Q.Consider a coin of Question 1.20. It is electrically neutral and contains equal amounts of positive and negative charge of magnitude 34.8 kC. Suppose that these equal charges were concentrated in two point charges separated by
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Inverse Square Law Comparison
The Intuition: Why Does Light Get Dimmer So Fast?
Imagine you're standing near a campfire. You feel its warmth on your face. Now take ten steps back. Does the warmth feel half as strong? No — it feels much weaker, maybe a quarter as strong. That's not an accident. It's a pattern that shows up everywhere in physics: gravity, light, sound, electric fields, even radiation.
The reason is simple: as you move away from a source, the same amount of energy (or force) has to spread out over a larger area. And that area grows with the square of the distance.
The Core Idea in One Picture
Think of a light bulb at the centre of a balloon. As you inflate the balloon, the light hitting the inner surface spreads thinner and thinner. If you double the radius of the balloon, the surface area becomes four times larger. So each patch of the balloon gets only one-fourth the light.
That's the inverse square law in a nutshell: double the distance → one-fourth the intensity.
The Precise Statement
I∝r21orI=r2k
where:
- I = intensity (brightness, force per unit area, etc.)
- r = distance from the source
- k = a constant that depends on the source's strength
If you compare two distances r1 and r2, the ratio of intensities is:
I1I2=(r2r1)2
This is the inverse square law comparison — you compare how strong a quantity is at two different distances by taking the inverse ratio of the squares of those distances.
Why "Inverse Square" and Not Just "Inverse"?
Because the geometry of space is three-dimensional. The surface of a sphere is 4πr2. As r grows, the sphere's surface grows as r2. Whatever is radiating outward (light, sound, gravity) must pass through that entire surface. So the amount per unit area drops as 1/r2.
If we lived in a flat, two-dimensional world, the law would be 1/r (like ripples on a pond). In one dimension, it would be constant. The inverse square law is a direct consequence of living in three dimensions.
The Comparison: What It Really Means
When you compare two situations, you're not calculating absolute intensity — you're finding the ratio. For example:
A star is 3 times farther away than another identical star. How much dimmer does it appear?
InearIfar=(31)2=91
The farther star is 9 times dimmer. Not 3 times — 9 times. That's the punch of the square.
A common mistake: thinking "twice the distance means half the intensity." It's actually one-fourth. The square makes the drop much steeper than linear intuition suggests. …
Why this formula?
Inverse Square Law Comparison — Why the Formula Holds
The Inverse Square Law appears in physics wherever a quantity spreads out uniformly from a point source in three-dimensional space. The core idea is that the intensity (or field strength) decreases as the square of the distance from the source.
1. The Intuition: Spreading Over a Sphere
Imagine a point source emitting energy, light, sound, or gravitational force equally in all directions.
- At a distance r, the energy is spread uniformly over the surface area of a sphere of radius r.
- The surface area of a sphere is:
A=4πr2
If the total power (or flux) emitted by the source is P, then the intensity I (power per unit area) at distance r is:
I=4πr2P
Key insight: The same total power is spread over a larger and larger area as r increases. Hence, intensity is inversely proportional to r2.
2. Derivation for Gravitational Force (Newton's Law)
Newton’s law of gravitation states:
F=r2GMm
Why 1/r2?
- The gravitational field lines from a point mass M radiate outward uniformly.
- The number of field lines crossing a sphere of radius r is constant (conservation of flux).
- The density of field lines (force per unit mass) at distance r is:
g=r2GM
- This is because the total flux Φ=4πGM is spread over 4πr2, giving:
g=4πr2Φ=r2GM
Thus, the force on a test mass m is F=mg=r2GMm.
3. Derivation for Coulomb's Law (Electrostatics)
Coulomb’s law for electric force between two point charges q1 and q2:
F=r2kq1q2
Why 1/r2?
- Electric field lines from a point charge q radiate radially outward (or inward for negative charge).
