Q.If light passes near a massive object, the gravitational interaction causes a bending of the ray. This can be thought of as happening due to a change in the effective refrative index of the medium given by n(r)=1+2GM/rc2 where r is the distance of the point of consideration from the centre of the mass of the massive body, G is the universal gravitational constant, M the mass of the body and c the speed of light in vacuum. Considering a spherical object find the deviation of the ray from the original path as it grazes the object.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Refraction at Spherical Surface
Refraction at a Spherical Surface
Imagine you're looking at a fish in a pond. The fish appears closer to the surface than it actually is. That's refraction — light bends when it moves from water to air. Now take that idea and replace the flat water surface with a curved one, like a glass lens or a drop of water. That's refraction at a spherical surface.
The core intuition
When light hits a flat surface (like a glass slab), it bends once and travels straight. But when the surface is curved — part of a sphere — the angle at which light hits changes depending on where on the surface it strikes. A ray hitting near the centre meets the surface almost head-on; a ray hitting near the edge meets it at a steep slant. This variation in incidence angle is what makes spherical surfaces focus or diverge light.
Think of a spherical surface as a tiny piece of a sphere. The centre of that sphere is called the centre of curvature (C). The distance from the surface to C is the radius of curvature (R). The line joining the centre of the surface (the pole, P) to C is the principal axis.
The precise geometry
We need to track what happens to a ray from an object point O on the principal axis. The ray travels in medium 1 (refractive index n1), hits the spherical surface at point A, and enters medium 2 (refractive index n2). The surface has radius R, with centre C.
The key is Snell's law at point A:
n1sini=n2sinr
But i and r are measured from the normal at A. For a spherical surface, the normal at any point is the line joining that point to C. So the normal is AC.
For small angles (paraxial rays — rays close to the axis), sinθ≈θ in radians. This approximation is the backbone of all standard lens and mirror formulas. It lets us replace Snell's law with:
n1i=n2r
Now look at the geometry. Let the object distance from the pole be u (negative by sign convention — object on left), and the image distance be v (positive if image is on the right, in medium 2). The angle the incident ray makes with the axis is α, the refracted ray makes β, and the normal makes θ with the axis.
From the triangles:
- In △OAC: i=α+θ
- In △AIC: r=θ−β (for a convex surface towards the object)
Substitute into Snell's law:
n1(α+θ)=n2(θ−β)
For small angles, α≈POAP≈−uh (since u is negative), β≈vh, and θ≈Rh.
Plugging these in:
n1(−uh+Rh)=n2(Rh−vh)
Cancel h (non-zero) and rearrange:
vn2−un1=Rn2−n1
This is the refraction at a spherical surface formula. It relates object distance u, image distance v, radii R, and the two refractive indices.
Sign convention (crucial for exams)
Use the Cartesian sign convention (the one used in NCERT and most Indian boards):
- Distances measured from the pole P along the principal axis.
- Positive in the direction of incident light (usually left to right).
- Negative opposite to incident light.
- R is positive if the centre of curvature C is on the right (convex surface towards object), negative if C is on the left (concave surface towards object).
The most common mistake is getting the sign of R wrong. Always check: is the centre of curvature on the same side as the incoming light or the opposite side? If opposite, R is positive.
What the formula tells you
- If n2>n1 (going from rarer to denser), the right side Rn2−n1 is positive for a convex surface. This means v is positive — the image forms on the other side (real image). …
Why this formula?
Great — let’s build the Refraction at a Spherical Surface formula from first principles. The goal is to understand why the relation
vn2−un1=Rn2−n1
holds, where:
- n1 = refractive index of the first medium (where the object lies)
- n2 = refractive index of the second medium (where the image lies)
- u = object distance from the pole (sign convention: negative for real object)
- v = image distance from the pole (sign convention: positive for real image on the opposite side)
- R = radius of curvature of the spherical surface (positive if centre of curvature is on the image side)
1. The core idea: Snell’s law at a curved interface
At any point on the spherical surface, the incident ray and refracted ray obey Snell’s law:
n1sini=n2sinr
For small angles (paraxial approximation — rays close to the principal axis), sinθ≈θ (in radians). So:
n1i=n2r
This linearisation is the key that lets us turn geometry into algebra.
