Q.(a) Write reasons for the following :
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Part (a)Concept understanding — Ortho Para Directing
The Intuition: Why Some Groups "Point" the Next Attack
Imagine you're trying to add a second substituent to a benzene ring that already has one group attached. The ring already has six hydrogens, but they aren't all equal anymore — the first group has changed the electron density at different positions. Some positions become more "attractive" to an incoming electrophile (a positive or electron-seeking species), while others become less attractive.
Ortho-para directing groups are substituents that make the next electrophile prefer to attack the positions next to the group (ortho, positions 2 and 6) or directly opposite it (para, position 4), rather than the meta position (position 3 and 5).
The terms come from Greek: ortho = straight/correct (adjacent), meta = after (one carbon away), para = beside/opposite (two carbons away, directly across).
The Precise Statement
Ortho-para directing groups are substituents that, when present on a benzene ring, cause the next electrophilic aromatic substitution (EAS) reaction to occur predominantly at the ortho and para positions relative to themselves. These groups are typically electron-donating (activating) or weakly deactivating (like halogens).
The Mechanism: How They Work
The key lies in the stability of the intermediate carbocation (the arenium ion / sigma complex) formed during the attack.
When an electrophile attacks benzene, the ring temporarily loses its aromaticity and becomes a positively charged carbocation. This intermediate is stabilised if the positive charge can be delocalised onto the substituent. Ortho-para directing groups are able to donate electron density into the ring, either through:
- Resonance effect (most important): The group has lone pairs or pi electrons that can be pushed into the ring, creating extra resonance structures where the positive charge is on the substituent (which is more stable).
- Inductive effect: The group is electron-donating through sigma bonds (e.g., alkyl groups like methyl).
Let's see what happens when an electrophile attacks the ortho position of aniline (NH₂ group):
›Proof
Resonance stabilisation for ortho attack (aniline)
The NH₂ group donates its lone pair into the ring. When the electrophile attacks ortho, the positive charge can be delocalised onto the nitrogen atom (which is very happy to carry a positive charge because it's electronegative and has a lone pair). This gives an extra, highly stable resonance structure that is not available for meta attack.
For meta attack, the positive charge stays on the ring carbons — no extra stabilisation from the substituent. Hence ortho/para attack is favoured.
The Two Categories of Ortho-Para Directors
| Type | Examples | Effect | Why? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strongly activating | -OH, -NH₂, -OCH₃, -NHR | Strong ortho-para directing | Strong resonance donation (lone pairs) |
| Moderately activating | -CH₃, -C₂H₅, -R (alkyl) | Ortho-para directing | Inductive electron donation (no lone pairs, but pushes electrons through sigma bonds) |
| Weakly deactivating | -F, -Cl, -Br, -I | Ortho-para directing (surprisingly!) | Halogens are electron-withdrawing inductively but electron-donating by resonance (lone pairs). The resonance effect wins for directing, but the inductive withdrawal makes the ring less reactive overall. |
Common mistake: Students think "deactivating" means "meta directing". Halogens are the exception — they deactivate the ring (slower reaction) but still direct ortho/para. The resonance donation of lone pairs is strong enough to stabilise the ortho/para intermediate, but the inductive withdrawal makes the ring less electron-rich overall. …
Why this formula?
Ortho-Para Directing: The Why Behind the Rule
Let’s build this from first principles. The question is: Why do certain groups on a benzene ring direct new substituents to the ortho and para positions, while others direct to the meta position?
The answer lies in resonance stabilization of the intermediate carbocation (the arenium ion / σ-complex) during electrophilic aromatic substitution (EAS).
1. The Core Mechanism: EAS Forms a Carbocation Intermediate
In EAS, the electrophile (E+) attacks the benzene ring. The ring temporarily loses aromaticity, forming a resonance-stabilized carbocation:
benzene+EX+[arenium ion]product
The arenium ion has three resonance forms. The stability of this intermediate determines how fast the reaction proceeds and where the electrophile attacks.