- Gauss’s law states that the total electric flux through a closed surface is proportional to the enclosed charge:
∮E⋅dA=ε0q
- For a sphere of radius r centered on the charge, the field is radial and constant in magnitude:
E⋅4πr2=ε0q
- Therefore:
E=4πε01r2q
- The force on a test charge q2 is F=q2E=4πε01r2q1q2.
4. Derivation for Light/Radiation Intensity
For a point source of light emitting power P:
- At distance r, the power is spread over a sphere of area 4πr2.
- Illuminance (intensity) is:
I=4πr2P
Why not 1/r?
- In 2D (e.g., a line source), intensity falls as 1/r because the circumference of a circle is 2πr.
- In 3D, the surface area grows as r2, so intensity falls as 1/r2.
5. The Common Mathematical Reason
All inverse square laws arise from conservation of flux in three-dimensional space with isotropic emission. The geometry forces: …
The key idea is the Inverse Square Law: the electrostatic force between two point charges is F=4πε01r2q1q2. Here, q1=q2=34.8 kC=3.48×104 C, and 4πε01=9×109 N m2/C2.
Step 1: Write the force formula.
F=9×109×r2(3.48×104)2
Step 2: Compute (3.48×104)2=1.21104×109≈1.21×109.
Step 3: So F=9×109×r21.21×109=r21.089×1019 N.
Step 4: Substitute each r:
- (i) r=0.01 m: F=10−41.089×1019=1.089×1023 N
- (ii) r=100 m: F=1041.089×1019=1.089×1015 N
- (iii) r=106 m: F=10121.089×1019=1.089×107 N …
By Coulomb's law F=r2kq2 with q=34.8 kC, the forces are (i) 1.09×1023 N,
(ii) 1.09×1015 N,
(iii) 1.09×107 N. Even at Earth-radius separation the force is colossal, so a coin's positive and negative charges must be intimately mixed — matter is stable only because it is electrically neutral at every macroscopic scale.
Set up the constant part
The magnitude of the force between the two point charges is
F=4πε01r2q2=r2kq2,k=8.99×109 N m2C−2
With q=34.8 kC=3.48×104 C:
q2=(3.48×104)2=1.211×109 C2,kq2=8.99×109×1.211×109=1.09×1019 N m2
This numerator is the same in all three cases; only r changes.
Case (i): r=1 cm=10−2 m
F=(10−2)21.09×1019=10−41.09×1019=1.09×1023 N
Case (ii): r=100 m=102 m
F=(102)21.09×1019=1041.09×1019=1.09×1015 N
Case (iii): r=106 m
F=(106)21.09×1019=10121.09×1019=1.09×107 N
Conclusion …
Method: Coulomb’s Law (Inverse Square Law Comparison)
We use Coulomb’s Law for point charges:
F=4πε01⋅r2q1q2
where
- 4πε01=9×109 N m2/C2
- q1=q2=34.8 kC=34.8×103 C
Steps
- Write the general formula Since both charges are equal:
F=9×109⋅r2(34.8×103)2
- Simplify the numerator
(34.8×103)2=(34.8)2×106=1211.04×106
So:
F=9×109×r21211.04×106
F=r21.089936×1019 N
-
Substitute each separation distance (in metres)
- (i) r=1 cm=0.01 m
F=(0.01)21.089936×1019=10−41.089936×1019
F=1.09×1023 N
- (ii) r=100 m
F=(100)21.089936×1019=1041.089936×1019
F=1.09×1015 N
- (iii) r=106 m …
Common Mistakes on Inverse Square Law Comparison Problems
Students often make predictable errors when comparing electrostatic forces across vastly different distances. Here are the most frequent ones — and how to avoid each.
1. Forgetting the Square in the Denominator
The Mistake
Students treat the force as inversely proportional to distance (F∝1/r) instead of distance squared (F∝1/r2). This leads to underestimating how rapidly force drops.
Example of Error
If r increases by 100×, a student might think F becomes 1/100 of its original value — but the correct factor is 1/1002=1/10,000.
