Q.What is spectrochemical series? Explain the difference between a weak field ligand and a strong field ligand.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Crystal Field Splitting
Crystal Field Splitting: From Intuition to Precision
Imagine you are a negatively charged electron sitting on a metal ion. All around you, the space is perfectly spherical — every direction feels the same. Your energy depends only on how far you are from the nucleus, not on which way you face.
Now imagine that six negative ions (or the negative ends of polar molecules) march in from the x, y, and z axes and stop close to you. Suddenly, the space around you is no longer uniform. If you try to move straight toward one of these approaching ions, you feel a strong repulsion — that path costs extra energy. If you move between the axes (say, along a diagonal), you feel less repulsion because you are farther from the incoming charges.
This is the core intuition: when ligands approach a metal ion, they break the spherical symmetry of the space around the metal. Different directions in space are no longer equivalent. Electrons in orbitals that point directly at the ligands get pushed up in energy; electrons in orbitals that point between the ligands stay lower.
The Precise Statement
Crystal Field Splitting is the splitting of degenerate d orbitals of a transition metal ion into two or more sets of different energies, caused by the electrostatic repulsion between the metal's d electrons and the negative charge (or dipole) of surrounding ligands.
For the most common geometry — octahedral — here is what happens:
- Six ligands sit at the corners of an octahedron, along the +x, −x, +y, −y, +z, −z axes.
- The dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point their lobes directly along these axes. These are the eg set. They feel maximum repulsion → higher energy.
- The dxy, dxz, and dyz orbitals point their lobes between the axes (into the octahedral faces). These are the t2g set. They feel less repulsion → lower energy.
The energy gap between these two sets is denoted by Δo (or 10Dq). The t2g set drops by 0.4Δo and the eg set rises by 0.6Δo, keeping the average energy unchanged (the "barycentre" rule).
The labels eg and t2g come from group theory — they describe how the orbitals transform under the symmetry operations of an octahedron. You do not need to memorise the derivation, but the notation is standard in every exam.
Why This Matters
Crystal field splitting explains three things you will see repeatedly:
- Colour — electrons can jump from t2g to eg by absorbing visible light. The gap Δo determines the colour you see.
- Magnetism — if Δo is large, electrons pair up in the lower t2g set (low spin). If Δo is small, electrons spread out (high spin). This changes the number of unpaired electrons. …
Why this formula?
Crystal Field Splitting: Why the Energy Splitting Occurs
Crystal Field Theory (CFT) explains how the d-orbitals of a transition metal ion split in energy when placed in an electrostatic field created by surrounding ligands (anions or polar molecules). The key result is that five degenerate d-orbitals split into two or more sets with different energies. Let's understand why this happens.
1. The Starting Point: Degenerate d-Orbitals
In a free transition metal ion (no ligands), all five d-orbitals have the same energy (degenerate). Their shapes are:
- dxy, dxz, dyz — lobes lie between the x, y, z axes (called t2g set in octahedral symmetry)
- dx2−y2, dz2 — lobes point directly along the x, y, z axes (called eg set)
Key idea: The spatial orientation of each orbital determines how it interacts with approaching ligands.
2. The Octahedral Case: Why eg Orbitals Are Higher in Energy
Imagine six ligands approaching along the +x, –x, +y, –y, +z, –z axes (octahedral geometry).
What happens to dx2−y2 and dz2?
- Their lobes point directly at the ligands.
- The negatively charged ligands repel the electron density in these orbitals.
- This repulsion raises the energy of these orbitals — they become less stable (higher energy).
What happens to dxy, dxz, dyz?
- Their lobes point between the axes (e.g., dxy lobes lie in the xy-plane but at 45° to x and y).
- They avoid the ligands — less repulsion.
- Their energy is lower than the eg set.
The Splitting Pattern
Δoct=E(eg)−E(t2g)
Where:
- E(eg) = energy of dx2−y2 and dz2 (higher)
- E(t2g) = energy of dxy, dxz, dyz (lower)
- Δoct is called the crystal field splitting energy (CFSE)
Why the name? The eg orbitals are "doubly degenerate" (2 orbitals), t2g are "triply degenerate" (3 orbitals). The letters come from group theory symmetry labels.
3. The Energy Conservation Rule
The total energy of all five d-orbitals must remain constant (no energy is created or destroyed). So:
- The center of gravity (average energy) of the split set equals the original degenerate energy.
- For octahedral splitting:
- 2 eg orbitals go up by +0.6Δoct each
- 3 t2g orbitals go down by −0.4Δoct each
Check:
2×(+0.6Δ)+3×(−0.4Δ)=1.2Δ−1.2Δ=0
This conservation of energy is a fundamental constraint — the splitting is not arbitrary.
