Q.If ey(x+1)=1, show that dx2d2y=(dxdy)2.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Implicit Differentiation
Implicit Differentiation
When y isn't alone
You can differentiate y=x2+3x term by term because y is written explicitly in terms of x. But an equation like x2+y2=25, or x3+y3=6xy, does not give y by itself — solving for y is messy or downright impossible.
Implicit differentiation finds dxdy without isolating y: treat y as an unknown function of x, differentiate the whole equation as it stands, then solve for dxdy.
The one key move: y is really y(x)
Wherever y appears, picture y(x) hiding inside. Differentiating a y-term therefore needs the chain rule, which tacks on a factor of dxdy:
dxd(y2)=2ydxdy.
That extra dxdy on every y-term is the whole trick.
The procedure
- Differentiate both sides with respect to x, treating y as y(x).
- Each time you differentiate a y-term, multiply by dxdy (chain rule); use the product rule on mixed terms such as xy.
- Gather all dxdy terms on one side, everything else on the other.
- Factor out dxdy and divide.
Worked example
For x2+y2=25:
2x+2ydxdy=0⇒dxdy=−yx.
The answer naturally contains both x and y — that is normal here. To get the slope at a point on the curve, substitute the coordinates after differentiating; there is no need to solve for y first. …
Concept: Implicit Differentiation — differentiate both sides with respect to x, treating y as a function of x.
Step 1: Differentiate ey(x+1)=1 implicitly:
eydxdy(x+1)+ey⋅1=0
Factor ey:
ey[(x+1)dxdy+1]=0
Since ey=0, we get:
(x+1)dxdy+1=0⇒dxdy=−x+11
Step 2: Differentiate again with respect to x:
dx2d2y=dxd(−x+11)=(x+1)21 …
The key idea is to use implicit differentiation on ey(x+1)=1, then differentiate again and simplify using the first derivative to show the second derivative equals the square of the first derivative.
We start with the equation ey(x+1)=1. This is an implicit relation between x and y — we cannot easily solve for y in terms of x (though here we could, but implicit differentiation is cleaner). The goal is to prove that the second derivative dx2d2y equals (dxdy)2.
The intuition: implicit differentiation lets us differentiate both sides with respect to x, treating y as a function of x. Every time we differentiate y, we multiply by dxdy (chain rule). Then we differentiate again, and the algebra should collapse nicely.
Let’s work through it.
- Differentiate once. Given: ey(x+1)=1. Differentiate both sides with respect to x:
dxd[ey(x+1)]=dxd[1]=0.
Use the product rule:
dxd(ey)⋅(x+1)+ey⋅dxd(x+1)=0.
Now dxd(ey)=eydxdy (chain rule), and dxd(x+1)=1. So:
eydxdy(x+1)+ey⋅1=0.
Factor ey:
ey[(x+1)dxdy+1]=0.
Since ey>0 for all real y, we can divide by ey:
(x+1)dxdy+1=0.
So the first derivative is:
dxdy=−x+11.
Notice that from the original equation ey(x+1)=1, we have x+1=e−y, so x+1 is never zero. This division is safe.
- Differentiate again. We need dx2d2y. Differentiate the equation (x+1)dxdy+1=0 with respect to x:
dxd[(x+1)dxdy]+dxd[1]=0.
Use the product rule on the first term:
dxd(x+1)⋅dxdy+(x+1)⋅dxd(dxdy)=0.
That is:
1⋅dxdy+(x+1)dx2d2y=0.
So:
(x+1)dx2d2y+dxdy=0.
Rearranging:
dx2d2y=−x+11⋅dxdy. …
Method: Implicit Differentiation Twice, Substituting Back
For an equation relating x and y (with no way to isolate y cleanly, or where it's cleaner not to), differentiate implicitly to get y1 in terms of x (and possibly y), then differentiate that equation again — and substitute the first-derivative relation back in to simplify.
Steps
Step 1: Differentiate the given relation implicitly to find y1
Use the product rule and chain rule as needed, remembering every y-term picks up a factor of y1.
Step 2: Differentiate the Step-1 equation again (not just the isolated y1 formula) to bring in y2
Step 3: Substitute the known value/expression for y1 back into the y2 equation to reach the final simplified relation …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Forgetting the product rule when differentiating (x+1)y1 a second time.
