Q.Species having same bond order are : (Note: more than one of the given options may be correct.)
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Bond Order Strength
Bond Order Strength: From Intuition to Precision
Imagine two people holding hands. If they just touch fingertips, a gentle breeze can separate them. If they clasp firmly, it takes more effort to pull them apart. If they lock arms, you need real force. That's the core idea behind bond order — it tells you how strongly two atoms are connected in a molecule.
The Intuition
In a chemical bond, atoms share electrons. The more electron pairs they share, the tighter the grip. A single bond (one shared pair) is like a handshake — it works, but it's easy to break. A double bond (two shared pairs) is like a firm clasp — stronger, shorter, harder to pull apart. A triple bond (three shared pairs) is like a wrestler's lock — very strong and very short.
This directly translates to real molecules:
- C–C single bond: bond energy ≈ 350 kJ/mol, bond length ≈ 154 pm
- C=C double bond: bond energy ≈ 610 kJ/mol, bond length ≈ 134 pm
- C≡C triple bond: bond energy ≈ 835 kJ/mol, bond length ≈ 120 pm
More shared electrons → stronger bond → shorter bond. That's the pattern.
The Precise Definition
Bond order is the number of chemical bonds between a pair of atoms. For simple molecules, it's just the number of shared electron pairs:
Bond Order=2Number of bonding electrons−Number of antibonding electrons
This formula matters most when you move beyond simple Lewis structures — for molecules with resonance or molecular orbital theory.
How Bond Order Determines Strength
Bond order and bond strength are directly proportional. Here's why:
-
More electron density between nuclei: Higher bond order means more electrons are concentrated in the region between the two nuclei. These electrons simultaneously attract both nuclei, pulling them together.
-
Greater electrostatic attraction: The shared electrons act like "glue." More glue means stronger adhesion.
-
Shorter bond length: Stronger attraction pulls the nuclei closer. Shorter bonds are harder to stretch or break.
Don't confuse bond order with bond energy. Bond order tells you the number of bonds; bond energy tells you the energy required to break them. They're proportional, but not identical — a C=C bond isn't exactly twice as strong as a C–C bond (it's about 1.7 times stronger).
Real Examples
| Molecule | Bond | Bond Order | Bond Energy (kJ/mol) | Bond Length (pm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H₂ | H–H | 1 | 436 | 74 |
| O₂ | O=O | 2 | 498 | 121 |
| N₂ | N≡N | 3 | 945 | 110 |
| F₂ | F–F | 1 | 159 | 142 |
Notice how N₂ with a triple bond is the strongest diatomic molecule — it takes 945 kJ/mol to break that bond. That's why nitrogen gas is so unreactive.
When Bond Order Gets Tricky
Some molecules don't have simple whole-number bond orders. Consider ozone (O₃): …
The key idea is Bond Order, which quantifies the number of chemical bonds between two atoms. It is calculated using molecular orbital theory as half the difference between the number of electrons in bonding molecular orbitals (Nb) and antibonding molecular orbitals (Na).
Bond Order (B.O.) =21(Nb−Na)
For diatomic species, bond order can be quickly determined by their total number of electrons:
-
Calculate total electrons for each species:
- (A) N2: 2×7=14 electrons
- (B) N2−: 2×7+1=15 electrons
- (C) F2+: 2×9−1=17 electrons
- (D) O2−: 2×8+1=17 electrons
-
Determine bond order for each species: …
To find species with the same bond order, we calculate the bond order for each using molecular orbital (MO) theory. This involves determining the total number of electrons, writing the MO configuration, and applying the formula: Bond Order = 1/2×(bonding electrons−anti-bonding electrons). We find that F2+ and O2− both have a bond order of 1.5.
In chemistry, bond order is a fundamental concept that describes the number of chemical bonds between a pair of atoms. It's a direct indicator of bond strength and stability: a higher bond order generally means a stronger, shorter, and more stable bond. We determine bond order using Molecular Orbital (MO) theory, which describes how atomic orbitals combine to form molecular orbitals.
