Out of 2-chloroethanol and ethanol, which is more acidic and why?

NCERT Exemplar · Q23

Q. Out of 2-chloroethanol and ethanol, which is more acidic and why?

Andhra Pradesh BieapShort· 2mImportance★★★★★

56% · 75/135 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Acidity Of Phenol

Inductive Effect on Acidity – From Intuition to Precision

Imagine you are holding a rope tied to a heavy box. If you pull the rope, the box moves toward you. Now imagine the rope is made of rubber bands — the pull still reaches the box, but it gets weaker the farther away you are. That is exactly how the inductive effect works inside a molecule.

The Core Intuition

An acid donates a proton ( $H^+$ ). After it does, the remaining part (the conjugate base) carries a negative charge. The stability of that negative charge determines how willing the molecule is to give up the proton. More stable conjugate base → stronger acid.

Now, some atoms or groups are electron-withdrawing — they pull electron density toward themselves through the sigma bonds. If such a group is attached near the acidic proton, it pulls some electron density away from the negative charge on the conjugate base. That spreads out (delocalises) the negative charge, making the conjugate base more stable. The acid becomes stronger.

Conversely, electron-donating groups push electron density toward the negative charge, concentrating it and making the conjugate base less stable. The acid becomes weaker.

Note

The inductive effect operates through sigma bonds only. It does not involve pi bonds or resonance. It is a permanent, through-bond polarisation.

The Precise Statement

Inductive effect on acidity: The acidity of a compound increases with the presence of electron-withdrawing groups (EWGs) near the acidic site, and decreases with electron-donating groups (EDGs). The effect is strongest when the group is closest to the acidic proton, and diminishes rapidly with distance.

Mathematically, for a series of substituted carboxylic acids:

\text{R-COOH} \quad \text{where R = substituent}

The acid dissociation constant $K_a$ changes as:

If R is electron-withdrawing (e.g., $-\text{Cl}$ , $-\text{NO}_2$ , $-\text{CF}_3$ ): $K_a$ increases → stronger acid.
If R is electron-donating (e.g., $-\text{CH}_3$ , $-\text{C}_2\text{H}_5$ ): $K_a$ decreases → weaker acid.

Why Distance Matters

The inductive effect falls off with distance because sigma bonds are localised. Each bond attenuates the effect by roughly a factor of 2–3. For example, compare:

Compound	$pK_a$	Explanation
$\text{CH}_3\text{COOH}$	4.76	Reference (no EWG)
$\text{ClCH}_2\text{COOH}$	2.86	Cl withdraws through one bond
$\text{Cl}_2\text{CHCOOH}$	1.29	Two Cl atoms, stronger withdrawal
$\text{Cl}_3\text{CCOOH}$	0.65	Three Cl atoms, strongest withdrawal
$\text{CH}_3\text{CH}_2\text{COOH}$	4.87	Ethyl group is electron-donating (slightly weaker acid)

Notice: $\text{ClCH}_2\text{COOH}$ is about 100 times stronger than acetic acid ( $\Delta pK_a \approx 1.9$ ). But if the Cl is moved further away:

Compound	$pK_a$
$\text{ClCH}_2\text{CH}_2\text{COOH}$	4.08
$\text{ClCH}_2\text{CH}_2\text{CH}_2\text{COOH}$	4.52

The effect fades as the chlorine moves farther from the carboxyl group. …

Why this formula?

Acidity of Phenol: Why It's More Acidic Than Alcohols

Let's build this from first principles — understanding why phenol is acidic is the key to mastering organic chemistry.

1. The Core Observation

Phenol ( $\ce{C6H5OH}$ ) has a pKa ≈ 10, while ethanol ( $\ce{CH3CH2OH}$ ) has a pKa ≈ 16.

This means phenol is about 1 million times more acidic than a typical alcohol.

The question: Why does the O–H bond in phenol break so much more easily?

2. The Key: Stability of the Conjugate Base

Acidity is determined by the stability of the conjugate base after losing $\ce{H+}$ .

