Q.To ensure almost 100 per cent transmittivity, photographic lenses are often coated with a thin layer of dielectric material. The refractive index of this material is intermediated between that of air and glass (which makes the optical element of the lens). A typically used dielectric film is MgF2 (n=1.38). What should the thickness of the film be so that at the center of the visible speetrum (5500 A˚) there is maximum transmission.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Index Matching
Index Matching
In ray optics, index matching means bringing two materials into contact so their refractive indices are equal (or very nearly equal). When n1=n2 across a boundary, the boundary becomes optically invisible — light passes through as if the interface were not there at all.
Why a mismatched interface bends and reflects light
Whenever light crosses a boundary between media of index n1 and n2, two things happen:
- Refraction, governed by Snell's law:
n1sinθ1=n2sinθ2
- Partial reflection. For light at normal incidence, the fraction reflected is
R=(n2+n1n2−n1)2
Both effects are driven by the difference n2−n1: a bigger mismatch means more bending and more reflected light.
What happens when the indices match
As n2→n1:
- Snell's law gives sinθ1=sinθ2, so θ1=θ2 — the ray does not bend.
- The reflection formula gives R=0 — no light is reflected.
When n1=n2: the ray continues undeviated and the reflected intensity is zero. The interface transmits light as though it were absent.
The classic demonstration — the "disappearing" glass rod
Drop a clear glass rod into water: you still see it, because glass (n≈1.5) and water (n≈1.33) differ, so light reflects and refracts at the glass surface. But immerse the same rod in a liquid tuned to exactly n=1.5 (a glycerine mixture, for example), and the submerged part vanishes from view — with no index difference, its surfaces no longer signal their presence to your eye.
Index matching does not make the glass transparent — it already was. It removes the surface effects (reflection and refraction) by erasing the index difference at the boundary.
Where it is used
- Oil-immersion microscopes: immersion oil (n≈1.5) fills the gap between slide and objective that air would otherwise leave, removing reflection/refraction losses and letting steeply angled rays enter — sharpening the image.
- Optical-fibre splices: an index-matching gel between two fibre ends removes the air gap so almost no signal reflects back at the joint. …
Why this formula?
Index Matching: Why the Formula Holds
Index matching is a powerful technique in combinatorics and probability — it's used to simplify sums over complicated index sets by cleverly re-indexing or pairing terms. The core idea is to match indices so that a double sum (or product) collapses into a simpler expression.
Let's build the reasoning step by step.
The Core Formula
The most common index matching identity is:
∑i=1n∑j=1naibj=(∑i=1nai)(∑j=1nbj)
This looks trivial — it's just the distributive law. But the why matters for deeper applications.
Why It Holds: The Distributive Law in Action
Step 1: Expand the outer sum
The left side means: for each fixed i, sum over all j, then sum over i.
∑i=1n(∑j=1naibj)
Step 2: Factor out ai from the inner sum
Since ai does not depend on j, it can be pulled out:
∑i=1n(ai⋅∑j=1nbj)
Step 3: The inner sum is constant with respect to i
Let Sb=∑j=1nbj. Then:
∑i=1nai⋅Sb=Sb⋅∑i=1nai
Step 4: Recognize the product
This is exactly:
(∑i=1nai)(∑j=1nbj)
Key insight: The double sum over all n2 pairs (i,j) is just the product of the two separate sums. This works because the terms factor as aibj — no cross-dependence between i and j.
Why This Matters for Exam Problems
Index matching is used when you have double sums with constraints (like i<j or i=j). The trick:
- Start with the unconstrained double sum (all i,j)
- Subtract the diagonal terms (i=j) or the off-diagonal terms
- Use index matching to simplify
Example: Sum over i<j
We want ∑1≤i<j≤naibj.
Derivation:
∑i=1n∑j=1naibj=∑i=1n∑j=1i−1aibj+∑i=1naibi+∑i=1n∑j=i+1naibj
The first and third terms are symmetric (just swap i and j). So:
(∑ai)(∑bj)=∑i=1naibi+2∑i<jaibj
Thus:
i<j∑aibj=21[(∑ai)(∑bj)−∑aibi]
Why this works: The unconstrained double sum counts each unordered pair (i,j) twice (once as (i,j) and once as (j,i)), except the diagonal which appears once. Index matching lets us express the constrained sum in terms of the product.
