Skip to content

Mathematics · Ch 1 — Complex Numbers

The a + ib Form: Real Part, Imaginary Part, and the Symbol i

1.2

The a + ib Form: Real Part, Imaginary Part, and the Symbol i

Ordered pairs are precise but clumsy to write, so the next step is to recover the familiar a+iba+ib notation from them — and to show it means exactly the same thing.

Notice that for any real numbers a,ba, b: (a,0)+(b,0)=(a+b,0)(a,0) + (b,0) = (a+b, 0) and (a,0)⋅(b,0)=(ab,0)(a,0)\cdot(b,0) = (ab, 0). In other words, complex numbers whose second entry is 00 behave under addition and multiplication exactly like ordinary real numbers. This lets us simply identify the real number aa with the complex number (a,0)(a,0), writing aa in place of (a,0)(a,0) without any loss of information. Every real number is now also a complex number.

Next, give the special complex number (0,1)(0,1) its own name: ii. Compute its square using the multiplication rule from Section 1.1:

i⋅i=(0,1)⋅(0,1)=(0⋅0−1⋅1, 0⋅1+1⋅0)=(−1,0)=−1i \cdot i = (0,1)\cdot(0,1) = (0\cdot 0 - 1\cdot 1,\ 0\cdot 1 + 1\cdot 0) = (-1, 0) = -1

So i2=−1i^2 = -1 — the multiplication rule we defined in Section 1.1 was engineered precisely so that this would hold. This is the 'missing' square root of −1-1 that motivated the whole chapter, now sitting on solid logical ground.

Any complex number (a,b)(a,b) can now be rewritten: (a,b)=(a,0)+(0,b)=(a,0)+(b,0)⋅(0,1)=a+ib(a,b) = (a,0) + (0,b) = (a,0) + (b,0)\cdot(0,1) = a + ib. So instead of writing z=(a,b)z=(a,b), we write z=a+ibz = a+ib, where aa is called the real part of zz (written Re⁡(z)\operatorname{Re}(z)) and bb is the imaginary part (written Im⁡(z)\operatorname{Im}(z)) — note that the imaginary part is itself a real number, it's just the coefficient sitting next to ii. A complex number with Im⁡(z)=0\operatorname{Im}(z)=0 is a real number; one with Re⁡(z)=0\operatorname{Re}(z)=0 (and b≠0b\ne0) is called purely imaginary.

Under this identification, the addition/subtraction/multiplication rules from Section 1.1 turn into the ordinary algebra you'd expect if you just treat ii as a quantity satisfying i2=−1i^2=-1 and expand normally:

(a+ib)+(c+id)=(a+c)+i(b+d)(a+ib) + (c+id) = (a+c) + i(b+d)

(a+ib)(c+id)=ac+iad+ibc+i2bd=(ac−bd)+i(ad+bc)(a+ib)(c+id) = ac + iad + ibc + i^2bd = (ac-bd) + i(ad+bc)

That second line is worth pausing on: you never need to memorise the product rule (ac−bd,ad+bc)(ac-bd, ad+bc) separately — just multiply out (a+ib)(c+id)(a+ib)(c+id) like two binomials and replace i2i^2 by −1-1 wherever it appears.

Division needs a trick, because there's no direct 'divide entry-wise' rule. To simplify 1c+id\dfrac{1}{c+id}, multiply top and bottom by c−idc - id (the sign of the imaginary part flipped) so the denominator becomes real:

1c+id=c−id(c+id)(c−id)=c−idc2+d2\frac{1}{c+id} = \frac{c-id}{(c+id)(c-id)} = \frac{c-id}{c^2+d^2} …