Alcohol conjugate base: $\ce{CH3CH2O-}$ (alkoxide ion) — negative charge is localized on oxygen.
Phenol conjugate base: $\ce{C6H5O-}$ (phenoxide ion) — negative charge is delocalized into the benzene ring.

The Resonance Explanation

The phenoxide ion has multiple resonance structures:

\ce{C6H5O-} \leftrightarrow \text{(several resonance forms where negative charge moves to ortho/para carbons)}

Draw the structures mentally:

One structure has the negative charge on oxygen.
Other structures show the negative charge on carbon atoms at the ortho and para positions of the ring.

This delocalization spreads the negative charge over more atoms, making the ion more stable.

Key principle: The more stable the conjugate base, the stronger the acid.

3. Why Alcohols Can't Do This

In an alkoxide ion ( $\ce{RO-}$ ), the negative charge is stuck on oxygen.

There are no empty p-orbitals or conjugated $\pi$ systems nearby to accept the charge.

Result: The alkoxide is less stable, so the alcohol is less acidic.

4. The Inductive Effect Also Helps (But Resonance Dominates)

The benzene ring is slightly electron-withdrawing (due to its $sp^2$ carbons being more electronegative than $sp^3$ ).

This inductive effect pulls electron density away from the O–H bond, making the proton slightly more positive and easier to remove.

However, resonance stabilization of the conjugate base is the dominant factor — inductive effects alone cannot explain the million-fold difference.

5. The Quantitative Picture (pKa Values)

Compound	pKa	Conjugate base stability
Ethanol	~16	Localized charge on O
Phenol	~10	Delocalized charge via resonance
Acetic acid	~4.76	Even more resonance (two O atoms)

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The acidity of alcohols is governed by the stability of the conjugate base (alkoxide ion). Electron-withdrawing groups (like chlorine) stabilise the alkoxide by inductive effect, making the alcohol more acidic. 2-Chloroethanol is more acidic than ethanol because the -Cl group pulls electron density away from the O⁻, stabilising the conjugate base.

Why This Works: Inductive Effects and Alcohol Acidity

The question is about alcohols, not phenol, but the underlying principle is the same one used for phenols: acidity depends on how easily the O–H bond breaks and how stable the resulting negative charge on oxygen is. For any compound with an –OH group, the more stable the conjugate base (the alkoxide ion, RO⁻), the stronger the acid.

In ethanol ( $\mathrm{CH_3CH_2OH}$ ), the ethyl group is electron-donating (through hyperconjugation and inductive effect). That destabilises the negative charge on the oxygen in $\mathrm{CH_3CH_2O^-}$ — it pushes electron density toward an already negative centre. Bad for acidity.

In 2-chloroethanol ( $\mathrm{ClCH_2CH_2OH}$ ), the chlorine atom is strongly electron-withdrawing (inductive effect). It pulls electron density through the sigma bonds, away from the O⁻. That stabilises the negative charge, making the conjugate base more stable and the alcohol more acidic.

Watch out

Do not confuse this with the resonance effect in phenol. Here, chlorine’s effect is purely inductive — it acts through sigma bonds, not pi bonds. There is no resonance stabilisation of the alkoxide in 2-chloroethanol.

Step-by-Step Reasoning

Identify the acidic site. Both compounds have an –OH group. The acidic proton is the one on oxygen. When it leaves, we get an alkoxide ion: $\mathrm{RO^-}$ .
Compare the substituents attached to the –OH carbon chain.
- Ethanol: $\mathrm{CH_3CH_2OH}$ → conjugate base: $\mathrm{CH_3CH_2O^-}$
- 2-Chloroethanol: $\mathrm{ClCH_2CH_2OH}$ → conjugate base: $\mathrm{ClCH_2CH_2O^-}$
Analyse the inductive effect of the substituent.
- In ethanol, the ethyl group ( $\mathrm{-CH_2CH_3}$ ) is weakly electron-donating (+I effect). It pushes electron density toward the oxygen, making the negative charge on O⁻ more concentrated and less stable. This raises the energy of the conjugate base, so ethanol is a weaker acid.
- In 2-chloroethanol, the chlorine atom is electron-withdrawing (−I effect). It pulls electron density away from the oxygen through the sigma bonds. This delocalises the negative charge over a larger volume, stabilising the alkoxide ion. The conjugate base is lower in energy, so the acid is stronger. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Common Mistakes: Acidity of 2-Chloroethanol vs Ethanol

✗ Mistake 1: Assuming Chlorine Always Increases Acidity

The error: Students think "chlorine is electron-withdrawing, so 2-chloroethanol must be more acidic."

