Q.If , prove that .
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →The key idea is to use implicit differentiation on , then simplify using the original relation to express everything in terms of and . The result is .
Why implicit differentiation?
The equation ties and together in a way that can't be easily solved for as a function of (at least not in a simple closed form). But we don't need to — we can differentiate both sides with respect to , treating as a function of , and then solve for . That's the essence of implicit differentiation.
A natural first step: take the natural logarithm on both sides. This simplifies the exponential and brings the variables into a more manageable form.
- Take the natural log Given , take on both sides:
This is much cleaner. Now appears in the denominator, but we can work with it.
- Differentiate implicitly Differentiate both sides with respect to . Remember is a function of , so use the chain rule on the right-hand side:
Left side: .
Right side: use the quotient rule (or product rule — treat as ). Let's do quotient rule:
So we have:
- Solve for Multiply both sides by :
Rearrange to isolate the derivative term:
Factor on the right:
So:
- Use the original relation to rewrite in terms of only We have , so . Substitute this into the expression:
Simplify numerator: …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.