2. What Makes a Group Ortho-Para Directing?
A group is ortho-para directing if it donates electron density into the ring, especially at the ortho and para positions. This donation stabilizes the carbocation when the electrophile attacks those positions.
The Key: Resonance Structures of the Intermediate
Consider an activating group like −OH (phenol). When the electrophile attacks the ortho position, one resonance form places the positive charge directly on the carbon bearing the −OH group. The oxygen’s lone pair can then donate into that empty p-orbital, creating an extra, highly stable resonance structure:
ortho attack: ...[resonance form with C+-OH][resonance form with O+=C]
This extra resonance contributor (with a positive charge on the electronegative oxygen) is not possible for meta attack. For meta attack, the positive charge never lands on the carbon attached to the −OH group — so no extra stabilization.
The donation itself, drawn for phenol:
Result: The ortho/para intermediates are more stable (lower energy) than the meta intermediate. Hence, the reaction is faster at ortho/para positions.
3. The Formula: Why Ortho and Para Specifically?
The resonance structures of the arenium ion reveal the pattern:
- For ortho attack: The positive charge can be delocalized to the carbon bearing the substituent (position 1).
- For para attack: The positive charge can also be delocalized to the carbon bearing the substituent (position 1).
- For meta attack: The positive charge never reaches the carbon with the substituent.
Mathematically, if the substituent is at position 1, the positions that can stabilize the positive charge via resonance are positions 2, 4, and 6 (ortho and para). Positions 3 and 5 (meta) cannot.
4. The Deactivating Ortho-Para Directors: The Halogen Exception
Halogens (−F,−Cl,−Br,−I) are deactivating (they withdraw electron density inductively) but ortho-para directing. Why?
- Inductive effect: Halogens are electronegative → pull electron density away from the ring → deactivate (slow down EAS).
- Resonance effect: Halogens have lone pairs → can donate into the ring via resonance → stabilize the ortho/para intermediates (just like −OH).
Drawn out for chlorobenzene: …
Part (b)Concept understanding — Hofmann Bromamide Reaction
Hofmann Bromamide Degradation
Imagine you have an amide — a molecule with a carbonyl group (−CO−) attached to a nitrogen. You want to turn it into a primary amine, but you also want to chop off one carbon from the chain. That is exactly what the Hofmann bromamide reaction does: it shortens the carbon skeleton by one carbon and gives you an amine.
The Intuition
The reaction uses bromine (BrX2) in the presence of a strong alkali (like NaOH or KOH). The alkali first deprotonates the amide nitrogen, making it a strong nucleophile. This nucleophile attacks bromine, forming an N-bromoamide. Under the strongly basic conditions, this intermediate loses a bromide ion and undergoes a rearrangement — the alkyl group attached to the carbonyl carbon migrates from carbon to nitrogen. The result is an isocyanate intermediate (R−N=C=O). Finally, the isocyanate is hydrolysed by the aqueous alkali to give a primary amine and carbon dioxide.
The net effect: the carbonyl carbon is lost as COX2, and the alkyl group ends up attached to the nitrogen.
The product amine has one fewer carbon than the starting amide. The lost carbon is the carbonyl carbon.
The Precise Statement
Hofmann bromamide degradation (also called Hofmann rearrangement) is the conversion of a primary amide to a primary amine with one fewer carbon atom, using bromine and an aqueous alkali (usually NaOH or KOH).
The general reaction is:
R−CONHX2+BrX2+4NaOHR−NHX2+2NaBr+NaX2COX3+2HX2O
Or, in a more compact form:
R−CONHX2BrX2,NaOHR−NHX2+COX2
Step-by-Step Mechanism
- Deprotonation: The amide nitrogen is deprotonated by the strong base, forming an amide anion.
R−CONHX2+OHX−R−CONHX−+HX2O
- Bromination: The amide anion attacks bromine, forming an N-bromoamide.