The key idea is that electrons occupy these molecular orbitals, some of which are bonding (stabilizing the molecule) and some are anti-bonding (destabilizing the molecule). The net effect of these electrons determines the bond order.
The bond order (BO) is calculated as:
BO=21(Nb−Na)
where Nb is the number of electrons in bonding molecular orbitals and Na is the number of electrons in anti-bonding molecular orbitals.
A crucial aspect of MO theory for diatomic molecules is the energy ordering of the molecular orbitals, which changes depending on the total number of electrons in the molecule. This change is due to the extent of s-p mixing.
The energy order of molecular orbitals for diatomic molecules:
- For molecules with up to 14 electrons (e.g., N2, C2, B2): σ1s<σ1s∗<σ2s<σ2s∗<π2px=π2py<σ2pz<π2px∗=π2py∗<σ2pz∗
- For molecules with more than 14 electrons (e.g., O2, F2, Ne2): σ1s<σ1s∗<σ2s<σ2s∗<σ2pz<π2px=π2py<π2px∗=π2py∗<σ2pz∗
Let's calculate the bond order for each given species:
-
N2
- Total number of electrons = 7(from N)+7(from N)=14 electrons.
- Since it has 14 electrons, we use the MO energy order for ≤14 electrons.
- MO configuration: \sigma_{1s}^2 \sigma^*_{1s}^2 \sigma_{2s}^2 \sigma^*_{2s}^2 \pi_{2p_x}^2 \pi_{2p_y}^2 \sigma_{2p_z}^2
- Number of bonding electrons (Nb) = 2(σ1s)+2(σ2s)+4(π2p)+2(σ2pz)=10
- Number of anti-bonding electrons (Na) = 2(σ1s∗)+2(σ2s∗)=4
- Bond Order = 21(10−4)=21(6)=3
-
N2−
- Total number of electrons = 7(from N)+7(from N)+1(for negative charge)=15 electrons.
- Even though it has 15 electrons, the s-p mixing effect is still significant for nitrogen-based molecules. Therefore, we still use the MO energy order for ≤14 electrons.
- MO configuration: \sigma_{1s}^2 \sigma^*_{1s}^2 \sigma_{2s}^2 \sigma^*_{2s}^2 \pi_{2p_x}^2 \pi_{2p_y}^2 \sigma_{2p_z}^2 \pi^*_{2p_x}^1
- Number of bonding electrons (Nb) = 2(σ1s)+2(σ2s)+4(π2p)+2(σ2pz)=10
- Number of anti-bonding electrons (Na) = 2(σ1s∗)+2(σ2s∗)+1(π2px∗)=5
- Bond Order = 21(10−5)=21(5)=2.5
-
F2+
- Total number of electrons = 9(from F)+9(from F)−1(for positive charge)=17 electrons. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-FN1 markMCQQ.The increasing order of N–N bond length of N2O(A), N2O3(B), N2O4(C) is (A) A, C, B (B) A, B, C (C) B, C, A (D) C, B, A
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests how N–N bond length varies across nitrogen oxides depending on bond order and the structural environment. Answer: A, C, B (increasing order).
Concept and Intuition
Bond length is inversely related to bond order/strength: a higher-order (more multiple-bond character) N–N linkage is shorter and stronger, while a weak single bond between two units pulling electron density away (as through delocalization into N=O groups) is unusually long. N2O has significant N≡N triple-bond character (it's isoelectronic with CO2, structure N≡N−O), giving the shortest N–N distance. N2O4 is two planar NO2 units joined by a single N–N bond, and N2O3 is an NO unit joined to an NO2 unit by an even weaker, longer N–N single bond — a well-known "unusually long" bond because of extensive delocalization pulling electron density away from the N–N linkage.
Step-by-Step Solution
- N2O: structure is N≡N−O (like CO2), giving the N–N bond significant triple-bond character, bond length ≈1.12–1.13 Å — shortest.
- N2O4: two NO2 groups joined by a single N–N bond, bond length ≈1.75 Å. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-AN1 markMCQQ.The number of species having bond order ≥2 from the following is N2, O22−, NO−, O2+, NO+, NO (A) 4 (B) 6 (C) 5 (D) 3
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests MO-theory bond orders for a set of diatomics/ions; only O22− falls below bond order 2, so 5 of the 6 species qualify.