4. The Tetrahedral Case: Why It's Opposite and Smaller
In a tetrahedral complex, four ligands approach from alternate corners of a cube. The axes are different:
- The dxy, dxz, dyz orbitals now point closer to the ligands (more repulsion).
- The dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point away from ligands (less repulsion).
Result:
- e set ( dx2−y2, dz2 ) — lower energy
- t2 set ( dxy, dxz, dyz ) — higher energy
The splitting is inverted compared to octahedral.
Magnitude:
Δtet≈94Δoct
Why smaller?
- Only 4 ligands (vs. 6) → less total repulsion.
- Ligands are not directly along axes → weaker interaction. …
The spectrochemical series is an experimentally determined ranking of ligands by the magnitude of the crystal field splitting (Δ) they produce when bonded to a metal ion in a coordination complex. It is a direct consequence of Crystal Field Theory.
Key reasoning:
- Ligands are ordered from those that cause the smallest Δ (weak field) to those that cause the largest Δ (strong field). A common partial order is: I−<Br−<Cl−<F−<H2O<NH3<en<NO2−<CN−<CO.
- A weak field ligand (e.g., Cl−) produces a small Δ. For a given metal ion, this favours high-spin configurations — electrons occupy all five d orbitals singly before pairing, because pairing energy (P) exceeds Δ. …
The spectrochemical series ranks ligands by their ability to split d-orbital energies in a transition metal complex. Weak field ligands cause a small splitting (high-spin complexes), while strong field ligands cause a large splitting (low-spin complexes). This difference arises from the ligand's donor/acceptor properties and directly affects the magnetic and optical properties of the complex.
The Core Idea: Why Ligands Split d-Orbitals
In a free transition metal ion, all five d-orbitals have the same energy. But when ligands approach the metal to form a complex, they create an electric field. This field is not felt equally by all d-orbitals. Orbitals pointing directly at the ligands (like dx2−y2 and dz2) experience strong repulsion and rise in energy. Orbitals pointing between the ligands (like dxy, dxz, dyz) experience less repulsion and stay lower in energy. This splitting is called crystal field splitting, and the energy gap between the two sets is denoted by Δ (or 10Dq).
The size of Δ is not fixed — it depends heavily on the nature of the ligand. The spectrochemical series is simply the list of common ligands arranged in order of increasing Δ they produce.
The Spectrochemical Series
The series, from weakest to strongest field ligand, is:
I−<Br−<SCN−<Cl−<S2−<F−<OH−<C2O42−<H2O<NCS−<CH3CN<py<NH3<en<bipy<phen<NO2−<PPh3<CN−<CO
Don't try to memorise the whole list with a forced mnemonic — anchor the two extremes (I− weakest, CO strongest) and remember the donor-atom trend: halogen donors < oxygen donors (OH−, C2O42−, H2O) < nitrogen donors (NH3, en, NO2−) < carbon donors (CN−, CO). That pattern reconstructs the series whenever you need it.
Weak Field vs. Strong Field Ligands: The Key Difference
The difference is entirely about the magnitude of Δ relative to the pairing energy (P) — the energy cost of forcing two electrons into the same orbital.
-
Weak field ligands (left side of the series, e.g., I−, Br−, Cl−, F−) produce a small Δ. Here, Δ<P. It is energetically cheaper for an electron to occupy a higher-energy orbital (Hund's rule) than to pair up in a lower one. This leads to high-spin complexes — the maximum number of unpaired electrons.
-
Strong field ligands (right side of the series, e.g., CN−, CO, NH3) produce a large Δ. Here, Δ>P. It costs less energy to pair electrons in the lower set of orbitals than to promote an electron to the higher set. This leads to low-spin complexes — the minimum number of unpaired electrons.
A common mistake is to think that strong field ligands always produce low-spin complexes. This is only true for d4, d5, d6, and d7 configurations in octahedral geometry. For d1, d2, d3, d8, d9, and d10, there is no choice — the electron configuration is the same regardless of Δ, so spin state does not change.
Step-by-Step Comparison
-
Magnitude of splitting (Δ): Weak field ligands give small Δ; strong field ligands give large Δ. This is the fundamental physical difference.
-
Electron pairing: In weak fields, electrons avoid pairing (Hund's rule dominates). In strong fields, electrons pair up in lower orbitals before occupying higher ones. …
Spectrochemical Series & Ligand Field Strength
1. The Spectrochemical Series (Named List Method)
The spectrochemical series is an experimentally determined ranking of ligands based on their ability to split the d-orbital energies in a transition metal complex (i.e., their crystal field splitting parameter, Δ or 10Dq).
