Skip to content

Mathematics · Ch 8 — Principle of Mathematical Induction

Proving Inequalities by Induction

5

Proving Inequalities by Induction

Inequality statements behave a little differently from equalities in an induction proof: instead of simplifying both sides down to a single algebraic identity, the inductive step usually chains together the inductive hypothesis with one or more auxiliary true inequalities (such as 2k≥k+12k \ge k+1 for k≥1k \ge 1, or x2≥0x^2 \ge 0 for real xx) to reach the required conclusion for k+1k+1.

The general pattern. To prove an inequality P(n)P(n) of the form L(n) (≥ or >) R(n)L(n) \ (\ge \text{ or } >)\ R(n) by induction: (i) verify P(n0)P(n_0) directly at the smallest value n0n_0 where the statement is claimed to hold (often, but not always, n0=1n_0=1); (ii) assume P(k)P(k): L(k) (≥ or >) R(k)L(k) \ (\ge\text{ or }>)\ R(k) for some k≥n0k \ge n_0; (iii) build a chain of inequalities starting from L(k+1)L(k+1), using the inductive hypothesis at some point in the chain, and ending at R(k+1)R(k+1).

Worked illustration. To prove 2n>n2^n > n for all n≥1n \ge 1: the base case n=1n=1 gives 21=2>12^1=2 > 1, true. Assuming 2k>k2^k > k, we get 2k+1=2⋅2k>2k2^{k+1} = 2\cdot 2^k > 2k; and since k≥1k \ge 1 gives 2k≥k+12k \ge k+1, chaining the two gives 2k+1>2k≥k+12^{k+1} > 2k \ge k+1, i.e. 2k+1>k+12^{k+1} > k+1, which is P(k+1)P(k+1).

When the base case is not n=1n=1. Some inequalities are simply false for small nn and only become true from some larger starting value n0n_0 onward -- for instance 2n>n22^n > n^2 fails at n=2,3,4n=2,3,4 (since 4=224=2^2, 8<98<9, 16=1616=16) but holds for every n≥5n \ge 5. In such cases the base case of the induction is taken at n0=5n_0=5 rather than at n=1n=1: you verify P(5)P(5) directly, and then prove P(k)⇒P(k+1)P(k) \Rightarrow P(k+1) only for k≥5k \ge 5. The conclusion is then that P(n)P(n) holds for all n≥5n \ge 5, not for all natural numbers nn -- induction proves the statement true from wherever its base case is planted onward, and no earlier. …