Q.Explain the bonding in coordination compounds in terms of Werner's postulates.
Concept understanding — Werner Coordination Theory
Werner Coordination Theory: The Idea That Changed Inorganic Chemistry
Imagine you're looking at a salt like cobalt(III) chloride. The formula is written as CoClX3, and when you dissolve it in water, you expect to find CoX3+ and ClX− ions. But something strange happens: when you add silver nitrate (which precipitates chloride ions), only some of the chlorine comes out as silver chloride. Not all of it. And the amount that precipitates depends on how you made the compound.
This was the puzzle that faced chemists in the late 1800s. Compounds like CoClX3⋅6NHX3 (orange-yellow) and CoClX3⋅5NHX3 (purple) had the same metal and the same ligands (ammonia), but different colours, different conductivities in solution, and different numbers of chloride ions that could be precipitated. The old ideas of fixed valency couldn't explain it.
Alfred Werner proposed a radical solution in 1893. He said: a metal ion has two kinds of valency.
The Core Intuition
Think of a metal ion like a king in a castle. The king has two types of relationships:
-
Primary valency (today: oxidation state) — this is the king's royal authority. It's fixed, non-directional, and satisfied by negative ions. For cobalt(III), this is +3. It's like the king's crown: it doesn't change.
-
Secondary valency (today: coordination number) — this is the king's personal bodyguard. The king can have a fixed number of guards (usually 4 or 6) who stand in specific positions around him. These guards can be neutral molecules (like ammonia) or negative ions (like chloride). The key: these guards are directly attached to the metal, forming a stable cluster called the coordination sphere.
The revolutionary idea: the chloride ions that act as bodyguards (inside the coordination sphere) do not behave like free ions. They don't precipitate with silver nitrate. They don't conduct electricity. They are "locked" to the metal.
The Precise Statement
Werner Coordination Theory (1893)
-
Every metal atom has two types of valency:
- Primary valency (ionisable): corresponds to the oxidation state. It is satisfied by negative ions. These ions are outside the coordination sphere and behave as free ions in solution.
- Secondary valency (non-ionisable): corresponds to the coordination number. It is satisfied by neutral molecules or negative ions directly bonded to the metal. These are inside the coordination sphere and do not dissociate.
-
The secondary valencies are directional — they point to fixed positions in space around the metal, giving the complex a definite geometry (e.g., octahedral for coordination number 6, square planar for 4).
-
The primary valency is non-directional — it is just a number, not a spatial arrangement.
How It Explains the Puzzle
Take the compound CoClX3⋅6NHX3 (orange-yellow). Werner said:
- Cobalt has primary valency +3 (needs three negative charges to satisfy it).
- Cobalt has secondary valency 6 (can hold six ligands around it).
- The six ammonia molecules satisfy all six secondary valencies. So the chloride ions cannot be inside the coordination sphere — they must be outside, as free ions.
- Structure: [Co(NHX3)X6]ClX3. All three chlorides precipitate with AgNOX3.
Now take CoClX3⋅5NHX3 (purple):
- Again, primary valency +3, secondary valency 6.
- Five ammonia molecules satisfy five secondary valencies. One chloride ion must fill the sixth spot — it becomes a ligand inside the sphere.
- The other two chlorides are outside as free ions.
- Structure: [Co(NHX3)X5Cl]ClX2. Only two chlorides precipitate.
The number of free ions in solution determines the conductivity and the number of precipitable chlorides. Werner's theory predicted exactly these numbers — and experiments confirmed them.
The Geometry Insight
Werner didn't just count ligands — he placed them in space. For coordination number 6, he proposed an octahedral arrangement (ligands at the six corners of an octahedron). This explained why [Co(NHX3)X4ClX2]+ exists as two different compounds (isomers): one where the two chlorides are next to each other (cis) and one where they are opposite (trans). No other geometry could produce exactly two isomers.
Werner's theory was the first to show that complexes have definite three-dimensional structures. This was decades before X-ray crystallography could confirm it directly.
What It Replaced
Before Werner, chemists thought bonding was simple: each atom had a fixed valency (like carbon always forms four bonds). They tried to write chain structures for coordination compounds (like organic molecules), but it failed — you couldn't explain why CoClX3⋅6NHX3 and CoClX3⋅5NHX3 were different compounds with the same metal and ligands.
Werner's key break: the metal can bond to more species than its oxidation state would suggest, and those bonds are not all the same type.
The Legacy
Werner won the Nobel Prize in 1913. His theory:
- Introduced the concept of coordination number and coordination sphere.
- Explained isomerism in complexes (geometric, optical).
- Laid the foundation for modern coordination chemistry, crystal field theory, and ligand field theory.
- Showed that inorganic compounds could have complex, predictable geometries — not just simple salts.
When you see a formula like [Co(NHX3)X6]ClX3, read the square brackets as "the castle walls". Everything inside is tightly bound to the metal; everything outside is free. That's Werner's idea in a nutshell.
Werner's coordination theory is the historical and conceptual foundation of the NCERT/CBSE Class 12 Chemistry chapter on Coordination Compounds, and ‘Werner's theory of coordination compounds’ is one of the most frequently asked important questions in board exams, JEE Main and NEET. Understanding primary and secondary valency as Werner defined them is essential groundwork for every other topic in this chapter.
Why this formula?
Werner Coordination Theory: Why the Key Formulas Hold
Werner Coordination Theory (1893) revolutionized inorganic chemistry by explaining how metal ions bind ligands. Let's build the reasoning from first principles — not just memorize formulas.
1. The Core Observation: Primary vs. Secondary Valence
Werner noticed that metal compounds had two types of bonding capacity:
- Primary valence (now oxidation state): Satisfies the metal's charge — ionic in nature.
- Secondary valence (now coordination number): Determines how many ligands attach — directional, spatial in nature.
Why this distinction?
Consider CoClX3 ⋅6NHX3 (one of Werner's classic compounds).
- The compound is electrically neutral overall.
- Adding AgNOX3 precipitates all 3 Cl⁻ as AgCl — meaning all chlorides are free ions.
- Therefore, the NHX3 molecules must be directly bonded to Co, not the chlorides.
This forces the idea: Co has a fixed capacity for direct ligand attachment (secondary valence = 6 here), separate from its charge balance (primary valence = +3).
2. The Key Formula: Coordination Number = Number of Ligands Attached
Formula:
Coordination number=number of donor atoms directly bonded to the metal
Why this holds:
- Werner's experiments showed that only a fixed number of ligands could be replaced without breaking the compound's identity.