The series (increasing Δ):
I−<Br−<Cl−<S2−<F−<OH−<H2O<NH3<en<NO2−<CN−<CO
- Left side: Weak field ligands (small Δ)
- Right side: Strong field ligands (large Δ)
2. Weak Field vs. Strong Field Ligands — The Difference
| Feature | Weak Field Ligand | Strong Field Ligand |
|---|---|---|
| Position in series | Left side (e.g., Cl−, F−, H2O) | Right side (e.g., CN−, CO, NH3) |
| Δ value | Small | Large |
| Electron pairing | High-spin complex (electrons prefer to occupy higher orbitals before pairing) | Low-spin complex (electrons pair in lower orbitals before occupying higher ones) |
| Example (d4 case) | [Mn(H2O)6]2+ — high-spin | [Mn(CN)6]4− — low-spin |
Why does this happen?
- With a weak field, the energy cost to pair electrons (P) is greater than Δ. So electrons follow Hund's rule — maximum unpaired spins.
- With a strong field, Δ is greater than P. So electrons pair up in the lower t2g orbitals first.
Key exam point: The spectrochemical series is not a theoretical prediction — it is based on experimental data from absorption spectra. The order depends on both the ligand's σ-donor and π-acceptor ability. …
Common Mistakes in Crystal Field Splitting & Spectrochemical Series
Mistake 1: Confusing the Order of Ligands in the Spectrochemical Series
The Mistake: Students often memorise the series incorrectly — mixing up strong and weak field ligands, or forgetting the relative positions of common ligands like H2O and NH3.
How to Avoid: Memorise the actual NCERT spectrochemical series (increasing field strength) directly — a single mnemonic rarely covers every ligand correctly:
I−<Br−<SCN−<Cl−<S2−<F−<OH−<C2O42−<H2O<NCS−<edta4−<NH3<en<CN−<CO
- Weak field ligands (left side): I−,Br−,SCN−,Cl−,S2−,F−
- Strong field ligands (right side): NH3,en,CN−,CO
Mistake 2: Thinking "Weak Field" Means "Small Ligand"
The Mistake: Students assume small ligands (like F−) are weak field and large ligands (like I−) are strong field — this is wrong.
The Reality: Field strength depends on the donor atom's electronegativity and π-bonding ability, not size alone.
- F− is small but weak field (high electronegativity → poor σ-donor)
- CO is moderate-sized but very strong field (π-acceptor → stabilises t2g)
How to Avoid: Focus on the donor atom and π-acceptor/π-donor nature, not ligand size.
Mistake 3: Confusing Weak/Strong Field with High/Low Spin
The Mistake: Students think weak field always gives high spin and strong field always gives low spin — but this is only true for d4, d5, d6, and d7 configurations.
The Correct Rule:
| Configuration | Weak Field | Strong Field |
|---|---|---|
| d1,d2,d3 | Only one possible arrangement — no pairing choice | Same — no change |
| d4,d5,d6,d7 | High spin | Low spin |
| d8,d9,d10 | Only one possible arrangement — no spin-state choice | Same — no change |
How to Avoid: Always check the dn configuration before deciding spin state — don't assume all weak field = high spin.
Mistake 4: Forgetting the Role of Δ (Crystal Field Splitting Energy)
The Mistake: Students define weak/strong field ligands without referencing Δ (the energy gap between t2g and eg orbitals).
The Correct Definition:
- Weak field ligand: Δ<P (pairing energy) → electrons prefer to occupy eg before pairing
- Strong field ligand: Δ>P → electrons pair up in t2g before occupying eg
How to Avoid: Always write the comparison:
Weak field: Δsmall<PvsStrong field: Δlarge>P
Mistake 5: Mixing Up Spectrochemical Series with Electrochemical Series
The Mistake: Students confuse the spectrochemical series (ligand field strength) with the electrochemical series (reduction potentials).
How to Avoid: Remember:
- Spectrochemical series → about ligands and crystal field splitting
- Electrochemical series → about metals and redox potentials
--- …
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 on this concept.
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-10-AN1 markMCQQ.Given below are two statements Statement-I: In the conversion of O2+ to O22+ bond length increases Statement-II: In the conversion of O2+ to O22+ magnetic property changes (A) Both statements I and II are correct (B) Statement I is correct, but statement II is not correct (C) Statement I is not correct, but statement II is correct (D) Both statements I and II are not correct
›Reveal solutionSolution
O2+ (bond order 2.5) → O22+ (bond order 3.0): bond order rises, so bond length decreases — Statement I is wrong. The species go from paramagnetic (1 unpaired e−) to diamagnetic (0 unpaired), so the magnetic property does change — Statement II is correct. Option (C).
Concept
Using MO theory, bond order=21(bonding−antibonding electrons). Neutral O2 has 16 electrons with the two highest in π∗ orbitals (singly occupied, hence paramagnetic). Removing electrons comes off these π∗ antibonding orbitals, which raises the bond order and shortens the bond.