Concept and Intuition
Bond order (BO) from molecular orbital theory is BO=21(Nb−Na), where Nb/Na are electrons in bonding/antibonding MOs. Removing an electron from an antibonding MO (forming a cation) raises the bond order; adding an electron to an antibonding MO (forming an anion) lowers it. Isoelectronic species (same total electron count) have identical MO configurations and hence the same bond order — this is the fast way to solve such problems.
Step-by-Step Solution
- N2 (14 e⁻): triple bond, BO = 3.
- O2 (16 e⁻) has BO = 2. O22− (18 e⁻, two extra electrons go into the antibonding π∗ orbitals) has BO =2−1=1. Not ≥2.
- NO (15 e⁻, isoelectronic with O2+) has BO = 2.5.
- NO− (16 e⁻, isoelectronic with O2) has BO = 2.
- O2+ (15 e⁻, isoelectronic with NO) has BO = 2.5.
- NO+ (14 e⁻, isoelectronic with N2) has BO = 3. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-FN1 markMCQQ.Which of the following orders is not correct for the property mentioned against them? (A) H2O>HF>NH3>H2S — boiling point (B) H2O>NH3>NF3>CF4 — dipole moment (C) C−C>N−O>C−O>C−H — bond length (D) O2+>O2>O2−>O22− — bond order
›Reveal solutionSolution
Testing several classic periodic/bonding-trend orders at once; three check out against known values, but the bond-length order in (C) has N–O and C–O swapped — that's the incorrect one.
Concept and Intuition
Bond length shortens as bond order increases and as the atoms involved get smaller/more electronegative (stronger orbital overlap), while it lengthens with atomic size. For single (sigma) bonds among small second-period atoms, typical average bond lengths increase roughly as: C–H (shortest, small H) < N–O < C–O < C–C (largest single bond among these, both atoms carbon-sized without extra electronegativity-driven shortening). Recognizing the correct relative order between C–O and N–O bonds is the crux of this question.
Step-by-Step Solution
- (A) Boiling points: H2O and HF both hydrogen-bond strongly, with water's extensive 3-D H-bond network giving it the highest boiling point (100°C) even over HF (19.5°C, which H-bonds only linearly and has a low molar mass). NH3 (-33°C) H-bonds more weakly than HF, and H2S (-60°C) barely hydrogen-bonds at all. Order H2O>HF>NH3>H2S is correct.
- (B) Dipole moments: Water's bent shape with two lone pairs gives the largest net dipole (1.85 D); NH3's pyramidal shape gives 1.47 D; NF3's dipole is much reduced (0.24 D) because the lone pair and the three highly electronegative N–F bond dipoles largely oppose each other; CF4 is perfectly tetrahedral and symmetric, so its bond dipoles cancel exactly (0 D). Order correct.
- (C) Bond lengths: using standard average bond lengths (pm): C–C ≈154, C–O ≈143, N–O ≈136, C–H ≈109. The true descending order is C–C > C–O > N–O > C–H. The option states C–C > N–O > C–O > C–H, which incorrectly places N–O ahead of C–O. This order is wrong. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-AN1 markMCQQ.Match the following List – I (molecule / Ion) and List – II (Bond order and magnetic property): A. O2− ... I. 1.5 – Paramagnetic B. O2 ... II. 2.0 – Paramagnetic C. C22− ... III. 3.0 – Diamagnetic D. B2 ... IV. 1.0 – Paramagnetic The correct answer is (A) A-I, B-III, C-II, D-IV (B) A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV (C) A-IV, B-II, C-I, D-III (D) A-IV, B-I, C-II, D-III
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests MO-theory bond order and magnetic behaviour for four diatomic species. Matching gives O2−→1.5-paramagnetic, O2→2.0-paramagnetic, C22−→3.0-diamagnetic, B2→1.0-paramagnetic, i.e. A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV.
