Q.If y=(tan−1x)2, show that (x2+1)2y2+2x(x2+1)y1=2. Miscellaneous Examples
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Successive Differentiation
Successive Differentiation — Repeated Slopes
Differentiate a function, then differentiate the result, then differentiate that, and so on. Each pass produces a new function describing a deeper layer of change. The physics picture makes it concrete: position → velocity (1st derivative) → acceleration (2nd) → jerk (3rd). Every step asks the same question: "how does the previous rate of change itself change?"
The definition and notation
If y=f(x), its successive derivatives are written y1,y2,…,yn, equivalently f′(x),f′′(x),…,f(n)(x) or dxdy,dx2d2y,…,dxndny. Each one is the derivative of the previous:
dxndny=dxd(dxn−1dn−1y).
| Order | Leibniz | Lagrange | Newton |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | dxdy | f′(x) | y˙ |
| 2nd | dx2d2y | f′′(x) | y¨ |
| nth | dxndny | f(n)(x) | — |
Seeing the pattern
Take y=x4: y1=4x3,y2=12x2,y3=24x,y4=24,y5=0. Each differentiation drops the degree by one, so a degree-n polynomial has a constant nth derivative and vanishing higher ones. Other families behave differently: eax never dies out (dxndneax=aneax), and sinx cycles every four steps (sin→cos→−sin→−cos).
Power rule applied n times: dxndn(xm)=m(m−1)⋯(m−n+1)xm−n for n≤m.
dx2d2y is not (dxdy)2 — a second derivative is not the square of the first derivative. …
Concept: Successive Differentiation — we differentiate the given function twice and substitute into the expression.
Step 1:
y=(tan−1x)2
First derivative:
y1=2tan−1x⋅1+x21=1+x22tan−1x
Step 2:
Differentiate y1 using the quotient rule:
y2=(1+x2)2(1+x2)⋅1+x22−(2tan−1x)(2x)=(1+x2)22−4xtan−1x
Step 3:
Multiply y2 by (x2+1)2 and y1 by 2x(x2+1):
(x2+1)2y2=2−4xtan−1x …
The key idea is to use successive differentiation (Leibniz's rule) on the derivative of y=(tan−1x)2. By first finding y1 and then differentiating again, we can eliminate the inverse tangent terms and obtain the required relation. The final result is that (x2+1)2y2+2x(x2+1)y1=2 holds true.
Why This Approach Works
When you see a problem asking you to "show that" a differential relation holds, the natural instinct is to start differentiating directly. But here, y=(tan−1x)2 — if you differentiate twice in the obvious way, you'll get messy expressions involving tan−1x and rational functions. The trick is to notice that the derivative of tan−1x is 1+x21, which is a clean rational function. So by differentiating once, we get y1 in terms of tan−1x and 1+x2. Then, instead of differentiating y1 directly, we can multiply through by (1+x2) to simplify the algebra before taking the second derivative.
This is a classic technique: clear the denominator first, then differentiate. It avoids nested fractions and keeps the work tidy.
Step-by-Step Solution
1. Write down the given function and find the first derivative.
We have y=(tan−1x)2. Differentiate with respect to x:
y1=dxdy=2(tan−1x)⋅1+x21=1+x22tan−1x.
2. Multiply both sides by (1+x2) to prepare for the next differentiation.
This step is the key insight. Instead of differentiating y1 as a fraction, we write:
(1+x2)y1=2tan−1x.
Now the right-hand side is just 2tan−1x, which is much simpler to differentiate.
3. Differentiate this new equation to find y2.
Differentiate both sides of (1+x2)y1=2tan−1x with respect to x. Use the product rule on the left:
dxd[(1+x2)y1]=(1+x2)y2+(2x)y1.
The right-hand side differentiates to:
dxd[2tan−1x]=1+x22.
So we have: …
Method: Verifying a Relation Involving (x2+1) Factors (Clear the Denominator First)
Same trick as for logarithmic-argument ODEs: when the first derivative comes out as a fraction, multiply through by the denominator before differentiating a second time, rather than applying the quotient rule directly to a messy fraction.
Steps
Step 1: Find y1
For y=(tan−1x)2, the chain rule gives y1=1+x22tan−1x.
Step 2: Multiply both sides by (1+x2) to clear the denominator
(1+x2)y1=2tan−1x — now the right-hand side is simple to differentiate. …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Applying the quotient rule directly to y1=1+x22tan−1x instead of clearing the denominator first.
Why it's wrong: the quotient rule here produces a much messier expression that is far more error-prone to simplify down to the required form. Correct approach: multiply by (1+x2) first so the next differentiation only needs the product rule on a simple product.
Mistake 2: Forgetting the chain-rule factor 1+x21 when first differentiating (tan−1x)2. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-21-AN1 markMCQQ.If y=sin−1x then (1−x2)y2−xy1= (A) 0 (B) 1 (C) 2 (D) 2y
›Reveal solutionSolution
y=sin−1x satisfies (1−x2)y2−xy1=0 — a classic second-order ODE identity.
