Q.Determine whether the following statement is true or false. Justify your answer: For all sets and , .
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →The statement is true because the set difference (elements in but not ) and the intersection (elements in both and ) together form a partition of set .
When we talk about sets, understanding how different operations combine or separate elements is crucial. The statement essentially asks if we can reconstruct set by combining two specific parts:
- The elements that are in but not in (this is ).
- The elements that are in and also in (this is ).
Imagine set as a group of students. Set is another group of students.
- would be the students who are in group but not in group .
- would be the students who are in group and also in group .
If you take all the students who are in group but not in group , and then you add all the students who are in group and also in group , what do you get? You get all the students who are in group . This intuitive understanding suggests the statement is true.
To formally prove this, we need to show that every element in is also in , and conversely, every element in is also in . This is the standard method for proving set equality.
- Understanding the Definitions:
Let's first define the terms involved:
- The set difference (read as "A minus B") consists of all elements that are in but not in .
* The intersection $A \cap B$ (read as "A intersection B") consists of all elements that are common to both $A$ and $B$.
* The union $X \cup Y$ (read as "X union Y") consists of all elements that are in $X$ or in $Y$ (or both).
-
Proving :
We need to show that if an element belongs to , then it must also belong to .
Let .
By the definition of union, this means or .
-
Case 1:
By the definition of set difference, and .
From this, we can directly conclude that .
-
Case 2:
By the definition of intersection, and .
From this, we can directly conclude that .
In both possible cases, we find that . Therefore, any element in must also be in . This proves that .
-
-
Proving :
We need to show that if an element belongs to , then it must also belong to .
Let .
For any element and any set , there are only two possibilities regarding 's membership in : either or . These two possibilities are mutually exclusive and exhaustive. …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.