Which of the following reaction schemes will yield phenol? (Two or more options may be correct.) Scheme (a): c

NCERT Exemplar · Q57

Q. Which of the following reaction schemes will yield phenol? (Two or more options may be correct.) Scheme (a): chlorobenzene is fused with NaOH at high temperature and about 300 atm pressure, then treated with H2O/H+. Scheme (b): aniline (C6H5NH2) is treated first with NaNO2/HCl and then with H2O on warming. Scheme (c): benzene is treated with oleum, then with NaOH on heating, then with H+. Scheme (d): chlorobenzene is treated with aqueous NaOH at 298 K and 1 atm, then with HCl.

(i) scheme

(a) - chlorobenzene, fused NaOH at ~300 atm, then H2O/H+

(ii) scheme

(b) - aniline, NaNO2/HCl, then H2O (warming)

(iii) scheme

(iv) scheme

(d) - chlorobenzene, aqueous NaOH at 298 K/1 atm, then HCl

Andhra Pradesh BieapMCQ· 1mImportance★★★★★

81% · 109/135 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Aromatic Synthesis Route

Aromatic Synthesis Route – First Principles

Imagine you are a chef who has been given a plain wooden board and told to carve a specific shape out of it. You can cut away wood, but you cannot add wood back. That is exactly the problem in aromatic synthesis: you start with a simple, cheap aromatic ring (like benzene) and you need to attach specific groups at specific positions. The ring itself is already there — you cannot rearrange its carbon skeleton. So the entire challenge is where to put the next group, and how to get it there.

The "route" is the sequence of reactions you choose. The order matters enormously because the groups already on the ring control where the next group will go. A wrong order can give you the wrong isomer, or force you into a dead end.

The Core Idea: The Ring Directs

Every substituent already on a benzene ring has a directing effect — it tells the next incoming group to go to certain positions. There are two families:

Ortho/para directors (e.g., –OH, –NH₂, –CH₃, –Cl) — they push the next group to positions 2 and 4 (ortho and para).
Meta directors (e.g., –NO₂, –CN, –CHO, –SO₃H) — they push the next group to position 3 (meta).

Watch out

A common mistake is to think you can just "add any group in any order." The ring is not passive — it has a memory of what is already attached. If you ignore directing effects, you will get a mixture of products, often with the wrong isomer as the major one.

The Precise Statement

An aromatic synthesis route is a planned sequence of electrophilic aromatic substitution (EAS) reactions, chosen so that each new substituent is introduced at the correct position relative to the existing ones. The route must account for:

Directing effects of all current substituents.
Activation/deactivation — some groups make the ring more reactive (activators), some make it less reactive (deactivators). You cannot do a reaction on a strongly deactivated ring without special conditions.
Order of introduction — sometimes you must introduce a meta director first, then an ortho/para director, or vice versa, to get the desired final pattern.

A Concrete Example: Making 4-Nitrobenzoic Acid

You want a benzene ring with –COOH at position 1 and –NO₂ at position 4 (para to each other).

–COOH is a meta director. –NO₂ is also a meta director. If you put –COOH first and then nitrate, the –COOH will send the –NO₂ to the meta position (3), not para (4). That gives the wrong isomer.

Correct route:

Nitrate benzene first → nitrobenzene ( –NO₂ is meta directing).
Then oxidise the methyl group (if you started with toluene) or use a different method to introduce –COOH. But wait — –NO₂ deactivates the ring strongly. So you cannot easily do Friedel-Crafts acylation on nitrobenzene.

So the actual correct route is different:

Start with toluene (methylbenzene). The –CH₃ is an ortho/para director and an activator.
Nitrate toluene → you get a mixture of ortho and para nitrotoluene. Separate the para isomer.
Oxidise the –CH₃ to –COOH using KMnO₄. The –NO₂ survives this oxidation.

Note

The order here is: introduce the ortho/para director first ( –CH₃ ), then nitrate to get para, then convert the –CH₃ to –COOH. If you had tried to put –COOH first, you would have a meta director that would send –NO₂ to the wrong place.