Concept and Intuition
Molecular orbital theory gives bond order =21(Nb−Na) where Nb/Na are bonding/antibonding electrons, and a species is paramagnetic if it has unpaired electrons in its MO configuration (following Hund's rule in degenerate orbitals like π2p).
Step-by-Step Solution
- O2− (superoxide ion): total electrons = 8+8+1 = 17. Filling MOs beyond O2's 16, the extra electron goes into one of the degenerate π2p∗ orbitals, giving bond order =21(10−7)=1.5 and one unpaired electron → paramagnetic, matches I (1.5–Paramagnetic).
- O2: 16 electrons; classic MO configuration gives bond order =21(10−6)=2.0 with two unpaired electrons in π2p∗ → paramagnetic, matches II (2.0–Paramagnetic).
- C22−: 6+6+2 = 14 electrons, isoelectronic with N2. Bond order =21(10−4)=3.0, all electrons paired → diamagnetic, matches III (3.0–Diamagnetic). …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-19-AN1 markMCQQ.Identify the correct set in which sum of bond orders of all species is maximum (A) N2+,O2,O22+ (B) O2−,O2+,B2 (C) C2,F2,N2 (D) O22−,C22−,O22+
›Reveal solutionSolution
Computing MO bond orders species-by-species, Set A (N2+,O2,O22+) gives the largest total bond order sum, 7.5.
Concept and Intuition
Molecular orbital theory gives bond order as 21(bonding e−−antibonding e−). Removing an electron from an antibonding orbital (or adding one to a bonding orbital) raises bond order; removing a bonding electron or adding an antibonding one lowers it. Systematically working out each species' electron configuration lets us compare sums across the four sets.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Set A: N2+: BO =2.5 (one electron removed from a bonding σ2p MO of N2, BO=3). O2: BO=2.0 (standard). O22+: BO=3.0 (both π∗2p electrons removed from O2). Sum =2.5+2.0+3.0=7.5.
- Set B: O2−: BO=1.5 (one electron added to π∗2p). O2+: BO=2.5 (one electron removed from π∗2p). B2: BO=1.0. Sum =1.5+2.5+1.0=5.0.
- Set C: C2: BO=2.0. F2: BO=1.0. N2: BO=3.0. Sum =2.0+1.0+3.0=6.0.
- Set D: O22−: BO=1.0 (π∗2p fully filled). C22−: BO=3.0 (isoelectronic with N2 after adding 2 electrons to σ2p). O22+: BO=3.0. Sum =1.0+3.0+3.0=7.0. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-20-AN1 markMCQQ.The bond order of a homodiatomic molecule is 3. If the number of bonding electrons in it is 10, the number of antibonding electrons will be (A) 4 (B) 5 (C) 6 (D) 3
›Reveal solutionSolution
Solving the standard bond-order formula BO=(Nb−Na)/2 for Na with Nb=10 and BO=3 gives Na=4.
Concept and Intuition
Molecular orbital theory defines bond order as half the difference between the number of electrons in bonding orbitals (Nb) and antibonding orbitals (Na): BO=2Nb−Na. This is just algebra once two of the three quantities are known.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Formula: BO=2Nb−Na.
- Substitute BO=3, Nb=10: 3=210−Na. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-20-AN1 markMCQQ.Match the following. List - I (Molecule / ion): A. C2; B. O22+; C. O2; D. O2−. List - II (Bond order and magnetic nature): I. 3, Diamagnetic; II. 2, Paramagnetic; III. 2, Diamagnetic; IV. 1.5, Paramagnetic. The correct answer is (A) A-II, B-IV, C-I, D-III (B) A-III, B-I, C-IV, D-II (C) A-II, B-III, C-I, D-IV (D) A-III, B-I, C-II, D-IV
›Reveal solutionSolution
Working out the MO electron configuration (and hence bond order and unpaired-electron count) for C2, O22+, O2, and O2− gives the match A-III, B-I, C-II, D-IV.