The Deeper "Why": Symmetry and Factorization
The real power of index matching comes from symmetry: …
The key idea is thin-film interference for anti-reflection coatings. Maximum transmission occurs when reflected light from the air-film and film-glass interfaces interferes destructively, cancelling the reflection.
- For normal incidence, a phase change of π (half-wavelength) occurs at both reflections (air to film, film to glass) because the film index n=1.38 lies between air (n=1) and glass (n≈1.5). The two reflected waves are thus in phase at the point of reflection.
- To get destructive interference, the extra path travelled inside the film must be an odd multiple of half-wavelengths in the film: 2t=(m+21)λfilm, where λfilm=λ0/n and λ0=5500 A˚. …
For maximum transmission of light through a coated lens, we need destructive interference in the reflected light. This happens when the optical path difference in the film equals half a wavelength, leading to a minimum film thickness of t=4nλ. For λ=5500 A˚ and n=1.38, the required thickness is t≈996 A˚.
The problem is about anti-reflection coatings — a beautiful application of wave optics. When light hits a lens surface, about 4% of it reflects off each air-glass interface. For a multi-element lens, this adds up to significant light loss and glare. The trick is to deposit a thin transparent film whose refractive index lies between that of air (n=1) and glass (n≈1.5). Here, MgF2 with n=1.38 is used.
Why does this work? Light reflects from two interfaces: air-to-film and film-to-glass. If these two reflected waves are exactly out of phase (by half a wavelength), they cancel each other — destructive interference. That reflected energy is not lost; it is redirected into the transmitted beam, boosting transmission. The condition for cancellation depends on the film thickness and the wavelength.
Let’s work through the calculation step by step.
-
Identify the phase changes on reflection.
When light reflects off a boundary from a lower to a higher refractive index, it undergoes a phase shift of π (equivalent to an extra path of λ/2). From air (n=1) to MgF2 (n=1.38), the index increases, so the first reflected wave gets a π shift. From MgF2 to glass (n≈1.5), the index again increases, so the second reflected wave also gets a π shift. Both reflections suffer the same phase change — so the net phase difference between them comes only from the extra distance travelled by the second wave inside the film.
-
Set up the condition for destructive interference.
The second reflected wave travels an extra distance of 2t (down and back through the film). Inside the film, the wavelength is λ/n, where λ is the vacuum wavelength. So the optical path difference (OPD) is 2nt. For destructive interference, this OPD must equal an odd multiple of half-wavelengths in vacuum:
2nt=(m+21)λ,m=0,1,2,…
The smallest thickness (for m=0) gives the thinnest effective coating.
- Solve for the thickness. …
Method: Finding Anti-Reflection Coating Thickness (Quarter-Wave Condition)
Use this method for any thin-film problem asking for the coating thickness that
gives maximum transmission (equivalently, minimum reflection) at a stated
wavelength.
Steps
Step 1: Work out the phase shift at each reflecting interface
Light reflects at two interfaces: air→film and film→substrate (e.g. glass). A
reflection off a boundary where the index INCREASES (going from lower to
higher n) carries an extra phase shift of π (equivalent to λ/2 of
path); a reflection off a boundary where the index DECREASES carries no such
shift. Check both interfaces:
- If the film's index lies between the two neighbouring media (as it does for a coating chosen to sit between air and glass), BOTH reflections see an index increase, so BOTH pick up the same π shift — these cancel out of the net phase comparison, leaving only the path travelled inside the film to matter.
Step 2: Write the optical path difference between the two reflected waves
The second reflected wave travels an extra distance 2t inside the film
(down to the second interface and back), so its optical path length is 2nt
(using the film's own refractive index n, since light travels at c/n
inside it).