R−CONHX−+BrX2R−CONHBr+BrX−
- Second deprotonation: The N-bromoamide is deprotonated again by the base.
R−CONHBr+OHX−R−CONBrX−+HX2O
- Rearrangement: The alkyl group migrates from the carbonyl carbon to the nitrogen, with simultaneous loss of bromide ion. This forms an isocyanate.
R−CONBrX−R−N=C=O+BrX−
- Hydrolysis: The isocyanate reacts with water to form a carbamic acid, which spontaneously decarboxylates (loses COX2) to give the primary amine.
R−N=C=O+HX2OR−NH−COOHR−NHX2+COX2
The rearrangement step (step 4) is the key. The alkyl group migrates with its bonding electrons — it is a 1,2-shift from carbon to the electron-deficient nitrogen. This is why the carbon skeleton shortens by one carbon.
Key Points for Exams
- Starting material: Primary amide (R−CONHX2) only. Secondary or tertiary amides do not undergo this reaction.
- Reagents: BrX2 and NaOH (or KOH). Sometimes ClX2 can be used instead of BrX2, but bromine is more common.
- Product: Primary amine with one fewer carbon.
- By-products: NaBr, NaX2COX3, HX2O (or COX2 if written in the simplified form). …
Part (a)
(i) Ethylamine's small –NH₂ H-bonds strongly with water and its ethyl group is small, so it dissolves; aniline's large hydrophobic benzene ring dominates (and its N lone pair is partly delocalised into the ring), so it is water-insoluble.
(ii) –NH₂ is o/p-directing by resonance, but nitration uses acidic HNO3/H2SO4 which protonates it to −N+H3 — a meta-directing, deactivating group — so a substantial amount of m-nitroaniline forms. …
Part (a): ethylamine is water-soluble (effective H-bonding, small chain) while aniline is not (bulky hydrophobic ring); in acidic nitration aniline is protonated to the meta-directing −NHX3X+, giving substantial m-nitroaniline; amines are nucleophilic because of the N lone pair. Part (b): nitrobenzene → aniline (Sn/HCl then NaOH); ethanamide → methanamine (Hofmann bromamide, one C less); ethanenitrile → ethanamine (LiAlH₄).
Part (a)
- Ethylamine soluble, aniline insoluble. Ethylamine's small –NH₂ group hydrogen-bonds strongly with water, and its short ethyl chain barely disrupts the water structure — so it is very soluble. In aniline the same –NH₂ can H-bond, but the large hydrophobic benzene ring dominates and its lone pair is partly delocalised into the ring (less available for H-bonding), so aniline is only sparingly soluble.
- o/p-directing but gives m-nitroaniline. Free –NH₂ donates its lone pair by resonance and is strongly activating, o/p-directing. Nitration, however, is done in a strongly acidic HNOX3/HX2SOX4 mixture that protonates the amine:
The −NHX3X+ group is electron-withdrawing, deactivating and meta-directing, so a substantial fraction of the product is m-nitroaniline (the o/p isomers come from the small amount of free aniline present). …
CX6HX5NHX2+HX+CX6HX5NHX3X+
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-AN1 markMCQQ.Identify the set with only meta directing groups (A) −CH3 , −C(=O)−R , −NH−C(=O)−CH3 (B) −CN , −CO−R , −COOH (C) −OCH3 , −C2H5 , −NH2 (D) −NHR , −CHO , −NO2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Meta directors are electron-withdrawing groups that destabilise ortho/para carbocation intermediates by resonance; −CN, −CO−R, and −COOH are all meta directors, matching option (B) exactly.