- For CoClX3 ⋅6NHX3, adding acid doesn't remove NHX3 easily — they are coordinated.
- The maximum number of such tightly bound ligands is the coordination number — a property of the metal ion, not the counterions.
Derivation from data:
If you have [Co(NHX3)X6]ClX3, conductivity measurements show 4 ions in solution ([Co(NHX3)X6]X3+ + 3 Cl⁻).
If you had [Co(NHX3)X5Cl]ClX2, conductivity shows 3 ions.
The number of chlorides inside the coordination sphere (non-precipitable) plus those outside must sum to the total chlorides. This gives the coordination number directly.
3. The Geometry Formula: Coordination Number Determines Shape
Werner proposed that secondary valences are directed in space — leading to specific geometries.
| Coordination Number | Geometry | Why? |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Linear | Minimizes repulsion between 2 ligands |
| 4 | Tetrahedral or Square planar | 4 points in space — two arrangements possible |
| 6 | Octahedral | 6 ligands at 90° angles — most symmetric |
Why octahedral for 6?
- 6 ligands around a central atom must be placed to maximize separation.
- The octahedron (6 vertices, all equidistant from center, 90° between adjacent bonds) is the only regular polyhedron with 6 vertices.
- This explains why [Co(NHX3)X6]X3+ is octahedral — no other arrangement gives equal bond angles and distances.
4. The Isomer Counting Formula: Why 2n or n! Appears
Werner used isomer counts to confirm geometry. For an octahedral complex [MaX2bX2cX2]:
Number of geometrical isomers = 5 (not 6, not 4)
Why this formula?
- Place the two 'a' ligands: they can be cis (90°) or trans (180°).
- For each, place 'b' and 'c' in remaining positions — but symmetry reduces duplicates.
- The count comes from combinatorial reasoning on a fixed octahedral framework, not arbitrary permutation.
General principle:
Number of isomers=symmetry factortotal arrangements
This is not a simple n! — it depends on the point group symmetry of the complex.
5. The Valence Sum Rule: Primary + Secondary = Constant?
Not a fixed sum!
Werner's theory does not say primary + secondary valence = constant.
Example:
- CoX3+ has primary valence = 3, secondary = 6 → sum = 9
- PtX4+ has primary = 4, secondary = 6 → sum = 10
Why no fixed sum?
- Primary valence depends on the metal's oxidation state (variable).
- Secondary valence depends on the metal's size and electronic configuration (also variable).
- They are independent properties — the only link is that both must be satisfied for a stable complex.
Summary: The Core Insight
Werner's formulas hold because:
- Coordination number is an experimentally determined maximum — not a theoretical guess.
- Geometry follows from minimizing ligand-ligand repulsion on a sphere.
- Isomer counts follow from symmetry constraints on a fixed polyhedron.
- Primary and secondary valences are independent — no single formula links them.
The real power of Werner's theory: it turned coordination chemistry from a list of random compounds into a predictive, spatial science — long before X-ray crystallography confirmed the geometries.
Werner’s Coordination Theory was the first successful model to explain bonding in coordination compounds. It proposed that metal ions have two types of valency: primary valency (ionisable, corresponding to oxidation state) and secondary valency (non-ionisable, corresponding to coordination number). The secondary valencies are directed in space around the metal, giving a fixed geometry.
Reasoning steps:
- Primary valency is satisfied by negative ions (e.g., Cl⁻ in [Co(NHX3)X6]ClX3), and these ions are ionisable — they precipitate with Ag⁺.
- Secondary valency is satisfied by neutral molecules or anions (e.g., NH₃ in the same complex), and these are non-ionisable — they remain bound to the metal even in solution.
- The number of secondary valencies (coordination number) is fixed for a given metal, and they are arranged in a definite stereochemistry (e.g., octahedral for Co³⁺, square planar for Pt²⁺).
Werner’s postulates explain bonding by distinguishing primary (ionisable, corresponding to oxidation state) and secondary (non-ionisable, satisfied by ligands) valencies, with the secondary valencies directed in space to give a fixed geometry and stoichiometry.
Werner’s coordination theory explains bonding in coordination compounds by proposing that metal ions have two types of valencies — primary (ionisable) and secondary (non-ionisable) — and that ligands occupy fixed positions in space around the metal, giving a definite geometry.
Werner’s theory was revolutionary because it moved beyond simple ionic or covalent bonding ideas. Before Werner, chemists struggled to explain why compounds like CoClX3⋅6NHX3 (which we now call [Co(NHX3)X6]ClX3) did not behave like a simple mixture of CoClX3 and NHX3. Werner proposed that the metal ion has two distinct kinds of bonding capacity.
Primary valency corresponds to the oxidation state of the metal — it is satisfied by negative ions and is non-directional. Secondary valency corresponds to the coordination number — it is satisfied by neutral molecules or negative ions (ligands) and is directional, pointing to fixed positions in space around the metal. The secondary valencies give the compound its geometry.
Let’s see how this applies step by step.
-
Identify the central metal and its primary valency.
In [Co(NHX3)X6]ClX3, the central atom is cobalt. The primary valency of Co is 3 (since three ClX− ions are needed to neutralise the charge). This is the oxidation state of Co: +3.
-
Determine the secondary valency (coordination number).
Six NHX3 molecules are directly attached to Co — these satisfy the secondary valency. So the coordination number is 6. Werner said secondary valencies are always satisfied by ligands, and they are fixed in number for a given metal ion.
-
Assign the geometry based on secondary valencies.
For coordination number 6, Werner correctly predicted an octahedral arrangement. The six ligands occupy the six corners of an octahedron around the metal. This explained why [Co(NHX3)X6]ClX3 does not show isomerism due to different ligand positions — all six positions are equivalent.
-
Distinguish between ionisable and non-ionisable groups.
The three ClX− ions satisfy the primary valency and are ionisable — they precipitate as AgCl when treated with AgNOX3. The six NHX3 molecules satisfy secondary valencies and are non-ionisable — they do not precipitate. This matched experimental conductivity and precipitation data perfectly.
-
Explain the bonding in other compounds using the same logic.
For example, [Co(NHX3)X5Cl]ClX2:
- Primary valency of Co = 3 (two ClX− ions outside + one ClX− inside).
- Secondary valency = 6 (five NHX3 + one Cl).
- Only two ClX− are ionisable (precipitate with AgNOX3), confirming the third Cl is bonded directly to Co via secondary valency.
A common mistake is to think that primary valency equals the number of ligands. It does not — primary valency is the oxidation state, while secondary valency is the coordination number. They are independent.
