Q.Let us consider an equation 21mv2=mgh where m is the mass of the body, v its velocity, g is the acceleration due to gravity and h is the height. Check whether this equation is dimensionally correct.
Significant Figures: The Art of Honest Measurement
Imagine you're measuring the length of a table with a ruler that has marks every millimeter. You see the table edge falls somewhere between 152.3 cm and 152.4 cm. You estimate it as 152.35 cm. But here's the truth: you're certain about 152.3, pretty sure about the 0.05, and guessing about anything beyond that. Significant figures are simply a way to communicate how much of that number you actually know.
The Core Idea
Every measurement has uncertainty. Significant figures (or "sig figs") are the digits in a number that carry meaningful information about its precision. They include all the digits you're sure of, plus one more that you estimate.
Note
A digit is "significant" if removing it would change the precision of the measurement. Zeros can be tricky — they might just be placeholders.
The Rules (Memorize These)
1. Non-zero digits are always significant
123.45 has 5 sig figs. Simple.
2. Zeros between non-zero digits are significant
1002 has 4 sig figs. The zeros are "sandwiched" — they're part of the measurement.
3. Leading zeros are never significant
0.00123 has 3 sig figs. Those zeros just tell you where the decimal point is.
4. Trailing zeros are significant only if there's a decimal point
1200 has 2 sig figs (no decimal — zeros are placeholders)
1200. has 4 sig figs (decimal tells us those zeros were measured)
1200.0 has 5 sig figs
5. Exact numbers have infinite sig figs
If you count 5 apples, that's exactly 5 — no uncertainty. Conversion factors like 1 m=100 cm are exact by definition.
Tip
When in doubt, write the number in scientific notation. 1.20×103 clearly has 3 sig figs, while 1.2×103 has 2.
Why This Matters: Calculations
When you multiply or add measurements, the uncertainty propagates. You can't claim more precision than your least precise measurement.
Multiplication and Division
The result should have the same number of sig figs as the measurement with the fewest sig figs.
3.14×2.5=7.85 but you report 7.9 (2 sig figs, because 2.5 has only 2)
Addition and Subtraction
The result should have the same decimal places as the measurement with the fewest decimal places.
12.11+18.0=30.11 but you report 30.1 (one decimal place, because 18.0 has one) …
Why this formula?
Significant Figures: Why the Rules Work
Let’s start with the core idea: significant figures (sig figs) are a way to honestly report how precise a measurement is. The rules for addition/subtraction and multiplication/division aren’t arbitrary — they come directly from how uncertainty propagates through calculations.
1. The Fundamental Idea: Uncertainty is the Key
Every measurement has an uncertainty (error). When we say a length is 12.3 cm, we mean:
The true value lies somewhere between 12.25 cm and 12.35 cm (assuming ±0.05 cm uncertainty).
The last digit (3) is uncertain; the digits before it (1 and 2) are certain.
Why this matters: When we combine measurements, the uncertainty in the result depends on the uncertainties of the inputs. Sig fig rules are a shortcut for this uncertainty propagation.
2. Rule for Addition and Subtraction
Statement: The result should have the same number of decimal places as the measurement with the fewest decimal places.
Example:
12.3+4.56=16.86 → round to 16.9 (one decimal place, like 12.3)
Why this holds
Consider two measurements:
A=12.3±0.05 (uncertainty in the tenths place)
B=4.56±0.005 (uncertainty in the hundredths place)
When we add:
Certain digits: 12.3 has certainty up to the tenths place. 4.56 has certainty up to the hundredths place.
The weaker link: The tenths place of A is uncertain. So in the sum, the hundredths place (from B) is meaningless — because we don’t even know the tenths place of A exactly.
Mathematically, the absolute uncertainty in the sum is:
Δ(A+B)=(ΔA)2+(ΔB)2≈0.052+0.0052≈0.0502
This uncertainty is ~0.05, which affects the tenths place. So reporting the hundredths place is false precision.
Key takeaway: The result’s last significant digit is in the same decimal place as the least precise measurement’s last digit.
3. Rule for Multiplication and Division
Statement: The result should have the same number of significant figures as the measurement with the fewest significant figures.
Example:
12.3×4.56=56.088 → round to 56.1 (three sig figs, like both inputs)
Why this holds
Let’s use relative uncertainty (percentage error):
For multiplication, relative uncertainties add (approximately):
A×BΔ(A×B)≈(AΔA)2+(BΔB)2
Plugging in:
≈0.004072+0.001102≈0.00422 (0.422%)
Now, the absolute uncertainty in the product:
Δ(A×B)≈0.00422×(12.3×4.56)≈0.00422×56.088≈0.237
This uncertainty (~0.2) affects the tenths place of the result. So the result 56.088 has uncertainty in the first decimal — meaning only three digits (5, 6, and the uncertain 1) are meaningful. That’s three sig figs, matching the input with fewer sig figs (both have three here).