Concept and Intuition
For homonuclear diatomics of second-period elements, bond order =2Nb−Na, and whether the species is paramagnetic depends on whether any orbital (usually the degenerate π∗2p pair) holds unpaired electrons. Removing or adding electrons from/to O2 changes both its bond order and its magnetic character, since electrons are added/removed preferentially from the highest, and here degenerate, π∗2p level.
Step-by-Step Solution
- C2 (6+6 = 12 valence e−): configuration σ2s2σ∗2s2π2px2π2py2 (no σ2p occupied at this electron count). Bonding e−=2+4=6, antibonding =2. BO=(6−2)/2=2. Both π orbitals are completely filled (2 each), so all electrons are paired ⇒ diamagnetic. Matches item III (2, Diamagnetic).
- O2 (16 e−): standard configuration gives BO=2 with two unpaired electrons in the degenerate π∗2p orbitals (Hund's rule) ⇒ paramagnetic. Matches item II (2, Paramagnetic).
- O22+ (16−2 = 14 e−): the two electrons removed from O2 come from the (highest-energy, half-filled) π∗2p orbitals, removing both unpaired electrons entirely. New antibonding count is reduced by 2, giving BO=(8−2)/2=3, and no unpaired electrons remain ⇒ diamagnetic. Matches item I (3, Diamagnetic). …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-21-AN1 markMCQQ.Consider the following changes I and II O2−IIO2IO2+ The correct statements about these changes (I) and (II) in accordance with MO theory are A) In (I) bond order increases by 0.5 from the existing value B) In (II) bond order decreases by 1.0 from the existing value C) In both (I) and (II) magnetic property is not changed D) In both (I) and (II) magnetic property is changed (A) A, B & C only (B) A & C only (C) A & D only (D) B & C only
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests MO-theory bond order and unpaired-electron counting for O2, O2+, and O2−. Removing an electron raises bond order by 0.5; adding one lowers it by 0.5 (not 1.0); both ions stay paramagnetic like O2 itself, so statements A and C are correct.
Concept and Intuition
In O2's MO configuration, the highest occupied orbitals are the degenerate antibonding π2p∗ pair, each holding one electron (Hund's rule) — this is why O2 is famously paramagnetic even though its Lewis structure suggests no unpaired electrons. Removing or adding a single electron from/to these antibonding orbitals changes the bond order by exactly 21 per electron (since antibonding electrons subtract 21 from bond order), and — crucially — going from 2 unpaired electrons to 1 unpaired electron (either by removing one or by pairing one with an added electron) still leaves the species with an unpaired electron, so all three species remain paramagnetic.
Step-by-Step Solution
- O2 configuration: (σ2s)2(σ2s∗)2(σ2p)2(π2p)4(π2p∗)2, with the two π∗ electrons unpaired in separate degenerate orbitals. Bond order =21(8−4)=2. Paramagnetic (2 unpaired e−).
- Change I: O2→O2+ (remove one electron from π2p∗): now (π2p∗)1. Bond order =21(8−3)=2.5, an increase of 0.5 from 2. One unpaired electron remains — still paramagnetic. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-22-AN1 markMCQQ.The pair of molecules / ions with the same bond order value is (A) B2,C2 (B) O2,C2 (C) O2+,O2− (D) H2+,Li2
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests molecular orbital bond-order calculation; O2 and C2 are the pair that share the same bond order (2).
Concept and Intuition
Bond order =21(Nb−Na) where Nb, Na are the number of electrons in bonding and antibonding MOs. Applying the standard MO filling order for homonuclear diatomics (with π below σ2p for B2,C2,N2; σ2p below π for O2,F2) gives each species a definite bond order that also predicts bond strength/length trends.
Step-by-Step Solution
- B2 (10 e⁻): configuration σ2s2σ2s∗2π2px1π2py1; bonding = 4, antibonding = 2 (of core cancel); bond order =(4−2)/2=1.
- C2 (12 e⁻): configuration σ2s2σ2s∗2π2px2π2py2; bonding = 6, antibonding = 2; bond order =(6−2)/2=2.
- O2 (16 e⁻): configuration up to π∗2px1π∗2py1; bonding = 8, antibonding = 4; bond order =(8−4)/2=2.