The General Strategy

When planning a route, ask yourself in order:

What is the final substitution pattern? (1,2- ; 1,3- ; 1,4- ; etc.)
Which groups are ortho/para directors and which are meta directors?
Can I introduce the meta director first, then the ortho/para director? (Often yes, because meta directors deactivate the ring, making further substitution harder — so you want to do the deactivating step last if possible.)
If I need a 1,3 pattern, I usually put a meta director first, then an ortho/para director. If I need a 1,4 pattern, I usually put an ortho/para director first, then a meta director (because the ortho/para director will send the next group to para, and the meta director will then be at the correct position). …

Why this formula?

Aromatic Synthesis Route: Understanding the Why Behind the Key Principles

In organic chemistry, an aromatic synthesis route refers to a sequence of reactions designed to construct or modify an aromatic ring (typically benzene or its derivatives). The "key formulas" here are not single equations but rather rules and principles that govern reactivity and orientation. Let's break down the reasoning behind the most critical ones.

1. The 4n+2 Hückel Rule — Why Aromaticity Exists

Formula: A planar, cyclic, conjugated molecule is aromatic if it has $(4n+2)$ π electrons, where $n = 0,1,2,\dots$

Why this holds (the derivation):

In a cyclic conjugated system, the π electrons occupy molecular orbitals (MOs) that form a ring.
The energy levels of these MOs are given by the Frost circle (or polygon rule):
- For a regular polygon with $N$ vertices (atoms), inscribe it in a circle with one vertex at the bottom.
- The energy of each MO corresponds to the vertical coordinate of each vertex.
For benzene ( $N=6$ $N = 6$ ), the MOs split into:
- 1 low-energy bonding orbital
- 2 degenerate bonding orbitals
- 2 degenerate antibonding orbitals
- 1 high-energy antibonding orbital
Key insight: The 6 π electrons fill the 3 bonding MOs completely. This gives a closed-shell, highly stable configuration — the aromatic stabilization energy (~150 kJ/mol for benzene).
For $N=4$ (cyclobutadiene), the MO pattern gives 2 degenerate non-bonding orbitals — filling with 4 electrons creates an open-shell, antiaromatic (unstable) system.

Takeaway: The $(4n+2)$ rule is not arbitrary — it emerges from the symmetry of cyclic π systems and the filling of bonding MOs.

2. Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution (EAS) — The Reactivity Formula

General reaction:

\text{Ar-H} + \text{E}^+ \xrightarrow{\text{catalyst}} \text{Ar-E} + \text{H}^+

Why this is the only viable route for aromatic rings:

Aromatic rings are electron-rich (due to the π cloud) but resistant to addition — addition would break aromaticity.
Mechanism reasoning:
1. The electrophile $\text{E}^+$ attacks the ring, forming a σ-complex (arenium ion) — this step is slow (rate-determining).
2. The σ-complex is non-aromatic (4 π electrons in the ring) — it is high-energy and unstable.
3. To regain aromaticity, the complex loses a proton ( $\text{H}^+$ ) — this step is fast and thermodynamically driven.
Why substitution, not addition: Addition would permanently destroy aromaticity; substitution restores it.

Key formula: The rate law is $\text{Rate} = k[\text{Ar-H}][\text{E}^+]$ — first order in both, because the slow step involves both reactants.

3. Orientation Rules — Why Substituents Direct Where the Next Group Goes

Rule:

Activating groups (e.g., $-\text{OH}, -\text{NH}_2, -\text{OCH}_3$ ) direct to ortho/para positions.
Deactivating groups (e.g., $-\text{NO}_2, -\text{CN}, -\text{CHO}$ ) direct to meta positions.

Why this happens (resonance + inductive reasoning):

For ortho/para directors:

The substituent has a lone pair or π bond that can donate electrons into the ring via resonance.
Draw the resonance structures of the σ-complex for attack at ortho, meta, and para:
- Ortho attack: The positive charge can be delocalized onto the substituent (e.g., $-\text{OH}$ becomes $=\text{OH}^+$ ). This stabilizes the intermediate.
- Para attack: Similar stabilization — charge delocalized to the substituent.
- Meta attack: The positive charge cannot reach the substituent — less stable.
Result: Ortho/para intermediates are lower in energy → faster reaction.