Why it's wrong: The inductive effect of chlorine does increase acidity — but only if the negative charge on the conjugate base can be stabilised. In 2-chloroethanol, the chlorine is on the $\beta$ -carbon (two bonds away), so its inductive effect is weaker than if it were on the $\alpha$ -carbon.

Correct reasoning:

In ethanol ( $\text{CH}_3\text{CH}_2\text{OH}$ ), the conjugate base is ethoxide ( $\text{CH}_3\text{CH}_2\text{O}^-$ ).
In 2-chloroethanol ( $\text{ClCH}_2\text{CH}_2\text{OH}$ ), the conjugate base is $\text{ClCH}_2\text{CH}_2\text{O}^-$ .
The chlorine withdraws electron density through sigma bonds, but the effect diminishes with distance. The $\beta$ -position gives only a modest stabilisation of the alkoxide ion.

Result: 2-chloroethanol is more acidic than ethanol, but the difference is small — not dramatic.

✗ Mistake 2: Confusing Inductive Effect with Resonance

The error: Students treat the Cl–C bond as if it can stabilise the negative charge via resonance (like in phenol).

Why it's wrong:

Chlorine has lone pairs, but in an alkyl chloride, there is no conjugation with the $\text{O}^-$ centre. The negative charge is localised on oxygen.
Resonance stabilisation requires the lone pair on oxygen to be delocalised into an adjacent $\pi$ -system (e.g., aromatic ring in phenol).
In 2-chloroethanol, the $\text{O}^-$ is separated from Cl by two $\text{sp}^3$ carbons — no $\pi$ overlap possible.

Correct reasoning: Only the inductive effect operates here — no resonance.

✗ Mistake 3: Forgetting the Solvent/Medium Context

The error: Students compare gas-phase acidities without considering that in aqueous solution, solvation effects dominate.

Why it's wrong:

In water, the alkoxide ion is stabilised by hydrogen bonding.
The small inductive effect of chlorine is often masked by solvation differences.
In fact, ethanol and 2-chloroethanol have nearly identical pKa values in water (~15.9 vs ~15.5). The difference is only ~0.4 pKa units.

Correct reasoning: The question likely expects you to say 2-chloroethanol is slightly more acidic due to the inductive effect, but acknowledge that the difference is small. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Same / Similar Concept — real previous-year questions on the same or a closely similar concept, not this exact question.

AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-26-AN1 markMCQ
$pK_a$
›Reveal solutionSolution
Matching known $pK_a$ values: p-Nitrophenol (7.1, most acidic) < Phenol (10.0) < p-Cresol (10.2) < Ethanol (15.9, least acidic) — giving A-II, B-III, C-I, D-IV.

Concept and Intuition

Acidity here is governed by how well the conjugate base (the corresponding phenoxide/alkoxide anion) is stabilised:

p-Nitrophenol: the para $-$ NO $_2$ group is strongly electron-withdrawing by resonance, delocalising and stabilising the negative charge of the phenoxide ion extensively $\Rightarrow$ most acidic of the four (lowest $pK_a$ ).

Phenol: the phenoxide anion is stabilised by resonance delocalisation into the ring, but there is no additional electron-withdrawing substituent $\Rightarrow$ moderately acidic, $pK_a \approx 10.0$ .

p-Cresol: the para $-$ CH $_3$ group is electron-donating (+I/hyperconjugation), which destabilises the phenoxide anion slightly relative to phenol $\Rightarrow$ marginally less acidic than phenol, $pK_a$ slightly higher ( $\approx 10.2$ ).