Concept and Intuition
In electrophilic aromatic substitution, a substituent directs the incoming electrophile based on how it affects the stability of the arenium-ion intermediate at ortho/para vs meta positions. Groups with a lone pair or hyperconjugation that can donate electron density into the ring by resonance (−NH2, −NHR, −OCH3, −CH3, −C2H5, −NH−COCH3) are ortho/para directors (mostly activating, some like halogens deactivating but still o,p). Groups with a π-bond to a more electronegative atom directly on the ring (−CN, −CHO, −COR, −COOH, −NO2, −SO3H) withdraw electron density by resonance and destabilise the ortho/para arenium ions more than the meta one, making them meta directors (all deactivating).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Option (A): −CH3 (o,p, activating), −C(=O)R (meta), −NH−COCH3 (o,p, activating, via N lone pair) — mixed set, not all meta.
- Option (B): −CN (meta), −CO−R (meta), −COOH (meta) — all three are meta directors. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set ap-2025-05-19-AN1 markMCQQ.Which of the following compounds is most reactive towards electrophilic substitution reactions? (A) Phenol, C6H5OH (benzene ring with an OH substituent) (B) Toluene, C6H5CH3 (benzene ring with a CH3 substituent) (C) Chlorobenzene, C6H5Cl (benzene ring with a Cl substituent) (D) Nitrobenzene, C6H5NO2 (benzene ring with a NO2 substituent)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Among OH, CH₃, Cl, NO₂ substituents, -OH is the strongest ring-activator by resonance, making phenol the most reactive towards electrophilic substitution.
Concept and Intuition
The rate of electrophilic aromatic substitution depends on how much electron density a substituent pushes into the ring. Groups with a lone pair adjacent to the ring (like -OH, -NH₂) donate strongly by resonance and are powerful activators; alkyl groups (-CH₃) donate weakly by hyperconjugation/induction; halogens (-Cl) are deactivating overall (though o,p-directing) because their strong -I effect outweighs weak resonance donation; -NO₂ is strongly electron-withdrawing (both -I and -M) and strongly deactivating.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Rank the activating strength: −OH (strong activator, resonance donor) >−CH3 (weak activator) >−Cl (weak deactivator, net) >−NO2 (strong deactivator).
- Phenol's OH group increases electron density at ortho/para positions the most, lowering the activation energy for electrophilic attack far more than a methyl group does. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set ap-2025-05-19-FN1 markMCQQ.Identify the amide which gives propan-1-amine by Hoffmann bromamide reaction. (A) CH3−CH2−C(=O)−NH2 (B) CH3−CH(CH3)−C(=O)−NH2 (C) CH3−CH2−CH2−C(=O)−NH2 (D) CH3−CH2−C(=O)−NH−CH3
›Reveal solutionSolution
Hoffmann degradation removes the carbonyl carbon from a primary amide, so to land on
propan-1-amine (3 carbons) the amide must be the straight-chain 4-carbon amide,
butanamide.
Concept and Intuition
In the Hoffmann bromamide degradation, a primary amide R−CO−NH2 reacts with
Br2/NaOH to give the amine R−NH2 — the alkyl/aryl group R migrates directly
onto nitrogen while the carbonyl carbon is expelled as carbon dioxide (via an isocyanate
intermediate). The crucial consequence: the product amine has one carbon less than the starting amide, and the carbon skeleton of R is otherwise carried over unchanged
(no rearrangement of R itself).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Target product: propan-1-amine, CH3CH2CH2−NH2 — a straight 3-carbon chain with the amine on the terminal carbon.
- Since Hoffmann degradation removes exactly the carbonyl carbon, the parent amide must have R=CH3CH2CH2− (propyl), i.e. the amide is CH3CH2CH2−C(=O)−NH2 = butanamide (4 carbons total).
- Check each option:
- (A) CH3CH2C(=O)NH2 (propanamide, R= ethyl) → gives ethanamine (CH3CH2NH2), not propan-1-amine.
- (B) CH3CH(CH3)C(=O)NH2 (2-methylpropanamide, R= isopropyl) → gives isopropylamine ((CH3)2CHNH2), a branched 3-carbon amine, not propan-1-amine.