Werner’s theory is essentially the first successful model of coordination compounds. It correctly predicted the existence of isomers (like geometrical isomers in [Co(NHX3)X4ClX2]X+) long before X-ray crystallography confirmed them.
Werner’s postulates state that metal ions possess primary (ionisable, non-directional) and secondary (non-ionisable, directional) valencies, and that secondary valencies determine the geometry — for example, in [Co(NHX3)X6]ClX3, Co has primary valency 3 and secondary valency 6, giving an octahedral structure.
Werner Coordination Theory — Bonding Explanation
Method: Werner's Postulate Approach
This method explains bonding in coordination compounds using the primary valency and secondary valency concepts proposed by Alfred Werner in 1893.
Step 1 — Identify the Central Metal Atom
- The metal atom (usually a transition metal) acts as the central atom.
- Example: In [Co(NHX3)X6]ClX3, the central atom is cobalt (Co).
Step 2 — Assign Primary Valency (Ionisable Valency)
- Primary valency corresponds to the oxidation state of the metal.
- It is satisfied by negative ions (anions) and is non-directional.
- It is written outside the coordination sphere (square brackets).
Example:
In [Co(NHX3)X6]ClX3, Co has primary valency = +3 (since three ClX− ions are outside).
Step 3 — Assign Secondary Valency (Coordination Number)
- Secondary valency corresponds to the coordination number of the metal.
- It is satisfied by neutral molecules or negative ions (ligands) inside the coordination sphere.
- It is directional and determines the geometry of the complex.
Example:
In [Co(NHX3)X6]ClX3, Co has secondary valency = 6 (six NHX3 ligands).
Step 4 — Determine Geometry from Secondary Valency
- Secondary valency fixes the spatial arrangement of ligands around the metal.
| Coordination Number | Geometry |
|---|---|
| 2 | Linear |
| 4 | Tetrahedral or Square planar |
| 6 | Octahedral |
Example:
[Co(NHX3)X6]X3+ has octahedral geometry (secondary valency = 6).
Step 5 — Distinguish Between Ionisable and Non-Ionisable Groups
- Primary valency groups are outside the bracket — they are ionisable (precipitate with suitable reagents).
- Secondary valency groups are inside the bracket — they are non-ionisable (do not precipitate).
Example:
[Co(NHX3)X6]ClX3 gives 3 moles of AgCl with AgNOX3 (all three ClX− are ionisable).
[Co(NHX3)X5Cl]ClX2 gives only 2 moles of AgCl (one ClX− is inside the sphere, non-ionisable).
Step 6 — Summarise Bonding in Terms of Postulates
| Werner's Postulate | Explanation |
|---|---|
| 1. Every metal has two types of valencies | Primary (oxidation state) and secondary (coordination number) |
| 2. Secondary valencies are directional | They determine geometry (e.g., octahedral, tetrahedral) |
| 3. Primary valencies are satisfied by anions | They are ionisable and written outside the coordination sphere |
| 4. Secondary valencies are satisfied by ligands | They are non-ionisable and written inside the coordination sphere |
Final Key Takeaway
Werner's theory explains bonding by separating the metal's oxidation state (primary valency) from its coordination number (secondary valency), with the latter dictating the complex's shape and the former determining its charge and ionisable groups.
This method is concept-first: understand why the complex has a certain formula and geometry, then apply to any given coordination compound.
Common Mistakes in Werner's Coordination Theory (and How to Avoid Them)
Werner's theory is the foundation of coordination chemistry, but students often slip on a few key points. Here are the most frequent errors and how to fix them.
Mistake 1: Confusing Primary Valency with Secondary Valency
The error: Students think primary valency is the total charge on the complex, or that secondary valency is the oxidation state.
The truth:
- Primary valency = oxidation state of the central metal ion (ionizable, satisfied by anions)
- Secondary valency = coordination number (non-ionizable, satisfied by ligands, directional)
How to avoid: Memorise the distinction with a simple example:
- In [Co(NHX3)X6]ClX3, primary valency of Co = +3 (satisfied by 3 Cl⁻ ions), secondary valency = 6 (satisfied by 6 NH₃ molecules).
Mistake 2: Forgetting That Secondary Valency Is Fixed and Directional
The error: Students treat secondary valency as variable or non-geometric.
The truth: Werner proposed that secondary valencies are fixed in number for a given metal and point to fixed positions in space — this is the origin of stereochemistry (octahedral, square planar, tetrahedral).
How to avoid: Always draw the geometry when explaining. For example, [Co(NHX3)X6]X3+ is octahedral — all six positions are equivalent.
Mistake 3: Mixing Up Ionizable vs. Non-ionizable Groups
The error: Students think all anions satisfy primary valency, or that all neutral molecules satisfy secondary valency.
The truth:
- Primary valency is satisfied by anions (Cl⁻, SO₄²⁻, etc.) — these are ionizable and precipitate with Ag⁺, Ba²⁺, etc.
- Secondary valency can be satisfied by neutral molecules (NH₃, H₂O) or anions (Cl⁻, CN⁻) — these are non-ionizable and do not precipitate.
Example: In [Co(NHX3)X5Cl]ClX2:
- One Cl⁻ satisfies secondary valency (inside coordination sphere) — does not precipitate with Ag⁺
- Two Cl⁻ satisfy primary valency (outside sphere) — precipitate with Ag⁺
How to avoid: Practise writing the complex formula with square brackets — everything inside is secondary valency, everything outside is primary.
Mistake 4: Thinking Werner Explained All Bonding (Covalent/Electrostatic)
The error: Students believe Werner's theory describes the nature of the metal-ligand bond.
The truth: Werner's theory is purely structural — it explains how many and where ligands attach, but not why (that came later with VBT, CFT, MOT).
How to avoid: State clearly: "Werner's postulates describe the number and spatial arrangement of ligands, not the electronic structure of the bond."
Mistake 5: Ignoring the Existence of Isomers
The error: Students fail to connect secondary valency directionality to isomerism.
The truth: Because secondary valencies have fixed positions, complexes can show geometrical isomerism (e.g., cis/trans in [Co(NHX3)X4ClX2]X+) and optical isomerism.
How to avoid: When explaining Werner's postulates, always mention that the fixed spatial arrangement predicts isomerism — this was a major triumph of his theory.
Mistake 6: Using the Wrong Terminology in Exams
The error: Students write "primary valency = ionic bond" or "secondary valency = covalent bond."