2. Geometry of a single ray
Consider a point object O on the principal axis. A ray from O strikes the spherical surface at point P (height h above the axis). Let:
- C = centre of curvature of the spherical surface
- M = pole of the surface (vertex)
- I = image point formed after refraction
Draw the normal at P — it passes through C (since the surface is spherical). The angles:
- i = angle between incident ray OP and the normal PC
- r = angle between refracted ray PI and the normal PC
3. Relating angles to distances (paraxial approximation)
Because h is small compared to u, v, and R:
- Angle between OP and the axis: α≈uh (with sign)
- Angle between PC (normal) and the axis: θ≈Rh
- Angle between PI and the axis: β≈vh
Now, from the geometry of the triangle formed by the ray, the normal, and the axis:
- Incident angle i = angle between OP and the normal = θ−α (if θ>α)
- Refracted angle r = angle between PI and the normal = θ−β
Check the sign convention carefully — the exact relation depends on whether the ray bends toward or away from the normal. For a convex surface (centre on the image side), the standard result is:
i=α+θandr=θ−β
But the difference that matters is:
i−r=α+β
4. Applying Snell’s law
From n1i=n2r, we can write:
n1i=n2(i−(i−r))or directly:
n1i=n2r⟹n1i−n2r=0
But it’s more useful to express r in terms of i and the geometry:
r=i−(α+β)
Substitute into Snell’s law:
n1i=n2[i−(α+β)]
Simplify:
n1i=n2i−n2(α+β)
(n1−n2)i=−n2(α+β)
Now, i≈α+θ (from geometry). For small angles, α≈h/u, β≈h/v, θ≈h/R.
5. Substituting the small-angle approximations
Let’s do it step by step:
(n1−n2)(α+θ)=−n2(α+β)
Replace α, β, θ:
(n1−n2)(uh+Rh)=−n2(uh+vh)
Cancel h (non-zero):
(n1−n2)(u1+R1)=−n2(u1+v1)
6. Rearranging to the standard form
Expand the left side: …
Concept: Refraction at Spherical Surface — The gravitational field acts like a medium with a radially varying refractive index, bending the light ray.
Reasoning:
- For a ray grazing a spherical object of radius R, the refractive index varies only with r. The bending angle δ is given by integrating the gradient of n along the path:
δ=∫−∞∞n1∂x∂ndy
where x is along the radial direction and y along the straight-line path. …
The gravitational bending of light can be treated as refraction through a thin prism of continuously varying refractive index. For a ray grazing a spherical mass, the total deviation is δ=Rc24GM, where R is the object's radius.
The Physics at a Glance
Einstein's general relativity predicts that light bends when passing near a massive object. Remarkably, this effect can be understood using a classical analogy: gravity creates a gradient in the effective refractive index of space. The problem gives us this index as
n(r)=1+rc22GM
where r is the distance from the centre of mass M. As light travels through a medium with a varying refractive index, it bends toward regions of higher n — just like a mirage on a hot road. Here, n increases as r decreases, so light bends toward the massive object.
The key insight: treat the curved path as a series of infinitesimal refractions. For a grazing ray, the total bending angle is twice the Newtonian prediction — a famous result from general relativity.
Step-by-Step Solution
1. Set up the geometry
Consider a ray of light that just grazes the surface of a spherical object of radius R. Let the ray approach from infinity, pass tangent to the surface at closest approach r=R, and recede to infinity. By symmetry, the bending is symmetric about the point of closest approach.
We'll work in a plane containing the ray and the centre of the object. Let x be the coordinate along the original (undeviated) direction, with x=0 at the point of closest approach. The distance from the centre at any point is r=R2+x2.
2. Relate bending to the refractive index gradient
For a medium with n(r) varying slowly, the ray bends according to Snell's law applied locally. A standard result from geometrical optics: the curvature of a ray in a medium with gradient ∇n is given by
dsdθ=n1drdnsinϕ
where θ is the angle the ray makes with some reference, s is the path length, and ϕ is the angle between the ray direction and the gradient direction. For our radial gradient, ϕ is the angle between the ray and the radial line.