How to Avoid
- Write Coulomb’s law every time before substituting:
F=r2kq1q2
- Circle the r2 term. Remind yourself: double the distance → force drops to one-fourth.
2. Unit Conversion Errors
The Mistake
Plugging in distances in cm or km without converting to metres. Since k=9×109 N m2/C2, the SI unit for r is metres.
Example of Error
Using r=1 cm as 1 instead of 0.01 m gives a force 104 times too large.
How to Avoid
- Convert all distances to metres before calculation:
- 1 cm=1×10−2 m
- 100 m stays as is
- 106 m stays as is
- Write the conversion step explicitly:
r=1 cm=0.01 m
3. Misinterpreting "Force on Each Point Charge"
The Mistake
Students calculate the total force between the two charges but forget that each charge experiences the same magnitude of force (Newton’s Third Law). Some then halve the result incorrectly.
How to Avoid
- Remember: F12=F21 in magnitude.
- The question asks for the force on each — the answer is the same number for both charges.
- No need to divide by 2.
4. Not Recognising the Scale of the Numbers
The Mistake
After computing, students don’t check if the answer is physically plausible. For q=34.8 kC (that’s 3.48×104 C), forces are enormous — even at large distances.
Example of Error
Getting a force like 10−5 N for r=1 cm and not realising it’s absurdly small for such huge charges.
Quick Sanity Check
For r=1 cm:
F=(0.01)2(9×109)(3.48×104)2≈1.09×1020 N
That’s huge — comparable to the weight of a mountain. If your answer is tiny, you’ve made a unit or exponent error.
How to Avoid
- Estimate orders of magnitude before calculating:
- q2≈109
- k≈1010
- r2 for 1 cm ≈10−4 …
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 on this concept.
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-09-AN1 markMCQQ.An electron is moving in a stable circular orbit of radius 0.1 m around a thin infinitely long positively charged straight wire. If orbital velocity of the electron around the wire is 4×107 ms−1, then linear charge density of the wire is nearly (A) 4.5×10−7 Cm−1 (B) 9×10−7 Cm−1 (C) 5×10−7 Cm−1 (D) 2.5×10−7 Cm−1
›Reveal solutionSolution
The wire's field supplies the centripetal force: λ=e2πε0mv2≈5×10−7Cm−1.
The radial field of an infinite line charge is E=2πε0rλ. This provides the centripetal force on the electron:
eE=rmv2⇒2πε0reλ=rmv2
The radius cancels:
λ=e2πε0mv2 …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-10-FN1 markMCQQ.Two metallic spherical shells A and B of radii 3 cm and 4 cm are given electric charges 20 μC and 40 μC respectively. If the shells are arranged concentrically, then the ratio of the surface charge densities on the outer surfaces of the shells A and B is (A) 4:27 (B) 4:3 (C) 16:9 (D) 16:27
›Reveal solutionSolution
When two charged spherical shells are arranged concentrically, the charge on the outer surface of the inner shell is its own charge, while the charge on the outer surface of the outer shell is the sum of the charges of both shells. The ratio of their surface charge densities is 16:27.
Concept and Intuition
Surface charge density, denoted by σ (sigma), is defined as the amount of electric charge per unit surface area. For a spherical conductor with charge Q and radius R, its surface area is 4πR2, so the surface charge density is σ=4πR2Q.
When we have two concentric conducting spherical shells, the distribution of charges follows specific rules due to electrostatic induction:
- Inner Shell (A): Since shell A is a conductor, any charge QA given to it will reside entirely on its outer surface. This is because charges on a conductor repel each other and try to maximize their separation, pushing to the outermost boundary available to them.
- Outer Shell (B):
- The charge QA on the outer surface of shell A will induce an equal and opposite charge, −QA, on the inner surface of shell B. This happens to maintain zero electric field inside the material of the outer conductor (shell B).