Step 3: Set the destructive-interference condition
Because both reflections carried the same π phase shift (Step 1), those
shifts cancel between the two reflected waves, and the interference condition
depends only on the path travelled in the film. For the reflected light to
cancel (destructive interference in reflection = maximum transmission), the …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-11-FN1 markMCQQ.If a resistor of resistance 3125 Ω and a capacitor of capacitance π40 μF are connected in series with an ac supply of frequency 100 Hz, then the phase difference between current and voltage in the circuit is (A) 30∘ (B) 60∘ (C) 45∘ (D) 90∘
›Reveal solutionSolution
The phase difference in an RC series circuit is given by ϕ=tan−1(RXC). Here XC=2πfC1; plugging in the numbers gives ϕ=60∘, so the correct option is (B).
Concept & Intuition
In a series RC circuit, the voltage across the resistor is in phase with the current, but the voltage across the capacitor lags the current by 90∘. The total voltage is the vector sum of these two, so the current leads the voltage by some angle ϕ between 0∘ and 90∘. That angle is determined by the ratio of capacitive reactance XC to resistance R: tanϕ=XC/R. So the problem reduces to computing XC from the given capacitance and frequency, then finding ϕ.
Step-by-step solution
- Find the capacitive reactance The formula is XC=2πfC1. Given: f=100 Hz, C=π40 μF=π40×10−6 F. So
XC=2π⋅100⋅π40×10−61=2⋅100⋅40×10−61=8000×10−61=8×10−31=125 Ω.
-
Identify the resistance
Given R=3125 Ω.
-
Compute the phase difference
For a series RC circuit, the phase angle by which current leads voltage is
ϕ=tan−1(RXC). …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-03-AN1 markMCQQ.A convex lens of radii of curvature 6 cm and 12 cm is immersed in a liquid of refractive index 1.3. If the refractive index of the material of the lens is 1.5, then the focal length of the lens when immersed in the liquid is (A) 39 cm (B) 13 cm (C) 26 cm (D) 52 cm
›Reveal solutionSolution
Immersing the lens in the liquid weakens it; the focal length becomes 26 cm — option (C).
Concept
A lens refracts light because of the difference in refractive index between the lens material and its surroundings. In a medium, the lens maker's formula uses the relative index nlens/nmedium:
f1=(nmediumnlens−1)(R11−R21)
Solution
Curvature term. For the biconvex lens, R1=+6 cm and R2=−12 cm:
R11−R21=61+121=123=41 cm−1
Relative index term. With nlens=1.5 and nmedium=1.3: …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-03-AN1 markMCQQ.When unpolarised light from air incidents on the surface of a medium of refractive index 3, then the reflected light is totally polarised. The angle of refraction is (A) 30∘ (B) 53∘ (C) 60∘ (D) 37∘
›Reveal solutionSolution
When unpolarised light reflects off a surface and becomes totally polarised, the angle of incidence is Brewster’s angle, given by taniB=n. Using Snell’s law, the angle of refraction is found to be 30∘, so the correct option is (A).
The key concept here is Brewster’s law: when light reflects off a surface and the reflected ray is completely polarised, the angle of incidence is such that the reflected and refracted rays are perpendicular. This happens at a specific angle called Brewster’s angle (iB), where taniB=n (the refractive index of the medium, assuming the first medium is air with n=1). The beauty of this condition is that it also forces the angle of refraction to be the complement of the angle of incidence — that is, iB+r=90∘. So once we find iB, we immediately get r.
Let’s work through it step by step.
- Apply Brewster’s law For total polarisation by reflection, the angle of incidence iB satisfies
taniB=n=3.
Since tan60∘=3, we have
iB=60∘.
- Use the perpendicular condition At Brewster’s angle, the reflected and refracted rays are at right angles:
iB+r=90∘.
This is a direct consequence of Snell’s law combined with taniB=n — a neat shortcut that saves recalculating. …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-03-FN1 markMCQQ.A convex lens of radii of curvature 6 cm and 12 cm is immersed in a liquid of refractive index 1.3. If the refractive index of the material of the lens is 1.5, then the focal length of the lens when immersed in the liquid is (A) 26 cm (B) 39 cm (C) 13 cm (D) 52 cm
›Reveal solutionSolution
The focal length changes when the lens is immersed because the relative refractive index of the lens material with respect to the surrounding liquid replaces the absolute refractive index in the lens maker’s formula. Using the given radii and refractive indices, the focal length in the liquid is 52 cm.
