Q.Coulomb's law for electrostatic force between two point charges and Newton's law for gravitational force between two stationary point masses, both have inverse-square dependence on the distance between the charges and masses respectively.
Concept understanding — Inverse Square Law Comparison
The Intuition: Why Does Light Get Dimmer So Fast?
Imagine you're standing near a campfire. You feel its warmth on your face. Now take ten steps back. Does the warmth feel half as strong? No — it feels much weaker, maybe a quarter as strong. That's not an accident. It's a pattern that shows up everywhere in physics: gravity, light, sound, electric fields, even radiation.
The reason is simple: as you move away from a source, the same amount of energy (or force) has to spread out over a larger area. And that area grows with the square of the distance.
The Core Idea in One Picture
Think of a light bulb at the centre of a balloon. As you inflate the balloon, the light hitting the inner surface spreads thinner and thinner. If you double the radius of the balloon, the surface area becomes four times larger. So each patch of the balloon gets only one-fourth the light.
That's the inverse square law in a nutshell: double the distance → one-fourth the intensity.
The Precise Statement
I∝r21orI=r2k
where:
- I = intensity (brightness, force per unit area, etc.)
- r = distance from the source
- k = a constant that depends on the source's strength
If you compare two distances r1 and r2, the ratio of intensities is:
I1I2=(r2r1)2
This is the inverse square law comparison — you compare how strong a quantity is at two different distances by taking the inverse ratio of the squares of those distances.
Why "Inverse Square" and Not Just "Inverse"?
Because the geometry of space is three-dimensional. The surface of a sphere is 4πr2. As r grows, the sphere's surface grows as r2. Whatever is radiating outward (light, sound, gravity) must pass through that entire surface. So the amount per unit area drops as 1/r2.
If we lived in a flat, two-dimensional world, the law would be 1/r (like ripples on a pond). In one dimension, it would be constant. The inverse square law is a direct consequence of living in three dimensions.
The Comparison: What It Really Means
When you compare two situations, you're not calculating absolute intensity — you're finding the ratio. For example:
A star is 3 times farther away than another identical star. How much dimmer does it appear?
InearIfar=(31)2=91
The farther star is 9 times dimmer. Not 3 times — 9 times. That's the punch of the square.
A common mistake: thinking "twice the distance means half the intensity." It's actually one-fourth. The square makes the drop much steeper than linear intuition suggests.
Where This Law Applies (and Where It Doesn't)
Applies to:
- Light from a point source (a star, a bulb)
- Sound from a small source (a speaker in open air)
- Gravitational force between two masses
- Electric force between two charges
- Radiation from a radioactive point source
Does NOT apply to:
- Light from a laser beam (it stays collimated)
- Sound inside a pipe (it's guided)
- Gravity inside a planet (the mass distribution changes the law)
- Very large distances in cosmology (space itself is expanding)
The One-Line Takeaway
Inverse square law comparison: When distance multiplies by n, intensity divides by n2. Always compare using the square of the distance ratio, not the distance itself.
That's the whole idea. The rest is just practice applying it to different problems — but the geometry never changes.
Searches such as "inverse square law examples physics" and "intensity distance relationship formula" recur across gravitation, electrostatics, and optics topics in the NCERT/CBSE Class 11-12 Physics curriculum, since this same 1/r2 pattern underlies all of them. Comparing intensities at two distances is a very common numerical-question format in JEE Main and NEET.
Why this formula?
Inverse Square Law Comparison — Why the Formula Holds
The Inverse Square Law appears in physics wherever a quantity spreads out uniformly from a point source in three-dimensional space. The core idea is that the intensity (or field strength) decreases as the square of the distance from the source.
1. The Intuition: Spreading Over a Sphere
Imagine a point source emitting energy, light, sound, or gravitational force equally in all directions.
- At a distance r, the energy is spread uniformly over the surface area of a sphere of radius r.
- The surface area of a sphere is:
A=4πr2
If the total power (or flux) emitted by the source is P, then the intensity I (power per unit area) at distance r is:
I=4πr2P
Key insight: The same total power is spread over a larger and larger area as r increases. Hence, intensity is inversely proportional to r2.
2. Derivation for Gravitational Force (Newton's Law)
Newton’s law of gravitation states:
F=r2GMm
Why 1/r2?
- The gravitational field lines from a point mass M radiate outward uniformly.
- The number of field lines crossing a sphere of radius r is constant (conservation of flux).
- The density of field lines (force per unit mass) at distance r is:
g=r2GM
- This is because the total flux Φ=4πGM is spread over 4πr2, giving:
g=4πr2Φ=r2GM
Thus, the force on a test mass m is F=mg=r2GMm.
3. Derivation for Coulomb's Law (Electrostatics)
Coulomb’s law for electric force between two point charges q1 and q2:
F=r2kq1q2
Why 1/r2?
- Electric field lines from a point charge q radiate radially outward (or inward for negative charge).
- Gauss’s law states that the total electric flux through a closed surface is proportional to the enclosed charge:
∮E⋅dA=ε0q
- For a sphere of radius r centered on the charge, the field is radial and constant in magnitude:
E⋅4πr2=ε0q
- Therefore:
E=4πε01r2q
- The force on a test charge q2 is F=q2E=4πε01r2q1q2.
4. Derivation for Light/Radiation Intensity
For a point source of light emitting power P:
- At distance r, the power is spread over a sphere of area 4πr2.
- Illuminance (intensity) is:
I=4πr2P
Why not 1/r?
- In 2D (e.g., a line source), intensity falls as 1/r because the circumference of a circle is 2πr.
- In 3D, the surface area grows as r2, so intensity falls as 1/r2.
5. The Common Mathematical Reason
All inverse square laws arise from conservation of flux in three-dimensional space with isotropic emission. The geometry forces:
Intensity∝r21
because the area over which the quantity spreads is proportional to r2.
6. Key Exam Points
| Quantity | Formula | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Gravitational force | F=r2GMm | Flux of field lines over sphere area |
| Electric force | F=r2kq1q2 | Gauss’s law + spherical symmetry |
| Light intensity | I=4πr2P | Power spread over sphere surface |
| Sound intensity | I=4πr2P | Same geometric spreading |
Important: The inverse square law holds only for point sources in 3D space with no absorption or reflection. For extended sources or non-isotropic emission, the law is modified.
7. Common Misconception
- Not because "the force gets weaker with distance" — that’s vague.
- The exact 1/r2 comes from the geometry of a sphere, not from any arbitrary assumption.
- If space had 2 dimensions, the law would be 1/r; if 4 dimensions, 1/r3.