- (C) CH3CH2CH2C(=O)NH2 (butanamide, R= n-propyl) → gives …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-20-AN1 markMCQQ.What are X and Y respectively in the following reactions? Yi. LiAlH4ii. H2OC6H5CONH2Br2NaOHX (A) aniline (C6H5NH2) , aniline (C6H5NH2) (B) aniline (C6H5NH2) , benzylamine (C6H5CH2NH2) (C) benzylamine (C6H5CH2NH2) , benzylamine (C6H5CH2NH2) (D) benzylamine (C6H5CH2NH2) , aniline (C6H5NH2)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Br2/NaOH degrades benzamide to aniline (Hofmann degradation, loses a carbon); LiAlH4 simply reduces benzamide to benzylamine (keeps all carbons) — so X = aniline, Y = benzylamine.
Concept and Intuition
Benzamide, C6H5CONH2, can be converted to an amine in two very different ways, and the key distinguishing feature is carbon count:
- Br2/NaOH (Hofmann bromamide degradation) removes the carbonyl carbon entirely (as CO2 after rearrangement), so the amine formed has one carbon fewer than the amide.
- LiAlH4 is a simple reducing agent: it reduces the C=O of the amide down to a CH2 group, keeping all the original carbons.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Right-hand arrow: C6H5CONH2Br2/NaOHX. This is the classic Hofmann bromamide degradation: the amide is converted (via an isocyanate intermediate) into a primary amine with one carbon less than the starting amide — the phenyl group is retained but the carbonyl carbon is lost as carbonate/CO2. So X=C6H5NH2 (aniline). …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-21-AN1 markMCQQ.Number of deactivating groups of the following is −Cl,−SO3H,−OH,−NHC2H5,−COOCH3,−CH3 (A) 4 (B) 3 (C) 2 (D) 1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Of the six substituents, three are deactivating toward electrophilic aromatic substitution: −Cl, −SO3H, and −COOCH3.
Concept and Intuition
Groups that donate electron density into the benzene ring (by resonance or induction) activate it toward electrophilic substitution; groups that withdraw electron density deactivate it. Halogens are a special case: they withdraw inductively (deactivating overall) but still donate a lone pair by resonance (hence they remain o/p-directors despite being deactivating).
Step-by-Step Solution
- −Cl: strong −I effect dominates over weak +M donation → net deactivating (o/p-director).
- −SO3H: strongly electron-withdrawing (both −I and −M) → deactivating (m-director).
- −OH: lone pair strongly donated into ring by resonance → activating.
- −NHC2H5: amine lone pair strongly donated by resonance → activating (even stronger than −OH). …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-22-AN1 markMCQQ.In the reaction sequence Y is CH3CO2H(1) NH3(2) ΔPBr2/NaOHY (A) a primary amine with same number of carbons as in P (B) a primary amine with one carbon less than in P (C) a secondary amine with same number of carbons as in P (D) a secondary amine with one carbon less than in P
›Reveal solutionSolution
Acetic acid → acetamide (P) → Hofmann bromamide degradation strips one carbon, giving methylamine as Y — a primary amine with one carbon fewer than P: option (B).
Concept and Intuition
The Hofmann bromamide degradation is a name reaction that converts an amide R−CONH2 directly into a primary amine R−NH2 using bromine and concentrated NaOH — crucially, the carbonyl carbon is lost in the process (extruded as carbonate/CO₂ via an isocyanate intermediate), so the product amine has exactly one carbon fewer than the parent amide, and it is always a primary amine regardless of the amide's structure.
Step-by-Step Solution
- CH3COOH+NH3→CH3COONH4 (ammonium acetate, an acid-base salt).
- On heating (Δ), ammonium acetate loses water (dehydration) to give acetamide, CH3CONH2 — this is P (2 carbons).