For meta directors:

The substituent is electron-withdrawing (by induction or resonance, e.g., $-\text{NO}_2$ ).
Draw resonance for ortho attack: The positive charge is placed directly on the carbon bearing the withdrawing group — this is highly destabilizing (like putting a + charge next to a + pole).
For meta attack: The positive charge is never on the carbon with the withdrawing group — relatively more stable.
Result: Meta attack is the least destabilized → preferred. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Three classic routes to phenol are the Dow process from chlorobenzene (fused NaOH under high temperature/pressure, then acid), diazonium-salt hydrolysis from aniline, and the sulphonation route from benzene (oleum -> alkali fusion -> acid). All of (a), (b) and (c) succeed; (d) fails because the aryl C-Cl bond is inert to aqueous NaOH under mild (298 K, 1 atm) conditions.

Scheme (a) - Dow process (yields phenol)

Chlorobenzene fused with NaOH at high temperature and high pressure gives sodium phenoxide; acidification (H2O/H+) liberates phenol. The forcing conditions are what make nucleophilic aromatic substitution possible.

Scheme (b) - via benzenediazonium salt (yields phenol)

Aniline + NaNO2/HCl (cold) gives benzenediazonium chloride; warming with water hydrolyses it to phenol (with loss of N2). Correct.

Scheme (c) - sulphonation route (yields phenol)

Benzene + oleum -> benzenesulphonic acid; fusion with NaOH (heating) -> sodium phenoxide; acidification (H+) -> phenol. Correct. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Same / Similar Concept — real previous-year questions on the same or a closely similar concept, not this exact question.

Showing the 12 most recent of 96 on this concept.

AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-FN1 markMCQ
$\mathrm{C_7H_8}$
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests ring bromination direction, the peroxide (anti-Markovnikov) effect, and the Wurtz–Fittig coupling. The final product is p-methylpropylbenzene.

Concept and Intuition

Three separate organic ideas are chained together here. First, $\mathrm{Br_2/Fe}$ on an arene (dark, ionic mechanism, Fe acting as Lewis-acid catalyst by forming $\mathrm{FeBr_3}$ in situ) is classic electrophilic aromatic substitution, not the radical benzylic bromination you'd get with light. Toluene's methyl group is an activating ortho/para director, and because ortho substitution is more sterically hindered, the para isomer is the major product. Second, $\mathrm{HBr}$ addition to an unsymmetrical alkene normally follows Markovnikov's rule, but in the presence of a peroxide (here $\mathrm{(C_6H_5CO)_2O_2}$ , benzoyl peroxide) it proceeds by a radical chain mechanism, and the bromine ends up on the less substituted carbon — the anti-Markovnikov or 'peroxide effect'. Third, the Wurtz–Fittig reaction couples an aryl halide with an alkyl halide using sodium in dry ether, forming a new C–C bond between the ring and the alkyl chain.

Step-by-Step Solution

Toluene ( $\mathrm{C_6H_5CH_3}$ ) + $\mathrm{Br_2/Fe}$ (dark) → ring bromination, methyl directs ortho/para, para is major: X = p-bromotoluene ( $\mathrm{4\text{-}BrC_6H_4CH_3}$ ).

Propene ( $\mathrm{CH_3CH=CH_2}$ ) + $\mathrm{HBr}$ in presence of peroxide → anti-Markovnikov addition: Br adds to the terminal (less substituted) carbon. Y = 1-bromopropane ( $\mathrm{CH_3CH_2CH_2Br}$ ), i.e. n-propyl bromide. …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-FN1 markMCQ
$\mathrm{C_6H_5F} \xleftarrow{Y} \mathrm{C_6H_5N_2Cl} \xrightarrow{X} \mathrm{C_6H_5Cl}$
(i) $\mathrm{HBF_4}$
(ii) $\Delta$ (D) Cu | HCl ;
(i) $\mathrm{HBF_4}$
(ii) $\Delta$
›Reveal solutionSolution
Diazonium salt → chlorobenzene needs the Sandmeyer route (Cu/HCl); diazonium salt → fluorobenzene needs the Balz–Schiemann route (HBF₄ then heat). So X = Cu|HCl, Y = (i) HBF₄ (ii) Δ.