Final takeaway: The inverse square law is a geometric necessity for any conserved quantity spreading uniformly from a point in three-dimensional space. Memorize the formula, but understand the sphere-area argument — it’s the core reasoning for every exam question.
The key idea here involves comparing the magnitudes of electrostatic and gravitational forces, both of which follow an inverse-square law, and then applying Newton's second law to determine accelerations.
- To compare the strength of these forces, we determine the ratio of their magnitudes.
The electrostatic force is Fe=kr2∣q1q2∣, and the gravitational force is Fg=Gr2m1m2.
The ratio is FgFe=Gm1m2k∣q1q2∣.
Using constants: k=9×109N m2/C2, G=6.67×10−11N m2/kg2, e=1.602×10−19C.
- For an electron and a proton (q1=e,q2=e,m1=me,m2=mp): FgFe=(6.67×10−11)(9.11×10−31)(1.67×10−27)(9×109)(1.602×10−19)2=1.0140×10−672.30976×10−28≈2.28×1039
- For two protons (q1=e,q2=e,m1=mp,m2=mp):
FgFe=(6.67×10−11)(1.67×10−27)2(9×109)(1.602×10−19)2=1.8592×10−642.30976×10−28≈1.24×1036
✓Final answer
(a) (i) The ratio of electrostatic to gravitational force for an electron and a proton is 2.28×1039.
✓Final answer(a) (ii) The ratio of electrostatic to gravitational force for two protons is 1.24×1036.
- To estimate the accelerations, we first calculate the electrostatic force between an electron and a proton 1A˚ apart (r=10−10m).
Fe=kr2e2=(9×109)(10−10)2(1.602×10−19)2=2.30976×10−8N.
Using Newton's second law, a=F/m:
For the electron (me=9.11×10−31kg):
ae=meFe=9.11×10−31kg2.30976×10−8N≈2.54×1022m/s2.
For the proton (mp=1.67×10−27kg):
ap=mpFe=1.67×10−27kg2.30976×10−8N≈1.38×1019m/s2.
✓Final answer
(b) The acceleration of the electron is 2.54×1022m/s2, and the acceleration of the proton is 1.38×1019m/s2.
The electrostatic force is immensely stronger than the gravitational force, by factors of about 2.3×1039 for an electron-proton pair and 1.2×1036 for two protons. At 1A˚ separation, the electron experiences an acceleration of approximately 2.54×1022m/s2, while the proton experiences an acceleration of about 1.38×1019m/s2 due to their mutual electrical attraction.
Both Coulomb's law for electrostatic force and Newton's law for gravitational force describe interactions that follow an inverse-square dependence on the distance between the interacting particles. This means the force strength decreases rapidly as the separation increases. However, the fundamental nature and magnitudes of these forces are vastly different. Electrostatic force arises from charge and can be attractive or repulsive, while gravitational force arises from mass and is always attractive.
To truly grasp the relative importance of these forces, especially at the microscopic scale where atoms and subatomic particles interact, we compare their magnitudes directly. By forming a ratio of the electrostatic force to the gravitational force, we can quantify which force dominates. A key insight here is that since both forces depend on 1/r2, the distance r will cancel out in the ratio. This means the relative strength of these fundamental forces is a constant, independent of how far apart the particles are.
(a) Comparing the strength of electrostatic and gravitational forces
- Formulate the force equations: The magnitude of the electrostatic force (Fe) between two point charges q1 and q2 separated by a distance r is given by Coulomb's law:
Fe=kr2∣q1q2∣
where $k = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}$ is Coulomb's constant.
The magnitude of the gravitational force ($F_g$) between two point masses $m_1$ and $m_2$ separated by a distance $r$ is given by Newton's law of gravitation:
Fg=Gr2m1m2
where $G$ is the universal gravitational constant.
2. Determine the ratio of forces:
To compare their strengths, we take the ratio FgFe:
FgFe=Gr2m1m2kr2∣q1q2∣
As discussed, the $r^2$ terms cancel out, simplifying the ratio to:
FgFe=Gm1m2k∣q1q2∣
-
List fundamental constants:
We use the following standard values for our calculations:
- Elementary charge, e=1.602×10−19C
- Coulomb's constant, k=9×109N m2/C2
- Universal gravitational constant, G=6.67×10−11N m2/kg2
- Mass of electron, me=9.11×10−31kg
- Mass of proton, mp=1.67×10−27kg
Watch outPrecision in calculations involving powers of ten is crucial. Ensure correct substitution and arithmetic to avoid significant errors in the final magnitude.
(i) For an electron and a proton:
For an electron and a proton, the magnitude of their charges is e for both, so ∣q1q2∣=e2. Their masses are me and mp.
Substituting these into the ratio formula:
FgFe=Gmempke2
FgFe=(6.67×10−11N m2/kg2)(9.11×10−31kg)(1.67×10−27kg)(9×109N m2/C2)(1.602×10−19C)2
Calculating the numerator:
(9×109)×(1.602)2×10−38=9×2.566404×10−29≈2.310×10−28
Calculating the denominator:
(6.67×10−11)×(9.11×10−31)×(1.67×10−27)=(6.67×9.11×1.67)×10−11−31−27
=101.399×10−69≈1.014×10−67
Now, divide the numerator by the denominator:
FgFe=1.014×10−672.310×10−28≈2.278×1039
Rounding to two significant figures, consistent with the precision of $k$ and $G$:
FgFe≈2.3×1039
This result highlights that the electrostatic force is astronomically stronger than the gravitational force at the atomic scale.
**(ii) For two protons:**
For two protons, the magnitude of their charges is $e$ for both, so $|q_1 q_2| = e^2$. Their masses are both $m_p$.
Substituting these into the ratio formula:
FgFe=Gmp2ke2
FgFe=(6.67×10−11N m2/kg2)(1.67×10−27kg)2(9×109N m2/C2)(1.602×10−19C)2
The numerator is the same as before: $2.310 \times 10^{-28}$.
Calculating the denominator:
(6.67×10−11)×(1.67×10−27)2=(6.67×(1.67)2)×10−11−54
=(6.67×2.7889)×10−65=18.598×10−65≈1.860×10−64
Now, divide the numerator by the denominator:
FgFe=1.860×10−642.310×10−28≈1.242×1036
Rounding to two significant figures:
FgFe≈1.2×1036
Even for two protons, the electrostatic repulsion is vastly stronger than their gravitational attraction. The ratio is smaller than for the electron-proton pair because protons are much more massive than electrons, leading to a larger gravitational force in the denominator.