- Since shell B was initially given a total charge QB, and −QA has appeared on its inner surface, the remaining charge must reside on its outer surface. This remaining charge is QB−(−QA)=QA+QB. This total charge QA+QB will spread uniformly over the outer surface of shell B.
Therefore, to find the ratio of surface charge densities on the outer surfaces of shells A and B, we need to use QA for shell A and QA+QB for shell B.
Step-by-step Derivation
-
Identify the given parameters:
- Radius of shell A, rA=3 cm
- Charge on shell A, QA=20 μC
- Radius of shell B, rB=4 cm
- Charge on shell B, QB=40 μC
-
Determine the charge on the outer surface of shell A:
As explained in the concept, the entire charge QA given to shell A resides on its outer surface.
Charge on outer surface of A =QA=20 μC.
-
Determine the charge on the outer surface of shell B:
Due to electrostatic induction from QA on shell A, a charge of −QA is induced on the inner surface of shell B. Since the total charge given to shell B is QB, the charge remaining for its outer surface is QB−(−QA)=QA+QB.
Charge on outer surface of B =QA+QB=20 μC+40 μC=60 μC.
Watch outA common mistake is to assume the charge on the outer surface of shell B is simply QB. Remember that the inner shell's charge induces an equal and opposite charge on the inner surface of the outer shell, pushing the net charge to the outer surface of the outer shell.
-
Recall the formula for surface charge density:
The surface charge density σ on a sphere with charge Q and radius R is given by:
σ=4πR2Q …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-11-FN1 markMCQQ.The fundamental force that plays a key role in the large scale phenomena of the universe is (A) electromagnetic force (B) strong nuclear force (C) weak nuclear force (D) gravitational force
›Reveal solutionSolution
The large-scale structure of the universe — galaxies, clusters, and cosmic motion — is governed by gravity, which acts over astronomical distances and dominates the dynamics of massive bodies. The correct answer is (D) gravitational force.
The question asks which fundamental force is responsible for the large-scale phenomena of the universe. To answer this, you need to think about the range and strength of each fundamental force, and how they manifest on cosmic scales.
The four fundamental forces are: gravitational, electromagnetic, strong nuclear, and weak nuclear. Each has a very different role.
-
Strong nuclear force — This is the strongest force, but its range is tiny, about the size of an atomic nucleus (≈10−15 m). It holds protons and neutrons together inside the nucleus. It simply cannot act over distances larger than a few femtometres, so it plays no role in large-scale phenomena.
-
Weak nuclear force — Even shorter-ranged than the strong force (≈10−18 m). It is responsible for certain types of radioactive decay (like beta decay). Again, completely irrelevant on cosmic scales.
-
Electromagnetic force — This force has infinite range, like gravity, and is much stronger (about 1036 times stronger than gravity between two protons). However, on large scales, matter is electrically neutral overall — positive and negative charges cancel out. So the net electromagnetic force between astronomical bodies (like stars or galaxies) is essentially zero. Electromagnetism dominates at atomic and molecular scales, but not at the scale of the universe. …
-
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-11-FN1 markMCQQ.If two bodies A and B of masses 5 kg and 10 kg are thrown vertically upwards from the surface of the earth with velocities 0.5gR and 0.2gR respectively, then the ratio of maximum heights reached by the bodies A and B is (R - Radius of the earth) (A) 3:2 (B) 5:2 (C) 3:1 (D) 2:1
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is that for large velocities (comparable to escape velocity), the maximum height must be found using energy conservation with variable gravity, not constant-g kinematics. The ratio of maximum heights for the two bodies is 5:2, so option (B) is correct.