Solution
- O2+ (15 e−): antibonding π∗ holds 1 electron.
B.O.=28−3=2.5,one unpaired e−⇒paramagnetic.
- O22+ (14 e−): both π∗ electrons removed. …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-11-FN1 markMCQQ.Given below are two statements Statement-I: The percent compositions of Ni2+ and Ni3+ in Ni0.98O is 96% and 4% respectively Statement-II: The fraction of Fe3+ and Fe2+ ions in 1 mole of Fe0.93O is 0.14 and 0.79 respectively (A) Both statements I and II are correct (B) Statement I is correct, but statement II is not correct (C) Statement I is not correct, but statement II is correct (D) Both statements I and II are not correct
›Reveal solutionSolution
The problem tests the ability to compute the fraction of different oxidation states in a non-stoichiometric oxide using charge balance. For Ni₀.₉₈O, the given percentages (96% Ni²⁺, 4% Ni³⁺) are correct; for Fe₀.₉₃O, the given fractions (0.14 Fe³⁺, 0.79 Fe²⁺) are also correct. Hence both statements are true, and the correct option is (A).
Concept and Intuition
In a perfect ionic oxide like NiO or FeO, the metal ion is in the +2 state and the oxide ion is O²⁻, so the formula is exactly 1:1. But real crystals often have non-stoichiometry — missing some metal ions (cation vacancies). To keep the overall crystal electrically neutral, some of the remaining metal ions must adopt a higher oxidation state (+3 instead of +2) to compensate for the missing positive charge.
The key idea:
- Let the formula be M1−xO.
- There are 1−x metal ions per O²⁻.
- If a fraction f of those metal ions are M³⁺ and the rest (1−f) are M²⁺, then the total positive charge must exactly balance the −2 charge from O²⁻.
That gives one equation, which we solve for the fraction of M³⁺ (and hence M²⁺). This is a classic solid-state chemistry charge-balance problem.
Step-by-step solution
1. Set up the charge balance for Ni₀.₉₈O
The formula means: per oxide ion O²⁻, there are 0.98 nickel ions.
Let x = fraction of Ni ions that are Ni³⁺. Then the fraction that are Ni²⁺ is 1−x.
Total positive charge from nickel ions =
0.98×[3x+2(1−x)]=0.98×(2+x)
This must equal the negative charge from one O²⁻, which is 2.
So:
0.98(2+x)=2
2+x=0.982≈2.040816
x≈0.040816
Thus fraction of Ni³⁺ ≈ 0.0408 → 4.08%, and fraction of Ni²⁺ ≈ 0.9592 → 95.92%.
Statement-I says 96% and 4% — these are rounded values, perfectly acceptable. So Statement-I is correct.
2. Set up the charge balance for Fe₀.₉₃O
Per O²⁻, there are 0.93 iron ions.
Let y = fraction of Fe ions that are Fe³⁺. Then fraction Fe²⁺ = 1−y.
Total positive charge:
0.93×[3y+2(1−y)]=0.93×(2+y)
Set equal to 2:
0.93(2+y)=2
2+y=0.932≈2.150538
y≈0.150538
So fraction Fe³⁺ ≈ 0.1505, fraction Fe²⁺ ≈ 0.8495. …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-11-FN1 markMCQQ.The colour and magnetic nature of the compound formed, when MnO2 is fused with a mixture of KOH and KNO3 are respectively (A) Green, paramagnetic (B) Blue, paramagnetic (C) Green, diamagnetic (D) Violet, diamagnetic
›Reveal solutionSolution
Fusing MnO₂ with KOH and KNO₃ oxidises Mn(IV) to Mn(VI), forming the green manganate ion MnO₄²⁻, which has one unpaired electron and is paramagnetic — so the answer is (A).
The key here is recognising that the reaction is an oxidation in a strongly alkaline melt. MnO₂ (manganese in +4 oxidation state) is fused with KOH (base) and KNO₃ (a powerful oxidising agent). Under these conditions, Mn(IV) is oxidised further — not to Mn(VII) (purple permanganate), but to Mn(VI), because the alkaline melt stabilises the manganate ion, MnO₄²⁻. This ion is famously green in colour. Its electronic configuration (d¹) means it has one unpaired electron, making it paramagnetic.
Let’s walk through the reasoning step by step.
- Identify the reaction type. Fusing MnO₂ with KOH and KNO₃ is a classic laboratory preparation of potassium manganate. The KNO₃ acts as the oxidising agent, converting Mn(IV) to Mn(VI). The balanced equation is:
MnO2+2KOH+KNO3→K2MnO4+KNO2+H2O
The product is potassium manganate, which contains the manganate ion, MnO42−.
-
Determine the colour.