(b) Estimating accelerations
- Understand acceleration from force: According to Newton's second law, the acceleration (a) of an object is directly proportional to the net force (F) acting on it and inversely proportional to its mass (m):
a=mF
We need to calculate the acceleration of both the electron and the proton due to their mutual electrical attraction.
2. Calculate the electrostatic force:
The electron and proton are separated by a distance r=1A˚=10−10m.
The magnitude of the electrostatic force between them is:
Fe=kr2e2
Fe=(9×109N m2/C2)(10−10m)2(1.602×10−19C)2
Fe=(9×109)10−202.566404×10−38
Fe=9×2.566404×109−38+20
Fe=23.097636×10−9N
Fe≈2.31×10−8N
This is the magnitude of the attractive force acting on both the electron and the proton.
3. Calculate the acceleration of the electron:
The force on the electron is Fe, and its mass is me=9.11×10−31kg.
ae=meFe
ae=9.11×10−31kg2.30976×10−8N
ae≈0.2535×1023m/s2
ae≈2.54×1022m/s2
- Calculate the acceleration of the proton: The force on the proton is also Fe (by Newton's third law), and its mass is mp=1.67×10−27kg.
ap=mpFe
ap=1.67×10−27kg2.30976×10−8N
ap≈1.383×1019m/s2
ap≈1.38×1019m/s2
> [!TIP]
> The electron, being significantly less massive than the proton ($m_p \approx 1836 m_e$), experiences a proportionally larger acceleration for the same magnitude of force. This is a direct consequence of Newton's second law, $a = F/m$.
- The ratio of electrostatic to gravitational force is approximately 2.3×1039 for an electron and a proton, and 1.2×1036 for two protons.
- The acceleration of the electron is approximately 2.54×1022m/s2, and the acceleration of the proton is approximately 1.38×1019m/s2.
Method: Ratio of Forces & Newton’s Second Law
This problem uses the Inverse Square Law Comparison method — comparing two forces that both follow a r21 dependence, then applying Newton’s Second Law (F=ma) to find accelerations.
Part (a) — Ratio of Electrostatic to Gravitational Force
Step 1: Write the two force laws
- Coulomb’s law (electrostatic):
Fe=4πε01⋅r2∣q1q2∣
- Newton’s law (gravitational):
Fg=G⋅r2m1m2
Step 2: Form the ratio
Since both have r2 in the denominator, the distance cancels out:
FgFe=Gm1m24πε01∣q1q2∣
Step 3: Plug constants
- 4πε01=9×109N m2/C2
- G=6.67×10−11N m2/kg2
- e=1.6×10−19C
(i) For an electron and a proton
- ∣q1q2∣=e2
- m1m2=memp
FgFe=(6.67×10−11)(9.11×10−31)(1.67×10−27)(9×109)(1.6×10−19)2
Step 4: Calculate
- Numerator: 9×109×2.56×10−38=2.304×10−28
- Denominator: 6.67×10−11×1.52×10−57=1.014×10−67
FgFe=1.014×10−672.304×10−28≈2.27×1039
Result (i): 2.27×1039 — electrostatic force is enormously stronger than gravitational force for an electron-proton pair.
(ii) For two protons
- ∣q1q2∣=e2 (same as above)
- m1m2=mp2
FgFe=(6.67×10−11)(1.67×10−27)2(9×109)(1.6×10−19)2
- Denominator: 6.67×10−11×2.79×10−54=1.86×10−64
FgFe=1.86×10−642.304×10−28≈1.24×1036
Result (ii): 1.24×1036 — still huge, but smaller than (i) because protons are much heavier than electrons.
Part (b) — Accelerations due to Electrical Force at r=1A˚
Step 1: Calculate the electrostatic force
Fe=4πε01⋅r2e2
Fe=(10−10)29×109×(1.6×10−19)2
Fe=10−209×109×2.56×10−38
Fe=2.304×10−8N
Step 2: Apply Newton’s Second Law (F=ma)
- For the electron:
ae=meFe=9.11×10−312.304×10−8
ae≈2.53×1022m/s2
- For the proton:
ap=mpFe=1.67×10−272.304×10−8
ap≈1.38×1019m/s2
Final results:
- Electron acceleration: 2.53×1022m/s2
- Proton acceleration: 1.38×1019m/s2
The electron accelerates ~1836 times more than the proton (inverse ratio of their masses), as expected from Newton’s third law — equal force, but vastly different masses.
Here are the most common mistakes students make on this inverse-square law comparison problem, and how to avoid each.
1. Forgetting the Direction of the Force (Vector vs. Scalar)
- The Mistake: Students often write the ratio of forces as a vector, or they forget that Coulomb and Newton forces act along the same line (the line joining the two particles). They might also incorrectly add or subtract the forces.
- Why it’s wrong: The question asks for the ratio of magnitudes. Force is a vector, but a ratio of magnitudes is a scalar. You must take the absolute values.
- How to avoid: Always write the magnitude formulas first:
- Felectrostatic=kr2∣q1q2∣
- Fgravitational=Gr2m1m2
- Then, divide one by the other. The r2 cancels out immediately.
2. Using the Wrong Constants or Units
- The Mistake: Using k=9×109 but forgetting it’s in SI units (N m²/C²), or using G=6.67×10−11 but in wrong units (N m²/kg²). Also, mixing up mp and me in the ratio.
- Why it’s wrong: The ratio is dimensionless, but only if you use consistent SI units. If you plug in r=1A˚=10−10m, you must use meters.
- How to avoid: Write down the constants clearly:
- k=8.99×109≈9×109N m2/C2
- G=6.67×10−11N m2/kg2
- e=1.6×10−19C
- mp=1.67×10−27kg
- me=9.11×10−31kg
- Pro tip: For the ratio, you don’t even need r — it cancels. So you only need k, G, charges, and masses.
3. Incorrectly Handling the Charges for (a)(i) and (a)(ii)
- The Mistake: For (a)(i) (electron & proton), students use q1=−e and q2=+e, then get confused about the sign. For (a)(ii) (two protons), they forget that both charges are +e.
- Why it’s wrong: The magnitude of force uses ∣q1q2∣. For electron-proton, ∣(−e)(+e)∣=e2. For two protons, ∣(+e)(+e)∣=e2. Both are e2! The ratio is the same for both cases.
- How to avoid: Always take the absolute value of the product of charges. Write:
- ∣q1q2∣=e2 for both (i) and (ii).
- Then the ratio FgFe=Gm1m2ke2.
- For (i): m1m2=memp.
- For (ii): m1m2=mpmp=mp2.
4. Forgetting to Square the Masses in (a)(ii)
- The Mistake: In the two-proton case, students write m1m2=mp instead of mp2.