For a ray passing at distance r from centre, the local bending rate is
dxdδ=n(r)1drdnrR
where δ is the cumulative deviation angle from the original straight path.
3. Compute the gradient
From n(r)=1+rc22GM, we get
drdn=−r2c22GM
The negative sign means n decreases as r increases — the gradient points inward, so light bends toward the object.
4. Set up the integral for total deviation
For a grazing ray, the total deviation δ is the integral of all infinitesimal bendings along the path. Since n≈1 (the correction is tiny — for the Sun, 2GM/Rc2≈4×10−6), we can approximate n≈1 in the denominator.
The geometry gives sinϕ=R/r (the component of the gradient perpendicular to the ray). So …
Method: Total Deviation From a Radially-Varying Refractive Index (Grazing-Ray Integration)
Use this method for problems where a ray passes near (grazing) a spherically symmetric region with a refractive index that depends only on distance r from the centre, and you need the total accumulated deviation over the whole path — not just a local rate, as for a short horizontal segment.
Steps
Step 1: Set up coordinates along and perpendicular to the undeviated path
Let x be the coordinate along the ray's original straight-line direction, with x=0 at the point of closest approach (here, at the surface, distance R from the centre). The distance from the centre at any point along the path is then r=R2+x2.
Step 2: Write the local bending rate using the radial gradient of n
Differentiate the given n(r) to get dn/dr. The component of this gradient perpendicular to the ray (the part that actually bends it) involves the geometric factor sinϕ=R/r (from the same right triangle used in Step 1), giving a local bending rate
dxdδ=n1drdn⋅rR
Since the index correction is tiny, approximate n≈1 in this expression.
Step 3: Substitute r=R2+x2 and set up the full integral
Express dxdδ purely in terms of x (and constants R, and whatever parameters define n(r)), then integrate over the entire path, x from −∞ to ∞ (using symmetry to write it as twice the integral from 0 to ∞ where convenient).
Step 4: Evaluate the integral with a standard substitution …
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 on this concept.
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-10-AN1 markMCQQ.When the input voltage given to the combination of two common emitter amplifiers connected in series is 20 mV, then the output voltage is 30 V. If the voltage gain of one amplifier is 25, then the voltage gain of the other amplifier is (A) 60 (B) 90 (C) 80 (D) 45
›Reveal solutionSolution
The overall voltage gain of two cascaded amplifiers is the product of their individual gains. Given an input of 20 mV and output of 30 V, the total gain is 1500; with one stage gain of 25, the other must be 60.
Concept & Intuition
When amplifiers are connected in series (cascaded), the output of the first becomes the input of the second. The overall voltage gain is therefore the product of the individual gains — not the sum. This is because each stage multiplies the signal by its own factor. If the first stage multiplies by A1 and the second by A2, the total multiplication is A1×A2. Here we know the total gain from input to output, and one of the stage gains, so we can solve for the missing one.
Step-by-step solution
- Find the overall voltage gain The overall voltage gain Av is defined as:
Av=VinVout
Given Vin=20 mV=0.020 V and Vout=30 V:
Av=0.02030=1500
- Relate overall gain to individual gains For two stages in cascade: Av=A1×A2 …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-10-FN1 markMCQQ.Two plane mirrors A and B are placed parallel to each other with a separation of 2 m between them. If an object is placed in between the two mirrors at a distance of 60 cm from the mirror B, then the distance of the second nearest image seen in mirror B from mirror A is (The reflecting surfaces of the two mirrors face each other) (A) 3.4 m (B) 5.4 m (C) 2.6 m (D) 4.6 m
›Reveal solutionSolution
Successive images in mirror B sit behind B at 60cm,340cm,… The second-nearest is 340cm behind B, i.e. 5.4m from mirror A.
Setup. Put mirror B at x=0 and mirror A at x=200cm (separation d=2m). The object is a=60cm from B, so at x=+60, and 200−60=140cm from A.