Concept and Intuition

Aryl diazonium salts are versatile intermediates because the $-\mathrm{N_2^+}$ group can be replaced by a wide range of other groups. Simple treatment with aqueous HCl alone does not replace $-\mathrm{N_2^+}$ by Cl (it just hydrolyses to phenol on warming with water); a Cu(I) catalyst is essential to mediate the radical-type substitution — this is the Sandmeyer reaction. Fluorine, on the other hand, cannot be introduced by a Sandmeyer-type Cu-catalysed exchange at all; instead the diazonium salt is first converted to the stable, isolable diazonium tetrafluoroborate salt using $\mathrm{HBF_4}$ , which on gentle heating undergoes clean thermal decomposition to expel $\mathrm{N_2}$ and $\mathrm{BF_3}$ , leaving the aryl fluoride — the Balz–Schiemann reaction.

Step-by-Step Solution

Reaction to X: $\mathrm{C_6H_5N_2Cl} \xrightarrow{X} \mathrm{C_6H_5Cl}$ — this is a diazonium-to-chloride exchange, which requires the Sandmeyer conditions: Cu / HCl (cuprous chloride generated in situ, catalysing $-\mathrm{N_2^+} \to -\mathrm{Cl}$ ). …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-FN1 markMCQ
$Y \xleftarrow[(iii)\ H_3O^+]{(i)\ Br_2|Fe\ (ii)\ KMnO_4|OH^-}$
›Reveal solutionSolution
The order of oxidation vs bromination flips the directing group in play. Oxidise-then-brominate (toluene → benzoic acid → Br, meta-directed) gives 3-bromobenzoic acid (X); brominate-then-oxidise (toluene → p-bromotoluene → oxidise) gives 4-bromobenzoic acid (Y).

Concept and Intuition

This question tests how the order of reagent addition changes the regiochemistry of electrophilic aromatic substitution on a disubstituted benzene ring, because the directing effect of a substituent depends on what's already on the ring at the time of substitution:

The methyl group ( $-\mathrm{CH_3}$ ) in toluene is an activating, ortho/para-director.

The carboxylic acid group ( $-\mathrm{COOH}$ ) is a deactivating, meta-director.

So bromination is directed to the para position when methyl is still present, but to the meta position once the methyl has already been oxidised to $-\mathrm{COOH}$ .

Step-by-Step Solution

Path to X (given order: KMnO₄/OH⁻ first, then H₃O⁺, then Br₂/Fe):

Step (i): $\mathrm{C_6H_5CH_3} \xrightarrow{\mathrm{KMnO_4/OH^-}}$ oxidises the benzylic $-\mathrm{CH_3}$ to a carboxylate.

Step (ii): $\mathrm{H_3O^+}$ protonates to give benzoic acid, $\mathrm{C_6H_5COOH}$ .

Step (iii): $\mathrm{Br_2/Fe}$ brominates the ring — but now $-\mathrm{COOH}$ is the only ring substituent, and it is a meta-director, so bromination occurs at the meta position, giving 3-bromobenzoic acid. This is X.

Path to Y (given order: Br₂/Fe first, then KMnO₄/OH⁻, then H₃O⁺):

Step (i): $\mathrm{C_6H_5CH_3} \xrightarrow{\mathrm{Br_2/Fe}}$ brominates the ring while $-\mathrm{CH_3}$ is still present; methyl is an ortho/para-director, and the major (less hindered) product is para-bromotoluene. …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-14-FN1 markMCQ
$C_6H_5N_2Cl$
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a 3-step synthesis test: diazonium hydrolysis → Williamson ether synthesis → Friedel–Crafts acylation followed by Clemmensen reduction. The final answer is 4-ethoxyethylbenzene.

