Q.A coordination compound CrCl3⋅4H2O precipitates silver chloride when treated with silver nitrate. The molar conductance of its solution corresponds to a total of two ions. Write structural formula of the compound and name it.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Coordination Compound Nomenclature
Coordination Compound Nomenclature: From Intuition to Precision
Imagine you're naming a person. You'd say "Ravi Sharma" — family name first, then given name. Coordination compounds have a similar logic, but the "family name" is the metal, and the "given names" are the groups attached to it. The rules are just a systematic way of writing that name so any chemist anywhere can draw the exact structure from it.
The Core Idea
A coordination compound has a central metal ion surrounded by molecules or ions called ligands. Think of the metal as the nucleus and ligands as planets orbiting it. The entire assembly (metal + ligands) is called the coordination sphere, and it's written inside square brackets: [Co(NH₃)₆]Cl₃.
The nomenclature rules tell you:
- What order to list things
- How to name each ligand
- How to indicate the metal's oxidation state
- How to handle the counter-ions outside the brackets
The Rules, Step by Step
1. Cation before anion (just like NaCl is sodium chloride)
If the complex ion is positive, it's named first. If it's negative, it's named last. Simple.
2. Within the coordination sphere: ligands first, then metal
This is the big rule. Ligands are named before the metal, in alphabetical order (ignoring prefixes like di-, tri-).
Alphabetical order is based on the ligand's name, not its formula. So NH₃ (ammine) comes before H₂O (aqua), even though N comes after H in the alphabet.
3. Naming ligands
| Ligand type | Name | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Neutral molecule (NH₃) | ammine | [Co(NH₃)₆]³⁺ → hexaamminecobalt(III) |
| Neutral molecule (H₂O) | aqua | [Cu(H₂O)₄]²⁺ → tetraaquacopper(II) |
| Neutral molecule (CO) | carbonyl | [Ni(CO)₄] → tetracarbonylnickel(0) |
| Negative ion (Cl⁻) | chloro | [PtCl₆]²⁻ → hexachloroplatinate(IV) |
| Negative ion (CN⁻) | cyano | [Fe(CN)₆]⁴⁻ → hexacyanoferrate(II) |
| Negative ion (OH⁻) | hydroxo | [Al(OH)₄]⁻ → tetrahydroxoaluminate(III) |
ammine (with two m's) is for NH₃ as a ligand. amine (one m) is for organic compounds like ethylamine. Don't mix them up — exam setters love this trap.
4. Prefixes for multiple ligands
Use Greek prefixes: di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, hexa-, hepta-, octa-.
If the ligand name already contains a number (like ethylenediamine), use bis-, tris-, tetrakis- instead.
[Co(en)₃]³⁺ is tris(ethylenediamine)cobalt(III), not triethylenediaminecobalt(III). The parentheses around the ligand name are mandatory when using bis/tris/tetrakis.
5. Oxidation state of the metal
Write it in Roman numerals in parentheses right after the metal name. No space.
[Fe(CN)₆]³⁻ → hexacyanoferrate(III) (iron is in +3 state)
6. If the complex is an anion, change the metal's ending
| Metal | Anionic form |
|---|---|
| Cobalt | cobaltate |
| Copper | cuprate |
| Iron | ferrate |
| Nickel | nickelate |
| Platinum | platinate |
| Zinc | zincate |
General pattern:
[M(L)ₙ]Xₘ → cation name = [prefix-ligands]metal(oxidation state)
anion name = [prefix-ligands]metalate(oxidation state)
Worked Examples
Example 1: K₃[Fe(CN)₆]
- Cation: potassium (K⁺)
- Complex anion:
[Fe(CN)₆]³⁻ - Ligands: 6 cyano → hexacyano
- Metal: iron → ferrate (because it's an anion)
- Oxidation state: Fe is +3 (since 6 CN⁻ = -6, total charge -3, so Fe must be +3)
- Answer: Potassium hexacyanoferrate(III)
Example 2: [Co(NH₃)₅Cl]Cl₂
- Cation:
[Co(NH₃)₅Cl]²⁺ - Ligands: 5 ammine + 1 chloro → alphabetical: ammine before chloro → pentaamminechloro
- Metal: cobalt
- Oxidation state: Co is +3 (5 NH₃ neutral, 1 Cl⁻ = -1, total +2, so Co = +3) …
Why this formula?