The truth: Werner did not use the terms ionic/covalent. He said:
- Primary valency = ionizable (satisfied by anions)
- Secondary valency = non-ionizable (satisfied by ligands, directional)
How to avoid: Use Werner's own language: "ionizable" and "non-ionizable" or "satisfied by anions" and "satisfied by ligands."
Quick Revision Checklist
| Concept | Common Mistake | Correct Understanding |
|---|---|---|
| Primary valency | = charge on complex | = oxidation state of metal |
| Secondary valency | = variable | = fixed coordination number |
| Ionizable groups | All anions are ionizable | Only those outside coordination sphere |
| Bond nature | Werner explained covalent bonds | Werner explained structure, not bond type |
| Isomerism | Not linked to theory | Direct consequence of fixed geometry |
Final tip: When answering an exam question on Werner's postulates, always:
- State the two types of valency clearly.
- Give a concrete example with a formula.
- Mention that secondary valencies have fixed spatial positions (explaining isomerism).
- Prefer Werner's own terms — "ionisable"/"non-ionisable" — rather than flatly labelling the valencies as "ionic bonds" or "covalent bonds"; equating a valency with a bond type is the classic slip.
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 on this concept.
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-09-FN1 markMCQQ.Which of the following will give maximum number of isomers? (A) [Co(NH3)4Cl2]+ (B) [Ni(en)(NH3)4]2+ (C) [Ni(C2O4)(en)2] (D) [Cr(SCN)2(NH3)4]+
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key is to count all possible stereoisomers (geometrical and optical) plus linkage isomers for each complex. The complex with the most isomers is [Cr(SCN)2(NH3)4]+, which gives 6 isomers (three S/N binding combinations, each with cis and trans forms), so the answer is (D).
Concept & Intuition
Isomers in coordination chemistry arise from different spatial arrangements of ligands (geometrical isomers) and, for chiral complexes, non-superimposable mirror images (optical isomers). Additionally, ambidentate ligands like SCN⁻ can bind through different atoms (S or N), creating linkage isomers. To find which complex gives the maximum number, we systematically count all distinct isomers for each option.
-
Option (A): [Co(NH3)4Cl2]+
- This is an octahedral complex with two identical monodentate ligands (Cl) and four identical NH₃ ligands.
- Geometrical isomers: Only cis and trans arrangements of the two Cl ligands.
- Optical isomers: Neither cis nor trans is chiral (cis has a plane of symmetry, trans has a center of symmetry).
- Total isomers = 2.
-
Option (B): [Ni(en)(NH3)4]2+
- en (ethylenediamine) is a bidentate ligand. The complex is octahedral with one en and four NH₃.
- The en ligand must occupy two adjacent positions (cis), so there is no trans isomer.
- The complex is not chiral (it has a plane of symmetry through the en ring and opposite NH₃).
- Total isomers = 1.
-
Option (C): [Ni(C2O4)(en)2]
- Oxalate (C₂O₄²⁻) is a bidentate ligand, and en is also bidentate. The complex is octahedral with three bidentate ligands.
- Geometrical isomers: For three bidentate ligands, only the cis arrangement is possible (all three bidentates must occupy adjacent positions).
- Optical isomers: The cis arrangement is chiral (no plane of symmetry), so it exists as a pair of enantiomers.
- Total isomers = 2 (a pair of optical isomers).
-
Option (D): [Cr(SCN)2(NH3)4]+
- SCN⁻ is ambidentate: it can bind through sulfur (thiocyanato) or nitrogen (isothiocyanato).
- This combines linkage isomerism with cis/trans geometrical isomerism. Counting systematically:
- Both S-bound: cis and trans → 2 isomers.
- Both N-bound: cis and trans → 2 isomers.
- One S-bound, one N-bound: the two ligands are now different, so cis and trans are again distinct → 2 isomers.
- None of these arrangements is chiral: each cis form has a plane of symmetry passing through the two SCN ligands (or the S- and N-bound ligands) and the two opposite NH₃ groups, so there are no additional optical isomers.
- Total isomers = 2 + 2 + 2 = 6, the maximum among all four options.
Watch outA common mistake is to forget linkage isomerism for ambidentate ligands like SCN⁻. Also, students often assume all cis isomers are chiral — always check for symmetry planes.
TipFor octahedral complexes with two identical monodentate ligands and four others, the number of geometrical isomers is always 2 (cis/trans). Adding an ambidentate ligand multiplies this by the number of distinct binding combinations.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D).
ANSWER: D
-
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-10-AN1 markMCQQ.S2O32−(aq)+OH−(aq)→SO42−(aq)+H2O(l)+e− After the above half reaction is balanced, which of the following are the coefficients of OH− and SO42− respectively? (A) 8, 3 (B) 6, 2 (C) 10, 2 (D) 5, 2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Balancing the half‑reaction in basic solution gives coefficients 10 for OH⁻ and 2 for SO₄²⁻, so the correct choice is (C).
We are balancing a half‑reaction in basic solution. The key idea: first balance atoms other than H and O, then balance O by adding H₂O, balance H by adding H⁺ (as if in acid), and finally neutralize H⁺ by adding the same number of OH⁻ to both sides. This method works because every H⁺ added in the acidic step is converted to H₂O when we add OH⁻.
- Identify the atoms to balance The skeleton is:
S2O32−+OH−→SO42−+H2O+e−
Sulfur (S) is unbalanced: left has 2 S, right has 1 S. So put a coefficient 2 in front of SO₄²⁻:
S2O32−+OH−→2SO42−+H2O+e−
-
Balance oxygen atoms
Left: 3 O (from S₂O₃²⁻) + 1 O (from OH⁻) = 4 O total (coefficient of OH⁻ unknown yet).
Right: 2 × 4 = 8 O (from 2 SO₄²⁻) + 1 O (from H₂O) = 9 O.
To balance O, we need more O on the left. Add H₂O? No — we add H₂O to the side that needs oxygen. Actually, we balance O by adding H₂O to the side that is short of oxygen.
Left has 4 O, right has 9 O → left needs 5 more O. So add 5 H₂O to the left? That would add 5 O but also 10 H — messy. Better to use the standard acidic-then-basic method.