Concept and Intuition
Differentiating y=sin−1x once gives y1=1−x21, i.e. (1−x2)y12=1. Differentiating this relation again (implicitly) produces the required second-order identity — a standard result worth memorizing.
Step-by-Step Solution
- y1=1−x21⇒(1−x2)y12=1.
- Differentiate both sides w.r.t. x: −2xy12+(1−x2)⋅2y1y2=0.
- Divide by 2y1 (nonzero): −xy1+(1−x2)y2=0. …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-23-FN1 markMCQQ.If y=(tan−12x)2+(cot−12x)2, then (1+4x2)2y′′−16= (A) 8xy′ (B) −8x(1+4x2)y′ (C) 8x(1+4x2)y′ (D) −8xy′
›Reveal solutionSolution
Using tan−12x+cot−12x=π/2 collapses y to a quadratic in a=tan−12x; two differentiations and elimination of a give the required identity, matching option (B).
Concept and Intuition
Whenever a problem gives (tan−1u)2+(cot−1u)2, exploit the constant-sum identity tan−1u+cot−1u=π/2 to reduce two inverse-trig terms to one variable. This turns a messy-looking function into a clean quadratic, after which ordinary calculus (product/chain rule) finishes the job.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let a=tan−1(2x). Then cot−1(2x)=2π−a, so y=a2+(2π−a)2=2a2−πa+4π2.
- dxda=1+4x22. So y′=(4a−π)⋅1+4x22=D2(4a−π), where D=1+4x2.
- Let N=4a−π, so y′=2N/D. Differentiate again: dxdN=4⋅D2=D8, and dxdD=8x.
- y′′=2⋅D2N′D−ND′=2⋅D28−8xN=D216−16xN, so D2y′′=16−16xN. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-21-AN1 markMCQQ.If y=(ax+b)cosx, then y2+y1sin2x+y(1+sin2x)= (A) y2cos2x (B) y2sin2x (C) y1sin2x (D) ysin2x
›Reveal solutionSolution
Direct computation of y1,y2 from y=(ax+b)cosx and substitution shows the given combination collapses exactly to y2sin2x.
Concept and Intuition
This is a standard "verify the differential relation" problem: compute the first and second derivatives explicitly, then substitute back into the given combination and simplify using sin2x+cos2x=1 until only a multiple of y2 (or another named quantity) survives.
Step-by-Step Solution
- y=(ax+b)cosx.
- y1=acosx−(ax+b)sinx (product rule).
- y2=−asinx−[asinx+(ax+b)cosx]=−2asinx−(ax+b)cosx=−2asinx−y.
- Since y=(ax+b)cosx, we have ax+b=cosxy (for cosx=0).
- y1sin2x=[acosx−(ax+b)sinx]⋅2sinxcosx=2asinxcos2x−2(ax+b)sin2xcosx=2asinxcos2x−2ysin2x.
- Now sum: y2+y1sin2x+y(1+sin2x) =(−2asinx−y)+(2asinxcos2x−2ysin2x)+y+ysin2x =−2asinx(1−cos2x)+(−y+y)+(−2ysin2x+ysin2x) =−2asin3x−ysin2x. …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-20-FN1 markMCQQ.If y=tan(logx), then dx2d2y= (A) x2−sec2(logx)[1+2tanx] (B) x2sec2(logx)[1+tan(logx)] (C) x2sec(logx)[2tan(logx)−1] (D) x2sec2(logx)[2tan(logx)−1]
›Reveal solutionSolution
Repeated chain-rule differentiation of tan(logx); the trick is differentiating sec2(logx)/x correctly with the quotient rule.
Concept and Intuition
Every time we differentiate a function of logx, a factor of 1/x appears from the chain rule. So the second derivative naturally produces a 1/x2 term, and we must track how the inner derivative of sec2(logx) itself brings down another factor.
Step-by-Step Solution
- y=tan(logx)⇒y′=sec2(logx)⋅x1.
- Write y′=xsec2(logx) and differentiate using the quotient rule:
y′′=x2x⋅dxdsec2(logx)−sec2(logx)
- dxdsec2(logx)=2sec(logx)⋅sec(logx)tan(logx)⋅x1=x2sec2(logx)tan(logx).
- So x⋅dxdsec2(logx)=2sec2(logx)tan(logx). …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-07-FN1 markMCQQ.If y=tan(3tan−1x), then (1−3x2)dx2d2y−12xdxdy= (A) 6(x+y) (B) 6(y−x) (C) 6y (D) −6x
›Reveal solutionSolution
Writing y=tan(3tan−1x) explicitly as the rational function 1−3x23x−x3 and computing y′,y′′ directly shows that (1−3x2)y′′−12xy′ simplifies exactly to 6(y−x).