Why it's wrong: (x+1)y1 is a product of two functions of x (both (x+1) and y1 vary), so its derivative needs the product rule — treating (x+1) as if it were a fixed constant on the second pass loses the y1 term entirely. Correct approach: write dxd[(x+1)y1]=y1+(x+1)y2 explicitly.
Mistake 2: Not substituting the first-derivative expression back into the second-derivative equation. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-19-AN1 markMCQQ.If log(1+x2−x)=y(1+x2), then (1+x2)dxdy+xy= (A) 0 (B) 1 (C) 2 (D) −1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Implicit differentiation of log(1+x2−x)=y1+x2, using (1+x2−x)(1+x2+x)=1, collapses directly to the requested combination. Answer: −1.
Concept and Intuition
Writing s=1+x2 turns the relation into log(s−x)=ys, a compact form whose derivative — after using the identity s2−x2=1 — telescopes into exactly the expression (1+x2)y′+xy asked for.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let s=1+x2; then s′=sx and s2−x2=1⇒(s−x)(s+x)=1⇒s−x1=s+x.
- Given: log(s−x)=ys. Differentiate both sides w.r.t. x: s−xs′−1=y′s+ys′ …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-15-AN1 markMCQQ.If xxyy=ee, then (dx2d2y)(e,e)= (A) e1(dxdy)(e,e) (B) (dxdy)(e,e)+e1 (C) (dxdy)(e,e)−e1 (D) e(dxdy)(e,e)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Logarithmic differentiation of xxyy=ee twice, evaluated at (e,e), shows the second derivative equals e1 times the first derivative there.
Concept and Intuition
Expressions like xx are best handled by taking logs first (since log(xx)=xlogx is much easier to differentiate than xx directly). Implicit differentiation then relates y′ and y′′ through the resulting equation.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Take log: xlogx+ylogy=log(ee)=e (a constant).
- Differentiate w.r.t. x: (logx+1)+(logy+1)y′=0.
- Solve: y′=−logy+1logx+1. At (e,e): loge=1, so y′=−22=−1.
- Differentiate the relation (logx+1)+(logy+1)y′=0 again w.r.t. x: x1+y(y′)2+(logy+1)y′′=0. …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-19-AN1 markMCQQ.If x2+y2=1, then ______. (A) y(y′′)−4(y′)2+1=0 (B) y(y′′)+(y′)2+1=0 (C) y(y′′)−(y′)2−1=0 (D) y(y′′)+2(y′)2+1=0
›Reveal solutionSolution
Differentiating the circle equation x2+y2=1 twice implicitly gives the differential equation yy′′+(y′)2+1=0.
Concept and Intuition
Any implicit curve, when differentiated repeatedly with respect to x treating y as a function of x, yields a differential equation that the curve satisfies. Here we just need to differentiate twice and simplify.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Start with x2+y2=1.
- Differentiate with respect to x: 2x+2yy′=0⟹x+yy′=0.
- Differentiate again with respect to x: 1+(y′)2+yy′′=0 (using the product rule on yy′, which gives y′⋅y′+y⋅y′′).
- So the relation is yy′′+(y′)2+1=0. …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-06-FN1 markMCQQ.m is the slope of a tangent to the curve ey=1+x2 at x=1 then m= (A) log22 (B) log2 (C) 2 (D) 1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Implicit differentiation of ey=1+x2 gives slope 2x/(1+x2), which is 1 at x=1.
Concept and Intuition
This is a straightforward implicit differentiation: differentiate both sides with respect to x, treating y as a function of x, then substitute the known relation back in to eliminate ey.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Differentiate ey=1+x2 with respect to x: eydxdy=2x.
- So dxdy=ey2x=1+x22x (substituting ey=1+x2 from the original equation). …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-22-AN1 markMCQQ.If x−xy+y−xy=1, then dxdy= (A) −x−x2y−y2 (B) −1−x21−y2 (C) −1−x1−y (D) −x+yx−y
›Reveal solutionSolution
Squaring the constraint reveals that it forces x+y=1 identically, so dxdy=−1 throughout; matching this against the options singles out −x−x2y−y2, since it equals −1 for every point satisfying y=1−x.
