_a$ to ∞, which yields $e^{-E_a/(RT)}$ .

Key takeaway: This exponential factor is not arbitrary — it comes directly from statistical mechanics.

4. The Pre-Exponential Factor ( $A$ )

Even if a collision has enough energy, it must also:

Have the correct orientation (steric factor)
Occur with sufficient collision frequency

These are bundled into the pre-exponential factor $A$ (also called the frequency factor):

A = \text{(collision frequency)} \times \text{(orientation factor)}

For simple gas-phase reactions, collision frequency can be calculated from kinetic molecular theory — it's on the order of $10^{10}$  L mol⁻¹ s⁻¹.

5. Putting It Together: The Arrhenius Equation

The rate constant $k$ is proportional to:

The number of effective collisions per second (given by $A$ )
The fraction of collisions with sufficient energy (given by $e^{-E_a/(RT)}$ )

Thus:

\boxed{k = A \, e^{-E_a / (RT)}}

This is the Arrhenius equation.

6. Why It Works — The Physical Logic

Component	Physical meaning	Why it's there
$A$	Maximum possible rate if every collision worked	Accounts for collision frequency & geometry

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The Arrhenius equation tells us that only a fraction of collisions have enough energy ( $E_a$ ), but even those must also have the correct orientation to break old bonds and form new ones. For example, in the reaction $\ce{NO2 + CO -> NO + CO2}$ , a collision where the carbon of CO hits the nitrogen of NO₂ is ineffective — the oxygen must be transferred from NO₂ to CO, so only a head-on collision with the right geometry works.

The idea that every collision between reactant molecules leads to a product is a common oversimplification. In reality, two conditions must be satisfied for a collision to be effective (i.e., to result in a chemical change):

The colliding molecules must possess sufficient kinetic energy to overcome the activation energy barrier ( $E_a$ ).
The molecules must be oriented properly relative to each other so that the necessary bonds can break and form.

The Arrhenius equation captures the energy requirement:

k = A e^{-E_a / RT}

Here, $A$ (the pre-exponential factor) includes the frequency of collisions and the steric (orientation) factor. Even if $E_a$ is met, a poor orientation means no reaction — the molecules simply bounce apart.

Step-by-step explanation with an example

1. Choose a reaction where orientation matters

Consider the gas-phase reaction between nitrogen dioxide and carbon monoxide:

\ce{NO2(g) + CO(g) -> NO(g) + CO2(g)}

This is a simple bimolecular reaction where an oxygen atom is transferred from NO₂ to CO.

2. What must happen at the molecular level?

For the reaction to occur, the oxygen atom bonded to nitrogen in NO₂ must come into contact with the carbon atom in CO. The collision must be head-on — the carbon end of CO must strike the oxygen end of NO₂.

3. An ineffective collision — despite enough energy …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Here are the common mistakes students make when answering this question, along with how to avoid each.

Mistake 1: Confusing "Energetically Effective" with "Sufficient Energy"

The Mistake: Students often think "energetically effective" simply means the colliding molecules have kinetic energy greater than or equal to the activation energy ( $E_a$ ). They then state that all such collisions should lead to a reaction.
Why it's Wrong: The definition of an effective collision in collision theory is stricter. It requires two conditions:
1. Sufficient kinetic energy (≥ $E_a$ ).
2. Proper orientation of the molecules at the moment of impact. The phrase "energetically effective" only satisfies condition 1. The question explicitly asks why condition 1 alone is not enough.
How to Avoid: Always write the two conditions for an effective collision in your notes. When you see "energetically effective," immediately think: "This only covers the energy part. What about the orientation part?"