- P undergoes the Hofmann bromamide reaction with Br2/NaOH: mechanistically, this proceeds via an N-bromoamide → nitrene/isocyanate rearrangement (the alkyl/aryl group migrates from carbon to nitrogen) → hydrolysis of the isocyanate to a carbamic acid → spontaneous decarboxylation, releasing CO2 and leaving the amine.
- Net result: CH3CONH2→CH3NH2 (methylamine) + CO2 + salts — Y is methylamine, a primary amine with one carbon less than P (P has 2 C, Y has 1 C). …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-15-AN1 markMCQQ.Two statements are given below Statement I: Chlorobenzene on nitration gives 1-chloro-4-nitrobenzene as major product Statement II: Chlorobenzene undergoes nitration slowly than benzene Identify the correct answer (A) Statements I, II are correct (B) Statements I, II are incorrect (C) Statement I correct but statement II is incorrect (D) Statement II correct but statement I is incorrect
›Reveal solutionSolution
Chlorobenzene is an ortho/para director (so Statement I is correct) but it deactivates the ring, making nitration slower than benzene (so Statement II is also correct). Thus both statements are true.
Concept & Intuition: Ortho/Para Directing and Activation/Deactivation
When a substituent is already on a benzene ring, it influences two things:
- Where the next substituent goes (orientation).
- How fast the reaction happens (reactivity).
Chlorine is a fascinating case: it is ortho/para directing because it can donate electrons through resonance (lone pairs on chlorine can delocalize into the ring, stabilizing the intermediate carbocation at ortho/para positions). However, chlorine is also highly electronegative, so it withdraws electrons inductively (through sigma bonds), which deactivates the ring overall. The net effect: chlorobenzene reacts slower than benzene, but when it does react, the new group goes ortho or para.
Now let’s check each statement.
-
Statement I: Chlorobenzene on nitration gives 1-chloro-4-nitrobenzene as major product
- Nitration is an electrophilic aromatic substitution. The electrophile is the nitronium ion (NO2+).
- Chlorine’s resonance donation makes the ortho and para positions more electron-rich than the meta position.
- The para product (1-chloro-4-nitrobenzene) is often the major one because ortho substitution can be slightly hindered by the chlorine atom’s size.
- So Statement I is correct.
-
Statement II: Chlorobenzene undergoes nitration slower than benzene
- Benzene itself has no substituent; its reactivity is the baseline.
- Chlorine withdraws electron density inductively (due to high electronegativity), making the ring less electron-rich overall. …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-16-FN1 markMCQQ.[FIGURE] (a benzene ring bearing a NO2 substituent reacting with an electrophile E+ to give a product benzene ring with NO2 and the electrophile E attached at the meta position relative to NO2) In the above reaction electrophile is substituted at meta position only, due to I. Electron density is more at ortho & para position II. Electron density is relatively less at ortho & para position III. Electron density is less at meta position IV. Electron density is relatively more at meta position correct answer is (A) I, III only (B) II, IV only (C) I only (D) III only
›Reveal solutionSolution
−NO2 withdraws electron density strongly from the ortho/para positions by resonance, so the meta position is comparatively electron-rich and that's where the electrophile attacks.
Concept and Intuition
In electrophilic aromatic substitution, the position attacked is the one with the most residual electron density (most nucleophilic carbon), not the one with the least. −NO2 is meta-directing precisely because its strong −M (resonance) and −I (inductive) effects pull electron density away from the ring, concentrating the depletion at the ortho and para carbons (where resonance structures place formal positive charge on the ring carbon). This leaves the meta carbon relatively less deactivated — i.e., comparatively electron-richer — so the electrophile bonds there.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Draw the resonance structures of nitrobenzene: positive charge on the ring appears at ortho and para carbons when −NO2's lone pair/π-system withdraws density.
