Skip to content

Mathematics · Ch 16 — Integration

Second Fundamental Theorem of Integral Calculus

16.8.3

Second Fundamental Theorem of Integral Calculus

The Second Fundamental Theorem: The Bridge from Indefinite to Definite

The Second Fundamental Theorem of Integral Calculus makes evaluating definite integrals practical. Instead of calculating limits of sums, it lets you use an antiderivative (indefinite integral) to find the exact value.

Theorem 2 (Second Fundamental Theorem of Integral Calculus)

Let ff be a continuous function on the closed interval [a,b][a, b], and let FF be an antiderivative of ff (meaning F′(x)=f(x)F'(x) = f(x) for all xx in [a,b][a, b]). Then:

∫abf(x) dx=[F(x)]ab=F(b)−F(a)\int_{a}^{b} f(x) \, dx = \big[ F(x) \big]_{a}^{b} = F(b) - F(a)

The definite integral of ff from aa to bb is simply the difference between the values of any antiderivative FF at the upper limit bb and the lower limit aa.

Remarks on the Theorem

  1. Practical utility: the theorem provides a straightforward method for calculating a definite integral without computing the limit of a sum — the primary reason we can solve most definite-integral problems in practice.

  2. Core operation: the crucial step is finding a function FF whose derivative is the integrand ff. This process solidifies the deep connection between differentiation and integration as inverse processes.

  3. A critical condition on continuity: ff must be well-defined and continuous on the entire closed interval [a,b][a, b]. If ff is not continuous at some point within [a,b][a, b], the theorem cannot be applied directly. For example, consider ∫−231x2(x2−1) dx\int_{-2}^{3} \frac{1}{x^2 (x^2 - 1)} \, dx. The integrand f(x)=1x2(x2−1)f(x) = \frac{1}{x^2 (x^2 - 1)} is not defined (hence not continuous) at x=0x = 0 and x=±1x = \pm 1. Since [−2,3][-2, 3] contains x=−1,0,1x = -1, 0, 1, evaluating this integral using the Second Fundamental Theorem in its basic form would be erroneous.

Watch out

Always check that the integrand f(x)f(x) is continuous on the entire interval [a,b][a, b] before applying the Second Fundamental Theorem. If it is not, a different approach (like splitting the integral at the points of discontinuity) is needed.

Steps for Calculating ∫abf(x) dx\int_{a}^{b} f(x) \, dx …

Theorem 2

The Second Fundamental Theorem of Integral Calculus

This theorem is the bridge that turns the hard work of finding an antiderivative into a direct method for evaluating a definite integral. It tells us that instead of computing limits of sums, we can simply evaluate the antiderivative at the endpoints.

Statement of the Theorem

Theorem 2 (Second Fundamental Theorem of Integral Calculus)

Let ff be a continuous function defined on the closed interval [a,b][a, b], and let FF be an antiderivative of ff (that is, F′(x)=f(x)F'(x) = f(x) for all xx in [a,b][a, b]). Then

∫abf(x) dx=[F(x)]x=ax=b=F(b)−F(a).\int_a^b f(x) \, dx = \big[F(x)\big]_{x=a}^{x=b} = F(b) - F(a).

The hypotheses are precise and non-negotiable:

  • ff must be continuous on the closed interval [a,b][a, b].
  • FF must be an antiderivative of ff, meaning F′(x)=f(x)F'(x) = f(x) for every xx in [a,b][a, b].
Watch out

If ff is not continuous on the entire interval [a,b][a, b], the theorem does not apply. For example, the integral ∫−231x2(x2−1) dx\int_{-2}^{3} \frac{1}{x^2(x^2-1)} \, dx is meaningless because the integrand is not defined for −1<x<1-1 < x < 1, which lies inside [−2,3][-2, 3].

Complete Proof

›Proof

We begin with the definition of the definite integral as a limit of Riemann sums. Let P={x0,x1,x2,…,xn}P = \{x_0, x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n\} be a partition of [a,b][a, b] where a=x0<x1<x2<⋯<xn=ba = x_0 < x_1 < x_2 < \dots < x_n = b, and let Δxk=xk−xk−1\Delta x_k = x_k - x_{k-1}.

Since FF is an antiderivative of ff, we have F′(x)=f(x)F'(x) = f(x). By the Mean Value Theorem, applied to FF on each subinterval [xk−1,xk][x_{k-1}, x_k], there exists some ckc_k in (xk−1,xk)(x_{k-1}, x_k) such that

F(xk)−F(xk−1)=F′(ck)(xk−xk−1)=f(ck)Δxk.F(x_k) - F(x_{k-1}) = F'(c_k)(x_k - x_{k-1}) = f(c_k) \Delta x_k.

Now sum this telescoping expression over all kk from 11 to nn:

∑k=1n[F(xk)−F(xk−1)]=∑k=1nf(ck)Δxk.\sum_{k=1}^n \big[F(x_k) - F(x_{k-1})\big] = \sum_{k=1}^n f(c_k) \Delta x_k.

The left-hand side telescopes:

F(x1)−F(x0)+F(x2)−F(x1)+⋯+F(xn)−F(xn−1)=F(xn)−F(x0)=F(b)−F(a).F(x_1) - F(x_0) + F(x_2) - F(x_1) + \dots + F(x_n) - F(x_{n-1}) = F(x_n) - F(x_0) = F(b) - F(a).

Therefore,

F(b)−F(a)=∑k=1nf(ck)Δxk.F(b) - F(a) = \sum_{k=1}^n f(c_k) \Delta x_k.

Now take the limit as the norm of the partition (the maximum subinterval length) goes to zero. The right-hand side becomes the Riemann integral of ff over [a,b][a, b], provided the limit exists. Since ff is continuous on [a,b][a, b], it is Riemann integrable, and the limit exists and equals the definite integral. Hence,

F(b)−F(a)=lim⁡∥P∥→0∑k=1nf(ck)Δxk=∫abf(x) dx.F(b) - F(a) = \lim_{\|P\| \to 0} \sum_{k=1}^n f(c_k) \Delta x_k = \int_a^b f(x) \, dx.

This completes the proof. …