-
Use the acidic method first
Ignore OH⁻ for a moment. Write the half‑reaction as if in acid:
S2O32−→2SO42−
Balance O: left 3 O, right 8 O → add 5 H₂O to left:
S2O32−+5H2O→2SO42−
Balance H: left now has 10 H, right has 0 → add 10 H⁺ to right:
S2O32−+5H2O→2SO42−+10H+
Balance charge: left –2, right 2×(−2) + 10 = +6. Difference = 8 electrons needed on right:
S2O32−+5H2O→2SO42−+10H++8e−
- Convert to basic solution Add 10 OH⁻ to both sides to neutralize the 10 H⁺:
S2O32−+5H2O+10OH−→2SO42−+10H2O+8e−
Cancel 5 H₂O from both sides (5 on left, 10 on right → net 5 H₂O on right):
S2O32−+10OH−→2SO42−+5H2O+8e−
- Check the given equation The problem’s skeleton had one OH⁻ on left and one H₂O on right, but after balancing we have 10 OH⁻ and 2 SO₄²⁻. The coefficients asked are for OH⁻ and SO₄²⁻ respectively: 10 and 2.
TipA common mistake is to forget that the H⁺ from the acidic step must be exactly neutralized by OH⁻, which often changes the number of water molecules. Always cancel water after adding OH⁻.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C).
ANSWER: C
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-10-AN1 markMCQQ.Which of the following aqueous solution has highest freezing point? (A) 0.1m Al2(SO4)3 (B) 0.1m BaCl2 (C) 0.1m NH4Cl (D) 0.1m AlCl3
›Reveal solutionSolution
The freezing point is highest for the solution with the smallest total particle concentration after dissociation. Since all are 0.1 m, the one that dissociates into the fewest ions gives the highest freezing point. That is 0.1 m NH₄Cl, which yields 0.2 m particles.
Concept & Intuition
Freezing point depression is a colligative property — it depends only on the number of solute particles in solution, not on their identity. The formula is
ΔTf=i⋅Kf⋅m
where i is the van’t Hoff factor (number of particles per formula unit after dissociation), Kf is the cryoscopic constant (same for water here), and m is the molality.
Since all solutions have the same molality (0.1 m), the one with the smallest i will have the smallest ΔTf, and therefore the highest freezing point. So we just need to count ions produced per formula unit in water.
Step‑by‑step reasoning
-
Determine the van’t Hoff factor for each salt (assuming complete dissociation in dilute aqueous solution).
- (A) Al2(SO4)3→2Al3++3SO42− → total ions = 2+3=5 → i=5
- (B) BaCl2→Ba2++2Cl− → total ions = 1+2=3 → i=3
- (C) NH4Cl→NH4++Cl− → total ions = 1+1=2 → i=2
- (D) AlCl3→Al3++3Cl− → total ions = 1+3=4 → i=4
-
Compare the effective particle concentrations
Since m=0.1 for all, the total particle molality is i×0.1:
- (A) 5×0.1=0.5m
- (B) 3×0.1=0.3m
- (C) 2×0.1=0.2m
- (D) 4×0.1=0.4m
-
Relate to freezing point
The larger the particle concentration, the larger the freezing point depression. So the smallest particle concentration gives the smallest depression, hence the highest freezing point.
Smallest particle concentration: 0.2m from NH₄Cl.
TipA common mistake is to forget that Al2(SO4)3 gives five ions, not four — the subscript 2 on Al and 3 on SO₄ both contribute. Always write the dissociation explicitly.
Watch outIf the problem involved a weak electrolyte or ion pairing, the actual i would be less than the ideal. But here all are strong electrolytes in dilute solution, so ideal dissociation is assumed.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C).
ANSWER: C
-
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-10-FN1 markMCQQ.Identify the complex ion which does not exist (A) [SiF6]2− (B) [GeCl6]2− (C) [Sn(OH)6]2− (D) [SiCl6]2−
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is that the central atom must have available d-orbitals to accommodate six ligands in an octahedral geometry. Silicon lacks accessible d-orbitals for chlorine ligands, so [SiCl6]2− does not exist. The answer is (D).
The question tests your understanding of coordination chemistry and the availability of d-orbitals in elements of the carbon family (Group 14). For a complex ion with six ligands (octahedral geometry), the central atom must use sp3d2 hybridization. This requires empty d-orbitals of suitable energy.
Silicon, germanium, and tin all belong to Group 14. As you go down the group, the size increases and the d-orbitals become more accessible. But here’s the catch: the nature of the ligand also matters. Small, highly electronegative ligands like fluorine can stabilize the high oxidation state and pull electron density, making d-orbital participation feasible even for silicon. Larger, less electronegative ligands like chlorine cannot do this effectively for silicon.
Let’s examine each option step by step.
-
Option (A): [SiF6]2−
Silicon is in the +4 oxidation state here. Fluorine is tiny and extremely electronegative. It strongly withdraws electron density, allowing silicon to use its 3d orbitals for sp3d2 hybridization. This complex is well-known and stable — it exists as salts like Na2[SiF6].
-
Option (B): [GeCl6]2−
Germanium is larger than silicon and has accessible 4d orbitals. Chlorine, though larger than fluorine, can still coordinate because germanium’s d-orbitals are energetically available. This complex exists, for example as (NH4)2[GeCl6].
-
Option (C): [Sn(OH)6]2−
Tin is even larger, with accessible 5d orbitals. The hydroxide ligand is a reasonable ligand for tin(IV). This complex is known — for instance, K2[Sn(OH)6] is a stable compound.
-
Option (D): [SiCl6]2−
Here’s the problem. Silicon is small, and chlorine is much larger than fluorine. The chlorine atoms would crowd around silicon, causing steric hindrance. More importantly, chlorine is not electronegative enough to pull sufficient electron density from silicon to make its 3d orbitals contract and become available for bonding. Silicon simply cannot expand its octet with chlorine ligands. This complex has never been isolated under normal conditions.
Watch outA common mistake is to think that because [SiF6]2− exists, [SiCl6]2− should too. But fluorine’s small size and high electronegativity are crucial — chlorine lacks both, so silicon cannot form six bonds to it.
TipA quick rule: For Group 14 elements, the ability to form hexacoordinate complexes with halogens decreases as the halogen gets larger. So SiF62− exists, SiCl62− does not, but GeCl62− and SnCl62− do exist because the central atom is larger.
✓Final answerThe complex ion which does not exist is [SiCl6]2−, option (D).
-
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-11-AN1 markMCQQ.Consider the following HF, H2O, BeCl2, CO2, BF3, NF3, CCl4, CHCl3 The number of polar molecules is (A) 2 (B) 3 (C) 4 (D) 5
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is that a molecule is polar if it has polar bonds and an asymmetric shape (net dipole moment). After checking each molecule, exactly 4 are polar, so the answer is (C).