- Why it’s wrong: Newton’s law uses the product of both masses. For two identical protons, that’s mp×mp=mp2.
- How to avoid: Always write the product explicitly: m1m2. If both are protons, it’s mp2. If one is electron and one is proton, it’s memp.
5. Misinterpreting “Acceleration” in Part (b)
- The Mistake: Students calculate the force correctly but then use F=ma with the wrong mass — they use the total mass or the mass of the other particle.
- Why it’s wrong: Newton’s second law says F=ma for each particle individually. The same magnitude of force acts on both, but their accelerations are different because their masses are different.
- How to avoid:
- First, calculate the electrostatic force Fe=kr2e2 (with r=10−10m).
- Then, separately compute:
- ae=meFe (acceleration of electron)
- ap=mpFe (acceleration of proton)
- Notice: ae will be much larger than ap because me≪mp.
6. Not Checking the Magnitude of the Ratio
- The Mistake: Students get a number like 1039 or 1036 but don’t realize how huge it is, so they don’t double-check their exponent arithmetic.
- Why it’s wrong: A small error in exponent (e.g., using 10−31 vs 10−27) changes the ratio by a factor of 104.
- How to avoid: Do a quick order-of-magnitude check:
- k≈1010, G≈10−10, so k/G≈1020.
- e2≈(10−19)2=10−38.
- For electron-proton: memp≈(10−30)(10−27)=10−57.
- Ratio ≈10−571020×10−38=1020−38+57=1039. That’s correct.
- For two protons: mp2≈10−54, ratio ≈10−541020×10−38=1020−38+54=1036. Also correct.
7. Forgetting to Convert Å to Meters in Part (b)
- The Mistake: Using r=1 instead of r=10−10m.
- Why it’s wrong: The force formula requires SI units. 1A˚=10−10m.
- How to avoid: Write the conversion explicitly: r=1A˚=1×10−10m. Then plug into F=ke2/r2.
Quick Summary Table of Mistakes & Fixes
| Mistake | Why It’s Wrong | How to Avoid |
|---|---|---|
| Using vector instead of magnitude | Ratio is scalar | Take absolute values of charges |
| Wrong constants/units | Ratio becomes dimensionally wrong | Write k, G, e, mp, me in SI |
| Sign confusion in charges | Magnitude is always e2 | Use $ |
| Forgetting mp2 in (a)(ii) | Product of masses is mp2 | Write m1m2 explicitly |
| Using wrong mass for acceleration | Each particle has its own a | a=F/m for each particle separately |
| Exponent errors in ratio | Off by factors of 104 | Do order-of-magnitude check |
| Not converting Å to m | Force value is wrong | 1A˚=10−10m |
Final tip: Always write the formulas in full, cancel common terms (r2), and then plug numbers. This minimizes errors and shows the examiner you understand the concept.
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 on this concept.
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-09-AN1 markMCQQ.An electron is moving in a stable circular orbit of radius 0.1 m around a thin infinitely long positively charged straight wire. If orbital velocity of the electron around the wire is 4×107 ms−1, then linear charge density of the wire is nearly (A) 4.5×10−7 Cm−1 (B) 9×10−7 Cm−1 (C) 5×10−7 Cm−1 (D) 2.5×10−7 Cm−1
›Reveal solutionSolution
The wire's field supplies the centripetal force: λ=e2πε0mv2≈5×10−7Cm−1.
The radial field of an infinite line charge is E=2πε0rλ. This provides the centripetal force on the electron:
eE=rmv2⇒2πε0reλ=rmv2
The radius cancels:
λ=e2πε0mv2
With 2πε0=2×9×1091=5.56×10−11, m=9.1×10−31kg, v=4×107ms−1, e=1.6×10−19C:
λ=1.6×10−195.56×10−11×9.1×10−31×(4×107)2≈5×10−7Cm−1
✓Final answerλ≈5×10−7Cm−1 — option (C).
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-10-FN1 markMCQQ.Two metallic spherical shells A and B of radii 3 cm and 4 cm are given electric charges 20 μC and 40 μC respectively. If the shells are arranged concentrically, then the ratio of the surface charge densities on the outer surfaces of the shells A and B is (A) 4:27 (B) 4:3 (C) 16:9 (D) 16:27
›Reveal solutionSolution
When two charged spherical shells are arranged concentrically, the charge on the outer surface of the inner shell is its own charge, while the charge on the outer surface of the outer shell is the sum of the charges of both shells. The ratio of their surface charge densities is 16:27.
Concept and Intuition
Surface charge density, denoted by σ (sigma), is defined as the amount of electric charge per unit surface area. For a spherical conductor with charge Q and radius R, its surface area is 4πR2, so the surface charge density is σ=4πR2Q.
When we have two concentric conducting spherical shells, the distribution of charges follows specific rules due to electrostatic induction:
- Inner Shell (A): Since shell A is a conductor, any charge QA given to it will reside entirely on its outer surface. This is because charges on a conductor repel each other and try to maximize their separation, pushing to the outermost boundary available to them.
- Outer Shell (B):
- The charge QA on the outer surface of shell A will induce an equal and opposite charge, −QA, on the inner surface of shell B. This happens to maintain zero electric field inside the material of the outer conductor (shell B).
- Since shell B was initially given a total charge QB, and −QA has appeared on its inner surface, the remaining charge must reside on its outer surface. This remaining charge is QB−(−QA)=QA+QB. This total charge QA+QB will spread uniformly over the outer surface of shell B.
Therefore, to find the ratio of surface charge densities on the outer surfaces of shells A and B, we need to use QA for shell A and QA+QB for shell B.
Step-by-step Derivation
-
Identify the given parameters:
- Radius of shell A, rA=3 cm
- Charge on shell A, QA=20 μC
- Radius of shell B, rB=4 cm
- Charge on shell B, QB=40 μC
-
Determine the charge on the outer surface of shell A:
As explained in the concept, the entire charge QA given to shell A resides on its outer surface.
Charge on outer surface of A =QA=20 μC.
-
Determine the charge on the outer surface of shell B:
Due to electrostatic induction from QA on shell A, a charge of −QA is induced on the inner surface of shell B. Since the total charge given to shell B is QB, the charge remaining for its outer surface is QB−(−QA)=QA+QB.
Charge on outer surface of B =QA+QB=20 μC+40 μC=60 μC.
Watch outA common mistake is to assume the charge on the outer surface of shell B is simply QB. Remember that the inner shell's charge induces an equal and opposite charge on the inner surface of the outer shell, pushing the net charge to the outer surface of the outer shell.