Concept and Intuition

A diazonium salt hydrolyzed at low temperature ( $283\,K$ , i.e. ice-cold water, warmed slightly) replaces $-N_2^+$ with $-OH$ , giving a phenol — this is the classic way to make phenols where direct ring hydroxylation is impossible. Once you have a phenol, treating it with base and then an alkyl halide is the Williamson ether synthesis: the phenoxide ion (a good nucleophile) displaces chloride from $C_2H_5Cl$ to give an aryl alkyl ether. An alkoxy group like $-OC_2H_5$ is a powerful electron donor by resonance, so it strongly activates the ring towards electrophilic substitution and directs ortho/para — with the bulky acylium electrophile, the para product dominates. The last step, Zn(Hg)/HCl, is the Clemmensen reduction, a classic way to fully deoxygenate a ketone $C=O$ down to $CH_2$ under acidic conditions (as opposed to Wolff–Kishner, which is basic).

Step-by-Step Solution

$C_6H_5N_2Cl \xrightarrow[283K]{H_2O}$ hydrolysis of diazonium salt → X = $C_6H_5OH$ (phenol), releasing $N_2$ and HCl.

X $\xrightarrow{\text{(i) NaOH}}$ sodium phenoxide $C_6H_5O^-Na^+$ ; $\xrightarrow{\text{(ii) } C_2H_5Cl}$ Williamson ether synthesis → Y = $C_6H_5OC_2H_5$ (phenetole / ethoxybenzene).

Y $\xrightarrow{CH_3COCl,\ anhy.\ AlCl_3}$ Friedel–Crafts acylation; the $-OC_2H_5$ group directs the acetyl group para (steric preference over ortho) → 4-ethoxyacetophenone, $4-(C_2H_5O)C_6H_4COCH_3$ . …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-14-AN1 markMCQ
$Y\ (does\ not\ give\ iodoform\ test) \xleftarrow[anhy.\ AlCl_3]{B} Benzene \xrightarrow[anhy.\ AlCl_3]{A} X\ (gets\ oxidised\ with\ Tollens'\ reagent)$
›Reveal solutionSolution
A = CO/HCl (Gatterman–Koch formylation of benzene to benzaldehyde, which is Tollens'-positive); B = propionyl chloride (Friedel–Crafts acylation to propiophenone, which is iodoform-negative because it lacks a methyl ketone group).

Concept and Intuition

Tollens' reagent is a test for aldehydes (and other easily oxidised groups) — a positive test on X tells us X must carry a $-CHO$ group, i.e. X is benzaldehyde. Direct formylation of an aromatic ring is done by the Gatterman–Koch reaction: $C_6H_6 + CO + HCl \xrightarrow{\text{anhyd. } AlCl_3/CuCl} C_6H_5CHO$ .

The iodoform test is positive only for compounds containing a $CH_3-CO-$ (methyl ketone) or $CH_3-CH(OH)-$ group. Friedel–Crafts acylation of benzene with acetyl chloride ( $CH_3COCl$ ) gives acetophenone $C_6H_5-CO-CH_3$ , which is iodoform-positive. But the question specifies Y does not give the iodoform test, so the acylating agent must not leave a methyl ketone — using propionyl chloride ( $CH_3CH_2COCl$ ) gives propiophenone $C_6H_5-CO-CH_2CH_3$ , whose carbonyl is flanked by an ethyl group, not methyl, so it is iodoform-negative.

Step-by-Step Solution

X gives positive Tollens' test ⟹ X has $-CHO$ ⟹ X = benzaldehyde.

Benzene → benzaldehyde requires the Gatterman–Koch formylation: reagent A = $CO, HCl$ (with anhydrous $AlCl_3$ ). …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-AN1 markMCQ
$\xleftarrow[\mathrm{anhy.\ AlCl_3}]{Y}$
›Reveal solutionSolution
$C_6H_6Cl_6$ forms by photochemical addition of $Cl_2$ to benzene (UV light, no catalyst); cumene forms as the major (rearranged) product when benzene is Friedel–Crafts alkylated with n-propyl chloride, since the initial 1° carbocation rearranges to the more stable 2° isopropyl cation.