Concept and Intuition
When a body is thrown upward with a speed that is a significant fraction of the escape velocity (2gR), the gravitational acceleration is not constant over the ascent. The usual kinematic formula h=u2/(2g) assumes constant g, which fails here because g decreases with height. Instead, we must use conservation of mechanical energy, accounting for the variation of gravitational potential energy with distance from Earth's center. The escape velocity from Earth's surface is ve=2gR. Both given velocities are comparable to this, so constant-g kinematics would give a wrong answer.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Write the energy conservation equation At the surface (radius R), the body has kinetic energy 21mu2 and potential energy −RGMm. At the maximum height h, its velocity is zero, so only potential energy remains: −R+hGMm. Energy conservation gives:
21mu2−RGMm=−R+hGMm
- Simplify using g=GM/R2 Substitute GM=gR2:
21u2−RgR2=−R+hgR2
21u2−gR=−R+hgR2
- Solve for h Rearranging:
R+hgR2=gR−21u2
R+h=gR−21u2gR2
h=gR−21u2gR2−R
h=R(gR−21u2gR−1)
h=R(gR−21u221u2)
- Introduce the ratio u2/(gR) Let k=gRu2. Then:
h=R(gR−21kgR21kgR)=R(1−21k21k)
So:
h=R⋅2−kk
- Apply to each body …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-04-AN1 markMCQQ.A cyclotron with dees of radius 50 cm and a magnetic field of 1.5 T is used to accelerate protons and alpha particles separately. The ratio of the maximum kinetic energies acquired by the proton and alpha particle is (A) 1:4 (B) 1:1 (C) 1:2 (D) 1:8
›Reveal solutionSolution
The maximum kinetic energy a charged particle acquires in a cyclotron depends on its charge-to-mass ratio, the magnetic field, and the cyclotron's radius. For a proton and an alpha particle, the ratio of their maximum kinetic energies in the same cyclotron is 1:1.
A cyclotron accelerates charged particles by making them move in a spiral path under a constant magnetic field, while an oscillating electric field provides energy boosts. The magnetic field forces the particles into circular paths, and the electric field between the dees accelerates them each time they cross the gap.
The particle gains kinetic energy with each acceleration, increasing its speed and thus the radius of its circular path. This process continues until the particle reaches the maximum radius of the dees, at which point it exits the cyclotron. The kinetic energy at this maximum radius is the maximum kinetic energy the particle can acquire.
To find this maximum kinetic energy, we use the principle that the magnetic force provides the necessary centripetal force for the circular motion.
- Derive the formula for maximum kinetic energy: When a charged particle of charge q and mass m moves with velocity v in a magnetic field B perpendicular to its velocity, the magnetic force FB=qvB acts as the centripetal force Fc=rmv2. Equating these forces:
qvB=rmv2
From this, we can find the velocity $v$ of the particle at a given radius $r$:v=mqBr
The maximum velocity $v_{max}$ is achieved when the particle reaches the maximum radius $R$ of the dees:vmax=mqBR
The maximum kinetic energy $K_{max}$ is then given by:Kmax=21mvmax2
Substitute the expression for $v_{max}$:Kmax=21m(mqBR)2=21mm2q2B2R2
> [!FORMULA] > The maximum kinetic energy acquired by a particle in a cyclotron is: > $$K_{max} = \frac{q^2B^2R^2}{2m}$$ > Here, $q$ is the charge of the particle, $m$ is its mass, $B$ is the magnetic field strength, and $R$ is the radius of the dees. Notice that the given values for the radius ($50$ cm) and magnetic field ($1.5$ T) are constant for both particles and will cancel out when we take the ratio.2. Identify properties of a proton:
A proton has a charge qp=e (where e is the elementary charge) and a mass mp=m. …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-04-FN1 markMCQQ.The reason for the constancy of binding energy per nucleon of nuclei whose mass number lies between 30 and 170 is (A) Short range of nuclear forces (B) The nuclear force between neutron-neutron is greater than the nuclear force between proton-proton (C) Nuclear forces are weak forces (D) Binding energy per nucleon is lower for these nuclei
›Reveal solutionSolution
The binding energy per nucleon is nearly constant for nuclei with mass number 30–170 because nuclear forces are short-range, so each nucleon only interacts with its immediate neighbours, making the total binding energy roughly proportional to the number of nucleons.