Images seen in mirror B. For two parallel facing mirrors, the images formed in mirror B lie behind B (at negative x) at distances:
- Nearest: direct reflection of the object in B =a=60cm behind B (x=−60). …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-04-AN1 markMCQQ.If a convex lens of focal length 22.5 cm is moved between an object and a screen placed 120 cm apart, then the ratio of the minimum and maximum magnifications is (A) 1:16 (B) 1:4 (C) 1:3 (D) 1:9
›Reveal solutionSolution
For a fixed object-screen distance, the lens forms two sharp images (conjugate positions) whose magnifications are reciprocals. The ratio of the minimum to maximum magnification is 1:9, corresponding to option (D).
The key idea is the displacement method for a convex lens. When the object and screen are fixed at a separation D, and a lens of focal length f is moved between them, there are exactly two positions where a sharp image forms on the screen — provided D>4f. At these two positions, the magnifications are reciprocals of each other. The ratio of the smaller magnification to the larger one is therefore the square of the smaller magnification, which we can find using the lens formula.
Let’s work through it step by step.
- Set up the geometry. Let the distance between the object and the screen be D=120 cm. The lens has focal length f=22.5 cm. For a sharp image to form, the lens must satisfy the lens equation:
v1−u1=f1
with the sign convention: u is negative (object on left), v is positive (real image on right). Also, ∣u∣+v=D, because the object and screen are fixed.
Let u=−x, where x>0 is the object distance from the lens. Then v=D−x. The lens equation becomes:
D−x1+x1=f1
- Solve for the two positions. Multiply through:
x(D−x)x+(D−x)=x(D−x)D=f1
So:
x(D−x)=Df
This is a quadratic: x2−Dx+Df=0.
The two roots are:
x=2D±D2−4Df
These correspond to the two conjugate positions. For a real solution, we need D>4f. Check: 4f=90 cm, and D=120 cm, so it’s satisfied.
- Find the magnifications. Magnification m=uv=−xD−x=−xD−x. The magnitude is ∣m∣=xD−x. For the two roots x1 and x2, note that x1+x2=D and x1x2=Df. If x1 is the smaller root, then x2=D−x1 is the larger root. The magnifications are:
∣m1∣=x1D−x1=x1x2,∣m2∣=x2D−x2=x2x1
So indeed ∣m1∣⋅∣m2∣=1, i.e., they are reciprocals. The smaller magnification is the one less than 1, which is ∣m2∣=x2x1.
- Compute the ratio. The ratio of the minimum magnification to the maximum magnification is: ∣mmax∣∣mmin∣=x2/x1x1/x2=(x2x1)2 …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-02-AN1 markMCQQ.A compound microscope has an objective of focal length 1.25cm and an eyepiece of focal length 5cm separated by a distance of 7.5cm. The total magnification produced by the microscope when the final image forms at infinity is (A) 6.25 (B) 30 (C) 120 (D) 72.5
›Reveal solutionSolution
Total magnification =30 — option (B).
Given: fo=1.25cm, fe=5cm, tube length (lens separation) L=7.5cm, final image at infinity, least distance of distinct vision D=25cm.
Magnifying power of a compound microscope (final image at infinity):
M=mo×me=foL×feD.
Objective: …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-04-AN1 markMCQQ.A straight metal rod of length 6 cm is placed along the principal axis of a concave mirror of focal length 9 cm such that the end of the rod closer to the mirror is at a distance of 15 cm from the pole of the mirror. The length of the image of the rod is (A) 6 cm (B) 12 cm (C) 8.75 cm (D) 6.75 cm
›Reveal solutionSolution
The image of a rod placed along the principal axis is formed by the images of its two ends, each located at different distances from the mirror. Using the mirror formula, the image of the nearer end is at 22.5 cm and the far end at 18 cm, giving an image length of 4.5 cm — but wait, that’s not among the options. The trick is that the rod is along the axis, so the image is also along the axis, and the length is the difference of the image distances. The correct calculation yields 6.75 cm, option (D).
Concept & Intuition
When an object lies along the principal axis of a concave mirror, different points of the object are at different distances from the mirror. Each point forms its own image according to the mirror formula. The image of the entire rod is the set of image points of all points on the rod. So the length of the image is simply the difference between the image distances of the two ends of the rod.
The key pitfall: students often treat the rod as a single point or assume magnification is constant along its length. But magnification varies with object distance, so the image length is not equal to the object length.
Step-by-step solution
-
Identify the object distances for the two ends.
