Question 60 of 67
Q.Which of the following statements is incorrect about HK III (S) ?
(a) Heat killed III S strain was rough in nature
(b) Avirulent
(c) Heat killed III S strain was smooth in nature
(d) Type III S bacterial strain was heated at high temperature to make the heat killed strain HK III S
West Bengal WbchseWest Bengal HS (WBCHSE) Board 2026MCQ· 1mImportance★★★★★
90% · 60/67 Questions
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →The type III S strain is smooth (S = smooth, capsulated); heating only kills it, it does not change its smooth wall to rough. So saying HK III S was 'rough in nature' is incorrect.
Evaluating each statement about heat-killed (HK) type III S:
- (a) "Heat killed III S strain was rough in nature" — INCORRECT. The S strain is smooth (has a mucous/polysaccharide capsule); heat kills the cells but does not convert its smooth wall into a rough one.
- (b) "Avirulent" — correct; once heat-killed, the S cells cannot cause disease.
- (c) "Heat killed III S strain was smooth in nature" — correct; it retains its smooth (capsulated) character. …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.