Concept & Intuition
Polarity depends on two things: (1) the presence of bonds between atoms with different electronegativities (polar bonds), and (2) the molecular geometry not cancelling those bond dipoles. Symmetric shapes like linear, trigonal planar, or tetrahedral can be nonpolar if all bonds are identical and arranged symmetrically. Asymmetric shapes or different substituents leave a net dipole.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
HF – Hydrogen and fluorine have a large electronegativity difference. The molecule is diatomic and linear, so the bond dipole is not cancelled. Polar.
-
H₂O – Bent shape (V-shaped) due to two lone pairs on oxygen. The two O–H bond dipoles do not cancel; they add to a net dipole pointing toward oxygen. Polar.
-
BeCl₂ – Linear molecule (Be is central, no lone pairs). The two Be–Cl bond dipoles are equal and opposite, cancelling exactly. Nonpolar.
-
CO₂ – Linear molecule (O=C=O). The two C=O bond dipoles are equal and opposite, cancelling. Nonpolar.
-
BF₃ – Trigonal planar (B is central, no lone pairs). The three B–F bond dipoles are symmetrically arranged at 120°, so their vector sum is zero. Nonpolar.
-
NF₃ – Trigonal pyramidal (N has one lone pair). The three N–F bond dipoles do not cancel because the lone pair pushes them downward, creating a net dipole. Polar.
-
CCl₄ – Tetrahedral (C central, no lone pairs). All four C–Cl bonds are identical and symmetrically arranged; dipoles cancel. Nonpolar.
-
CHCl₃ – Tetrahedral but with three Cl and one H. The C–Cl and C–H bonds have different polarities, so the symmetry is broken. The bond dipoles do not cancel, giving a net dipole. Polar.
TipA common pitfall is thinking that all molecules with polar bonds are polar. For example, CCl₄ has four polar C–Cl bonds, but its perfect tetrahedral symmetry makes it nonpolar. Always check geometry!
Count of polar molecules: HF, H₂O, NF₃, CHCl₃ → 4 molecules.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C).
ANSWER: C
-
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-02-FN1 markMCQQ.For the alkyne with formula C6H10, the number of alkynes with acidic hydrogens is x and number of alkynes with no acidic hydrogens is y. x and y are respectively (A) 2,5 (B) 3,4 (C) 4,3 (D) 5,2
›Reveal solutionSolution
C6H10 has 4 alkynes with acidic (terminal) hydrogens and 3 without, so x,y=4,3 — option (C).
An alkyne has an acidic hydrogen only when the triple bond is terminal (≡C–H). Enumerating the acyclic hexyne isomers:
Terminal alkynes (acidic H), x:
- Hex-1-yne, HC≡C-CH2CH2CH2CH3
- 3-Methylpent-1-yne, HC≡C-CH(CH3)CH2CH3
- 4-Methylpent-1-yne, HC≡C-CH2CH(CH3)2
- 3,3-Dimethylbut-1-yne, HC≡C-C(CH3)3
⇒x=4.
Internal alkynes (no acidic H), y:
- Hex-2-yne, CH3-C≡C-CH2CH2CH3
- Hex-3-yne, CH3CH2-C≡C-CH2CH3
- 4-Methylpent-2-yne, CH3-C≡C-CH(CH3)2
⇒y=3.
✓Final answerOption (C): x,y=4,3.
- TG EAPCET 2025Set ap-2025-04-29-FN1 markMCQQ.IUPAC name of [Co(NH3)4(H2O)Cl]Cl2 is (A) Tetraammineaquachlorocobalt (III) dichloride (B) Tetraamminechloroaquacobalt (III) chloride (C) Tetraammineaquachlorocobalt (III) chloride (D) Aquachlorotetraamminecobalt (III) chloride
›Reveal solutionSolution
The complex is a cationic coordination entity with cobalt in the +3 oxidation state; the correct IUPAC name lists ligands alphabetically (ignoring prefixes) and ends with the counterion. The answer is Tetraammineaquachlorocobalt(III) chloride.
The first thing to recognise is that this is a coordination compound with a complex cation and two chloride counterions. The square brackets enclose the coordination sphere, and the Cl2 outside the brackets tells us there are two chloride ions balancing the charge. So the name must end with "chloride" — not "dichloride" — because the counterion is simply chloride, and the number is implied by the formula or stated separately if needed.
Now, the central metal is cobalt. To name it correctly, we need its oxidation state. The complex inside the brackets is [Co(NH3)4(H2O)Cl]2+ (since the two external chlorides contribute −2 charge, the cation must be +2). Ammonia (NH3) and water (H2O) are neutral ligands; chloride inside the coordination sphere is anionic (Cl−). Let the oxidation state of Co be x. Then:
x+4(0)+0+(−1)=+2⇒x−1=+2⇒x=+3.
So it's cobalt(III).
The ligands are: four ammines (NH3), one aqua (H2O), and one chloro (Cl−). In IUPAC nomenclature, ligands are named in alphabetical order regardless of charge or number. The prefixes (tetra-, etc.) are ignored when alphabetising. So we compare the ligand names: "ammine", "aqua", "chloro". Alphabetically: ammine (a), aqua (a), chloro (c). But "ammine" and "aqua" both start with 'a' — we go to the second letter: 'm' vs 'q'. 'm' comes before 'q', so ammine comes before aqua. Then chloro comes last.
Thus the order is: tetraammineaquachloro.
Watch outA common mistake is to write "tetraamminechloroaqua" because chlorido ligands are sometimes placed before aqua in older conventions, or because students list by negative charge first. IUPAC rules are strictly alphabetical by ligand name (ignoring prefixes), so aqua comes before chloro.
Now assemble the name: Tetraammineaquachlorocobalt(III) chloride. Notice that the metal name is attached directly after the ligands (no space), and the oxidation state is in Roman numerals in parentheses. The counterion is named as a separate word: "chloride".
Let's check the options:
- (A) Tetraammineaquachlorocobalt (III) dichloride — "dichloride" is wrong; there are two chlorides, but the name of the anion is just "chloride". The number is not indicated in the name unless it's a special case (like "dichloride" is used for certain compounds, but here the standard IUPAC name uses "chloride").
- (B) Tetraamminechloroaquacobalt (III) chloride — wrong order: chloro before aqua.
- (C) Tetraammineaquachlorocobalt (III) chloride — correct.
- (D) Aquachlorotetraamminecobalt (III) chloride — wrong order (aqua before ammine) and also "tetraammine" is placed after aqua and chloro, which is not the standard way; the numerical prefix should come before the ligand name it modifies, but the alphabetical ordering of ligand names is still violated.