Key takeaway: The number of sig figs in the result is limited by the least precise measurement’s number of sig figs, because relative uncertainty is dominated by the measurement with the largest relative error.
An equation is dimensionally correct if both sides have identical dimensions. Here 21mv2 and mgh both reduce to [ML2T−2], confirming the equation is dimensionally consistent.
The principle of dimensional homogeneity states that any physically meaningful equation must have the same dimensions on both sides. This is a necessary (though not sufficient) condition for correctness. The equation 21mv2=mgh represents the conservation of mechanical energy: kinetic energy equals the potential energy lost. If the dimensions don't match, the equation cannot possibly be correct.
Dimensional analysis strips away numerical constants and focuses purely on the fundamental quantities: mass [M], length [L], and time [T].
Step-by-step dimensional check
1. Identify the dimensions of each physical quantity
We need the dimensions of mass, velocity, acceleration due to gravity, and height:
Quantity
Symbol
Dimensions
Mass
m
[M]
Velocity
v
[LT−1]
Acceleration
g
[LT−2]
Height
h
[L]
2. Find the dimensions of the left-hand side
The left side is 21mv2. The factor 21 is dimensionless (pure number), so we ignore it:
Method: dimensional bookkeeping by exponent algebra — instead of working out the dimensions of each side as a single combined expression, represent every physical quantity as a triple of exponents (M,L,T) and simply ADD the triples for each side. If the two summed triples match, the equation is dimensionally correct. This is faster than expanding brackets when an equation has several multiplied terms.
Setting up the exponent table
Write each base quantity's dimension as an (M,L,T) exponent triple:
Quantity
Dimension
Triple (M,L,T)
m
[M]
(1,0,0)
v
[LT−1]
(0,1,−1)
g
[LT−2]
(0,1,−2)
h
[L]
(0,1,0)
Sum the triples for the left side, 21mv2. The factor 21 is a pure number, so it contributes (0,0,0) and is dropped. v2 doubles v's triple:
m:(1,0,0)+v2:2×(0,1,−1)=(0,2,−2)⇒(1,2,−2)
Sum the triples for the right side, mgh — each factor's triple is added once, since it's a simple product:
m:(1,0,0)+g:(0,1,−2)+h:(0,1,0)⇒(1,2,−2) …
Common Mistakes in Dimensional Analysis of 21mv2=mgh
Mistake 1: Ignoring the constant 21
What students do wrong:
Students often think that because 21 is a pure number, it can be ignored in dimensional analysis. That part is actually correct — but some students remove it incorrectly or get confused about whether it affects dimensions.
Correct approach:
Constants like 21, π, e are dimensionless. They do not affect the dimensional formula. So you can safely ignore them.
✓Rule: Only check the dimensions of the physical quantities, not the numerical coefficients.
Mistake 2: Writing wrong dimensions for velocity (v)
What students do wrong:
Some write [v]=[LT−1] correctly, but then square it incorrectly — e.g., writing [v2]=[L2T−2] as [LT−2] or [L2T−1].
Correct approach:
v = distance / time → [v]=[LT−1]
v2 → [v2]=[L2T−2]
✓Tip: Square the entire dimensional formula, not just the unit.
Mistake 3: Confusing g (acceleration due to gravity) with g (gram)
What students do wrong:
In the equation, g is acceleration due to gravity, but some students treat it as mass (gram) and write [M].
Correct approach:
g = acceleration = velocity / time → [g]=[LT−2]
Never confuse the symbol g with the unit gram (g). In dimensional analysis, symbols represent physical quantities, not units.
✓Tip: Always identify the physical quantity first: "g is acceleration due to gravity."
Mistake 4: Forgetting to check both sides separately
What students do wrong:
Students try to "cancel" m from both sides without first writing dimensions. This leads to errors — especially if they cancel m but forget that m appears on both sides with the same dimension.
Correct approach:
Left-hand side (LHS): 21mv2
[m]=[M], [v2]=[L2T−2]
So [LHS]=[M][L2T−2]=[ML2T−2]
Right-hand side (RHS): mgh
[m]=[M], [g]=[LT−2], [h]=[L]
So [RHS]=[M][LT−2][L]=[ML2T−2]
✓Result: Both sides have dimensions [ML2T−2] → dimensionally correct.
Mistake 5: Thinking "dimensionally correct" means "numerically correct"