Skip to content
Exercise · Q31

Q.State two advantages of the hydrogen-oxygen fuel cell over a conventional fossil-fuel-burning power source, in terms of energy conversion efficiency and environmental impact.

West Bengal WbchseTextbookSubjectiveImportance★★★★★
60% · 31/52 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

A conventional fossil-fuel power source first burns fuel to release heat, then converts that heat into mechanical work (in an engine or turbine), and finally converts the mechanical work into electricity — each stage loses energy, and the heat-to-work stage is fundamentally capped by Carnot-cycle thermodynamic limits, so overall efficiencies of only around 3535–40%40\% are typical. A hydrogen-oxygen fuel cell instead converts the chemical energy of the H2/O2\text{H}_2/\text{O}_2 reaction directly into electrical energy via the electrode reactions, bypassing the heat-and-mechanical-work intermediate stages entirely; this lets fuel cells reach substantially higher efficiencies, often cited around 6060–70%70\%. Separately, since the only chemical product of the cell reaction 2H2+O2→2H2O2\text{H}_2 + \text{O}_2 \to 2\text{H}_2\text{O} is water, a fuel cell run on clean hydrogen produces no carbon dioxide, sulfur oxides, nitrogen o …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.