Ethanol: the ethoxide anion has no aromatic ring to delocalise charge into at all, so it is far less stabilised $\Rightarrow$ ethanol is a much weaker acid, with a much higher $pK_a$ ( $\approx 15.9$ ).

Step-by-Step Solution

Rank acidity qualitatively: p-Nitrophenol (most acidic, EWG) > Phenol > p-Cresol (EDG lowers acidity slightly vs phenol) > Ethanol (no ring stabilisation, weakest acid, highest $pK_a$ ). …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-22-AN1 markMCQ
$Q. Assertion (A): Carboxylic acids are more acidic than Phenols Reason (R): Resonance structures of carboxylate ion are equivalent, while resonance structures of phenoxide ion are not equivalent (A) Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A) (B) Both (A) and (R) are correct But (R) is not the correct explanation of (A) (C) (A) is correct but (R) is incorrect (D) (A) is incorrect but (R) is correct$
›Reveal solutionSolution
Both the assertion (carboxylic acids more acidic than phenols) and the reason (equivalent vs non-equivalent resonance structures of the conjugate bases) are true, and the reason correctly explains the assertion — option (A).

Concept and Intuition

Acid strength of an -OH-bearing compound correlates with how well its conjugate base (the anion formed after losing $\mathrm{H^+}$ ) is stabilized. Stabilization by resonance is most effective when the contributing resonance structures are equivalent (same energy) — equivalent structures each contribute equally and substantially to the true (hybrid) structure, spreading the negative charge symmetrically and lowering the energy a great deal.

In a carboxylate ion ( $\mathrm{RCOO^-}$ ), the negative charge is delocalized over the two oxygen atoms via two resonance structures that are mirror images of each other — completely equivalent, both localizing charge on the (highly electronegative) oxygen. This gives maximal stabilization.

In a phenoxide ion, resonance delocalizes the negative charge onto oxygen (one structure) and onto ring carbons (at ortho and para positions, three additional structures). These carbon-centred structures are not equivalent to the oxygen-centred one — they put negative charge on a less electronegative atom (carbon) and are higher in energy, contributing less to overall stabilization.

Step-by-Step Solution

Confirm Assertion: carboxylic acids (pKₐ ≈ 3–5) are indeed markedly more acidic than phenols (pKₐ ≈ 10) — true. …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-22-FN1 markMCQ
$Q. Arrange the following in the correct order of their acidic strength (I = phenol; II = p-cresol, i.e. 4-methylphenol; III = m-nitrophenol, i.e. 3-nitrophenol; IV = p-nitrophenol, i.e. 4-nitrophenol) (A) III > IV > I > II (B) IV > III > I > II (C) II > I > III > IV (D) I > IV > III > II$
›Reveal solutionSolution
Nitro groups (especially at para, via resonance) raise phenol's acidity; a methyl group

lowers it — giving the order p-nitrophenol > m-nitrophenol > phenol > p-cresol.

Concept and Intuition

The acidity of a substituted phenol is governed by how well the ring substituent stabilises

the phenoxide (conjugate base) anion. Electron-withdrawing groups (like $\mathrm{-NO_2}$ )

stabilise the negative charge and increase acidity; this effect is strongest when the group is

at the ortho/para position, where it can directly delocalise the negative charge through

resonance. At the meta position, $\mathrm{-NO_2}$ can only act inductively (no direct

resonance path to the phenoxide oxygen), so its acid-strengthening effect is smaller than at

para. Electron-donating groups (like $\mathrm{-CH_3}$ ) destabilise the phenoxide anion (push

electron density in, the opposite of what's needed) and so decrease acidity relative to plain

phenol.