The key to this question is understanding why the binding energy per nucleon doesn't keep rising as nuclei get bigger. If every nucleon attracted every other nucleon equally, the binding energy would grow roughly like A2 (the number of pairs), and the binding energy per nucleon would keep increasing with A. That doesn't happen — it flattens out. The reason is that nuclear forces have a very short range, about the size of a few nucleon diameters.
-
The saturation of nuclear forces
A nucleon inside a medium-sized or large nucleus only feels the strong force from its nearest neighbours — nucleons that are, say, 2–3 fm away. Nucleons on the opposite side of the nucleus are too far to contribute any attraction. This is completely different from gravity or electromagnetism, which are long-range and act between every pair.
-
What this means for binding energy
Because each nucleon only bonds with a fixed number of nearby nucleons (roughly 12–15), the total binding energy of the nucleus is proportional to the number of nucleons A, not to A2. So the binding energy per nucleon becomes roughly constant — about 8 MeV per nucleon — for nuclei where the surface effect is small compared to the volume effect. That happens for A between about 30 and 170.
-
Why the other options are wrong
- (B) is false: the nuclear force between a neutron and a proton is actually the strongest of the three pairs (n-p, n-n, p-p), and even if it weren't, that wouldn't explain the constancy of binding energy per nucleon.
- (C) is false: nuclear forces are the strongest known forces, not weak forces. The weak nuclear force is a different interaction responsible for beta decay. …
-
- TG EAPCET 2025Set ap-2025-04-29-AN1 markMCQQ.Two spherical shells of radii R and 2R, masses M and 2M respectively are arranged concentrically. The net gravitational force acting on a particle of mass 'm' placed at a distance of 23R from the common centre of the shells is (A) 3R24GMm (B) 9R276GMm (C) 9R24GMm (D) 9R268GMm
›Reveal solutionSolution
The gravitational force on a particle inside a spherical shell is zero, while outside it acts as if all mass is at the center. For the given setup, only the inner shell contributes to the force, resulting in 9R24GMm.
The problem asks for the net gravitational force on a particle placed at a specific distance from the common center of two concentric spherical shells. To solve this, we need to understand how gravitational force is exerted by a spherical shell on a point mass, which is described by the Shell Theorem.
Concept and Intuition: The Shell Theorem
The Shell Theorem is a fundamental result in gravitation that simplifies calculating the gravitational force due to spherical shells. It states two key principles:
- For a point outside a spherical shell: The gravitational force exerted by the shell on a particle outside it is the same as if all the mass of the shell were concentrated at its center.
- For a point inside a spherical shell: The net gravitational force exerted by the shell on a particle located anywhere inside it is zero. This is because the gravitational pulls from different parts of the shell cancel each other out perfectly.
When dealing with multiple concentric shells, we apply this theorem to each shell individually and then sum the forces vectorially. Since gravitational force is always attractive and directed towards the center of mass (or the center of the shell in this symmetric case), the forces will be collinear, simplifying the vector sum to an algebraic sum of magnitudes.
Let's apply this to the given problem.
Step-by-step Derivation:
-
Identify the setup:
- Inner spherical shell: Radius R, Mass M.
- Outer spherical shell: Radius 2R, Mass 2M.
- Particle: Mass m, placed at a distance r=23R from the common center.
-
Analyze the force due to the inner shell:
The inner shell has radius R and mass M. The particle is placed at a distance r=23R from the center.
Since r=23R=1.5R, and 1.5R>R, the particle is outside the inner spherical shell.
According to the Shell Theorem, the inner shell behaves as if all its mass M is concentrated at the common center.
The gravitational force exerted by the inner shell on the particle is given by Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation:
F1=r2GMm
Substituting $r = \dfrac{3R}{2}$:F1=(23R)2GMm=49R2GMm=9R24GMm
This force is directed towards the common center.3. Analyze the force due to the outer shell: …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set ap-2025-04-29-FN1 markMCQQ.Two charged particles enter a uniform magnetic field normally. If the ratio of the specific charges of the two particles is 2:3, then the ratio of the times taken by the two particles to complete one revolution is (A) 1:1 (B) 3:2 (C) 9:4 (D) 3:2
›Reveal solutionSolution
The time period for circular motion in a uniform magnetic field depends only on the mass-to-charge ratio, not on speed. Given the specific charge ratio 2:3, the time period ratio is the inverse, i.e., 3:2.