Coordination Compound Nomenclature: Why the Rules Work
Coordination compound nomenclature isn't about a single formula — it's a system of rules built on a few core principles. Let's understand the why behind each major rule, so you never have to memorise blindly.
1. The Central Idea: Ligands as "Guests" Around a Metal "Host"
A coordination compound has a central metal atom/ion surrounded by ligands (molecules or ions that donate electron pairs). The naming reflects this relationship:
- Cation first, then anion (like normal ionic compounds)
- Ligands named before the metal (because they modify the metal's identity)
Why?
In chemistry, we name the more electropositive part first (cation). The metal-ligand complex is treated as a single unit — the ligands are "attached" to the metal, so they come first in the complex name.
2. Key Rule: Ligand Order — Alphabetical, Not by Charge
Rule: Ligands are named in alphabetical order (ignoring prefixes like di-, tri-).
Why?
- If we ordered by charge or size, the name would change every time a ligand is replaced.
- Alphabetical order is universal and unambiguous — it doesn't depend on the metal or oxidation state.
- Example:
[Co(NH₃)₄Cl₂]⁺is tetraamminedichlorocobalt(III) — "ammine" (a) before "chloro" (c).
3. Oxidation State: Why Roman Numerals?
Rule: The metal's oxidation state is written in Roman numerals in parentheses after the metal name.
Why?
- The oxidation state tells you the charge on the metal after accounting for ligand charges.
- Roman numerals avoid confusion with Arabic numbers (which are used for ligand counts).
- Example:
[Fe(CN)₆]³⁻→ hexacyanoferrate(III) — the iron is Fe³⁺, not Fe²⁺.
Derivation of oxidation state:
Let the complex charge = Q, ligand charges = sum of ligand charges L, number of ligands = n.
Then:
Metal oxidation state=Q−L
For [Fe(CN)₆]³⁻: CN⁻ has charge -1, so L=6×(−1)=−6, Q=−3.
Fe oxidation state=−3−(−6)=+3
4. Anionic Ligands: The "-o" Ending
Rule: Anionic ligands (negative ions) end in -o (e.g., Cl⁻ → chloro, CN⁻ → cyano, OH⁻ → hydroxo).
Why?
- This distinguishes them from neutral ligands (e.g., NH₃ → ammine, H₂O → aqua).
- The suffix -o signals "this ligand came from an anion" — crucial for charge balance.
Common examples:
| Anion | Ligand name |
|---|---|
| Cl⁻ | chloro |
| CN⁻ | cyano |
| OH⁻ | hydroxo |
| SO₄²⁻ | sulfato |
5. Neutral Ligands: Special Names
Rule: Neutral ligands keep their molecular name, except for a few with special names:
- NH₃ → ammine (not "ammonia")
- H₂O → aqua
- CO → carbonyl
- NO → nitrosyl
Why?
- "Ammine" avoids confusion with ammonia (NH₃) as a free molecule.
- These special names are historical but standardised — you must memorise them for exams.
6. Prefixes: di-, tri-, tetra-, etc.
Rule: Use Greek prefixes to indicate the number of each ligand:
- 2 → di, 3 → tri, 4 → tetra, 5 → penta, 6 → hexa
Why?
- Without prefixes,
[Co(NH₃)₆]³⁺would be "hexaamminecobalt(III)" — the "hexa" tells you there are six ammines. - For ligands with complex names (e.g., ethylenediamine), use bis-, tris-, tetrakis- to avoid confusion.
Example:
[Co(en)₃]³⁺ → tris(ethylenediamine)cobalt(III) — "tris" because "triethylenediamine" would sound like three ethylenediamine molecules (which is correct, but "tris" is clearer).
7. Anionic Complexes: The "-ate" Suffix …
Concept: Coordination Compound Nomenclature — determining the number of ionizable chlorides from precipitation and conductance data.
Reasoning:
-
Precipitation with AgNO₃: Only chloride ions outside the coordination sphere (free Cl⁻) precipitate as AgCl. Since the compound gives AgCl, at least one Cl⁻ is ionic.
-
Molar conductance: A solution with two ions total means the complex dissociates into exactly two particles. For a Cr(III) complex, the cation is always complex; the anion must be a single Cl⁻ (giving one cation + one anion = two ions). …
The compound is a coordination isomer where water acts as both a ligand and water of crystallisation. It precipitates 1 mole of AgCl per mole of compound (from one ionisable Cl⁻) and conducts as a 1:1 electrolyte (two ions total). The formula is [Cr(HX2O)X4ClX2]Cl — tetraaquadichloridochromium(III) chloride.