Concept and Intuition

The formula $C_6H_6Cl_6$ keeps all 6 hydrogens of benzene while adding 6 chlorines — this can only happen by addition across all three double bonds (giving 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexachlorocyclohexane), not substitution. This addition is initiated by UV light (free-radical mechanism), with no Lewis-acid catalyst — $AlCl_3$ would instead catalyze electrophilic aromatic substitution (chlorobenzene, losing HCl), which cannot give this formula.

The word "major product" attached to cumene is the giveaway for the second blank: if the reagent were straightforwardly isopropyl chloride, there'd be nothing to call "major" about — the alkylation would go directly to cumene. Calling it the major product signals a carbocation rearrangement is involved: n-propyl chloride with $AlCl_3$ generates a 1° carbocation that undergoes a hydride shift to the more stable 2° carbocation, which then alkylates benzene to give cumene (isopropylbenzene) as the major product (with some n-propylbenzene as minor product).

Step-by-Step Solution

Identify X (benzene → $C_6H_6Cl_6$ ): must be an addition reaction, achieved by $Cl_2$ under UV light — X = $Cl_2$ /UV light. …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-AN1 markMCQ
$C_6H_5N_2^+Cl^- \xrightarrow{CuCl\ |\ HCl} C_6H_5Cl$
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests the precise scope of the "Sandmeyer reaction" name — it specifically refers to Cu(I)-catalysed replacement of a diazonium group, not just any halogen-substitution reaction of a diazonium salt.

Concept and Intuition

Aryl diazonium salts are versatile intermediates: the $-N_2^+$ group can be replaced by many different groups. When the replacement is carried out using a cuprous salt as catalyst (CuCl, CuBr, or CuCN), the reaction is specifically named the Sandmeyer reaction. When iodide replaces the diazonium group, however, iodide ion is nucleophilic and reducing enough on its own that no copper catalyst is needed — simply warming the diazonium salt with KI solution gives the aryl iodide directly. Because this reaction proceeds without the defining Cu(I) catalyst, it is conventionally not called a Sandmeyer reaction (even though it accomplishes a similar net transformation).

Step-by-Step Solution

(A) $C_6H_5N_2^+Cl^- \xrightarrow{CuCl/HCl} C_6H_5Cl$ : diazonium + CuCl/HCl → chlorobenzene. Uses Cu(I) catalyst → is a Sandmeyer reaction.

(B) $C_6H_5N_2^+Cl^- \xrightarrow{KI/Warm} C_6H_5I$ : diazonium + KI, simply warmed, no copper salt used → not a Sandmeyer reaction (it is just direct nucleophilic substitution by iodide). …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-AN1 markMCQ
$C_6H_5N_2^+Cl^- \xrightarrow[\text{(ii) } C_2H_5Cl/Na,\ dry\ ether]{\text{(i) } Cu_2Cl_2/HCl} X \xrightarrow[\text{(ii) } H_3O^+]{\text{(i) } KMnO_4/OH^-} Y$
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests a two-step named-reaction sequence (Sandmeyer, then Wurtz–Fittig) followed by vigorous side-chain oxidation of an alkylbenzene. The final product $Y$ is benzoic acid.

Concept and Intuition

Aryl diazonium salts are versatile synthetic handles. Converting $-N_2^+$ to $-Cl$ via Cu(I) (Sandmeyer) gives an aryl halide, which can then be coupled to an alkyl halide via Na/dry ether (Wurtz–Fittig) to build a longer alkyl side chain on the ring. Once you have an alkylbenzene, hot alkaline $KMnO_4$ is a powerful oxidant that attacks the benzylic C–H bonds and oxidizes the entire side chain down to a single carboxylic acid carbon attached to the ring — the specific length or branching of the original side chain doesn't matter (as long as there's at least one benzylic hydrogen), the product is always the aromatic carboxylic acid, i.e. benzoic acid for a monosubstituted benzene.

Step-by-Step Solution

Step (i): $C_6H_5N_2^+Cl^- \xrightarrow{Cu_2Cl_2/HCl}$ — this is the Sandmeyer reaction, replacing $-N_2^+$ with $-Cl$ : product is chlorobenzene, $C_6H_5Cl$ .