Mistake 2: Giving a Vague or Incorrect Example

The Mistake: Providing an example like "sodium and chlorine react" or "burning paper." These are either too simple (ionic reactions where orientation is less critical) or too complex (involving multiple steps).
Why it's Wrong: The best examples clearly show that a molecule can hit with enough energy but from the wrong side, so no bond forms. A bad example doesn't illustrate the orientation failure.
How to Avoid: Memorize the classic textbook example:
- Reaction: $2HI \rightarrow H_2 + I_2$
- Explanation: For the reaction to occur, the two HI molecules must collide such that the H-atom of one molecule hits the I-atom of the other molecule. If the two H-atoms (or two I-atoms) collide with high energy, no reaction occurs—they simply bounce off. The energy is sufficient, but the orientation is wrong.

Mistake 3: Forgetting to Mention the "Transition State"

The Mistake: The answer only says "they don't have the right orientation" without explaining why orientation matters at the molecular level.
Why it's Wrong: The examiner wants to see that you understand the concept of the activated complex (transition state). The correct orientation is necessary to form this unstable, high-energy intermediate. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Same / Similar Concept — real previous-year questions on the same or a closely similar concept, not this exact question.

TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-11-FN1 markMCQ
$Q. At what temperature will the RMS velocity of sulphur dioxide molecules at 400 K be the same as the most probable velocity of oxygen molecules? (A) 600 K (B) 200 K (C) 400 K (D) 300 K$
›Reveal solutionSolution

Equating $v_{rms}(\text{SO}_2, 400\,\text{K})$ with $v_{mp}(\text{O}_2, T)$ gives $T = 300$ K.

$v_{rms} = \sqrt{\frac{3RT_1}{M_1}}, \qquad v_{mp} = \sqrt{\frac{2RT_2}{M_2}}.$
With $M(\text{SO}_2) = 64$ , $T_1 = 400$ K, and $M(\text{O}_2) = 32$ , set the two speeds equal:

$\frac{3RT_1}{M_1} = \frac{2RT_2}{M_2}$ …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
TG EAPCET 2021Set ap-2021-08-10-AN1 markMCQ
$^\circ$
›Reveal solutionSolution
The temperature coefficient (Q₁₀ = 2) tells us the rate constant halves for every 10 °C drop. From 25 °C to 15 °C is a 10 °C decrease, so the rate constant at 15 °C is half of $1 \times 10^{-3}$ min⁻¹, i.e., $5 \times 10^{-4}$ min⁻¹.

Concept & Intuition

The temperature coefficient (often denoted $Q_{10}$ ) is defined as the factor by which the rate constant increases when the temperature is raised by 10 °C.

Here $Q_{10} = 2$ means:

Increase temperature by 10 °C → rate constant doubles.

Decrease temperature by 10 °C → rate constant halves.

We are moving down from 25 °C to 15 °C, a drop of exactly 10 °C. So the rate constant at the lower temperature is simply $k_{15} = k_{25} / 2$ .

Step-by-step reasoning

Identify the given data

$k_{25} = 1 \times 10^{-3}$ min⁻¹

Temperature coefficient $Q_{10} = 2$

Temperature change: from 25 °C to 15 °C = −10 °C

Apply the definition of temperature coefficient

The relationship is:

$\frac{k_{T+10}}{k_T} = Q_{10}$
So for a 10 °C decrease:
$\frac{k_{15}}{k_{25}} = \frac{1}{Q_{10}} = \frac{1}{2}$

Calculate the unknown rate constant $k_{15} = k_{25} \times \frac{1}{2} = (1 \times 10^{-3}) \times \frac{1}{2} = 0.5 \times 10^{-3} = 5 \times 10^{-4} \text{ min}^{-1}$ …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
TG EAPCET 2021Set ap-2021-08-10-FN1 markMCQ
$25^\circ \mathrm{C}$
›Reveal solutionSolution
The temperature coefficient (Q₁₀ = 2) tells us the rate constant halves for every 10°C drop. Going from 25°C to 15°C is a 10°C decrease, so the rate constant at 15°C is half of the given value: $5 \times 10^{-4}~\mathrm{min}^{-1}$ .

