Solving a System of Equations by the Matrix Method
A system of linear equations can be written as a single matrix equation and solved in one clean step using the inverse of a matrix. This is the Class-12 "matrix method" for simultaneous equations.
If det(A)=0, then A−1 exists, and multiplying both sides on the left by A−1 gives
X=A−1B,where A−1=det(A)1adj(A).
So you compute det(A), then adj(A), form A−1, and multiply by B. The single column X=A−1B hands you x, y, z at once, and because A−1 is unique, the solution is unique.
Watch out
Multiply in the correct order: X=A−1B, not BA−1. Matrix multiplication is not commutative, and BA−1 is not even defined here.
When det(A)=0
If det(A)=0, A−1 does not exist and the inverse method fails. The system is then either inconsistent (no solution) or has infinitely many solutions. Decide which by computing (adjA)B:
(adjA)B=O → no solution (inconsistent).
(adjA)B=O → infinitely many solutions (consistent, dependent). …
From CD=AB with C invertible, D=C−1(AB)=[−19177−11044].
The equation CD−AB=O rearranges to CD=AB. Because C sits on the left of the unknown D, we undo it by left-multiplying both sides by C−1: C−1(CD)=C−1(AB), i.e. D=C−1(AB). So the plan is: compute AB, invert C, multiply.
Step 1 — compute AB
AB=[23−14][5724].
(1,1):2⋅5+(−1)⋅7=3
(1,2):2⋅2+(−1)⋅4=0
(2,1):3⋅5+4⋅7=43
(2,2):3⋅2+4⋅4=22
So AB=[343022].
Step 2 — invert C
detC=(2)(8)−(5)(3)=16−15=1=0,
so C is invertible. For a 2×2 matrix [acbd] the inverse is det1[d−c−ba]; here det=1, so
Why it's wrong: because C is on the left of D, you must left-multiply: D=C−1(AB), not (AB)C−1. Matrix multiplication is not commutative. Correct approach: apply the inverse on the same side as the coefficient.