-
Recall the formula for surface charge density:
The surface charge density σ on a sphere with charge Q and radius R is given by:
σ=4πR2Q
-
Calculate the surface charge density for shell A (σA):
σA=Area of outer surface of ACharge on outer surface of A=4πrA2QA
σA=4π(3×10−2 m)220×10−6 C=4π×9×10−420×10−6 C/m2
σA=36π20×10−2 C/m2
-
Calculate the surface charge density for shell B (σB):
σB=Area of outer surface of BCharge on outer surface of B=4πrB2QA+QB
σB=4π(4×10−2 m)260×10−6 C=4π×16×10−460×10−6 C/m2
σB=64π60×10−2 C/m2
-
Find the ratio σA:σB:
σBσA=64π60×10−236π20×10−2
The terms 10−2 and 4π cancel out:
σBσA=60/1620/9=920×6016
σBσA=6020×916=31×916
σBσA=2716
Thus, the ratio of the surface charge densities is 16:27.
✓Final answerThe ratio of the surface charge densities on the outer surfaces of shells A and B is 16:27.
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-11-FN1 markMCQQ.The fundamental force that plays a key role in the large scale phenomena of the universe is (A) electromagnetic force (B) strong nuclear force (C) weak nuclear force (D) gravitational force
›Reveal solutionSolution
The large-scale structure of the universe — galaxies, clusters, and cosmic motion — is governed by gravity, which acts over astronomical distances and dominates the dynamics of massive bodies. The correct answer is (D) gravitational force.
The question asks which fundamental force is responsible for the large-scale phenomena of the universe. To answer this, you need to think about the range and strength of each fundamental force, and how they manifest on cosmic scales.
The four fundamental forces are: gravitational, electromagnetic, strong nuclear, and weak nuclear. Each has a very different role.
-
Strong nuclear force — This is the strongest force, but its range is tiny, about the size of an atomic nucleus (≈10−15 m). It holds protons and neutrons together inside the nucleus. It simply cannot act over distances larger than a few femtometres, so it plays no role in large-scale phenomena.
-
Weak nuclear force — Even shorter-ranged than the strong force (≈10−18 m). It is responsible for certain types of radioactive decay (like beta decay). Again, completely irrelevant on cosmic scales.
-
Electromagnetic force — This force has infinite range, like gravity, and is much stronger (about 1036 times stronger than gravity between two protons). However, on large scales, matter is electrically neutral overall — positive and negative charges cancel out. So the net electromagnetic force between astronomical bodies (like stars or galaxies) is essentially zero. Electromagnetism dominates at atomic and molecular scales, but not at the scale of the universe.
-
Gravitational force — Also has infinite range, but is the weakest of the four. However, gravity is always attractive and cannot be cancelled. Since astronomical bodies are massive and electrically neutral, gravity is the only force that accumulates over large distances. It governs the motion of planets, stars, galaxies, and the expansion of the universe itself.
Watch outA common mistake is to pick electromagnetic force because it is "stronger" and has infinite range. But on large scales, charge neutrality cancels it out. Gravity, though weak per particle, adds up because mass always attracts mass.
TipThink of it this way: if you take two galaxies, the electromagnetic force between them is negligible because each galaxy has equal numbers of protons and electrons. But their masses are enormous, so gravity pulls them together. That is why gravity shapes the universe.
Thus, the fundamental force that plays the key role in large-scale phenomena of the universe is gravity.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) gravitational force.
-
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-11-FN1 markMCQQ.If two bodies A and B of masses 5 kg and 10 kg are thrown vertically upwards from the surface of the earth with velocities 0.5gR and 0.2gR respectively, then the ratio of maximum heights reached by the bodies A and B is (R - Radius of the earth) (A) 3:2 (B) 5:2 (C) 3:1 (D) 2:1
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is that for large velocities (comparable to escape velocity), the maximum height must be found using energy conservation with variable gravity, not constant-g kinematics. The ratio of maximum heights for the two bodies is 5:2, so option (B) is correct.
Concept and Intuition
When a body is thrown upward with a speed that is a significant fraction of the escape velocity (2gR), the gravitational acceleration is not constant over the ascent. The usual kinematic formula h=u2/(2g) assumes constant g, which fails here because g decreases with height. Instead, we must use conservation of mechanical energy, accounting for the variation of gravitational potential energy with distance from Earth's center. The escape velocity from Earth's surface is ve=2gR. Both given velocities are comparable to this, so constant-g kinematics would give a wrong answer.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Write the energy conservation equation At the surface (radius R), the body has kinetic energy 21mu2 and potential energy −RGMm. At the maximum height h, its velocity is zero, so only potential energy remains: −R+hGMm. Energy conservation gives:
21mu2−RGMm=−R+hGMm
- Simplify using g=GM/R2 Substitute GM=gR2:
21u2−RgR2=−R+hgR2
21u2−gR=−R+hgR2
- Solve for h Rearranging:
R+hgR2=gR−21u2
R+h=gR−21u2gR2
h=gR−21u2gR2−R
h=R(gR−21u2gR−1)
h=R(gR−21u221u2)
- Introduce the ratio u2/(gR) Let k=gRu2. Then:
h=R(gR−21kgR21kgR)=R(1−21k21k)
So:
h=R⋅2−kk
- Apply to each body
- For body A: uA=0.5gR → kA=0.5
hA=R⋅2−0.50.5=R⋅1.50.5=3R
- For body B: uB=0.2gR → kB=0.2
hB=R⋅2−0.20.2=R⋅1.80.2=9R
- Find the ratio
hBhA=R/9R/3=39=3
So the ratio is 3:1.
Watch outA common mistake is to use h=u2/(2g), which gives hA:hB=0.5:0.2=5:2. That is incorrect because constant-g kinematics is invalid for such large velocities. The correct ratio from energy conservation is 3:1.
TipNotice that the ratio depends only on the dimensionless parameter k=u2/(gR). The masses of the bodies cancel out — in free fall (or free ascent) under gravity, the motion is independent of mass.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C).
ANSWER: C
- TG EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-04-AN1 markMCQQ.A cyclotron with dees of radius 50 cm and a magnetic field of 1.5 T is used to accelerate protons and alpha particles separately. The ratio of the maximum kinetic energies acquired by the proton and alpha particle is (A) 1:4 (B) 1:1 (C) 1:2 (D) 1:8
›Reveal solutionSolution
The maximum kinetic energy a charged particle acquires in a cyclotron depends on its charge-to-mass ratio, the magnetic field, and the cyclotron's radius. For a proton and an alpha particle, the ratio of their maximum kinetic energies in the same cyclotron is 1:1.