Concept and Intuition
Rather than blindly grinding through implicit differentiation of two square roots, it pays to first understand the curve itself. Squaring x−xy+y−xy=1 carefully (using s=x+y,p=xy) collapses to a perfect square equalling zero, revealing that the relation is nothing but the straight line x+y=1. Once we know that, dxdy=−1 is immediate, and we just need to find which option reduces to −1 on this line.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Square the given equation:
x(1−y)+y(1−x)+2xy(1−x)(1−y)=1
x+y−2xy+2xy(1−x)(1−y)=1
- Let s=x+y, p=xy. Then:
2p(1−x)(1−y)=1−s+2p
Note (1−x)(1−y)=1−s+p. Squaring again:
4p(1−s+p)=(1−s+2p)2
Let q=1−s. Expanding both sides: LHS =4pq+4p2; RHS =q2+4pq+4p2. So 0=q2, i.e. q=0, i.e. s=1.
3. Hence x+y=1 is forced — the given relation is the line y=1−x (restricted to the domain where the square roots are real, 0≤x,y≤1).
4. Differentiating y=1−x directly: dxdy=−1.
5. Check which option gives −1 identically along y=1−x:
- (A): y−y2=y(1−y). Substituting y=1−x: y(1−y)=(1−x)⋅x=x−x2. So the ratio is exactly 1, and −1=−1 for every x. ✓ …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-10-05-FN1 markMCQQ.If yyy⋅⋅⋅∞=log{x+log{x+⋯}}, then dxdy at x=e2−2, y=2 equals _____ (A) 22(e2−1)log2 (B) 22(e2−1)1−log2 (C) e2−12(1−log2) (D) 2(e2−1)log2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Both sides define the same implicit quantity u via a self-referential equation; differentiate each side's defining equation implicitly and combine using the chain rule. The answer is (B).
Concept and Intuition
The infinite power tower yyy⋯=u satisfies the self-consistency equation u=yu (the tower "regenerates" itself). Likewise the infinite nested logarithm log{x+log{x+⋯}}=u satisfies u=log(x+u). Since the problem states these two quantities are equal (both equal to the same u), u is implicitly a common function linking x and y; differentiating each defining relation gives du/dy and du/dx, and the chain rule combines them into dy/dx.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Verify u=2 at the given point. Nested log: u=log(x+u) at x=e2−2: try u=2: log(e2−2+2)=log(e2)=2 ✓. Tower: u=yu at y=2: try u=2: (2)2=2 ✓. Both consistent with u=2.
- Differentiate the tower relation u=yu w.r.t. y. Take log: logu=ulogy. Differentiate: u1dydu=dydulogy+yu ⇒(u1−logy)dydu=yu⇒dydu=y(1−ulogy)u2. At y=2, u=2: dydu=2(1−2log2)4=2(1−ln2)4=1−ln222. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-AN1 markMCQQ.If x2+y2=t+t1 and x4+y4=t2+t21, then x3ydxdy= (A) -1 (B) 0 (C) 1 (D) 2
›Reveal solutionSolution
The two given relations force x2y2=1 (i.e. xy is constant), from which x3ydy/dx=−1.
Concept and Intuition
Rather than solving for x,y in terms of t explicitly, combine the two given equations algebraically (square the first, subtract the second) to eliminate t entirely and land on a simple constant-product relation between x and y.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Square the first relation: (x2+y2)2=(t+t1)2=t2+2+t21, i.e.
x4+2x2y2+y4=t2+2+t21
- The second given relation is x4+y4=t2+t21.
- Subtract: 2x2y2=(t2+2+t21)−(t2+t21)=2, so x2y2=1.
- This means xy=±1, a constant independent of t. Differentiate xy=const implicitly: …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-21-AN1 markMCQQ.If x2+y2=t−t1 and x4+y4=t2+t21, then dxdy= (A) xy (B) x2y2 (C) xy (D) −xy
›Reveal solutionSolution
Eliminating the parameter t between the two given equations produces the direct relation x2y2=−1 between x and y, whose implicit derivative is −y/x.
Concept and Intuition
When x and y are both linked to a parameter t through two equations, differentiating each with respect to t separately (and dividing) works, but it is often faster — and here it is exact — to first eliminate t algebraically to get a direct x–y relation, then differentiate that implicitly in the ordinary way.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Square the first equation: (x2+y2)2=(t−t1)2=t2−2+t21, i.e. x4+2x2y2+y4=t2+t21−2.