Step (ii): Chlorobenzene $\xrightarrow{C_2H_5Cl,\ Na,\ dry\ ether}$ — this is the Wurtz–Fittig reaction: sodium metal couples the aryl halide with the alkyl halide, forming a new C–C bond between the ring and the ethyl group. Product $X$ = ethylbenzene, $C_6H_5CH_2CH_3$ . …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-AN1 markMCQ
$C_6H_{14} \xrightarrow[10\text{-}20\ atm]{V_2O_5,\ 773\ K} X \xrightarrow[\mathrm{Anhy.\ AlCl_3}]{CH_3Cl} Y \xrightarrow[\text{ii) } H_3O^+]{\text{i) } CrO_2Cl_2,\ CS_2} Z$
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests a multi-step named-reaction sequence (aromatization → Friedel–Crafts alkylation → Étard reaction) ending at benzaldehyde, then checking four textbook facts about benzaldehyde. The false one is the claim about para-nitration, since $-CHO$ is a meta-director.

Concept and Intuition

Building the product chain first tells you exactly what $Z$ is; then each answer choice is simply a fact-check against known benzaldehyde chemistry. The trap is statement (D), which sounds plausible if you forget that an electron-withdrawing carbonyl group directs meta, not para, during electrophilic aromatic substitution.

Step-by-Step Solution

$C_6H_{14}$ (n-hexane) $\xrightarrow{V_2O_5,\,773K,\,10\text{-}20\,atm}$ X: catalytic reforming/dehydrocyclization converts the straight-chain hexane into an aromatic ring: $X$ = benzene.

X $\xrightarrow{CH_3Cl,\ Anhy.\ AlCl_3}$ Y: Friedel–Crafts alkylation installs a methyl group on the ring: $Y$ = toluene.

Y $\xrightarrow{(i)\,CrO_2Cl_2,\,CS_2\ (ii)\,H_3O^+}$ Z: this is the Étard reaction, oxidising the aromatic methyl group directly to an aldehyde: $Z$ = benzaldehyde, $C_6H_5CHO$ .

Check (A): benzaldehyde is an aromatic aldehyde and famously does not reduce Fehling's solution — statement is true.

Check (B): benzaldehyde can indeed be made directly from benzene by the Gattermann–Koch reaction ( $CO/HCl$ , anhydrous $AlCl_3+CuCl$ ) — statement is true.

Check (C): benzaldehyde has no α-hydrogen (the carbon adjacent to $-CHO$ is the aromatic ring carbon, with no abstractable H for the usual aldol pathway), so with concentrated NaOH it undergoes Cannizzaro reaction (disproportionation to benzyl alcohol and benzoate) — statement is true. …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-AN1 markMCQ
$C_7H_8 \xrightarrow[dark]{Br_2/Fe} X \xrightarrow[dry\ ether]{2Na} Y$
›Reveal solutionSolution
Toluene + $Br_2/Fe$ (dark) gives p-bromotoluene; Wurtz-Fittig coupling of that with Na/dry ether joins the two rings at the C–Br carbons, giving 4,4'-dimethylbiphenyl.

Concept and Intuition

"Dark" with $Fe$ as catalyst signals ionic (electrophilic aromatic substitution), not free-radical, bromination — so substitution happens on the ring, directed by the methyl group's activating, ortho/para-directing effect. The major product (less steric hindrance) is the para isomer. The Wurtz-Fittig reaction then couples an aryl halide with sodium in dry ether, forming a new C–C bond between two aryl rings at the position the halogen occupied.

Step-by-Step Solution

Toluene + $Br_2$ , catalytic $Fe$ , in the dark $\Rightarrow$ electrophilic aromatic substitution on the ring (methyl is o,p-director); major product X = p-bromotoluene ( $CH_3-C_6H_4-Br$ , Br para to $CH_3$ ).