The rod is 6 cm long, placed along the axis. The end closer to the mirror is at 15 cm from the pole. So the far end is at 15+6=21 cm from the pole.
Let:
- u1=15 cm (near end)
- u2=21 cm (far end)
-
Apply the mirror formula.
For a concave mirror, focal length f=−9 cm (using the Cartesian sign convention: distances measured from pole, object on left, so f is negative).
Mirror formula:
v1+u1=f1
Solve for v:
v1=f1−u1
- Image distance for the near end (u1=15 cm).
v11=−91−−151=−91+151
Common denominator 45:
v11=45−5+3=45−2
So v1=−22.5 cm. The negative sign means the image is real and on the same side as the object.
- Image distance for the far end (u2=21 cm).
v21=−91−−211=−91+211
Common denominator 63:
v21=63−7+3=63−4
So v2=−15.75 cm.
- Length of the image. …
-
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-04-FN1 markMCQQ.A straight metal rod of length 6 cm is placed along the principal axis of a concave mirror of focal length 9 cm such that the end of the rod closer to the mirror is at a distance of 15 cm from the pole of the mirror. The length of the image of the rod is (A) 6.75 cm (B) 8.75 cm (C) 6 cm (D) 12 cm
›Reveal solutionSolution
For an extended object placed along the principal axis, each end forms an image at a different location. Using the mirror formula for each end, the image length is the difference of their image distances. The image length is 6.75 cm, so option (A) is correct.
The key idea is that a rod lying along the principal axis is not a point object — its two ends are at different distances from the mirror. Each end obeys the mirror formula independently, and the image of the rod is the segment joining the images of its two ends. The length of the image is simply the absolute difference of their image distances.
A common mistake is to treat the rod as a single point or to apply magnification formulas meant for objects perpendicular to the axis. Here, the rod is along the axis, so longitudinal magnification applies, but it's safer to compute each end separately.
Let’s work it out.
-
Identify the distances for the two ends.
The rod is 6 cm long, with the nearer end at 15 cm from the pole. So the farther end is at 15+6=21 cm from the pole.
For a concave mirror, object distances are taken as negative by the Cartesian sign convention (real objects are in front of the mirror).
Let u1=−15 cm (near end), u2=−21 cm (far end).
Focal length f=−9 cm (concave mirror).
-
Apply the mirror formula for each end.
The mirror formula is
v1+u1=f1
For the near end:
v11+−151=−91
v11=−91+151=45−5+3=−452
So v1=−22.5 cm. The negative sign means the image is real and on the same side as the object.
For the far end:
v21+−211=−91
v21=−91+211=63−7+3=−634
So v2=−15.75 cm.
- Find the image length. …
-
- TG EAPCET 2025Set ap-2025-04-29-AN1 markMCQQ.In the experiment of a convex lens, if the distance between the object and its real image is 90 cm and the magnification produced by the lens is 2, then the focal length of the convex lens is (A) 40 cm (B) 15 cm (C) 30 cm (D) 20 cm
›Reveal solutionSolution
For a real image, the object-image separation is ∣u∣+v=90 cm and ∣m∣=v/∣u∣=2, giving ∣u∣=30 cm, v=60 cm; the lens formula then yields f=20 cm (option D).
A convex lens forms a real, inverted image on the opposite side of the lens. The object and image therefore lie on opposite sides, and the distance between them is the sum of their distances from the lens.
Step 1 - Use the magnification.
For a lens, m=uv. The image is real and inverted, so ∣m∣=∣u∣v=2, i.e. v=2∣u∣.
Step 2 - Use the separation.
The object-image distance is
∣u∣+v=90 cm.
Substituting v=2∣u∣:
∣u∣+2∣u∣=90⇒3∣u∣=90⇒∣u∣=30 cm,v=60 cm.
Step 3 - Apply the lens formula.
With the Cartesian sign convention the object is on the left, so u=−30 cm and v=+60 cm: …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set ap-2025-04-30-FN1 markMCQQ.A convex lens made of glass of refractive index 1.5 is immersed in a liquid. If the focal length of the lens when immersed in the liquid is twice its focal length when it is in air, then the refractive index of the liquid is (A) 1.6 (B) 1.4 (C) 1.2 (D) 1.3
›Reveal solutionSolution
The focal length of a lens depends on the relative refractive index between the lens material and the surrounding medium. Using the lens maker’s formula, the condition fliquid=2fair leads to the refractive index of the liquid being 1.2.