Concept & Intuition
The lens maker’s formula for a thin lens in air is
fair1=(nlens−1)(R11−R21)
where nlens is the refractive index of the lens material relative to air. When the lens is immersed in a liquid, the “bending” of light depends on the relative refractive index of the lens material with respect to the liquid:
nrel=nliquidnlens
So the formula becomes
fliquid1=(nrel−1)(R11−R21)
The key insight: the lens bends light less when surrounded by a medium closer to its own refractive index, so the focal length increases.
Step-by-step solution
-
Identify the given data
- Radii of curvature: R1=6 cm, R2=−12 cm (sign convention: convex surface facing incident light is positive; the second surface is concave relative to the first, so negative).
- Refractive index of lens material: nlens=1.5
- Refractive index of liquid: nliquid=1.3
-
Compute the relative refractive index
nrel=nliquidnlens=1.31.5≈1.1538
- Apply the lens maker’s formula for the immersed lens
fliquid1=(nrel−1)(R11−R21)
Substitute the values:
fliquid1=(1.31.5−1)(61−−121)
Simplify the bracket:
1.31.5−1=1.31.5−1.3=1.30.2=132
Simplify the curvature term:
61−−121=61+121=122+121=123=41
So:
fliquid1=132×41=522=261
Therefore:
fliquid=26 cm
- Check the sign and interpretation …
-
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-03-FN1 markMCQQ.When unpolarised light from air incidents on the surface of a medium of refractive index 3, then the reflected light is totally polarised. The angle of refraction is (A) 30∘ (B) 60∘ (C) 53∘ (D) 37∘
›Reveal solutionSolution
When unpolarised light reflects off a surface and becomes totally polarised, the angle of incidence is Brewster’s angle, given by taniB=n2/n1. Here n1=1, n2=3, so iB=60∘. Using Snell’s law, the angle of refraction is 30∘. The correct option is (A).
The key concept is Brewster’s law: when unpolarised light reflects from a surface, the reflected light is completely polarised if the angle of incidence equals Brewster’s angle iB, satisfying taniB=n1n2, where n1 and n2 are the refractive indices of the incident and transmitting media. At this special angle, the reflected and refracted rays are perpendicular. So the problem reduces to finding iB, then using Snell’s law to get the angle of refraction.
-
Identify the media. Light travels from air (n1=1) into a medium with n2=3. The reflected light is totally polarised, so the angle of incidence is Brewster’s angle iB.
-
Apply Brewster’s law.
taniB=n1n2=13=3.
Hence iB=tan−1(3)=60∘.
- Use the perpendicular-ray condition (or Snell’s law). At Brewster’s angle, the reflected and refracted rays are at 90∘ to each other. If r is the angle of refraction, then iB+r=90∘, so
r=90∘−60∘=30∘.
Alternatively, apply Snell’s law: n1siniB=n2sinr, i.e.
-
- TG EAPCET 2024Set ap-2024-05-07-AN1 markMCQQ.Two soap bubbles of volumes 27V and 64V coalesce under isothermal conditions. The volume of the bigger bubble formed is (A) 225V (B) 91V (C) 105V (D) 125V
›Reveal solutionSolution
When soap bubbles coalesce isothermally, the total surface energy is conserved, not the volume. The final bubble’s volume is found by equating the initial and final surface energies, leading to a result of 125V.
The key idea here is that when two soap bubbles merge, the air inside them is not simply added up in volume. Instead, the process is governed by the balance of surface tension forces under isothermal conditions. For a soap bubble, the excess pressure inside is inversely proportional to its radius, and the surface energy is proportional to the surface area. When they coalesce, the total surface energy of the system remains constant (since no work is done by an external agent and the process is isothermal), and the final bubble has a single radius that satisfies this energy conservation.
Let’s work through it step by step.
- Relate volume to radius. The volume of a spherical bubble is V=34πr3. So for the two bubbles, with volumes 27V and 64V, we have:
34πr13=27Vand34πr23=64V.