The manganate ion MnO42− is well-known to be green in solution (and in the solid state). This is a distinctive property — permanganate (MnO4−) is purple, while manganate is green. So the colour is green.
-
Determine the magnetic nature.
In MnO42−, manganese is in the +6 oxidation state. The electronic configuration of Mn is [Ar]3d54s2. Removing six electrons (to get Mn⁶⁺) leaves a 3d1 configuration.
- A d¹ ion has one unpaired electron in the d-orbital.
- Any species with unpaired electrons is paramagnetic (attracted to a magnetic field). Therefore, the compound is paramagnetic.
-
Eliminate other options. …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-04-AN1 markMCQQ.In Lassaigne’s test, violet colour is formed when sodium fusion extract of an organic compound is treated with solution of X. What is X? (A) Pb(CH3COO)2 (B) Na2[Fe(CN)5 NO] (C) Na4[Fe(CN)6] (D) (NH4)2MoO4
›Reveal solutionSolution
The violet colour in Lassaigne’s test for nitrogen comes from the formation of Prussian blue when the sodium fusion extract is treated with sodium nitroprusside — the correct reagent is Na2[Fe(CN)5 NO], option (B).
The Lassaigne’s test is a classic qualitative analysis method used to detect elements like nitrogen, sulphur, and halogens in organic compounds. The key idea is that when an organic compound is fused with sodium metal, the elements present are converted into water-soluble ionic salts. For nitrogen, the fusion produces sodium cyanide (NaCN). The test then relies on a specific chemical reaction that gives a distinctive coloured product — in this case, a deep violet or blue colour.
The violet colour is not the final Prussian blue itself but an intermediate complex that forms when the cyanide ion reacts with a particular iron-containing reagent. The reagent must supply iron in a form that can combine with cyanide to produce the coloured complex. Among the options, only sodium nitroprusside (Na2[Fe(CN)5 NO]) contains iron in a suitable oxidation state and ligand environment to react with CN− from the fusion extract, yielding the characteristic violet colour.
Let’s go through the reasoning step by step.
- What happens in the sodium fusion? The organic compound is heated with sodium metal. If nitrogen is present, it forms sodium cyanide:
Na+C+N→NaCN
This NaCN dissolves in water when the fusion product is extracted, giving a solution containing cyanide ions.
-
The test for cyanide using sodium nitroprusside:
When the sodium fusion extract (containing CN−) is treated with sodium nitroprusside (Na2[Fe(CN)5 NO]), a reaction occurs that produces a violet-coloured complex. The exact complex formed is Na3[Fe(CN)5 NO CN] — a substitution product where the nitroso group (NO) is replaced by cyanide. This is the characteristic positive test for nitrogen.
-
Why the other options are wrong:
- (A) Pb(CH3COO)2: This is lead acetate, used to test for sulphur (black precipitate of PbS), not nitrogen. …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-04-FN1 markMCQQ.The pairs of ions which exhibit same colour in aquated state are I. Fe2+, Ni2+ II. V2+, Cr2+ III. Cr2+, Cu2+ The correct answer is Options : (A) I, II only (B) II, III only (C) I, II, III (D) I, III only
›Reveal solutionSolution
The colour of an aquated transition-metal ion depends on the number of d-electrons and the crystal-field splitting. Ions with the same d-electron count often show similar colours. Here, Fe²⁺ (d⁶) and Ni²⁺ (d⁸) differ; V²⁺ (d³) and Cr²⁺ (d⁴) differ; Cr²⁺ (d⁴) and Cu²⁺ (d⁹) are both Jahn–Teller active and appear blue-green. Only pair III matches.
Concept & Intuition
In aqueous solution, transition-metal ions are surrounded by water ligands, creating an octahedral crystal field. The d-orbitals split into two sets: lower-energy t2g and higher-energy eg. When visible light is absorbed, electrons jump from t2g to eg, and the complementary colour is observed. The energy gap Δo depends on the metal ion’s charge and its position in the periodic table, but a key factor is the number of d-electrons. Ions with the same d-count often have similar absorption spectra and thus similar colours — but exceptions occur due to Jahn–Teller distortions or different oxidation states.
Let’s examine each pair.
-
Pair I: Fe²⁺ and Ni²⁺
- Fe²⁺ has the electron configuration [Ar]3d6. In an octahedral field, it is high-spin: t2g4eg2.
- Ni²⁺ has [Ar]3d8, giving t2g6eg2.
- These have different d-electron counts (d⁶ vs d⁸), so the crystal-field splitting and the number of d–d transitions differ. Fe²⁺ solutions are pale green, while Ni²⁺ solutions are bright green. They are not the same colour. → Pair I is incorrect.
-
Pair II: V²⁺ and Cr²⁺
- V²⁺ is d³: t2g3.