The key to solving this lies in understanding two separate experimental clues and letting them converge on a single structure.
Clue 1: Precipitation with silver nitrate.
When you add AgNOX3 to a solution of the compound, only the chloride ions that are outside the coordination sphere (i.e., free, ionisable chloride) will react to form AgCl precipitate. Chloride ions that are directly bonded to the metal as ligands do not dissociate and therefore do not precipitate. The fact that the compound does precipitate silver chloride tells you that at least one chloride is outside the coordination sphere.
Clue 2: Molar conductance corresponds to two ions total.
Conductance depends on the number of charged particles in solution. If the solution contains only two ions total, that means the compound dissociates into exactly one cation and one anion — a 1:1 electrolyte. For example, NaCl gives two ions; CaClX2 gives three. So your complex must break into exactly two charged species.
Now, the compound is CrClX3⋅4HX2O. Chromium(III) has a coordination number of 6 (almost always). So the central CrX3+ ion must be surrounded by six ligands. The available ligands are water molecules and chloride ions. You have 4 water molecules and 3 chloride ions total.
Let’s work through the possibilities step by step.
- Determine the number of ionisable chlorides. Let x be the number of ClX− ions outside the coordination sphere (these will precipitate with AgNOX3). Then the number of ClX− ligands inside the sphere is 3−x. The total number of ligands around Cr must be 6. So:
(water molecules as ligands)+(3−x)=6
You have 4 water molecules total. Some may be inside the sphere, some outside as water of crystallisation. Let y be the number of water molecules inside the sphere. Then:
y+(3−x)=6⇒y=3+x
But y cannot exceed 4 (you only have 4 water molecules). So 3+x≤4, which gives x≤1. Since x must be a non-negative integer, x is either 0 or 1.
-
Use the conductance clue.
If x=0, all three chlorides are inside the sphere, so from y=3+x the sphere holds only y=3 water molecules, with the fourth water sitting outside as water of crystallisation: [Cr(HX2O)X3ClX3]⋅HX2O. This complex has no chloride outside the coordination sphere at all, so it would give no free chloride ions on dissolving — it would not precipitate AgCl. But the problem states that it does precipitate silver chloride. So x=0 is ruled out.
Therefore x=1. That means exactly one chloride is outside the sphere (ionisable), and the other two chlorides are ligands inside the sphere.
-
Now find the water ligand count.
With x=1, y=3+1=4. So all four water molecules are inside the coordination sphere. There is no water of crystallisation. The complex cation is [Cr(HX2O)X4ClX2]X+, and the anion is the single free ClX−.
The structural formula is:
[Cr(HX2O)X4ClX2]Cl
- Check the conductance. In solution, this dissociates into:
[Cr(HX2O)X4ClX2]Cl[Cr(HX2O)X4ClX2]X++ClX−
That’s exactly two ions — matches the conductance clue.
- Check the precipitation. Only the free ClX− reacts with AgNOX3: ClX−+AgNOX3AgCl↓+NOX3X− …
Method: Conductance & Precipitation Analysis for Coordination Compound Structure
This problem uses conductance and precipitation data to deduce the coordination sphere and counter ions.
Step 1: Interpret the conductance data
- Molar conductance corresponds to two ions total in solution.
- This means the complex dissociates into 1 cation + 1 anion (or possibly 2 ions of opposite charge).
- The complex must have only one ion outside the coordination sphere.
Step 2: Interpret the precipitation data
- CrCl3⋅4H2O treated with AgNO3 gives silver chloride precipitate.
- This means chloride ions are present outside the coordination sphere (free Cl− ions).
- The precipitate confirms that at least one Cl− is ionic (not coordinated).
Step 3: Determine the coordination sphere
- Total composition: CrCl3⋅4H2O → 1 Cr, 3 Cl, 4 H₂O.
- Chromium(III) has coordination number 6 (common for Cr3+).
- The coordination sphere must contain 6 ligands (water molecules and/or chloride ions).