Taking cube roots, the radii are proportional to the cube roots of the volumes:
r1∝(27V)1/3=3V1/3,r2∝(64V)1/3=4V1/3.
So we can write r1=3k and r2=4k, where k is a constant that depends on V (specifically k=(4π3V)1/3).
- Surface energy of a soap bubble. A soap bubble has two surfaces (inner and outer), so its total surface area is 2×4πr2=8πr2. The surface energy is surface tension σ times area: E=8πσr2. For the two initial bubbles:
E1=8πσr12=8πσ(9k2),E2=8πσr22=8πσ(16k2).
Total initial surface energy:
Einitial=8πσ(9k2+16k2)=8πσ(25k2).
- Final bubble after coalescence. Let the final bubble have radius R. Its surface energy is Efinal=8πσR2. Under isothermal conditions, the total surface energy is conserved (the air inside does work against surface tension, but no heat exchange occurs, and the process is slow enough that energy is just redistributed). So: 8πσR2=8πσ(25k2)⇒R2=25k2⇒R=5k. …
- TG EAPCET 2024Set ap-2024-05-07-AN1 markMCQQ.The current gain of a transistor in common emitter configuration is 45. If the resistances in collector and base sides of the circuit are 4.5 kΩ and 900 Ω, the voltage gain of the amplifier is (A) 90 (B) 150 (C) 225 (D) 135
›Reveal solutionSolution
The voltage gain of a CE amplifier is the product of the current gain and the ratio of collector resistance to base resistance. Here it comes out to 225.
The key idea is that in a common-emitter amplifier, the voltage gain AV is not just the current gain β — it also depends on how the resistances in the collector and base circuits transform that current gain into a voltage swing. The transistor gives you current amplification, but the resistors determine how much voltage change you get at the output for a given input voltage change.
For a CE configuration, the voltage gain is given by:
AV=β⋅RBRC
where β is the current gain (also called hfe), RC is the collector resistance, and RB is the base resistance. This formula comes from the fact that a small change in base current ΔIB produces a change ΔIC=βΔIB in the collector. The output voltage change is ΔVC=−ΔIC⋅RC, and the input voltage change is ΔVB=ΔIB⋅RB. The ratio gives the magnitude of voltage gain.
Let's work through it step by step.
-
Identify the given values.
Current gain β=45
Collector resistance RC=4.5 kΩ=4500 Ω
Base resistance RB=900 Ω
-
Apply the voltage gain formula.
AV=β⋅RBRC=45×9004500
- Simplify the fraction. 9004500=5 So AV=45×5=225 …
-
- TG EAPCET 2023Set ap-2023-05-11-FN1 markMCQQ.At a place, the horizontal component of earth’s magnetic field is 3 times the vertical component of earth’s magnetic field. The angle of dip at this place is (A) 30∘ (B) 45∘ (C) 60∘ (D) 90∘
›Reveal solutionSolution
The angle of dip is the angle the total magnetic field makes with the horizontal. When the horizontal component is 3 times the vertical component, the angle of dip is 30∘.
The Earth's magnetic field at any location can be resolved into two perpendicular components: a horizontal component BH that points toward magnetic north, and a vertical component BV that points into or out of the ground. The angle of dip (or magnetic inclination) δ is the angle the total field vector makes with the horizontal plane.
Think of it this way: if you hold a freely suspended magnetic needle, it won't stay horizontal except at the magnetic equator. The angle it makes below the horizontal is precisely the angle of dip, determined by the ratio of vertical to horizontal components.
The geometry gives us:
tanδ=BHBV
This follows directly from the right triangle formed by BH (adjacent side), BV (opposite side), and the total field B (hypotenuse).
Now let's apply the given condition:
-
Set up the relationship. We're told that BH=3⋅BV, which means the horizontal component is larger than the vertical component.
-
Express the tangent of the dip angle. Substituting into our formula: …
-
- TG EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-14-FN1 markMCQQ.Two convex lenses of focal lengths 20 cm and 30 cm are placed in contact with each other co-axially. The focal length of the combination is (A) 60 cm (B) 10 cm (C) 12 cm (D) 40 cm
›Reveal solutionSolution
When thin lenses are placed in contact, the power of the combination is the sum of the individual powers. The focal length of the combination is given by F1=f11+f21. Here, f1=20 cm and f2=30 cm, so the combined focal length is 12 cm. The correct option is (C).