Step-by-Step Solution

p-Nitrophenol (IV): $\mathrm{-NO_2}$ at para position — full resonance stabilisation of the phenoxide ion — strongest acid of the four.

m-Nitrophenol (III): $\mathrm{-NO_2}$ at meta — only inductive stabilisation, weaker than para but still more acidic than unsubstituted phenol. …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
AP EAPCET 2023Set ap-2023-05-23-FN1 markMCQ
$Q. Two statements are given below Statement - I : C - O bond length in methanol is 136 pm and in phenol 142 pm. Statement - II : The C -O- H bond angle in methanol and phenol is almost same correct answer is (A) Both are correct statements (B) Both are incorrect statements (C) Statement - I is incorrect but Statement - II is correct (D) Statement - I is correct but Statement- II is incorrect$
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is that resonance in phenol gives the C–O bond partial double-bond character, shortening it compared to a pure single bond, while the C–O–H bond angle is affected by the same resonance and hybridization changes. The correct answer is that Statement I is incorrect (phenol’s C–O bond is actually shorter, not longer) and Statement II is incorrect (the bond angles differ), so both statements are false.

Understand the claim in Statement I

Statement I says the C–O bond length in methanol is 136 pm and in phenol it is 142 pm — meaning phenol has a longer C–O bond. Intuitively, a longer bond is weaker. But we know from organic chemistry that phenol’s C–O bond has partial double-bond character due to resonance between the oxygen lone pairs and the aromatic ring. A double bond is shorter than a single bond. Therefore, phenol’s C–O bond should be shorter than methanol’s, not longer.

In methanol (CH₃OH), the C–O bond is a pure single bond (sp³ carbon, sp³ oxygen). Typical C–O single bond length is ~143 pm.

In phenol (C₆H₅OH), the oxygen’s lone pairs delocalize into the ring, giving the C–O bond about 30–40% double-bond character. This shortens it to roughly 136–137 pm. So Statement I is incorrect — it has the lengths reversed.

Examine Statement II about bond angles

Statement II claims the C–O–H bond angle in methanol and phenol is “almost the same.” Let’s check:

In methanol, the oxygen is sp³ hybridized (two lone pairs, two sigma bonds), so the ideal bond angle is near the tetrahedral angle (~109.5°). The actual C–O–H angle in methanol is about 108.9°.

In phenol, the oxygen is also sp³ hybridized in the local sense, but one of its lone pairs is partially delocalized into the π system of the ring. This delocalization reduces the electron density on oxygen, which slightly changes the balance of repulsions. More importantly, the oxygen’s hybridization shifts toward sp² character (since the lone pair involved in resonance is in a p orbital). With sp² hybridization, the C–O–H angle would be closer to 120°. Experimentally, the C–O–H angle in phenol is about 109°? Actually, careful measurements show it is around 109° as well — but wait, that seems contradictory. Let’s check data:

Methanol: C–O–H ≈ 108.9°

Phenol: C–O–H ≈ 109.0° (some sources say 109.5°) So they are indeed very close. However, the reason they are close is not because nothing changes — it’s because the oxygen’s hybridization doesn’t fully become sp²; the resonance is partial. But the statement itself is about the fact that they are almost the same, which is true. But — there is a subtlety: The C–O–H angle in phenol is actually slightly larger than in methanol? Some data: methanol 108.9°, phenol 109.2°. That is “almost the same.” So Statement II is correct in its claim.

Re-evaluate with reliable data

Let’s confirm bond lengths: …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-04-FN1 markMCQ
$\mathrm{C_6H_5OH}$
›Reveal solutionSolution
Electron-donating para-substituents reduce phenol's acidity by destabilizing the phenoxide; $\mathrm{OCH_3}$ donates more strongly by resonance than $\mathrm{CH_3}$ , so methoxyphenol is least acidic: I > II > III.

Concept and Intuition

Phenol is acidic because the phenoxide ion ( $\mathrm{C_6H_5O^-}$ ) is stabilized by resonance delocalization of the negative charge into the ring. Any substituent that makes the ring more electron-rich (an electron-donating group, EDG) works against this delocalization/stabilization of the negative charge, and so decreases acidity. Conversely, an electron-withdrawing group (EWG) stabilizes the anion further and increases acidity.