- Cr²⁺ is d⁴: in water it is high-spin, t2g3eg1.
- Different d-counts again. V²⁺ solutions are violet, Cr²⁺ solutions are blue. They are not the same colour. → Pair II is incorrect.
-
Pair III: Cr²⁺ and Cu²⁺
- Cr²⁺ is d⁴ (high-spin, t2g3eg1). …
-
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-02-AN1 markMCQQ.Identify the incorrect statement from the following? (A) ml designates the orientation of the orbital (B) The probability density of electron is expressed by ∣ψ∣3 (C) The total information about electron in atom is stored in its ψ (D) Total number of orbitals in a sub level is equal to (2l+1)
›Reveal solutionSolution
The question asks to identify the incorrect statement among four options about quantum numbers and orbitals. The wrong one is (B) because probability density is ∣ψ∣2, not ∣ψ∣3.
The key concept here is the Born interpretation of the wavefunction in quantum mechanics. The wavefunction ψ itself is not directly observable; it is a mathematical object that contains all information about the electron's state. However, the physical meaning comes from ∣ψ∣2, which gives the probability density of finding the electron at a given point in space. Any statement that misstates this exponent is automatically false.
Let’s examine each option step by step.
-
Option (A): "ml designates the orientation of the orbital."
This is correct. The magnetic quantum number ml can take integer values from −l to +l, and each value corresponds to a specific orientation of the orbital in space (e.g., px, py, pz for l=1).
-
Option (B): "The probability density of electron is expressed by ∣ψ∣3."
This is incorrect. According to Max Born’s statistical interpretation, the probability density is ∣ψ∣2 (the square of the magnitude of the wavefunction). The cube has no physical meaning in standard quantum mechanics. This is the classic trap — students sometimes misremember the exponent.
-
Option (C): "The total information about electron in atom is stored in its ψ." …
-
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-03-AN1 markMCQQ.The incorrect statement about crystals with Schottky defect is (A) It is due to missing of equal number of cations and anions from lattice points (B) On the whole crystal is electrically neutral (C) It is shown by ionic compounds in which cation and anion are of almost same size (D) Density of the crystal increases
›Reveal solutionSolution
Schottky defect involves missing equal numbers of cations and anions, preserving neutrality and decreasing density; the incorrect statement is that density increases — so the answer is (D).
Concept and Intuition
Schottky defect is a type of point defect in ionic crystals. Imagine a perfect crystal lattice where every cation and anion sits in its assigned spot. In a Schottky defect, a pair of ions — one cation and one anion — simply vanish from their lattice sites, leaving behind vacancies. Because the numbers of missing positive and negative ions are equal, the crystal remains electrically neutral overall. This defect is common in ionic compounds where the cation and anion are similar in size (like NaCl), because the lattice can “afford” to lose both without collapsing. A key consequence: the crystal loses mass but its volume stays roughly the same, so its density decreases — not increases. That’s the trap in option (D).
Step-by-Step Reasoning
-
What is Schottky defect?
It is a vacancy defect where an equal number of cations and anions are missing from their lattice sites. This preserves the stoichiometry and electrical neutrality of the crystal.
Example: In NaCl, one Na⁺ and one Cl⁻ leave, creating two vacancies.
-
Check option (A):
“It is due to missing of equal number of cations and anions from lattice points.”
This is exactly the definition. So (A) is correct.
-
Check option (B):
“On the whole crystal is electrically neutral.”
Since equal numbers of positive and negative ions are removed, the net charge remains zero. So (B) is correct.
-
Check option (C):
“It is shown by ionic compounds in which cation and anion are of almost same size.” …
-
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-03-FN1 markMCQQ.Noble gas ‘X’ is used as a diluent for oxygen in modern diving apparatus and noble gas ‘Y’ is used mainly to provide an inert atmosphere in high temperature metallurgical processes. ‘Y’ and ‘X’ are respectively? (A) Ar, Kr (B) He, Kr (C) He, Ar (D) Ar, He
›Reveal solutionSolution
Helium (He) is the diluent mixed with oxygen in diving apparatus, and argon (Ar) provides the inert atmosphere in high-temperature metallurgy. Since the question asks for 'Y and X' in that order — metallurgy gas first, then diving gas — the answer is Ar, He, option (D).
Concept & Intuition
Noble gases are prized for their chemical inertness, but each has distinct physical properties suited to particular applications.
- Helium (He) is extremely light and has very low solubility in blood, making it ideal for mixing with oxygen in deep-sea diving — it reduces the risk of decompression sickness ("the bends") and avoids nitrogen narcosis.
- Argon (Ar) is denser than air, cheap, and abundant (about 0.93% of the atmosphere). It forms a stable, non-reactive blanket that protects hot metals from oxidation during welding, casting, and other high-temperature metallurgical processes.