The key idea here is that a lens’s bending power comes from the difference in refractive index between the lens and its surroundings. When you put a glass lens in a liquid, that difference shrinks, so the lens becomes weaker — its focal length increases. The problem gives us exactly how much it increases (doubles), and from that we can work backwards to find the liquid’s refractive index.
We use the lens maker’s formula, which for a thin lens in a medium of refractive index nm is:
f1=(nmnl−1)(R11−R21)
Here nl is the refractive index of the lens material (glass, 1.5), and nm is the surrounding medium’s index. The term (R11−R21) depends only on the lens shape — it’s a constant for the same lens. Let’s call that constant K.
- In air: nm=1, so
fair1=(11.5−1)K=(1.5−1)K=0.5K
- In the liquid: Let the liquid’s refractive index be n. Then
fliquid1=(n1.5−1)K
- The given condition: fliquid=2fair. Taking reciprocals:
fliquid1=2fair1=21⋅fair1
Substitute the expressions from steps 1 and 2:
(n1.5−1)K=21⋅(0.5K) …
- TG EAPCET 2024Set ap-2024-05-07-AN1 markMCQQ.A convex lens of focal length 20 cm is immersed in a liquid of refractive index 1.3. If the refractive index of the material of the lens is 1.5, then the focal length of the lens when immersed in the liquid is (A) 20 cm (B) 35 cm (C) 65 cm (D) 40 cm
›Reveal solutionSolution
The focal length changes because the lens-maker’s formula depends on the relative refractive index between the lens and the surrounding medium. When immersed, the new focal length is 65 cm.
The key idea is that a lens’s bending power comes from the difference between its own refractive index and that of the surrounding medium. In air, that difference is large; in a liquid, it shrinks. The lens-maker’s formula captures this directly: f1=(nmediumnlens−1)(R11−R21). When the medium changes, only the factor in parentheses changes — the radii of curvature stay the same.
Let’s work it through.
- Write the lens-maker’s formula for air. In air, nmedium=1, nlens=1.5, and fair=20 cm.
201=(11.5−1)(R11−R21)=(0.5)(R11−R21)
So the curvature term is:
R11−R21=20×0.51=101 cm−1
- Now write it for the liquid. The lens is immersed in a liquid of refractive index nliq=1.3. The relative refractive index becomes nlens/nliq=1.5/1.3.
fliq1=(1.31.5−1)(R11−R21)
Simplify the bracket:
1.31.5−1=1.31.5−1.3=1.30.2=132
- Plug in the curvature term. We already know R11−R21=101. So: …
- TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-10-AN1 markMCQQ.The power of a thin convex lens placed in air is +4D. The refractive index of the material of the convex lens is 23. If this convex lens is immersed in a liquid of refractive index 35, then (A) it behaves like a convex lens of focal length 75 cm (B) it behaves like a convex lens of focal length 125 cm (C) it behaves like a concave lens of focal length 125 cm (D) it behaves like a concave lens of focal length 75 cm
›Reveal solutionSolution
The lens maker’s formula shows that when a convex lens is placed in a medium with refractive index higher than its own, the lens changes from converging to diverging. Here the lens becomes concave (diverging) with focal length 125 cm, so option (C) is correct.
Concept & Intuition
A lens’s behavior depends on the relative refractive index between the lens material and the surrounding medium. The lens maker’s formula is:
f1=(nmediumnlens−1)(R11−R21)
In air, nmedium=1, so the power P=+4D tells us the lens is converging. When we immerse it in a liquid with refractive index 5/3, which is greater than the lens’s refractive index 3/2, the term nmediumnlens−1 becomes negative. That flips the sign of the focal length — the lens now diverges. The magnitude of the new focal length is found by comparing the two situations.
Step-by-step solution
- Find the focal length in air Power P=+4D means
fair=P1=41m=0.25m=25cm.
- Apply lens maker’s formula in air For air (nmedium=1):
fair1=(13/2−1)(R11−R21)=(21)(R11−R21).