A cyclotron accelerates charged particles by making them move in a spiral path under a constant magnetic field, while an oscillating electric field provides energy boosts. The magnetic field forces the particles into circular paths, and the electric field between the dees accelerates them each time they cross the gap.
The particle gains kinetic energy with each acceleration, increasing its speed and thus the radius of its circular path. This process continues until the particle reaches the maximum radius of the dees, at which point it exits the cyclotron. The kinetic energy at this maximum radius is the maximum kinetic energy the particle can acquire.
To find this maximum kinetic energy, we use the principle that the magnetic force provides the necessary centripetal force for the circular motion.
- Derive the formula for maximum kinetic energy: When a charged particle of charge q and mass m moves with velocity v in a magnetic field B perpendicular to its velocity, the magnetic force FB=qvB acts as the centripetal force Fc=rmv2. Equating these forces:
qvB=rmv2
From this, we can find the velocity $v$ of the particle at a given radius $r$:v=mqBr
The maximum velocity $v_{max}$ is achieved when the particle reaches the maximum radius $R$ of the dees:vmax=mqBR
The maximum kinetic energy $K_{max}$ is then given by:Kmax=21mvmax2
Substitute the expression for $v_{max}$:Kmax=21m(mqBR)2=21mm2q2B2R2
> [!FORMULA] > The maximum kinetic energy acquired by a particle in a cyclotron is: > $$K_{max} = \frac{q^2B^2R^2}{2m}$$ > Here, $q$ is the charge of the particle, $m$ is its mass, $B$ is the magnetic field strength, and $R$ is the radius of the dees. Notice that the given values for the radius ($50$ cm) and magnetic field ($1.5$ T) are constant for both particles and will cancel out when we take the ratio.2. Identify properties of a proton:
A proton has a charge qp=e (where e is the elementary charge) and a mass mp=m.
-
Identify properties of an alpha particle:
An alpha particle is the nucleus of a helium atom (24He). It consists of two protons and two neutrons.
Its charge is qα=2e.
Its mass is approximately mα=4m (since the mass of a neutron is very close to that of a proton).
-
Calculate maximum kinetic energy for a proton (Kp):
Using the formula Kmax=2mq2B2R2 with qp=e and mp=m:
Kp=2me2B2R2
- Calculate maximum kinetic energy for an alpha particle (Kα): Using the formula Kmax=2mq2B2R2 with qα=2e and mα=4m:
Kα=2(4m)(2e)2B2R2=8m4e2B2R2=2me2B2R2
- Find the ratio of the maximum kinetic energies: Now, we take the ratio of Kp to Kα:
KαKp=2me2B2R22me2B2R2
KαKp=1
Thus, the ratio is $1:1$.✓Final answerThe ratio of the maximum kinetic energies acquired by the proton and alpha particle is 1:1.
- TG EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-04-FN1 markMCQQ.The reason for the constancy of binding energy per nucleon of nuclei whose mass number lies between 30 and 170 is (A) Short range of nuclear forces (B) The nuclear force between neutron-neutron is greater than the nuclear force between proton-proton (C) Nuclear forces are weak forces (D) Binding energy per nucleon is lower for these nuclei
›Reveal solutionSolution
The binding energy per nucleon is nearly constant for nuclei with mass number 30–170 because nuclear forces are short-range, so each nucleon only interacts with its immediate neighbours, making the total binding energy roughly proportional to the number of nucleons.
The key to this question is understanding why the binding energy per nucleon doesn't keep rising as nuclei get bigger. If every nucleon attracted every other nucleon equally, the binding energy would grow roughly like A2 (the number of pairs), and the binding energy per nucleon would keep increasing with A. That doesn't happen — it flattens out. The reason is that nuclear forces have a very short range, about the size of a few nucleon diameters.
-
The saturation of nuclear forces
A nucleon inside a medium-sized or large nucleus only feels the strong force from its nearest neighbours — nucleons that are, say, 2–3 fm away. Nucleons on the opposite side of the nucleus are too far to contribute any attraction. This is completely different from gravity or electromagnetism, which are long-range and act between every pair.
-
What this means for binding energy
Because each nucleon only bonds with a fixed number of nearby nucleons (roughly 12–15), the total binding energy of the nucleus is proportional to the number of nucleons A, not to A2. So the binding energy per nucleon becomes roughly constant — about 8 MeV per nucleon — for nuclei where the surface effect is small compared to the volume effect. That happens for A between about 30 and 170.
-
Why the other options are wrong
- (B) is false: the nuclear force between a neutron and a proton is actually the strongest of the three pairs (n-p, n-n, p-p), and even if it weren't, that wouldn't explain the constancy of binding energy per nucleon.
- (C) is false: nuclear forces are the strongest known forces, not weak forces. The weak nuclear force is a different interaction responsible for beta decay.
- (D) is a restatement of the observation, not an explanation. The question asks for the reason the binding energy per nucleon is constant, not a description of the graph.
Watch outA common mistake is to confuse the strong nuclear force (which binds the nucleus) with the weak nuclear force (which causes radioactive decay). They are completely different in strength and range. The strong force is about 100 times stronger than the electromagnetic force; the weak force is about 10−6 times as strong.
TipThink of a nucleus like a pile of marbles held together by Velcro patches on each marble. Each marble only sticks to the marbles it touches — not to marbles on the far side of the pile. If you add more marbles to the middle, each new marble adds about the same amount of stickiness as the ones before it. That's saturation.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A), because the short range of nuclear forces causes saturation, making the binding energy per nucleon roughly constant for A between 30 and 170.
-
- TG EAPCET 2025Set ap-2025-04-29-AN1 markMCQQ.Two spherical shells of radii R and 2R, masses M and 2M respectively are arranged concentrically. The net gravitational force acting on a particle of mass 'm' placed at a distance of 23R from the common centre of the shells is (A) 3R24GMm (B) 9R276GMm (C) 9R24GMm (D) 9R268GMm
›Reveal solutionSolution
The gravitational force on a particle inside a spherical shell is zero, while outside it acts as if all mass is at the center. For the given setup, only the inner shell contributes to the force, resulting in 9R24GMm.
The problem asks for the net gravitational force on a particle placed at a specific distance from the common center of two concentric spherical shells. To solve this, we need to understand how gravitational force is exerted by a spherical shell on a point mass, which is described by the Shell Theorem.
Concept and Intuition: The Shell Theorem
The Shell Theorem is a fundamental result in gravitation that simplifies calculating the gravitational force due to spherical shells. It states two key principles:
- For a point outside a spherical shell: The gravitational force exerted by the shell on a particle outside it is the same as if all the mass of the shell were concentrated at its center.
