Skip to content
NCERT Exemplar · Q9

Q.The work done to move a charge along an equipotential from A to B

(a) cannot be defined as −∫ABE⃗⋅dl⃗-\int_A^B \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l}.
(b) must be defined as −∫ABE⃗⋅dl⃗-\int_A^B \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l}.
(c) is zero.
(d) can have a non-zero value.
Uttarakhand UbseMCQ· 1mImportance★★★★★
54% · 30/56 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The work done moving a charge from A to B is, by definition, always W=−q∫ABE⃗⋅dl⃗W=-q\int_A^B \vec E\cdot d\vec l — this formula is universally valid, so option (b) is correct — and because E⃗\vec E is perpendicular to dl⃗d\vec l everywhere on an equipotential, that integral evaluates to exactly zero, so option (c) is also correct. Both (b) and (c) hold; (a) and (d) are false.

The general definition of work, first

For any path from A to B in an electrostatic field, the work done by the field on a charge qq is

W=q∫ABE⃗⋅dl⃗,W = q\int_A^B \vec E\cdot d\vec l,

or, equivalently, the work required by an external agent (against the field) is Wext=−q∫ABE⃗⋅dl⃗=q(VB−VA)W_{\text{ext}}=-q\int_A^B\vec E\cdot d\vec l = q(V_B-V_A). This line-integral formula for work is not a special rule that applies only away from equipotentials — it is the general definition of electrostatic work along any path, equipotential or not. So option (b), "must be defined as −∫ABE⃗⋅dl⃗-\int_A^B \vec E\cdot d\vec l" (up to the constant qq), is simply true — this is always how the work is defined, and option (a), which claims the opposite (that it cannot be defined this way), is therefore false.

Now apply it to a path along an equipotential

An equipotential surface, by definition, is a surface where VV has the same value at every point. Two known facts about equipotentials:

  1. VA=VBV_A = V_B if A and B lie on the same equipotential.
  2. The electric field E⃗\vec E is always perpendicular to an equipotential surface at every point on it.

Step 1 — Using the potential-difference form. Since VA=VBV_A=V_B on the same equipotential, W=q(VB−VA)=q⋅0=0W=q(V_B-V_A)=q\cdot 0=0 immediately.

Step 2 — Confirming it via the line integral (option b's formula). Because E⃗\vec E is everywhere perpendicular to the equipotential surface, and the displacement dl⃗d\vec l along a path on the surface is everywhere tangent to it, E⃗⋅dl⃗=0\vec E\cdot d\vec l=0 at every point of the path. Integrating zero along the whole path gives

∫ABE⃗⋅dl⃗=0  ⟹  W=0.\int_A^B \vec E\cdot d\vec l = 0 \implies W=0. …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.