TipA quick way to verify: write the ligand names in alphabetical order ignoring prefixes: ammine, aqua, chloro. Then insert the numerical prefixes: tetraammine, aqua, chloro. Then attach to the metal: tetraammineaquachlorocobalt(III). Then add the counterion: chloride. That matches option (C) exactly.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) Tetraammineaquachlorocobalt(III) chloride.
- TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-10-FN1 markMCQQ.Choose the correct statements from the following I) In vapour phase BeCl2 exists as chlorobridged dimer II) BeSO4 is readily soluble in water III) BeO is completely basic in nature IV) BeCO3, being unstable, is kept in the atmosphere of CO2 V) BeCO3 is less soluble among all the carbonates of group 2 elements (A) II, III, IV (B) I, II, IV (C) I, IV, V (D) II, III, V
›Reveal solutionSolution
Statements I, II and IV are correct; III and V are false. The correct option is (B).
Beryllium is anomalous in group 2 because of its very small size and high polarising (charge/size) power, giving covalent character and a diagonal relationship with aluminium.
I) BeCl2 exists as a chloro-bridged dimer in the vapour phase - TRUE.
On heating the solid (polymeric) chloride, the vapour first forms a chloro-bridged dimer Be2Cl4, which dissociates to the linear Cl-Be-Cl monomer only at high temperature (∼1200 K). So over the ordinary vapour range the bridged dimer exists.
II) BeSO4 is readily soluble in water - TRUE.
The tiny Be2+ ion has a very high hydration enthalpy that exceeds the lattice enthalpy, so BeSO4 (and MgSO4) are highly soluble, unlike the heavier, insoluble BaSO4.
III) BeO is completely basic - FALSE.
BeO is amphoteric: it dissolves in acids to give Be2+ salts and in strong alkali to give beryllate, e.g. Na2[Be(OH)4]. Only the heavier group-2 oxides are purely basic.
IV) BeCO3 is unstable and is kept under a CO2 atmosphere - TRUE.
BeCO3 decomposes easily to BeO and CO2; storing it under CO2 suppresses this decomposition.
V) BeCO3 is the least soluble group-2 carbonate - FALSE.
Carbonate solubility decreases down the group, so BeCO3 is the most soluble, not the least.
Correct statements: I, II, IV.
✓Final answerThe correct statements are I, II and IV. The correct option is (B).
ANSWER: B
- TG EAPCET 2023Set ap-2023-05-10-FN1 markMCQQ.Solubility of A3X4 in pure water is ‘S’ mol L−1. Its solubility product is (A) S7 (B) 108S5 (C) 5184S7 (D) 6912S7
›Reveal solutionSolution
The solubility product (Ksp) for a sparingly soluble salt A3X4 is derived by considering its dissociation into 3A4+ and 4X3− ions. If its solubility is S mol L−1, then [A4+]=3S and [X3−]=4S. Substituting these into the Ksp expression, Ksp=[A4+]3[X3−]4, yields Ksp=6912S7.
When a sparingly soluble ionic compound dissolves in water, it establishes an equilibrium between the undissolved solid and its constituent ions in solution. The solubility product constant, Ksp, quantifies this equilibrium. It is a measure of how much of the solid dissolves to form a saturated solution.
The key idea is to understand how the stoichiometry of the ionic compound dictates the relative concentrations of its ions in solution. If 'S' represents the molar solubility of the compound (i.e., the number of moles of the compound that dissolve per liter of solution), then the concentration of each ion in the saturated solution will be a multiple of 'S', determined by the coefficients in the balanced dissociation equation.
For a general sparingly soluble salt AmXn, its dissociation equilibrium is:
AmXn(s)⇌mAn+(aq)+nXm−(aq)
If the molar solubility of AmXn is S mol L−1, then at equilibrium:
[An+]=mS
[Xm−]=nS
The solubility product expression is then given by:
Ksp=[An+]m[Xm−]n
Substituting the concentrations in terms of S:
Ksp=(mS)m(nS)n=mmnnSm+n
This general formula is what we will apply to the specific compound A3X4.
-
Write the dissociation equilibrium for A3X4:
The compound A3X4 dissociates into its constituent ions. To maintain charge neutrality, if there are 3 A ions and 4 X ions, and the formula is A3X4, then the charge on A must be +4 and the charge on X must be −3.
So, the dissociation equilibrium is:
A3X4(s)⇌3A4+(aq)+4X3−(aq)
-
Relate ion concentrations to solubility (S):
If the molar solubility of A3X4 is S mol L−1, it means that S moles of A3X4 dissolve in one liter of water. According to the stoichiometry of the dissociation reaction:
For every 1 mole of A3X4 that dissolves, 3 moles of A4+ ions and 4 moles of X3− ions are produced.
Therefore, in a saturated solution:
[A4+]=3S mol L−1
[X3−]=4S mol L−1
-
Write the expression for the solubility product (Ksp):
The solubility product constant is defined as the product of the concentrations of the ions, each raised to the power of its stoichiometric coefficient in the balanced dissociation equation.
Ksp=[A4+]3[X3−]4
-
Substitute the ion concentrations in terms of S into the Ksp expression:
Now, substitute the expressions for [A4+] and [X3−] from Step 2 into the Ksp expression from Step 3:
Ksp=(3S)3(4S)4
Ksp=(33⋅S3)⋅(44⋅S4)
Ksp=(27S3)⋅(256S4)
Ksp=27×256×S3+4
Ksp=6912S7
Watch outA common mistake is to forget to raise the stoichiometric coefficient to its power along with S. For example, writing 3S3 instead of (3S)3. Remember that the entire concentration term, including the coefficient, is raised to the power.
Comparing this result with the given options:
(A) S7
(B) 108S5
(C) 5184S7
(D) 6912S7
The calculated solubility product matches option (D).
✓Final answerThe solubility product of A3X4 is 6912S7.
-
- TG EAPCET 2023Set ap-2023-05-10-FN1 markMCQQ.What is the correct order of freezing point of the following solutions? I 0.1m Ba3(PO4)2 II 0.1m Na2SO4 III 0.1m NaCl (A) III > II > I (B) I > II > III (C) II > III > I (D) III > I > II
›Reveal solutionSolution
Freezing point depression depends on the number of particles in solution. The more particles, the lower the freezing point. The correct order is III > II > I, so option (A).
The key concept here is colligative properties — properties that depend only on the number of solute particles, not on their identity. Freezing point depression is one such property: adding a solute lowers the freezing point of a solvent, and the drop is proportional to the total molality of particles in solution.