- For a point inside a spherical shell: The net gravitational force exerted by the shell on a particle located anywhere inside it is zero. This is because the gravitational pulls from different parts of the shell cancel each other out perfectly.
When dealing with multiple concentric shells, we apply this theorem to each shell individually and then sum the forces vectorially. Since gravitational force is always attractive and directed towards the center of mass (or the center of the shell in this symmetric case), the forces will be collinear, simplifying the vector sum to an algebraic sum of magnitudes.
Let's apply this to the given problem.
Step-by-step Derivation:
-
Identify the setup:
- Inner spherical shell: Radius R, Mass M.
- Outer spherical shell: Radius 2R, Mass 2M.
- Particle: Mass m, placed at a distance r=23R from the common center.
-
Analyze the force due to the inner shell:
The inner shell has radius R and mass M. The particle is placed at a distance r=23R from the center.
Since r=23R=1.5R, and 1.5R>R, the particle is outside the inner spherical shell.
According to the Shell Theorem, the inner shell behaves as if all its mass M is concentrated at the common center.
The gravitational force exerted by the inner shell on the particle is given by Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation:
F1=r2GMm
Substituting $r = \dfrac{3R}{2}$:F1=(23R)2GMm=49R2GMm=9R24GMm
This force is directed towards the common center.3. Analyze the force due to the outer shell:
The outer shell has radius 2R and mass 2M. The particle is placed at a distance r=23R from the center.
Since r=23R=1.5R, and 1.5R<2R, the particle is inside the outer spherical shell.
According to the Shell Theorem, the net gravitational force exerted by a spherical shell on a particle inside it is zero.
Therefore, the gravitational force exerted by the outer shell on the particle is:
F2=0
- Calculate the net gravitational force: The net gravitational force on the particle is the vector sum of the forces due to each shell. Since both forces (or the only non-zero force) are directed towards the common center, we can simply add their magnitudes:
Fnet=F1+F2
Fnet=9R24GMm+0
Fnet=9R24GMm
> [!WARNING] > A common mistake is to treat the outer shell as a point mass at the center, even when the particle is inside it. Remember that the Shell Theorem has two distinct cases: inside and outside the shell.5. Compare with the given options:
The calculated net gravitational force is 9R24GMm, which matches option (C).
✓Final answerThe net gravitational force acting on the particle is 9R24GMm.
- TG EAPCET 2025Set ap-2025-04-29-FN1 markMCQQ.Two charged particles enter a uniform magnetic field normally. If the ratio of the specific charges of the two particles is 2:3, then the ratio of the times taken by the two particles to complete one revolution is (A) 1:1 (B) 3:2 (C) 9:4 (D) 3:2
›Reveal solutionSolution
The time period for circular motion in a uniform magnetic field depends only on the mass-to-charge ratio, not on speed. Given the specific charge ratio 2:3, the time period ratio is the inverse, i.e., 3:2.
The key concept here is the cyclotron motion of a charged particle in a uniform magnetic field. When a particle of charge q and mass m enters a uniform magnetic field B perpendicular to its velocity, the magnetic force provides the centripetal force. This force is always perpendicular to velocity, so it changes only the direction, not the speed. The result is uniform circular motion.
The time taken to complete one full revolution — the time period T — is independent of the particle’s speed. Why? Because a faster particle moves in a larger circle (larger radius) but covers the larger circumference in exactly the same time. Let’s derive that.
- Set up the force equation. The magnetic force is F=qvB (since v⊥B). This equals the centripetal force mv2/r. So:
qvB=rmv2
Cancel v (non-zero) to get:
qB=rmv⇒r=qBmv
- Find the time period. The circumference of the circle is 2πr. The particle’s speed v is constant, so:
T=speedcircumference=v2πr
Substitute r from above:
T=v2π⋅qBmv=qB2πm
T=qB2πm
The time period depends only on mass m, charge q, and magnetic field B — not on speed or radius.
- Interpret the given ratio. The problem gives the ratio of specific charges, which is charge per unit mass: q/m. Let’s denote:
m1q1:m2q2=2:3
That means:
m1q1=32⋅m2q2
- Find the ratio of time periods. From the formula T=2πm/(qB), the ratio for the two particles (in the same magnetic field B) is:
T2T1=m2/q2m1/q1=1/(q2/m2)1/(q1/m1)=q1/m1q2/m2
So the time period ratio is the inverse of the specific charge ratio:
T2T1=23
Watch outA common mistake is to think the time period depends on speed or radius. It does not — the radius adjusts exactly to keep T constant for a given m/q. Always go back to T=2πm/(qB).
✓Final answerThe ratio of the times taken is 3:2, which corresponds to option (B).
- TG EAPCET 2024Set ap-2024-05-08-FN1 markMCQQ.A body weighs the same on the surfaces of two planets of densities 'ρ1' and 'ρ2.' The ratio of the radii of the planets is (A) ρ1ρ2 (B) ρ12ρ22 (C) ρ13ρ23 (D) ρ14ρ24
›Reveal solutionSolution
Weight equality on two planets means their surface gravitational accelerations are equal. Using g=34πGρR, the ratio of radii is R2R1=ρ1ρ2, so the correct option is (A).
The key idea is that a body’s weight on a planet’s surface is mg, where g is the acceleration due to gravity at that surface. If the weight is the same on both planets, then g must be the same on both — the mass m of the body is unchanged. So the problem reduces to: given two planets of different densities, find the ratio of their radii such that their surface g values are equal.
For a spherical planet of mass M and radius R, the surface gravity is g=R2GM. But M is not directly given — we know the density ρ. Since the planet is a sphere, M=ρ⋅34πR3. Substituting this into the expression for g gives a clean relation that eliminates M and ties g directly to ρ and R.
- Write the surface gravity in terms of density and radius:
g=R2G⋅(34πR3ρ)=34πGρR.
Notice that g is proportional to the product ρR — a larger radius or a larger density both increase surface gravity linearly.
- For planet 1 (density ρ1, radius R1) and planet 2 (density ρ2, radius R2), the condition that the body weighs the same on both surfaces is:
g1=g2⇒34πGρ1R1=34πGρ2R2.
- Cancel the common factor 34πG (which is the same for both planets) to get:
ρ1R1=ρ2R2.
- Rearranging gives the required ratio of radii:
R2R1=ρ1ρ2.
Watch outA common mistake is to start from g=GM/R2 and then substitute M=34πR3ρ but forget that R appears in both the numerator and denominator — leading to an incorrect power of R. Always simplify fully: g∝ρR, not ρR3 or ρ/R2.