X + $2Na$ / dry ether $\Rightarrow$ Wurtz-Fittig reaction: two molecules of p-bromotoluene couple at their C–Br carbons, eliminating $2NaBr$ , joining the two rings directly (biphenyl linkage) at the carbons that bore Br. …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-18-FN1 markMCQ
$C_3H_6 \xrightarrow[(C_6H_5CO)_2O_2]{HBr} X \xrightarrow[\text{Anhy. } AlCl_3]{C_6H_6} Y \xrightarrow[\substack{(ii)\ H_3O^+ \\ (iii)\ NaOH/CaO,\Delta}]{(i)\ KMnO_4/OH^-} Z$
›Reveal solutionSolution
Propene gives 1-bromopropane (anti-Markovnikov, peroxide effect); Friedel–Crafts alkylation with $AlCl_3$ rearranges it to cumene; oxidation to benzoic acid followed by soda-lime decarboxylation regenerates benzene as Z.

Concept and Intuition

Three separate named reactions are chained here: (1) the peroxide (Kharasch) effect reverses the regiochemistry of $HBr$ addition to an alkene via a radical mechanism; (2) Friedel–Crafts alkylations with primary alkyl halides are notorious for carbocation rearrangement to the most stable carbocation before the ring attacks it; (3) vigorous oxidation of any alkylbenzene with $KMnO_4$ always converts the entire side chain to a single $-COOH$ directly on the ring (regardless of chain length), and heating the sodium salt of a carboxylic acid with soda lime removes the $-COOH$ group entirely, replacing it with $-H$ .

Step-by-Step Solution

$C_3H_6$ (propene) + $HBr$ / $(C_6H_5CO)_2O_2$ (peroxide) → anti-Markovnikov addition (Br adds to the terminal, less-substituted carbon via a radical chain mechanism) → X = $CH_3CH_2CH_2Br$ (1-bromopropane, n-propyl bromide).

X + $C_6H_6$ / anhydrous $AlCl_3$ → Friedel–Crafts alkylation. The primary carbocation generated from n-propyl bromide is unstable and undergoes a 1,2-hydride shift to the more stable secondary (isopropyl) carbocation before attacking benzene → Y = isopropylbenzene (cumene), not n-propylbenzene. …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-18-FN1 markMCQ
$C_6H_5N_2^+Cl^- \xrightarrow[283\ K]{H_2O} X \xrightarrow{Zn/\Delta} Y \xrightarrow[\text{Anhy. } AlCl_3]{CO+HCl} Z$
›Reveal solutionSolution
This chains three named reactions — diazonium hydrolysis, Zn-dust reduction, and Gattermann–Koch formylation — to arrive at benzaldehyde as Z.

Concept and Intuition

Diazonium salts are versatile synthetic hubs: warming them in water hydrolyses $-N_2^+Cl^-$ to $-OH$ , releasing $N_2$ . Phenol's $-OH$ can then be completely removed (deoxygenated) by distillation with zinc dust, regenerating the parent arene. From benzene, the Gattermann–Koch reaction is the classic method to install an aldehyde group directly onto the ring using CO and HCl with anhydrous $AlCl_3$ / $CuCl$ as catalyst (a Friedel–Crafts-type formylation, effectively delivering a formyl cation electrophile).

Step-by-Step Solution

$C_6H_5N_2^+Cl^- \xrightarrow{H_2O, 283K} X$ : warming the diazonium salt in water hydrolyses it, replacing $-N_2^+$ with $-OH$ and releasing $N_2$ gas $\Rightarrow$ X = phenol ( $C_6H_5OH$ ).

$X \xrightarrow{Zn/\Delta} Y$ : distillation of phenol with zinc dust reduces/removes the phenolic $-OH$ group entirely, giving the parent hydrocarbon $\Rightarrow$ Y = benzene ( $C_6H_6$ ). …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →

←Previous questionQ56 — Which of the following are used to convert RCHO into RCH₂OH? (Two or m…→Next questionQ58 — Which of the following reagents can be used to oxidise primary alcohol…

Scheme (a) - Dow process (yields phenol)

Scheme (b) - via benzenediazonium salt (yields phenol)

Scheme (c) - sulphonation route (yields phenol)

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Unlock everything free for 14 days