Step-by-Step Solution

Phenol (I): the reference compound, moderately acidic ( $pK_a \approx 10$ ).

p-Cresol (II): the para $\mathrm{-CH_3}$ group is a weak electron donor (hyperconjugation/+I), pushing electron density into the ring and slightly destabilizing the phenoxide -- makes it less acidic than phenol.

4-Methoxyphenol (III): the para $\mathrm{-OCH_3}$ group is a strong $+M$ (resonance) electron donor -- its lone pair conjugates directly with the ring, pushing even more electron density onto the ring (and especially onto the position para to it, i.e. right where the phenolic oxygen sits), destabilizing the phenoxide anion more than $\mathrm{-CH_3}$ does. …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
AP EAPCET 2021Set ap-2021-09-03-FN1 markMCQ
$\mathrm{C_6H_5OH}$
›Reveal solutionSolution
More electron-withdrawing groups at positions conjugated with the phenoxide oxygen increase phenol acidity; picric acid (three ortho/para $-NO_2$ groups) is the most acidic option. Answer: (C).

Concept and Intuition

A phenol's acidity depends on how stable its conjugate base (the phenoxide ion) is. Electron-withdrawing groups (like $-NO_2$ ) at ortho/para positions delocalize the negative charge of the phenoxide oxygen into the substituent via resonance, spreading out (stabilizing) the charge and making the O–H bond easier to ionize. Electron-donating groups (like $-CH_3$ ) do the opposite — they push electron density onto the ring/oxygen, destabilizing the phenoxide and making the phenol less acidic than plain phenol.

Step-by-Step Solution

Rank the substituent effects: $-NO_2$ (strong EWG, both resonance and inductive) $\gg$ $-H$ (no effect, plain phenol) $>$ $-CH_3$ (weak EDG, destabilizes phenoxide).

Compare the number/position of $-NO_2$ groups: 4-nitrophenol has one $-NO_2$ at the para position (good resonance overlap with the phenoxide oxygen) — more acidic than phenol. 2,4,6-trinitrophenol has THREE $-NO_2$ groups, at both ortho positions AND the para position, all able to resonance-stabilize the phenoxide charge simultaneously. …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →

←Previous questionQ22 — Suggest a reagent for the following conversion. The starting material …→Next questionQ24 — Suggest a reagent for conversion of ethanol to ethanal.

Q.Out of 2-chloroethanol and ethanol, which is more acidic and why?

Concept understanding — Acidity Of Phenol

Inductive Effect on Acidity – From Intuition to Precision

The Core Intuition

The Precise Statement

Why Distance Matters

Why this formula?

Acidity of Phenol: Why It's More Acidic Than Alcohols

1. The Core Observation

2. The Key: Stability of the Conjugate Base

The Resonance Explanation

3. Why Alcohols Can't Do This

4. The Inductive Effect Also Helps (But Resonance Dominates)

5. The Quantitative Picture (pKa Values)

Why This Works: Inductive Effects and Alcohol Acidity

Step-by-Step Reasoning

Method: Inductive Effect Analysis for Acidity Comparison

Step 1: Recall the acidity principle for alcohols

Step 2: Draw the conjugate bases

Step 3: Compare the inductive effects on the alkoxide ion

Step 4: Apply the stability–acidity relationship

Common Mistakes: Acidity of 2-Chloroethanol vs Ethanol

✗ Mistake 1: Assuming Chlorine Always Increases Acidity

✗ Mistake 2: Confusing Inductive Effect with Resonance

✗ Mistake 3: Forgetting the Solvent/Medium Context

Concept and Intuition

Step-by-Step Solution

Concept and Intuition

Step-by-Step Solution

Concept and Intuition

Step-by-Step Solution

Concept and Intuition

Step-by-Step Solution

Concept and Intuition

Step-by-Step Solution

Q.Out of 2-chloroethanol and ethanol, which is more acidic and why?

Why This Works: Inductive Effects and Alcohol Acidity

Step-by-Step Reasoning

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Unlock everything free for 14 days