The key concept here is the cyclotron motion of a charged particle in a uniform magnetic field. When a particle of charge q and mass m enters a uniform magnetic field B perpendicular to its velocity, the magnetic force provides the centripetal force. This force is always perpendicular to velocity, so it changes only the direction, not the speed. The result is uniform circular motion.
The time taken to complete one full revolution — the time period T — is independent of the particle’s speed. Why? Because a faster particle moves in a larger circle (larger radius) but covers the larger circumference in exactly the same time. Let’s derive that.
- Set up the force equation. The magnetic force is F=qvB (since v⊥B). This equals the centripetal force mv2/r. So:
qvB=rmv2
Cancel v (non-zero) to get:
qB=rmv⇒r=qBmv
- Find the time period. The circumference of the circle is 2πr. The particle’s speed v is constant, so:
T=speedcircumference=v2πr
Substitute r from above:
T=v2π⋅qBmv=qB2πm
T=qB2πm
The time period depends only on mass m, charge q, and magnetic field B — not on speed or radius.
- Interpret the given ratio. The problem gives the ratio of specific charges, which is charge per unit mass: q/m. Let’s denote: …
- TG EAPCET 2024Set ap-2024-05-08-FN1 markMCQQ.A body weighs the same on the surfaces of two planets of densities 'ρ1' and 'ρ2.' The ratio of the radii of the planets is (A) ρ1ρ2 (B) ρ12ρ22 (C) ρ13ρ23 (D) ρ14ρ24
›Reveal solutionSolution
Weight equality on two planets means their surface gravitational accelerations are equal. Using g=34πGρR, the ratio of radii is R2R1=ρ1ρ2, so the correct option is (A).
The key idea is that a body’s weight on a planet’s surface is mg, where g is the acceleration due to gravity at that surface. If the weight is the same on both planets, then g must be the same on both — the mass m of the body is unchanged. So the problem reduces to: given two planets of different densities, find the ratio of their radii such that their surface g values are equal.
For a spherical planet of mass M and radius R, the surface gravity is g=R2GM. But M is not directly given — we know the density ρ. Since the planet is a sphere, M=ρ⋅34πR3. Substituting this into the expression for g gives a clean relation that eliminates M and ties g directly to ρ and R.
- Write the surface gravity in terms of density and radius:
g=R2G⋅(34πR3ρ)=34πGρR.
Notice that g is proportional to the product ρR — a larger radius or a larger density both increase surface gravity linearly.
- For planet 1 (density ρ1, radius R1) and planet 2 (density ρ2, radius R2), the condition that the body weighs the same on both surfaces is:
g1=g2⇒34πGρ1R1=34πGρ2R2.
- Cancel the common factor 34πG (which is the same for both planets) to get: ρ1R1=ρ2R2. …
- TG EAPCET 2024Set ap-2024-05-07-FN1 markMCQQ.Two particles of charges in the ratio 1:2 and masses in the ratio 2:3 moving along a straight line enter a uniform magnetic field at right angles to the direction of the field. If the radii of the circular paths of the particles in the magnetic field are in the ratio 3:4, then the ratio of the initial linear momenta of the two particles is (A) 1:1 (B) 3:4 (C) 3:8 (D) 2:3
›Reveal solutionSolution
The radius of a charged particle’s circular path in a uniform magnetic field is proportional to its linear momentum divided by its charge. Using the given ratios, the momentum ratio is found to be 3:8, which corresponds to option (C).