Concept and Intuition
The key idea is that when two thin lenses are placed in contact, the overall bending of light (the power) adds up. Think of it like two magnifying glasses stacked together — they bend light more strongly than either alone, so the combined focal length is shorter than either individual focal length. The power of a lens is defined as P=f1 (with f in meters), and for lenses in contact, Ptotal=P1+P2. This works because the first lens bends the light by a certain amount, and the second lens bends it further, so the net effect is the sum of the two bends.
Step-by-step solution
- Write the formula for lenses in contact For two thin lenses of focal lengths f1 and f2 placed coaxially in contact, the combined focal length F satisfies:
F1=f11+f21
This is derived from the fact that the image formed by the first lens acts as the object for the second, and when the separation is negligible, the equations combine neatly.
- Substitute the given values Here, f1=20 cm and f2=30 cm. Note that both are convex (converging) lenses, so their focal lengths are positive.
F1=201+301
- Find a common denominator and add The least common multiple of 20 and 30 is 60. F1=603+602=605 …
- TG EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-19-FN1 markMCQQ.A light ray travels from a medium with refractive index n1 to another medium of refractive index n2. If n1=2 and n2=3, then find the critical angle. (A) 15∘ (B) 30∘ (C) 45∘ (D) 60∘
›Reveal solutionSolution
The critical angle is the angle of incidence in the denser medium for which the angle of refraction becomes 90∘. Using Snell’s law, sinC=n2/n1, we get C=60∘.
The critical angle only exists when light travels from a denser to a rarer medium — that is, from a higher refractive index to a lower one. Here n1=2 (denser) and n2=3≈1.732 (rarer), so the condition is satisfied. The concept is simple: at the critical angle C, the refracted ray grazes the boundary, making the angle of refraction exactly 90∘.
- Apply Snell’s law at the critical condition. Snell’s law: n1sinθ1=n2sinθ2. At the critical angle, θ1=C and θ2=90∘. So:
n1sinC=n2sin90∘=n2
- Solve for sinC.
sinC=n1n2=23
- Find C from the known sine value. Since sin60∘=23, we get: C=60∘ …
- TG EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-06-FN1 markMCQQ.Car A is moving to the east with a speed of 30 km/hr, and car B is moving to the north with the same speed. What is the velocity of car B as measured in car A? (A) 42 km/hr, 45∘ north of west (B) 42 km/hr, 45∘ east of north (C) 60 km/hr, 45∘ south of east (D) 42 km/hr, 45∘ south of east
›Reveal solutionSolution
Relative velocity is the vector difference vB/A=vB−vA. Car A sees car B moving at 42 km/hr, 45∘ north of west.
The key idea is that when you ask for the velocity of B as measured in car A, you want the relative velocity of B with respect to A. That means you subtract A's velocity from B's velocity, treating both as vectors. The result tells you how B appears to move from A's frame — its speed and its direction.
A classic trap is to add the speeds or to forget that direction matters. Here, A moves east and B moves north at the same speed. Their relative velocity is not simply the difference in magnitudes; it's the vector difference, which gives a larger magnitude and a diagonal direction.
Let’s work it through.
-
Set up the velocities as vectors.
Take east as the positive x-direction and north as the positive y-direction.
Car A: vA=30 i^ km/hr (east).
Car B: vB=30 j^ km/hr (north).
-
Write the relative velocity formula.
The velocity of B as seen from A is
vB/A=vB−vA.
This is the vector you would measure if you were sitting in car A and watching car B.
- Subtract the vectors.
vB/A=(30 j^)−(30 i^)=−30 i^+30 j^.
The −30 i^ means the relative motion has a component pointing west (opposite to east), and the +30 j^ means it has a component pointing north.
- Find the magnitude.
∣vB/A∣=(−30)2+(30)2=900+900=1800=302≈42 km/hr.
- Find the direction. …
-
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.