- The second equation says x4+y4=t2+t21. Substitute this in: (t2+t21)+2x2y2=t2+t21−2.
- This forces 2x2y2=−2⇒x2y2=−1 — a t-free relation directly linking x and y. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-FN1 markMCQQ.If Tan−1x2+Tan−1y2=2π, then (dxdy)(−1,2)= (A) 0 (B) 1 (C) 21 (D) −21
›Reveal solutionSolution
Reducing to y2=x−2 gives dxdy=−x3y1, which at (−1,2) equals 21.
Concept and Intuition
If Tan−1a+Tan−1b=2π with a,b>0, then Tan−1b=2π−Tan−1a=Cot−1a, so b=a1. Applying this to a=x2, b=y2 collapses the relation into an algebraic one.
Step-by-Step Solution
- From Tan−1x2+Tan−1y2=2π we get y2=x21=x−2.
- Differentiate: 2ydxdy=−2x−3.
- Hence dxdy=−x3y1. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-24-FN1 markMCQQ.If x2+y2+siny=4, then the value of dx2d2y at x=−2 is (A) −30 (B) −34 (C) −32 (D) −18
›Reveal solutionSolution
Implicit differentiation of x2+y2+siny=4 twice, using y(−2)=0 and y′(−2)=4, gives y′′(−2)=−34.
Concept and Intuition
For an implicitly-defined curve, we differentiate the whole equation with respect to x (treating y as a function of x and applying the chain rule to every y-term), solve for y′, then differentiate the resulting equation again to get y′′. The key first step is always finding the actual point (x0,y0) on the curve, since y′ and y′′ are evaluated there.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Find y at x=−2: substituting x=−2 into x2+y2+siny=4: 4+y2+siny=4⇒y2+siny=0. Clearly y=0 satisfies this (and is the relevant branch), so y(−2)=0.
- First derivative: differentiate x2+y2+siny=4 w.r.t. x:
2x+2yy′+cosy⋅y′=0⟹y′(2y+cosy)=−2x⟹y′=2y+cosy−2x.
At (x,y)=(−2,0): y′=2(0)+cos0−2(−2)=14=4.
3. Second derivative: differentiate 2x+2yy′+cosy⋅y′=0 again w.r.t. x, using the product rule on both 2yy′ and cosy⋅y′: …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-23-AN1 markMCQQ.If y=logyx, then dxdy= ______ (A) xlogy1 (B) x(1+logy)logy (C) x(1+logy)1 (D) 1+logy1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Rewriting y=logyx as ylny=lnx and differentiating implicitly gives dxdy=x(1+logy)1.
Concept and Intuition
logyx means "logarithm of x to base y", i.e. lnylnx. So the given relation y=logyx really means y=lnylnx, or equivalently ylny=lnx — a cleaner form to differentiate implicitly, since it avoids a quotient with y in both places.
Step-by-Step Solution
- y=logyx=lnylnx⇒ylny=lnx.
- Differentiate both sides with respect to x, treating y as a function of x:
dxd(ylny)=dxd(lnx)
- LHS (product rule): dxdylny+y⋅y1dxdy=dxdy(lny+1).
- RHS: x1.
- So dxdy(lny+1)=x1⇒dxdy=x(1+lny)1=x(1+logy)1. …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-25-FN1 markMCQQ.If y=x+x+x+⋯∞, then dxdy= (A) y1 (B) x1 (C) 2x−11 (D) 2y−11
›Reveal solutionSolution
The infinite nested radical satisfies y2=x+y (self-similarity), which is then differentiated implicitly.
Concept and Intuition
An infinitely repeating nested expression under a radical satisfies a self-referential equation: the whole expression y equals the same structure with x+y under the first radical (since removing the outermost layer just reproduces y again).
Step-by-Step Solution
- y=x+x+x+⋯=x+y (the inner infinite tail is again y).
- Square both sides: y2=x+y.
- Differentiate implicitly with respect to x: 2ydxdy=1+dxdy.
- Collect: dxdy(2y−1)=1⇒dxdy=2y−11. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.