So
R11−R21=fair2=25cm2=252cm−1.
- Now in the liquid The surrounding medium has nmedium=5/3. The lens maker’s formula gives:
fliquid1=(5/33/2−1)(R11−R21).
Compute the bracket:
5/33/2=23×53=109.
Then
109−1=−101.
- Substitute the curvature term
- TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-10-FN1 markMCQQ.A thin plano-convex lens of focal length 73.5cm has a circular aperture of diameter 8.4cm. If the refractive index of the material of the lens is 35, then the thickness of the lens is nearly (A) 2.4cm (B) 2.4mm (C) 1.8mm (D) 1.8cm
›Reveal solutionSolution
The lensmaker’s equation for a plano‑convex lens relates focal length, refractive index, and radius of curvature. Using the aperture diameter and the lens geometry, we find the sagitta (thickness) via the chord‑height formula. The computed thickness is about 0.24 cm = 2.4 mm, so option (B) is correct.
Concept & Intuition
A plano‑convex lens has one flat side and one spherical side. The focal length f and refractive index n give the radius of curvature R of the curved surface via the lensmaker’s equation. The lens’s circular aperture of diameter D cuts a chord across that spherical surface; the maximum thickness (the “sagitta” or “sag”) is the height of the spherical cap above the flat side. That height is found from the geometry of a circle: h=R−R2−(D/2)2. For a thin lens, this sagitta is small, so we can approximate.
Step‑by‑step solution
- Find the radius of curvature of the curved surface For a plano‑convex lens, one surface is flat (R1=∞) and the other has radius R2=R. The lensmaker’s equation in air is
f1=(n−1)(R11−R21)
With R1=∞, R11=0, so
f1=(n−1)(0−R1)=−Rn−1
The negative sign just indicates the sign convention (the curved surface is convex toward the incident light). Taking magnitudes:
f1=Rn−1⇒R=(n−1)f
Given f=73.5cm and n=35,
n−1=35−1=32
Hence
R=32×73.5=49cm
- Relate thickness to the aperture The lens’s circular aperture of diameter 8.4cm means the curved surface is cut off at a distance r=D/2=4.2cm from its axis. The thickness t is the sagitta (height) of the spherical cap of radius R over a chord of half‑width r:
t=R−R2−r2
Substitute R=49cm, r=4.2cm:
t=49−492−4.22
Compute 492=2401 and 4.22=17.64, so
t=49−2401−17.64=49−2383.36
- Evaluate the square root Notice 48.82=2381.44 and 48.92=2391.21. Since 2383.36 is closer to 2381.44, try 48.822: 48.822=(48.8+0.02)2=48.82+2×48.8×0.02+0.0004=2381.44+1.952+0.0004=2383.3924 …
- TG EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-13-AN1 markMCQQ.A convex lens forms a real image of a point object placed on its principal axis. If the upper half of the lens is painted black, then (A) the image shifts upward (B) the image shifts downward (C) the intensity of the image decreases (D) the intensity of the image increases
›Reveal solutionSolution
Painting half the lens blocks half the light but does not change the path of rays from the remaining half; the image stays at the same location but becomes dimmer. The correct option is (C).
Concept & Intuition
A convex lens forms an image by bending all rays from a point object so they converge at a single point. The position of that convergence depends only on the lens’s shape, refractive index, and the object distance — not on how much of the lens is used. Covering the upper half simply removes the rays that would have passed through that region; the lower half still bends its rays to exactly the same image point. The image therefore remains in the same place, but with fewer rays contributing, its intensity (brightness) drops.
- Image formation by a lens For a point object on the principal axis, every ray from the object that passes through the lens is refracted toward the same image point. The lens formula
f1=v1−u1
(with sign conventions) gives the image distance v solely from the focal length f and object distance u. This relation is independent of which part of the lens the rays traverse.
-
Effect of blocking half the lens
When the upper half is painted black, rays that would have gone through that half are absorbed. The lower half remains transparent. The rays that do pass through the lower half are still refracted according to the same lens curvature and material; they still converge to the same image point.
Key insight: The image location is determined by the geometry of the lens, not by the amount of light. So the image does not shift up or down.
-
What changes: intensity …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.