- This means ortho/para carbons are the most electron-poor (statement I, claiming they have more electron density, is wrong; statement II, that they have relatively less, is right). …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-04-AN1 markMCQQ.Identify the ortho and para directing groups towards aromatic electrophilic substitution reactions from the following list -OH (I) -CN (II) -CO2H (III) -OCH3 (IV) -NHCOCH3 (V) -CHO (VI) (A) I, IV, V (B) II, III, VI (C) I, II, IV (D) IV, V, VI
›Reveal solutionSolution
Groups with a lone pair that can donate into the aromatic ring by resonance (–OH, –OCH3, –NHCOCH3) are ortho/para directors; groups with an electron-withdrawing π-system attached directly to the ring (–CN, –CO2H, –CHO) are meta directors.
Concept and Intuition
In electrophilic aromatic substitution, a substituent already on the ring determines where the next electrophile attacks by how it distributes electron density around the ring through resonance. Groups bonded to the ring via an atom bearing a lone pair (O, N) can donate that lone pair into the ring's π system, building up electron density specifically at the ortho and para positions, so they are ortho/para directors (and ring-activating). Groups bonded to the ring via a carbon that is itself part of an electron-withdrawing multiple bond (C≡N, C=O of an acid, C=O of an aldehyde) pull electron density away from the ring by resonance, leaving the meta position comparatively most electron-rich (least destabilized in the transition state), so they are meta directors (and ring-deactivating).
Step-by-Step Solution
- –OH (I): oxygen lone pair donates into the ring — ortho/para director, activating.
- –CN (II): the C≡N group withdraws electron density — meta director, deactivating.
- –CO2H (III): the carboxyl carbon is electron-poor (C=O), withdraws by resonance — meta director, deactivating.
- –OCH3 (IV): like –OH, oxygen lone pair donates into ring — ortho/para director, activating. …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-04-AN1 markMCQQ.Identify the major product of the following reaction PhCONH2 (benzamide) reacts with Br2+NaOH to give (A) 4-Br-C6H4-CH2NH2 (4-bromobenzylamine) (B) PhCH2NH2 (benzylamine) (C) 4-Br-C6H4-CONH2 (4-bromobenzamide) (D) PhNH2 (aniline)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Br2/NaOH on a primary amide is the classic Hofmann bromamide degradation, which shortens the chain by one carbon to give the amine. Answer: PhNH2 (aniline).
Concept and Intuition
The Hofmann bromamide (Hofmann degradation) reaction converts a primary amide, R−CONH2, into a primary amine, R−NH2, with the loss of the carbonyl carbon as carbon dioxide/carbonate. Mechanistically: Br2/NaOH first brominates the amide nitrogen (N-bromoamide), base-induced rearrangement then migrates the R group from carbon to nitrogen with simultaneous loss of bromide, forming an isocyanate (R−N=C=O), which is rapidly hydrolysed under the basic aqueous conditions to the amine plus carbonate. The key structural consequence is that the amine formed has one fewer carbon than the starting amide, and the R group (here, phenyl) ends up directly attached to nitrogen.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Start: PhCONH2 (benzamide), where Ph is attached to the carbonyl carbon.
- Br2/NaOH brominates nitrogen, then base-promoted rearrangement migrates the phenyl group from the carbonyl carbon directly to nitrogen (with loss of the carbonyl carbon as isocyanate then carbonate/CO2).
- Net result: the phenyl group is now bonded straight to −NH2, i.e. Ph−NH2 (aniline) — one carbon shorter than the starting amide. …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-05-FN1 markMCQQ.Identify the major product of the following reaction: chlorobenzene + Br2 Anhyd. FeCl3 ? (A) [FIGURE: 1-bromo-2-chlorobenzene — a benzene ring with Cl and Br substituents in the ortho (1,2) positions] (B) [FIGURE: 1-bromo-2-chlorobenzene — a benzene ring with Cl and Br substituents in the ortho (1,2) positions] (C) [FIGURE: 2,4,6-tribromochlorobenzene — a benzene ring with Cl at one carbon and Br at each of the other three alternating carbons] (D) [FIGURE: 1-bromo-4-chlorobenzene — a benzene ring with Br and Cl in the para (1,4) positions]
›Reveal solutionSolution
Chlorobenzene undergoes electrophilic aromatic substitution with Br₂/FeCl₃. The chlorine atom is an ortho/para director, so the major product is the para isomer (1-bromo-4-chlorobenzene) due to steric hindrance at the ortho positions. The correct option is (D).
