Q.State whether the following statement is True or False: If and are two events such that and , then .
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →The statement is True. The key idea is to rewrite the conditional probability inequality using the complement rule and the given condition , which ensures the inequality holds.
Why This Approach Works
The problem asks whether is always true under the conditions and .
At first glance, this looks like a conditional probability inequality that might depend on the specific events. But the complement rule gives us a powerful way to simplify: . So the right-hand side becomes .
The trick is to realise that , and we can relate to using the inclusion-exclusion principle. The condition guarantees that , which is crucial.
Let's work through it step by step.
Step-by-Step Solution
1. Write the target inequality in terms of .
We know . The inequality becomes:
Multiply both sides by (so the inequality direction stays the same):
2. Replace using the complement rule.
Since , we get:
So the inequality we need to prove is:
3. Recognise this as a known inequality from inclusion-exclusion.
The inclusion-exclusion principle for two events states:
Since (probabilities cannot exceed 1), we have:
Rearranging:
This is exactly the inequality we need! It holds for any two events and , regardless of the given conditions.
The inequality is always true — it's a direct consequence of . No extra conditions are needed for this step.
4. Check the role of the given conditions.
- : This is necessary so that is defined (we can't divide by zero). …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.