The question asks for "Y and X respectively" — so Y is the metallurgy gas and X is the diving diluent.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Identify the diving diluent (X)
Modern diving apparatus mixes oxygen with a diluent to prevent oxygen toxicity and nitrogen narcosis. Helium is the standard choice — it is far less soluble in blood than nitrogen and does not cause narcosis. Argon and krypton are unsuitable (argon itself causes narcosis at depth; krypton is far too costly).
→ X = He
-
Identify the metallurgy gas (Y)
High-temperature metallurgical processes need an inert blanket to prevent oxidation. Argon is the standard choice for its low cost, abundance, and complete inertness. Krypton is far too expensive for this bulk use.
→ Y = Ar
-
Match to the options
"Y and X" means Y first, then X — so we need (Ar, He).
- (A) Ar, Kr → wrong (Kr is not the diving diluent) …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-03-FN1 markMCQQ.The incorrect statement about crystals with Schottky defect is (A) On the whole crystal is electrically neutral (B) It is due to missing of equal number of cations and anions from lattice points (C) It is shown by ionic compounds in which cation and anion are of almost same size (D) Density of the crystal increases
›Reveal solutionSolution
Schottky defect involves missing equal numbers of cations and anions, keeping the crystal neutral but decreasing its density. The incorrect statement is the one claiming density increases.
The key concept here is Schottky defect — a type of point defect in ionic crystals where a pair of one cation and one anion is missing from their lattice sites, creating vacancies. This defect preserves electrical neutrality because the missing ions are equal in number and opposite in charge. However, because atoms are removed, the mass of the crystal decreases while its volume remains nearly the same, so the density decreases — not increases. The question asks for the incorrect statement, so we need to spot the one that contradicts this behavior.
Let’s examine each option step by step:
-
Option (A): "On the whole crystal is electrically neutral"
This is correct. In Schottky defect, equal numbers of cations and anions are missing, so the net charge remains zero. The crystal as a whole stays electrically neutral.
-
Option (B): "It is due to missing of equal number of cations and anions from lattice points"
This is the very definition of Schottky defect. It is correct.
-
Option (C): "It is shown by ionic compounds in which cation and anion are of almost same size"
This is also correct. Schottky defect is common in compounds like NaCl, KCl, CsCl, where the cation and anion have similar ionic radii. This similarity allows the lattice to tolerate vacancies without collapsing. …
-
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-04-AN1 markMCQQ.A metal (M), crystallizes in fcc lattice with edge length of 4.242 Å. What is the radius of M atom (in Å)? (A) 1.25 (B) 1.75 (C) 1.5 (D) 1.0
›Reveal solutionSolution
For an fcc lattice, the face diagonal equals four atomic radii; using the given edge length, the atomic radius is calculated as r=22a≈1.5A˚, so the correct option is (C).
Concept & Intuition
In a face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice, atoms touch along the face diagonal — not along the edge. The face diagonal spans from one corner atom to the opposite corner atom on the same square face. Along that diagonal, there are two half-atoms at the corners and one full atom at the face center, making a total of two full atomic diameters. So the face diagonal length equals 4r (where r is the atomic radius). Since the face diagonal of a cube of edge a is a2, we get the key relation:
a2=4r⇒r=22a.
Step-by-step solution
-
Identify the geometry
The metal crystallizes in an fcc lattice. In fcc, atoms are located at each corner and at the center of each face. The closest contact occurs between a corner atom and a face-centered atom — this distance is half the face diagonal.
-
Write the relation between edge length and radius
For fcc:
Face diagonal=a2=4r.
Therefore,
r=4a2=22a.
- Plug in the given edge length Edge length a=4.242A˚. r=224.242. …
-
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-04-AN1 markMCQQ.The pair of ions with paramagnetic nature and same number of electrons is (A) Lu3+, Yb2+ (B) Eu3+, Pm2+ (C) Eu2+, Gd3+ (D) La3+, Ce4+
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key is to compare the electron configurations of lanthanide ions: paramagnetic ions have unpaired electrons, and the pair must also have the same number of electrons (be isoelectronic). Only one option satisfies both conditions.
Concept & Intuition
Paramagnetism arises from unpaired electrons. In lanthanides, the 4f subshell is being filled. When ions form, they typically lose the two 6s electrons and sometimes one 4f electron. To check paramagnetism, we count unpaired 4f electrons. To check “same number of electrons,” we compare total electron count (atomic number minus charge). The trick: many lanthanide ions have the same number of electrons but different configurations — only some are paramagnetic.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Determine electron counts for each ion
- Lu³⁺: Lu (Z=71) → 71 – 3 = 68 electrons.
- Yb²⁺: Yb (Z=70) → 70 – 2 = 68 electrons.