Let the formula be: [Cr(H2O)xCly]Clz⋅(4−x)H2O
- Total water: x+(4−x)=4 ✓
- Total chloride: y+z=3
- Coordination number: x+y=6
Step 4: Solve for x, y, z
From x+y=6 and y+z=3:
- Possible integer solutions:
- If z=1 (one ionic Cl−), then y=2, x=4 → [Cr(H2O)4Cl2]Cl
- If z=2, then y=1, x=5 → but x cannot exceed 4 (only 4 water molecules total)
- If z=3, then y=0, x=6 → impossible (only 4 water molecules) …
Here are the common mistakes students make on this Coordination Compound Nomenclature problem, along with how to avoid each.
1. Mistake: Misinterpreting the Conductivity Data
The error: Students see “molar conductance corresponds to a total of two ions” and think the compound has only two atoms or that the complex itself is a single ion.
Why it’s wrong: Conductance tells you the number of ions in solution, not the number of atoms. “Two ions” means the compound dissociates into one cation and one anion (like NaCl → 2 ions).
How to avoid:
- Remember: Conductance ∝ number of ions.
- “Two ions” = 1 cation + 1 anion.
- For CrCl3⋅4H2O, the total ions must be 2, so the complex must be neutral overall (no extra counterions beyond the complex itself).
2. Mistake: Forgetting the Role of Water in Coordination Sphere
The error: Students treat all 4 water molecules as lattice water (outside the coordination sphere) or, conversely, put all 4 inside the sphere without checking charge balance.
Why it’s wrong:
- If all 4 water are outside, the complex would be [CrCl3(H2O)4] — but then the complex is neutral, and there are no free ions → conductance would be near zero (not 2 ions).
- If all 4 water are inside, the complex might be [Cr(H2O)4Cl2]+ with one free Cl− → that gives 2 ions (correct number), but then the precipitation test fails (see next mistake).
How to avoid:
- Water can be inside (coordinated) or outside (lattice).
- Use the precipitation test to decide:
- AgNO3 precipitates only free chloride ions (outside the coordination sphere).
- Count how many Cl− are free → that tells you how many are outside.
3. Mistake: Ignoring the Silver Nitrate Test
The error: Students write a formula that gives 2 ions but doesn’t match the precipitation result.
Example: [Cr(H2O)4Cl2]Cl gives 2 ions ([Cr(H2O)4Cl2]+ and Cl−), but it would precipitate 1 mole of AgCl per mole of compound. The problem says it precipitates silver chloride — but doesn’t say how much. However, the key is: if all chloride were free, you’d get 3 AgCl. The fact that it precipitates at all means at least one Cl− is free.
How to avoid:
- The precipitation test tells you how many chloride ions are outside the coordination sphere.
- Here, the compound precipitates AgCl → at least one Cl− is free.
- Combined with “2 ions total”, the only possibility is:
- Complex cation: [Cr(H2O)4Cl2]+
- Free anion: Cl−
- Total ions = 2 ✓
- Free Cl⁻ = 1 → precipitates AgCl ✓
4. Mistake: Wrong Oxidation State of Chromium
The error: Students assign Cr an oxidation state that doesn’t match the formula or charge balance.
Why it’s wrong:
- In CrCl3⋅4H2O, total charge = 0.
- If the complex is [Cr(H2O)4Cl2]+Cl−, the complex cation has charge +1.
- Let oxidation state of Cr be x: x+4(0)+2(−1)=+1⟹x−2=+1⟹x=+3
- Cr is in +3 oxidation state (common for Cr).
How to avoid:
- Always write the charge balance equation.
- Remember: H2O is neutral, Cl− is -1.
- Common Cr states: +2, +3, +6. Here it’s +3.
5. Mistake: Incorrect Naming (IUPAC)
The error: Students name the compound incorrectly — e.g., “Tetraaquadichlorochromium(III) chloride” but forget parentheses, oxidation state notation, or alphabetical order.
Common naming errors:
- Writing “tetraaquadichloro” without hyphen or wrong order.
- Forgetting the Roman numeral for oxidation state.
- Writing “chromium” before ligands (ligands come first).
- Not using “-ate” for anionic complexes (not needed here, it’s cationic).
Correct name:
Tetraaquadichloridochromium(III) chloride
(Note: “chlorido” is IUPAC preferred over “chloro”, but “chloro” is still accepted in many Indian exams — check your syllabus.)
How to avoid:
- Follow IUPAC order: ligands alphabetically → metal → oxidation state in Roman numerals.