- O2+ (15 e⁻, one antibonding electron removed from O2): bond order =2.5.
- O2− (17 e⁻, one extra antibonding electron): bond order =1.5.
- H2+ (1 e⁻ in σ1s): bond order =0.5. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-23-FN1 markMCQQ.The sum of bond order values of C2 and O22+ is x, which is equal to sum of bond order values of a, b and c. What are a, b and c ? (A) O2−,O2+,O2 (B) B2,N2,F2 (C) He2+,F2,N2 (D) O22−,N2,Be2
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests MO-theory bond-order calculation for diatomics/ions and matching a target sum; the matching set is B₂, N₂, F₂, option (B).
Concept and Intuition
Molecular orbital bond order is BO=2Nb−Na, where Nb/Na are electrons in bonding/antibonding MOs. For second-period diatomics with Z≤7 (B₂, C₂, N₂), the π2p orbitals fill before σ2pz; for O₂, F₂ the order reverses. Removing electrons from an antibonding orbital (as in cations) INCREASES bond order.
Step-by-Step Solution
- C2 (12 e⁻): σ1s2σ∗1s2σ2s2σ∗2s2π2px2π2py2. Bonding = 8, antibonding = 4, so BO=(8−4)/2=2.
- O22+ (14 e⁻, removed from the antibonding π∗): O2 (16 e⁻) has BO=2; removing 2 electrons from π∗2p leaves antibonding = 4 (was 6), bonding stays 10, so BO=(10−4)/2=3.
- So x=BO(C2)+BO(O22+)=2+3=5. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set ap-2025-05-20-AN1 markMCQQ.The sum of number of antibonding electrons present in O2,O2−,O22− is (A) 15 (B) 9 (C) 21 (D) 6
›Reveal solutionSolution
Counting antibonding electrons in the MO diagrams of O2, O2− and O22− gives 6, 7 and 8 respectively; their sum is 21.
Concept and Intuition
Molecular orbital theory places O2's 16 electrons in the sequence
σ1s2 σ∗1s2 σ2s2 σ∗2s2 σ2pz2 (π2px2=π2py2) (π∗2px1=π∗2py1)
The two unpaired electrons in the degenerate π∗2p orbitals give O2 its paramagnetism. Adding electrons (to form O2−, then O22−) simply adds them one at a time into the still-incomplete π∗2p set, since that is the highest occupied (partially filled) level.
Step-by-Step Solution
- O2 (16 electrons): antibonding electrons are in σ∗1s (2), σ∗2s (2), and π∗2p (2, one each in πx∗,πy∗) =2+2+2=6.
- O2− (17 electrons, superoxide): the extra electron pairs up in one of the π∗2p orbitals, making π∗2p3: antibonding total =2+2+3=7. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-26-FN1 markMCQQ.The correct order of increasing bond lengths of C−H, O−H, C−C and H−H is (A) O−H<H−H<C−C<C−H (B) C−C<C−H<H−H<O−H (C) C−C<O−H<H−H<C−H (D) H−H<O−H<C−H<C−C
›Reveal solutionSolution
Comparing the standard bond lengths of these four common single bonds gives the increasing order H−H<O−H<C−H<C−C, matching option (D).
Concept and Intuition
Bond length depends chiefly on the sum of the covalent radii of the two bonded atoms (with some shortening from bond polarity/multiple-bond character, though all four bonds here are single bonds). Smaller atoms with smaller covalent radii form shorter bonds. Hydrogen has the smallest covalent radius, so H-H is the shortest bond among ordinary single bonds. Oxygen is small but larger than H, so O-H is next. Carbon is somewhat larger than oxygen in effective single-bond radius contribution when paired with H, giving C-H a bit longer than O-H. Two carbon atoms bonded together (C-C) sum two of the largest radii in this set, making it the longest.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Recall standard/reference bond lengths: H−H≈0.74A˚, O−H≈0.96A˚, C−H≈1.09A˚, C−C≈1.54A˚.
- Arrange these in increasing numerical order: 0.74<0.96<1.09<1.54. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.