For ionic compounds, each formula unit dissociates into a certain number of ions. The van’t Hoff factor i tells us how many particles each mole of solute produces. The freezing point depression is given by ΔTf=i⋅Kf⋅m, where m is the molality. Since Kf and m are the same for all three solutions here (all are 0.1m in water), the freezing point is lowest for the solution with the largest i, and highest for the one with the smallest i.
Let’s work through each solution.
- Solution I: 0.1m Ba3(PO4)2 This salt dissociates completely in water:
Ba3(PO4)2→3Ba2++2PO43−
That’s 3+2=5 ions per formula unit. So i=5.
The effective particle molality is 0.1×5=0.5m.
This gives the largest depression, hence the lowest freezing point.
- Solution II: 0.1m Na2SO4 Dissociation:
Na2SO4→2Na++SO42−
That’s 2+1=3 ions. So i=3.
Effective particle molality = 0.1×3=0.3m.
Freezing point is higher than I, lower than III.
- Solution III: 0.1m NaCl Dissociation:
NaCl→Na++Cl−
That’s 2 ions. So i=2.
Effective particle molality = 0.1×2=0.2m.
This gives the smallest depression, hence the highest freezing point.
Watch outA common mistake is to forget that Ba3(PO4)2 gives 5 ions, not 2 or 3. Count carefully: the subscript 3 on Ba and 2 on PO4 mean 3 barium ions and 2 phosphate ions.
So the order of freezing point (highest to lowest) is:
III (highest) > II > I (lowest).
✓Final answerThe correct order is III > II > I, which corresponds to option (A).
- TG EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-12-AN1 markMCQQ.Consider the following about the Tyndall effect I) It is used to distinguish between a true and colloidal solution II) It is possible only when the dispersed medium and dispersed phase differ much in their refractive indices III) It is observed only when the size of colloidal particles is much smaller than the wavelength of the light used The correct statements are (A) I & III only (B) II & III only (C) I, II & III (D) I & II only
›Reveal solutionSolution
The Tyndall effect is the scattering of light by colloidal particles; it distinguishes true from colloidal solutions, requires a refractive index difference, and occurs when particle size is comparable to (not much smaller than) the light’s wavelength. Only statements I and II are correct.
The Tyndall effect is a classic optical phenomenon used to tell apart a true solution (like salt water) from a colloidal dispersion (like milk or fog). The key idea is that light scatters when it hits particles of a certain size — but the exact conditions matter. Let’s break down each statement.
-
Statement I: “It is used to distinguish between a true and colloidal solution.”
This is correct. In a true solution, solute particles are of molecular size (less than 1 nm) and do not scatter visible light — the beam passes through invisibly. In a colloid, particles are larger (1–1000 nm) and scatter light, making the beam visible (the Tyndall effect). So shining a light through a sample and looking for a visible beam is a simple test.
-
Statement II: “It is possible only when the dispersed medium and dispersed phase differ much in their refractive indices.”
This is also correct. Scattering intensity depends on the difference in refractive index between the particles and the surrounding medium. If they have nearly the same refractive index, light passes through with little scattering — the effect is weak or absent. A large difference (e.g., water droplets in air) gives strong scattering.
-
Statement III: “It is observed only when the size of colloidal particles is much smaller than the wavelength of the light used.”
This is incorrect. The Tyndall effect is strongest when the particle size is comparable to the wavelength of light (roughly 1/10 to 10 times the wavelength). If particles are much smaller than the wavelength, Rayleigh scattering occurs (like the blue sky), but the Tyndall effect — a visible, milky beam — requires larger particles. If particles are much larger, they simply reflect or refract light (like dust or raindrops), not scatter it in the characteristic Tyndall way.
Watch outA common mistake is to think that smaller particles always scatter more. In fact, for the Tyndall effect, the particles must be large enough (roughly 40–900 nm for visible light) to produce the observable cone of scattered light. Particles much smaller than the wavelength give weak, wavelength-dependent scattering (blue sky), not the strong white beam of the Tyndall effect.
Thus, only statements I and II are correct.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D).
ANSWER: D
-
- TG EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-13-FN1 markMCQQ.According to Werner’s theory, the number of groups bonded to the central metal atom / ion in a coordination complex represent (A) Oxidation state (B) Primary valency (C) Secondary Valency (D) Polyhedron
›Reveal solutionSolution
Werner’s theory distinguishes primary valency (ionic, non-directional) from secondary valency (directional, fixed number of ligands directly bonded to the metal). The number of groups bonded to the central metal atom represents the secondary valency.
Werner’s theory was the first successful model of coordination compounds. Before it, chemists struggled to explain why compounds like CoClX3 ⋅6NHX3 existed — why would ammonia stick to cobalt chloride in such a fixed ratio? Werner’s key insight was that a metal ion has two kinds of valency:
- Primary valency (now called oxidation state) — satisfied by negative ions, non-directional, and corresponds to the charge on the metal.
- Secondary valency (now called coordination number) — satisfied by neutral molecules or negative ions directly bonded to the metal, directional, and fixed in number for a given metal.
The question asks: “the number of groups bonded to the central metal atom / ion” — that is, the count of ligands directly attached to the metal. That is exactly what Werner called secondary valency.
-
Identify what “groups bonded” means
In a complex like [Co(NHX3)X6]X3+, six ammonia molecules are directly bonded to cobalt. The number “6” is the count of groups bonded. This is not the charge (oxidation state) nor the shape (polyhedron) itself — it’s the number that determines the shape.
-
Eliminate the distractors
- (A) Oxidation state — This is the charge left on the metal after satisfying primary valency. For CoX3+, the oxidation state is +3, not 6.
- (D) Polyhedron — The arrangement of ligands (e.g., octahedron) is a consequence of the number of groups, not the number itself.
- (B) Primary valency — This is satisfied by ions that balance charge, not necessarily by groups directly bonded. In [Co(NHX3)X6]ClX3, the three Cl⁻ ions satisfy primary valency but are not bonded directly to cobalt — they are outside the coordination sphere.
-
Confirm with Werner’s own words
Werner wrote that secondary valency is “the number of groups directly attached to the metal atom.” That is the definition. For [Co(NHX3)X6]ClX3, secondary valency = 6, primary valency = 3.
TipA quick memory trick: Primary = charge (oxidation state), Secondary = number of ligands (coordination number). The question asks for “number of groups bonded” — that’s secondary.
Watch outA common mistake is to confuse “groups bonded” with “ions needed to neutralize charge.” Remember: in KX4[Fe(CN)X6], the four K⁺ ions satisfy primary valency, but the six CN⁻ groups bonded to iron represent secondary valency.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C).
ANSWER: C
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.