- Use aquo for H2O, chlorido or chloro for Cl−. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-AN1 markMCQQ.Choose the correct formula for tris (ethane-1, 2-diamine) cobalt (III) hexacyanido ferrate (II) (A) [Co(en)3][Fe(CN)6] (B) [Co(en)3]2[Fe(CN)6]3 (C) [Co(en)3]3[Fe(CN)6]2 (D) [Co(en)3]4[Fe(CN)6]3
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests naming-to-formula conversion for coordination compounds — figuring out ligand charges, metal oxidation states, and then balancing overall charge between cation and anion. The answer is [Co(en)3]4[Fe(CN)6]3.
Concept and Intuition
When a coordination compound's name specifies both a cationic complex and an anionic complex (as here — cobalt complex is the cation, ferrate complex is the anion), the overall salt must be electrically neutral. You find each complex ion's own charge first, then combine cation and anion in whatever whole-number ratio makes the total charge zero — exactly like balancing a simple ionic salt such as Al2O3 (from Al3+ and O2−).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Cation — tris(ethane-1,2-diamine)cobalt(III): "ethane-1,2-diamine" (en) is a neutral bidentate ligand (NH2CH2CH2NH2), and "tris" means three of them are attached: [Co(en)3]. The oxidation state of cobalt is given as (III), i.e. +3. Since en is neutral, the whole complex ion carries the metal's charge: [Co(en)3]3+.
- Anion — hexacyanidoferrate(II): "hexacyanido" means six CN− ligands, each carrying −1 charge, i.e. −6 total from ligands. "ferrate(II)" tells us iron is in the +2 state. Net charge of the complex ion =+2+(−6)=−4: [Fe(CN)6]4−. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-19-AN1 markMCQQ.The IUPAC name of [PtCl2(H2N−CH2−CH2−NH2)2](NO3)2 is (A) Bis (ethane - 1,2 - diamine)dichloridoplatinum (IV) nitrate (B) Bis(ethane - 1,2 - diamine)dichloridoplatinum (IV) dinitrate (C) Dichloridobis (ethane - 1,2 - diamine)platinum (IV) nitrate (D) Dichloridobis(ethane - 1,2 - diamine)platinum (IV) dinitrate
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests IUPAC coordination nomenclature: computing the metal's oxidation state and applying the alphabetical-ligand-order + no-prefix-on-a-Stock-named-counter-ion rules. Answer: Dichloridobis(ethane-1,2-diamine)platinum(IV) nitrate.
Concept and Intuition
A coordination compound name is built as [cationic complex or ligands][metal(oxidation state)] [anion]. Two separate rules govern it here: (1) ligands inside the complex are cited in alphabetical order by the ligand's own name, ignoring any multiplying prefix (mono/di/bis, tris...); (2) once the metal's oxidation state is stated in Roman numerals (Stock notation), the charge of the whole complex ion is fixed, so the number of counter-ions needed to balance it is implicit and is NOT restated with a multiplying prefix on the counter-ion's name.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Ligands: Cl− (chlorido, charge −1 each, two of them) and en = ethane-1,2-diamine (neutral, a bidentate ligand named with "bis" since its own name contains a numerical locant "1,2").
- Overall salt is [PtCl2(en)2](NO3)2, so the complex cation carries +2 charge (two nitrate anions balance it).
- Let Pt oxidation state be x: x+2(−1)+2(0)=+2⇒x=+4. So it's platinum(IV).
- Ligand naming: "chlorido" for Cl− ×2 → "dichlorido"; "ethane-1,2-diamine" ×2 → "bis(ethane-1,2-diamine)" (bis is used, not "di", because the ligand name itself already has numbers in it — using "di" would be ambiguous).
- Alphabetical citation order compares "chlorido" (c) vs "ethane-1,2-diamine" (e): c precedes e, so chlorido-containing part is written first: "Dichloridobis(ethane-1,2-diamine)platinum(IV)". …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-26-AN1 markMCQQ.The IUPAC name of the complex shown below is K3[Co(ox)3] (A) Tripotassium trioxalatocobaltate (III) (B) Potassium trioxalatecobaltate (III) (C) Potassium trioxalatecobalt (III) (D) Potassium trioxalatocobaltate (III)
›Reveal solutionSolution
IUPAC naming of coordination compounds: ligand 'oxalato' × 3 = 'trioxalato', anionic complex metal gets the '-ate' suffix ('cobaltate'), oxidation state by charge balance is +3, and the counter-cation 'potassium' is stated without a multiplying prefix — giving Potassium trioxalatocobaltate(III).