Concept and Intuition
This problem tests your understanding of directing effects in electrophilic aromatic substitution (EAS). Chlorine (Cl) on a benzene ring is a unique substituent: it is deactivating (due to its strong inductive electron withdrawal) but ortho/para directing (because its lone pairs can donate electron density via resonance to the ortho and para positions). When we add a second substituent (here, Br), the incoming electrophile (Br⁺, generated by Br₂/FeCl₃) will preferentially attack the positions that are most electron-rich — the ortho and para positions relative to the Cl.
However, the ortho positions are sterically crowded (adjacent to the bulky Cl atom), so the para product is usually the major one. The reaction is a classic example of electrophilic bromination of a deactivated aromatic ring, catalyzed by FeCl₃ (a Lewis acid that polarizes Br₂).
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Identify the catalyst’s role Anhydrous FeCl₃ acts as a Lewis acid. It coordinates with Br₂, polarizing the Br–Br bond and generating a stronger electrophile:
Br2+FeCl3→Brδ+⋯FeCl3Brδ−
This effectively creates a Br⁺ species that can attack the benzene ring.
-
Analyze the directing effect of Cl
Chlorine has two opposing effects:
- Inductive withdrawal (due to high electronegativity) makes the ring less reactive overall (deactivating).
- Resonance donation (lone pairs on Cl can delocalize into the ring) increases electron density at the ortho and para positions. The resonance structures show that the ortho and para carbons carry partial negative charge, making them the only sites for electrophilic attack.
-
Consider steric hindrance
The ortho positions are adjacent to the Cl atom. The Cl atom is relatively large, so an incoming Br atom at the ortho position would experience steric repulsion. The para position is farther away and much less hindered. Therefore, the para product is kinetically favored (major product).
-
Evaluate the options
- (A) and (B) both show ortho products (1-bromo-2-chlorobenzene). They are essentially identical drawings; these are minor products. …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-06-FN1 markMCQQ.The reagent P used for the reaction is Cyclopentanecarboxamide (a cyclopentane ring with a C(=O)NH2 substituent) P cyclopentylamine (a cyclopentane ring with an NH2 substituent) (A) Zn−Hg/HCl (B) HCl/SnCl2 (C) Br2/NaOH (D) ZnCl/HCl
›Reveal solutionSolution
Cyclopentanecarboxamide → cyclopentylamine is a one-carbon degradation, achieved by the Hofmann bromamide reaction using Br2/NaOH.
Concept and Intuition
The transformation given — an amide, R−CONH2, converting into an amine with one less carbon, R−NH2 — is the signature outcome of the Hofmann bromamide degradation reaction:
R−CONH2Br2,NaOHR−NH2+Na2CO3+2NaBr+2H2O
Mechanistically, Br2/NaOH first brominates the amide nitrogen to give an N-bromoamide; base-mediated rearrangement (loss of bromide, migration of the R group from carbon to nitrogen) generates an isocyanate (R−N=C=O), which is then hydrolyzed under the basic aqueous conditions to give the primary amine R−NH2 directly (with the original carbonyl carbon lost as carbonate).
The other reagents don't fit this transformation:
- Zn−Hg/HCl (Clemmensen reduction) reduces a ketone/aldehyde carbonyl to −CH2−, not applicable to an amide going to an amine with carbon loss.
- HCl/SnCl2 (Stephen reduction) reduces nitriles to aldehydes.
- ZnCl2/HCl (Lucas reagent) is a test/reaction for alcohols, not related here.
Step-by-Step Solution …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.