Concept & Intuition

The temperature coefficient (often denoted $Q_{10}$ ) is the factor by which the rate constant changes when the temperature is raised by 10°C. Here $Q_{10} = 2$ means that for every 10°C increase, the rate constant doubles; conversely, for every 10°C decrease, it halves. Since we are moving from 25°C down to 15°C (a drop of exactly 10°C), we simply divide the given rate constant by 2.

Step-by-step reasoning

Identify the temperature change

The given rate constant $k_{25} = 1 \times 10^{-3}~\mathrm{min}^{-1}$ is at $25^\circ\mathrm{C}$ . We need $k_{15}$ at $15^\circ\mathrm{C}$ .

The difference: $25^\circ\mathrm{C} - 15^\circ\mathrm{C} = 10^\circ\mathrm{C}$ .

Apply the definition of the temperature coefficient

The temperature coefficient $Q_{10}$ is defined as

$Q_{10} = \frac{k_{T+10}}{k_T}$
Here $Q_{10} = 2$ , so for a 10°C increase the rate constant multiplies by 2. For a 10°C decrease, we use the reciprocal:
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
TG EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-05-AN1 markMCQ
$Q. When salt is added to water, which of the following statement is true? (A) Boiling point decreases (B) Boiling point increases (C) Boiling point remain constant (D) Freezing point increases$
›Reveal solutionSolution
Adding salt to water raises its boiling point and lowers its freezing point — a colligative effect. The correct statement is that the boiling point increases.

The question tests your understanding of colligative properties — properties that depend only on the number of solute particles, not their chemical identity. When salt (sodium chloride, NaCl) dissolves in water, it dissociates into Na⁺ and Cl⁻ ions, increasing the total number of particles in the solution. This changes two key physical properties of water: its boiling point and its freezing point.

Why does this happen? At the boiling point, the vapour pressure of the liquid equals the atmospheric pressure. Adding a non-volatile solute like salt lowers the vapour pressure of the solvent (water). To make the vapour pressure reach atmospheric pressure again, you need to supply more heat — hence the boiling point rises. For freezing, the solute particles disrupt the orderly arrangement of water molecules into ice, so a lower temperature is needed to freeze the solution — hence the freezing point drops.

Let’s examine each option step by step.

Boiling point behaviour

The boiling point elevation is given by $\Delta T_b = i \cdot K_b \cdot m$ , where $i$ is the van’t Hoff factor (for NaCl, $i \approx 2$ ), $K_b$ is the ebullioscopic constant of water, and $m$ is the molality. Since $\Delta T_b > 0$ , the boiling point increases. This eliminates option (A) and (C).

Freezing point behaviour …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →

←Previous questionQ40 — Why can we not determine the order of a reaction by taking into consid…→Next questionQ42 — What happens to most probable kinetic energy and the energy of activat…

Q.All energetically effective collisions do not result in a chemical change. Explain with the help of an example.

Concept understanding — Arrhenius Equation

The Arrhenius Equation Plot: Why Temperature Changes Reaction Speed

The core idea: an energy barrier

The Arrhenius equation (precise statement)

Why plot it? The linear trick

What the plot tells you

A typical Arrhenius plot looks like this

Why this formula?

Arrhenius Equation: Why It Holds

1. The Core Question

2. The Key Insight: An Energy Barrier

3. The Boltzmann Factor — The "Why" of Exponential Dependence

4. The Pre-Exponential Factor ( $A$ )

5. Putting It Together: The Arrhenius Equation

6. Why It Works — The Physical Logic

Step-by-step explanation with an example

Concept: The Activation Energy Barrier & Effective Collision Theory

Method: The "Orientation & Energy" Filter Method

Example: Reaction between $\mathbf{NO}$ and $\mathbf{O_3}$

Mistake 1: Confusing "Energetically Effective" with "Sufficient Energy"

Mistake 2: Giving a Vague or Incorrect Example

Mistake 3: Forgetting to Mention the "Transition State"

Q.All energetically effective collisions do not result in a chemical change. Explain with the help of an example.

Step-by-step explanation with an example

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Unlock everything free for 14 days