Concept and Intuition
Coordination-compound IUPAC names follow a fixed template: cation first, then ligands alphabetically with multiplying prefixes (bis/tris for complex ligand names, di/tri for simple ones like oxalato), then the metal name — with the special rule that if the complex ion is an anion, the metal name is modified to end in '-ate' (e.g. cobalt → cobaltate, iron → ferrate), followed by the oxidation state in Roman numerals in brackets.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Formula: K3[Co(ox)3], where 'ox' = oxalate ion (C2O42−), a bidentate ligand named 'oxalato' in coordination nomenclature.
- Charge balance: complex ion is [Co(ox)3]3− (balanced by 3 K+). Let Co oxidation state be x: x+3(−2)=−3⇒x=+3.
- Ligand prefix: three oxalato ligands → 'trioxalato' (using tri- since oxalato is a simple, unsubstituted ligand name).
- Since the complex ion is an anion, the metal name takes the anionic suffix: cobalt → 'cobaltate'.
- Combine: 'trioxalatocobaltate', with oxidation state (III) in brackets: 'trioxalatocobaltate(III)'. …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-16-FN1 markMCQQ.The formula of tris (ethane -1,2- diamine) cobalt (III) sulphate is: (A) [Co(H2NCH2CH2NH2)3]SO4 (B) [Co(H2NCH2CH2NH2)3]3(SO3)2 (C) [Co(CH3CH2NHNH2)3]2(SO4)3 (D) [Co(H2NCH2CH2NH2)3]2(SO4)3
›Reveal solutionSolution
The complex cation [Co(en)₃]³⁺ needs 2 cations for every 3 sulphate ions to balance charge, giving [Co(en)₃]₂(SO₄)₃.
Concept and Intuition
"Ethane-1,2-diamine" (en) is the neutral bidentate ligand H2NCH2CH2NH2. Cobalt(III) with three such neutral ligands gives a complex cation charge equal to the metal's oxidation state alone: [Co(en)3]3+. To form a neutral salt with sulphate (SO42−), the overall charges must balance using the smallest whole-number ratio — LCM of 3 and 2 is 6, so 2 cations (total +6) balance 3 sulphates (total −6).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Write the complex cation: [Co(H2NCH2CH2NH2)3]3+ (Co³⁺ + 3 neutral en ligands).
- Sulphate anion charge: SO42−.
- Balance charges: need ratio such that 2×3=3×2=6 → 2 cations : 3 sulphates. …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-17-AN1 markMCQQ.IUPAC name of [Pt(NH3)2Cl(NH2CH3)]Cl is (A) (Amino methane) chloro (diammine) platinum (II) chlolide (B) Chlorodiammine (methanamine) platinum (II) chloride (C) Diamminechloro (methanamine) platinum (II) chloride (D) Diamminechloro (methylamine) platinum (IV) chloride
›Reveal solutionSolution
Naming ligands alphabetically (ammine, chloro, methanamine) and computing Pt's oxidation state as +2 gives Diamminechloro(methanamine)platinum(II) chloride.
Concept and Intuition
IUPAC coordination nomenclature: (1) name ligands alphabetically using IUPAC ligand names (ignoring di/tri prefixes for alphabetization); (2) anionic ligands get '-o' suffix (chloro for Cl-); (3) metal oxidation state deduced from charge balance; (4) counter-ion named last.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Ligands in [Pt(NH3)2Cl(NH2CH3)]Cl: two NH3 (ammine, neutral), one Cl− (chloro, -1), one NH2CH3 = methanamine (neutral, the IUPAC ligand name for methylamine).
- Alphabetize ignoring 'di': ammine (a) < chloro (c) < methanamine (m) -> "diamminechloro(methanamine)". …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-05-FN1 markMCQQ.The homoleptic complex in the following is (A) [Co(NH3)4Br2]⊕ (B) [Co(C2O4)(NH3)4]⊕ (C) [Co(NH3)6]3⊕ (D) [Co(CN)4Cl2]⊖
›Reveal solutionSolution
A homoleptic complex has all identical ligands; only [Co(NH3)6]3+ qualifies among the given options.
Concept and Intuition
Coordination complexes are classified as homoleptic (all ligands of one single type bound to the metal) or heteroleptic (two or more different kinds of ligands). This is purely a matter of reading off the ligands present in each formula and checking whether they are all the same species.