TipThe relation g=34πGρR is a powerful shortcut for any problem comparing surface gravities of spherical planets of known densities and radii. It saves you from re-deriving the mass each time.
✓Final answerThe ratio of the radii is ρ1ρ2, which corresponds to option (A).
- TG EAPCET 2024Set ap-2024-05-07-FN1 markMCQQ.Two particles of charges in the ratio 1:2 and masses in the ratio 2:3 moving along a straight line enter a uniform magnetic field at right angles to the direction of the field. If the radii of the circular paths of the particles in the magnetic field are in the ratio 3:4, then the ratio of the initial linear momenta of the two particles is (A) 1:1 (B) 3:4 (C) 3:8 (D) 2:3
›Reveal solutionSolution
The radius of a charged particle’s circular path in a uniform magnetic field is proportional to its linear momentum divided by its charge. Using the given ratios, the momentum ratio is found to be 3:8, which corresponds to option (C).
Concept & Intuition
When a charged particle enters a uniform magnetic field perpendicular to its velocity, it experiences a magnetic force that acts as a centripetal force, causing it to move in a circle. The radius r of this circle is given by
r=qBmv=qBp,
where p=mv is the linear momentum, q is the charge, and B is the magnetic field strength (same for both particles). So, for a fixed B, the radius is directly proportional to momentum and inversely proportional to charge. This relation lets us connect the given ratios.
Step-by-step solution
- Write the radius formula for each particle For particle 1: r1=q1Bp1 For particle 2: r2=q2Bp2 Since B is the same, dividing the two equations gives
r2r1=p2p1⋅q1q2.
-
Insert the given ratios
Charges are in the ratio q1:q2=1:2, so q1q2=12=2.
Radii are in the ratio r1:r2=3:4, so r2r1=43.
-
Solve for the momentum ratio
From step 1:
43=p2p1×2.
Therefore,
p2p1=43×21=83.
So the ratio of initial linear momenta is 3:8.
TipNotice that the masses (ratio 2:3) are irrelevant here because the radius depends on momentum, not mass directly. A common mistake is to try to use mass and velocity separately — but the problem gives radii and charges, so momentum is the natural quantity.
Watch outDo not confuse the charge ratio order: the formula uses q2/q1, not q1/q2. Always check which particle’s quantity is in the numerator.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C).
ANSWER: C
- TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-10-FN1 markMCQQ.Two stars of masses ‘M’ and ‘2M’ that are at a distance ‘d’ apart, are revolving one around another. The angular velocity of the system of two stars is (G-Universal gravitational constant) (A) d34GM (B) d32GM (C) d39GM (D) d33GM
›Reveal solutionSolution
The two stars revolve around their common centre of mass, and the gravitational force provides the centripetal force for each star. The angular velocity is found to be d33GM, so the correct option is (D).
The key concept here is that two bodies orbiting each other do not revolve around the centre of either star. Instead, they both orbit their common centre of mass (the balance point of the system). The gravitational attraction between them supplies the necessary centripetal force for each star’s circular motion around that point. Because the stars have different masses, they orbit at different distances from the centre of mass, but they share the same angular velocity — otherwise they would not stay opposite each other.
Let’s work through it step by step.
- Locate the centre of mass. Place the star of mass M at position x=0 and the star of mass 2M at x=d. The centre of mass (CM) is at
xCM=M+2MM⋅0+2M⋅d=3M2Md=32d.
So the CM is 32d from the lighter star and 31d from the heavier star.
- Define the orbital radii. Let r1 be the distance from the CM to the star of mass M, and r2 the distance to the star of mass 2M. From step 1:
r1=32d,r2=31d.
Notice r1+r2=d, as expected.
- Apply Newton’s law of gravitation and centripetal force for one star. For the star of mass M, the gravitational force from the other star is
F=d2G⋅M⋅2M=d22GM2.
This force provides the centripetal force needed for M to move in a circle of radius r1 with angular velocity ω:
Mω2r1=d22GM2.
- Solve for ω. Cancel M from both sides:
ω2r1=d22GM.
Substitute r1=32d:
ω2⋅32d=d22GM.
Multiply both sides by 2d3:
ω2=d33GM.
Taking the square root:
ω=d33GM.
- Check consistency with the other star (optional but reassuring). For the star of mass 2M, centripetal force is 2Mω2r2=d22GM2. Substituting r2=31d gives the same ω2, confirming the result.
Watch outA common mistake is to assume both stars orbit the centre of the heavier star, or to use the full separation d as the radius for either star’s orbit. That would give d32GM (option B) — a plausible but incorrect answer.
TipIn any two-body gravitational system, the angular velocity depends only on the total mass and the separation: ω=d3G(M1+M2). Here M1+M2=3M, so directly ω=d33GM.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D).
ANSWER: D
- TG EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-12-AN1 markMCQQ.The ratio of the radii of two planets is ‘r’ and the ratio of accelerations due to gravity on the planets is ‘x’. Then the ratio of the escape velocities from the planets is (A) xr (B) xr (C) rx (D) rx
›Reveal solutionSolution
The ratio of escape velocities depends on both the planet’s radius and its surface gravity; combining the formulas gives rx, so the correct option is (C).
Concept & Intuition
Escape velocity is the minimum speed needed to break free from a planet’s gravitational pull. It depends on two things: the planet’s mass (which determines how strong the gravity is) and its radius (how far you are from the center when you start). But we aren’t given masses directly — we’re given the ratio of radii (r) and the ratio of surface gravities (x). Since surface gravity itself depends on mass and radius, we can combine these to find the escape velocity ratio without needing absolute values.
Step-by-step reasoning
- Recall the formula for escape velocity For a planet of mass M and radius R, the escape velocity is
ve=R2GM
where G is the universal gravitational constant.
- Express mass in terms of surface gravity The acceleration due to gravity at the surface is
g=R2GM
So GM=gR2.
- Substitute into the escape velocity formula
ve=R2(gR2)=2gR
This is a neat form: escape velocity depends only on the planet’s surface gravity and its radius.
- Set up the ratios Let planet 1 have radius R1 and gravity g1, planet 2 have R2 and g2. Given:
R2R1=randg2g1=x
- Write the ratio of escape velocities
ve2ve1=2g2R22g1R1=g2g1⋅R2R1=x⋅r
- Interpret the result The ratio is rx, which matches option (C).
TipA common mistake is to think escape velocity depends only on gravity or only on radius. The formula ve=2gR shows both matter equally — so the ratio is the geometric mean of the two given ratios.
Watch outDon’t confuse ve=2gR with the orbital velocity formula vo=gR. Escape velocity is always 2 times larger.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C).
ANSWER: C
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.