Concept & Intuition
When a charged particle enters a uniform magnetic field perpendicular to its velocity, it experiences a magnetic force that acts as a centripetal force, causing it to move in a circle. The radius r of this circle is given by
r=qBmv=qBp,
where p=mv is the linear momentum, q is the charge, and B is the magnetic field strength (same for both particles). So, for a fixed B, the radius is directly proportional to momentum and inversely proportional to charge. This relation lets us connect the given ratios.
Step-by-step solution
- Write the radius formula for each particle For particle 1: r1=q1Bp1 For particle 2: r2=q2Bp2 Since B is the same, dividing the two equations gives
r2r1=p2p1⋅q1q2.
-
Insert the given ratios
Charges are in the ratio q1:q2=1:2, so q1q2=12=2.
Radii are in the ratio r1:r2=3:4, so r2r1=43.
-
Solve for the momentum ratio
From step 1:
43=p2p1×2. …
- TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-10-FN1 markMCQQ.Two stars of masses ‘M’ and ‘2M’ that are at a distance ‘d’ apart, are revolving one around another. The angular velocity of the system of two stars is (G-Universal gravitational constant) (A) d34GM (B) d32GM (C) d39GM (D) d33GM
›Reveal solutionSolution
The two stars revolve around their common centre of mass, and the gravitational force provides the centripetal force for each star. The angular velocity is found to be d33GM, so the correct option is (D).
The key concept here is that two bodies orbiting each other do not revolve around the centre of either star. Instead, they both orbit their common centre of mass (the balance point of the system). The gravitational attraction between them supplies the necessary centripetal force for each star’s circular motion around that point. Because the stars have different masses, they orbit at different distances from the centre of mass, but they share the same angular velocity — otherwise they would not stay opposite each other.
Let’s work through it step by step.
- Locate the centre of mass. Place the star of mass M at position x=0 and the star of mass 2M at x=d. The centre of mass (CM) is at
xCM=M+2MM⋅0+2M⋅d=3M2Md=32d.
So the CM is 32d from the lighter star and 31d from the heavier star.
- Define the orbital radii. Let r1 be the distance from the CM to the star of mass M, and r2 the distance to the star of mass 2M. From step 1:
r1=32d,r2=31d.
Notice r1+r2=d, as expected.
- Apply Newton’s law of gravitation and centripetal force for one star. For the star of mass M, the gravitational force from the other star is
F=d2G⋅M⋅2M=d22GM2.
This force provides the centripetal force needed for M to move in a circle of radius r1 with angular velocity ω:
Mω2r1=d22GM2.
- Solve for ω. Cancel M from both sides:
ω2r1=d22GM.
Substitute r1=32d:
ω2⋅32d=d22GM.
Multiply both sides by 2d3:
- TG EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-12-AN1 markMCQQ.The ratio of the radii of two planets is ‘r’ and the ratio of accelerations due to gravity on the planets is ‘x’. Then the ratio of the escape velocities from the planets is (A) xr (B) xr (C) rx (D) rx
›Reveal solutionSolution
The ratio of escape velocities depends on both the planet’s radius and its surface gravity; combining the formulas gives rx, so the correct option is (C).
Concept & Intuition
Escape velocity is the minimum speed needed to break free from a planet’s gravitational pull. It depends on two things: the planet’s mass (which determines how strong the gravity is) and its radius (how far you are from the center when you start). But we aren’t given masses directly — we’re given the ratio of radii (r) and the ratio of surface gravities (x). Since surface gravity itself depends on mass and radius, we can combine these to find the escape velocity ratio without needing absolute values.
Step-by-step reasoning
- Recall the formula for escape velocity For a planet of mass M and radius R, the escape velocity is
ve=R2GM
where G is the universal gravitational constant.
- Express mass in terms of surface gravity The acceleration due to gravity at the surface is
g=R2GM
So GM=gR2.
- Substitute into the escape velocity formula
ve=R2(gR2)=2gR
This is a neat form: escape velocity depends only on the planet’s surface gravity and its radius.
- Set up the ratios Let planet 1 have radius R1 and gravity g1, planet 2 have R2 and g2. Given: R2R1=randg2g1=x …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.