Step-by-Step Solution
- [Co(NH3)4Br2]+ — ligands present: NH3 and Br− (two types) → heteroleptic.
- [Co(C2O4)(NH3)4]+ — ligands present: oxalate (C2O42−) and NH3 (two types) → heteroleptic.
- [Co(NH3)6]3+ — ligand present: only NH3, six of them → homoleptic. …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-07-FN1 markMCQQ.The IUPAC name of the following complex is [Co(NH2CH2CH2NH2)2Br2]Br (A) Bis (ethane-1, 2- diamine) dibromido cobalt (III) bromide (B) Di (ethane-1, 2- diamine) dibromido cobalt (III) bromide (C) Tribromido bis (ethane-1, 2- diamine) cobalt (III) (D) Dibromido bis (elthylene diamine) cobalt (III) bromide
›Reveal solutionSolution
The oxidation state of Co is +3 (from a +1 complex cation with two neutral en and two Br− ligands), and IUPAC alphabetical ligand ordering puts "bromido" before "(ethylenediamine)," giving dibromidobis(ethylenediamine)cobalt(III) bromide.
Concept and Intuition
Naming a coordination compound requires: (1) determining the metal's oxidation state from overall charge balance, (2) naming ligands with multiplying prefixes (di-, tri- for simple ligands; bis-, tris- for more complex/substituted ligand names like ethylenediamine, to avoid ambiguity), and (3) listing ligands in strict alphabetical order by ligand name (ignoring the multiplying prefix), followed by the metal name+oxidation state, then the counter-ion name.
Step-by-Step Solution
- The compound is [Co(en)2Br2]Br — one Br− is outside the coordination sphere (counter-ion), so the complex cation is [Co(en)2Br2]+.
- Charge balance inside the bracket: en is neutral (×2 = 0), Br− ligands contribute −2 (×2), so Co+0−2=+1⇒Co=+3.
- Ligand names: "ethylenediamine" (a bidentate amine, needs "bis" not "di" since its name itself could be ambiguous with a simple prefix) and "bromido" for Br−.
- Alphabetical order of ligand names (ignoring multiplying prefixes): "bromido" (b) before "ethylenediamine" (e). …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-08-AN1 markMCQQ.The IUPAC name of the following complex is [Cr(NH3)3(H2O)2Cl]Cl2 (A) Triamminediaqua chlorido chromium (III) chloride (B) Diaquatriammine chlorido chromium (III) chloride (C) Chlorido diaquatriammine chromium (III) chloride (D) Triammine diaqua trichlorido chromium (III)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Naming [Cr(NH3)3(H2O)2Cl]Cl2 requires listing ligands alphabetically (ammine, aqua, chlorido) with multiplying prefixes, then the oxidation state of Cr (found by charge balance) in Roman numerals, followed by the anion name — giving "triamminediaquachloridochromium(III) chloride".
Concept and Intuition
IUPAC naming of coordination compounds lists ligands in alphabetical order (by the first letter of the ligand name itself, ignoring multiplying prefixes like di-/tri-), followed by the name of the central metal with its oxidation state in Roman numerals in parentheses, and finally the counter-ion name (as a separate word) if the complex is a cation. The oxidation state of the metal is found by balancing charges: neutral ligands (NH₃, H₂O) contribute 0, anionic ligands contribute their charge, and the sum plus the metal's oxidation state must equal the overall charge of the complex ion.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Identify ligands inside the bracket: 3 NH₃ ("ammine" ×3 → "triammine"), 2 H₂O ("aqua" ×2 → "diaqua"), 1 Cl⁻ ("chlorido").
- Alphabetize by ligand name ignoring prefixes: compare "ammine", "aqua", "chlorido" — a-m-m... vs a-q-u-a: 'm' precedes 'q', so "ammine" comes before "aqua"; "chlorido" (starting with 'c') comes after both 'a' words. Order: ammine, aqua, chlorido.
- Combine with multiplying prefixes in that order: "triamminediaquachlorido".
- Determine oxidation state of Cr: the compound is neutral with 2 Cl⁻ as counter ions outside the bracket, so the complex ion charge is +2. Inside the bracket: 3(NH₃, 0) + 2(H₂O, 0) + 1(Cl⁻, −1) = −1. So Cr + (−1) = +2 → Cr = +3.
- Complete metal name: "chromium(III)". …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.