Mathematics · Ch 6 — Permutations and Combinations
Permutations When All the Objects Are Not Distinct Objects
Permutations When All the Objects Are Not Distinct Objects
Permutations When Objects Are Not All Distinct
Until now, every permutation problem we solved assumed that all objects being arranged were different from one another. But what happens when some objects are identical? The word ROOT has four letters, but two of them are the same letter O. If we simply wrote , we would be counting arrangements that are actually identical — swapping the two O's doesn't create a new word.
The key insight is this: when objects are identical, swapping them produces the same arrangement, not a different one. So we must divide out the overcounting.
The Core Idea — Worked Out with ROOT
Take the word ROOT. Temporarily treat the two O's as if they were different — call them and . Now we have four distinct objects: R, , , T. The number of permutations of these four distinct letters taken all at a time is .
Consider one such permutation: . If and are actually the same letter O, then the two permutations and are identical — both give the word ROOT. In fact, for every arrangement we counted in the list, there is a corresponding arrangement where the two O's are swapped, and these two are the same when the O's are identical.
How many such swaps exist for each arrangement? The two O's can be arranged among themselves in ways. So every distinct arrangement of the actual letters ROOT has been counted times in the total.
Therefore, the actual number of distinct permutations is:
The textbook shows this pairing explicitly in a large table. For each arrangement like , the pair is the same actual word. The 24 permutations of four distinct letters collapse into 12 distinct words when the two O's are identical.
Extending the Idea — INSTITUTE
Now consider the word INSTITUTE. It has 9 letters: I appears 2 times, T appears 3 times, and the remaining letters (N, S, U, E) are all different.
Temporarily treat the I's as , and the T's as , , . The number of permutations of 9 distinct objects is .
Take one such permutation, say . If the I's are actually identical and the T's are actually identical, then:
- The two I's can be rearranged among themselves in ways without changing the word.
- The three T's can be rearranged among themselves in ways without changing the word.
These rearrangements are independent, so each distinct arrangement of the actual letters has been counted times in the total.
Hence, the number of distinct permutations is:
Theorem 3 — One Type of Repeated Object
The number of permutations of objects, where objects are of the same kind and the rest are all different, is .
Why this works: Treat the identical objects as distinct temporarily. This gives permutations. But the identical objects can be arranged among themselves in ways, and all these arrangements correspond to the same actual permutation. So we divide by .
Theorem 4 — Multiple Types of Repeated Objects
The number of permutations of objects, where objects are of one kind, are of a second kind, , are of a th kind, and the rest (if any) are all different, is:
Why this works: Treat all objects as distinct temporarily — this gives permutations. The identical objects of the first kind can be rearranged in ways without changing the arrangement, the identical objects of the second kind in ways, and so on. Since these rearrangements are independent, each distinct arrangement has been counted times. Dividing by this product gives the correct count.
A common mistake is to forget that the "rest, if any" are all different — they contribute a factor of each, which doesn't change the denominator. Only the repeated objects contribute factors to the denominator.
Example 9 — ALLAHABAD
The word ALLAHABAD has 9 letters: 4 A's, 2 L's, and the rest (H, B, D) are all different.
Using Theorem 4 with , (for A), (for L):
Example 14 — DAUGHTER (Vowels Together / Never Together)
The word DAUGHTER has 8 distinct letters. The vowels are A, U, E (3 vowels). The consonants are D, G, H, T, R (5 consonants).
Part (i): All vowels occur together
Treat the three vowels as a single block (AUE). This block plus the 5 consonants gives 6 objects, all distinct. These 6 objects can be arranged in ways.
Inside the block, the 3 vowels can be arranged among themselves in ways.
By the multiplication principle:
Part (ii): All vowels do NOT occur together
Total arrangements without any restriction:
Subtract the arrangements where vowels are together (from part i):
"Never together" problems are almost always solved by subtraction: total arrangements minus arrangements where they ARE together. Direct counting of "never together" is usually much harder.
Example 15 — Coloured Discs
We have 4 red, 3 yellow, and 2 green discs, all indistinguishable within their own colour. Total discs = .
Using Theorem 4 with , , , :
Example 16 — INDEPENDENCE
The word INDEPENDENCE has 12 letters: N appears 3 times, E appears 4 times, D appears 2 times, and the rest (I, P, C) are all different.
Total arrangements without restriction:
Part (i): Words starting with P …
Theorem 4: Permutations When Objects Are Not All Distinct
The number of permutations of objects, where objects are of one kind, are of a second kind, ..., are of the th kind, and the rest (if any) are all different, is given by the formula above.
The hypothesis is that objects of the same kind are indistinguishable from each other. The are positive integers whose sum is at most ; the remaining objects are all distinct from each other and from the kinds.
When Do We Use This?
This formula applies whenever we arrange items where some are identical — rearranging letters of a word with repeated letters, arranging coloured discs where discs of the same colour look the same, or any situation where swapping two identical objects does not produce a new arrangement.
›Proof
Step 1: Treat identical objects as distinct temporarily.
Suppose we label the identical objects as , the identical objects as , and so on. If we treat every object as distinct (by these temporary labels), then we have distinct objects. The number of permutations of distinct objects taken all at a time is .
Step 2: Count how many labelled permutations collapse into one actual arrangement.
Consider any one actual arrangement of the objects (where identical objects are not distinguished). In the labelled version, the objects of the first kind can be permuted among themselves in ways without changing the actual arrangement — because swapping and leaves the same pattern of first-kind objects. Similarly, the objects of the second kind can be rearranged in ways, and so on up to the th kind. By the multiplication principle, the total number of labelled permutations that correspond to this single actual arrangement is
Step 3: Divide to remove the overcount.
Every actual arrangement is counted exactly times in the labelled permutations. Therefore, the number of distinct actual permutations is
This completes the proof. …
Theorem 4: Permutations When Objects Are Not All Distinct
The number of permutations of objects, where objects are of one kind, are of a second kind, ..., are of the th kind, and the rest (if any) are all different, is given by the formula above.
The hypothesis is that objects of the same kind are indistinguishable from each other. The are positive integers whose sum is at most ; the remaining objects are all distinct from each other and from the kinds.
When Do We Use This?
This formula applies whenever we arrange items where some are identical — rearranging letters of a word with repeated letters, arranging coloured discs where discs of the same colour look the same, or any situation where swapping two identical objects does not produce a new arrangement.
›Proof
Step 1: Treat identical objects as distinct temporarily.
Suppose we label the identical objects as , the identical objects as , and so on. If we treat every object as distinct (by these temporary labels), then we have distinct objects. The number of permutations of distinct objects taken all at a time is .
Step 2: Count how many labelled permutations collapse into one actual arrangement.
Consider any one actual arrangement of the objects (where identical objects are not distinguished). In the labelled version, the objects of the first kind can be permuted among themselves in ways without changing the actual arrangement — because swapping and leaves the same pattern of first-kind objects. Similarly, the objects of the second kind can be rearranged in ways, and so on up to the th kind. By the multiplication principle, the total number of labelled permutations that correspond to this single actual arrangement is
Step 3: Divide to remove the overcount.
Every actual arrangement is counted exactly times in the labelled permutations. Therefore, the number of distinct actual permutations is
This completes the proof. …