- Eu³⁺: Eu (Z=63) → 63 – 3 = 60 electrons.
- Pm²⁺: Pm (Z=61) → 61 – 2 = 59 electrons.
- Eu²⁺: Eu (Z=63) → 63 – 2 = 61 electrons.
- Gd³⁺: Gd (Z=64) → 64 – 3 = 61 electrons.
- La³⁺: La (Z=57) → 57 – 3 = 54 electrons.
- Ce⁴⁺: Ce (Z=58) → 58 – 4 = 54 electrons.
-
Identify which pairs are isoelectronic (same electron count)
- (A) Lu³⁺ (68) and Yb²⁺ (68) → same
- (B) Eu³⁺ (60) and Pm²⁺ (59) → different
- (C) Eu²⁺ (61) and Gd³⁺ (61) → same
- (D) La³⁺ (54) and Ce⁴⁺ (54) → same
So (B) is out.
-
Check paramagnetism (unpaired 4f electrons)
-
Lu³⁺: Lu is [Xe]4f¹⁴6s² → Lu³⁺ loses 6s² and one 4f? No, it loses 6s² and one 4f? Actually Lu³⁺ = [Xe]4f¹⁴ (full 4f, all paired) → diamagnetic.
-
Yb²⁺: Yb is [Xe]4f¹⁴6s² → Yb²⁺ loses 6s² → [Xe]4f¹⁴ → diamagnetic.
→ Pair (A) is diamagnetic-diamagnetic → not paramagnetic.
-
Eu²⁺: Eu is [Xe]4f⁷6s² → Eu²⁺ loses 6s² → [Xe]4f⁷ (half-filled, 7 unpaired) → paramagnetic.
-
Gd³⁺: Gd is [Xe]4f⁷5d¹6s² → Gd³⁺ loses 6s² and 5d¹ → [Xe]4f⁷ → paramagnetic.
→ Pair (C) is paramagnetic-paramagnetic ✓ …
-
-
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-04-FN1 markMCQQ.The pair of ions with paramagnetic nature and same number of electrons is (A) La3+, Ce4+ (B) Eu2+, Gd3+ (C) Eu3+, Pm2+ (D) Lu3+, Yb2+
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key is to compare the electron configurations of the lanthanide ions, checking for unpaired electrons (paramagnetism) and equal total electron count. The pair that satisfies both is Eu²⁺ and Gd³⁺, option (B).
Concept & Intuition
Paramagnetism arises from unpaired electrons. In lanthanide ions, the 4f subshell is gradually filled. To find a pair that is both paramagnetic and has the same number of electrons, we need to:
- Determine the atomic number of each element.
- Subtract the charge to get the number of electrons in the ion.
- Write the electron configuration (focus on the 4f subshell).
- Check for unpaired electrons (Hund’s rule: half-filled or partially filled f-orbitals are paramagnetic; empty, full, or exactly half-filled f⁷ are special cases).
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Identify atomic numbers
La (57), Ce (58), Eu (63), Gd (64), Pm (61), Lu (71), Yb (70).
-
Calculate electron counts for each ion
- La³⁺: 57 − 3 = 54 electrons
- Ce⁴⁺: 58 − 4 = 54 electrons
- Eu²⁺: 63 − 2 = 61 electrons
- Gd³⁺: 64 − 3 = 61 electrons
- Eu³⁺: 63 − 3 = 60 electrons
- Pm²⁺: 61 − 2 = 59 electrons
- Lu³⁺: 71 − 3 = 68 electrons
- Yb²⁺: 70 − 2 = 68 electrons
-
Write the 4f configurations (the core is [Xe] 4fⁿ)
- La³⁺: [Xe] → 4f⁰ (no unpaired electrons, diamagnetic)
- Ce⁴⁺: [Xe] → 4f⁰ (diamagnetic)
- Eu²⁺: [Xe] 4f⁷ (half-filled, all 7 electrons unpaired → paramagnetic)
- Gd³⁺: [Xe] 4f⁷ (half-filled, paramagnetic)
- Eu³⁺: [Xe] 4f⁶ (4 unpaired electrons, paramagnetic)
- Pm²⁺: [Xe] 4f⁵ (5 unpaired electrons, paramagnetic)
- Lu³⁺: [Xe] 4f¹⁴ (full, diamagnetic)
- Yb²⁺: [Xe] 4f¹⁴ (full, diamagnetic)
-
Check each option
- (A) La³⁺ (diamagnetic) and Ce⁴⁺ (diamagnetic) → both diamagnetic, so not paramagnetic.
- (B) Eu²⁺ (paramagnetic, 61 e⁻) and Gd³⁺ (paramagnetic, 61 e⁻) → both paramagnetic and same electron count. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.