Concept and Intuition
Using the triple-angle identity for tangent, tan(3θ)=1−3tan2θ3tanθ−tan3θ, with θ=tan−1x (so tanθ=x), the whole expression becomes an explicit rational function of x. Rather than working abstractly with the differential equation, it is often faster to differentiate this closed form directly and simplify the target combination.
Step-by-Step Solution
- y=tan(3tan−1x)=1−3x23x−x3 (triple-angle formula for tangent).
- Differentiate using the quotient rule: with N=3x−x3,N′=3−3x2 and D=1−3x2,D′=−6x, y′=D2N′D−ND′=(1−3x2)2(3−3x2)(1−3x2)+6x(3x−x3). Expanding the numerator gives 3(1+x2)2, so y′=(1−3x2)23(1+x2)2.
- Differentiate again similarly to get y′′=(1−3x2)348x(1+x2).
- Compute (1−3x2)y′′=(1−3x2)248x(1+x2) and 12xy′=(1−3x2)236x(1+x2)2.
- Subtracting: (1−3x2)y′′−12xy′=(1−3x2)212x(1+x2)[4−3(1+x2)]=(1−3x2)212x(1+x2)(1−3x2)=1−3x212x(1+x2). …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-05-AN1 markMCQQ.If dxndny=yn and y=ex+e−x, then 4xy2+2y1= (A) −y (B) y (C) 2y (D) −2y
›Reveal solutionSolution
Differentiating y=ex+e−x twice (using the chain rule through u=x) and simplifying shows that the combination 4xy2+2y1 collapses exactly back to y — this is the differential equation this function satisfies.
Concept and Intuition
Functions built from e±x satisfy a specific second-order ODE because of how the chain rule through u=x introduces extra factors of x and x each time we differentiate. Recognizing the pattern 4xy2+2y1 as "the ODE this family solves" is a common Class-12 differentiation-application question.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let u=x, so y=eu+e−u and dxdu=2x1.
- First derivative: y1=dudy⋅dxdu=(eu−e−u)⋅2x1=2xex−e−x.
- Write y1=wv with v=ex−e−x and w=2x. Then dxdv=2xex+e−x=2xy and dxdw=x1.
- Quotient rule: y2=w2w⋅v′−v⋅w′=4x2x⋅2xy−v⋅x1=4xy−xv. …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-22-FN1 markMCQQ.If y=sinx+sinx+sinx+⋯∞ then the value of dx2d2y at the point (π,1) is (A) 2 (B) −2 (C) −21 (D) 21
›Reveal solutionSolution
Convert the infinite nested radical into an implicit algebraic equation y2−y=sinx, then differentiate twice implicitly and substitute the given point.
Concept and Intuition
An infinite nested radical y=sinx+sinx+⋯ satisfies the self-referential relation y=sinx+y (the expression under the first root is sinx plus the same infinite tail y). Squaring converts this into a clean implicit equation that can be differentiated normally.
Step-by-Step Solution
- y=sinx+y⇒y2=sinx+y⇒y2−y=sinx.
- Differentiate w.r.t. x: 2yy′−y′=cosx⇒y′(2y−1)=cosx.
- At (π,1): cosπ=−1, 2(1)−1=1, so y′(1)=−1⇒y′=−1. …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-16-FN1 markMCQQ.If y=xlog(ax1+a1), then x(x+1)dx2d2y+xdxdy−y= (A) 0 (B) 1+x (C) −1 (D) x
›Reveal solutionSolution
Writing y=xlog(1+x)−xloga−xlogx and computing y′,y′′ directly, the combination x(x+1)y′′+xy′−y collapses to the constant −1.
Concept and Intuition
Simplify the logarithm first (combine the fractions inside), then this becomes a standard "compute derivatives and substitute into a differential expression" problem — careful term-by-term bookkeeping is the key, not a clever trick.
Step-by-Step Solution
- ax1+a1=ax1+x, so y=xlog(1+x)−xloga−xlogx.
- y′=log(1+x)+1+xx−loga−logx−1.
- y′′=1+x1+(1+x)21−x1.
- x(x+1)y′′=x(x+1)[1+x1+(1+x)21−x1]=x+1+xx−(x+1)=1+xx−1.
- xy′=xlog(1+x)+1+xx2−xloga−xlogx−x.
- xy′−y=[xlog(1+x)+1+xx2−xloga−xlogx−x]−[xlog(1+x)−xloga−xlogx]=1+xx2−x. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-18-FN1 markMCQQ.If x+y=a, then (dx2d2y)x=a= (A) a1 (B) 2a1 (C) 2a1 (D) 21
›Reveal solutionSolution
Solve x+y=a explicitly for y as a function of x and differentiate twice; the answer is 2a1.
Concept and Intuition
Instead of doing messy implicit differentiation (which produces a y−1/2 term that blows up as y→0), it is far cleaner here to isolate y first, since the given relation is easy to invert. This turns an implicit-differentiation problem into an ordinary one.
Step-by-Step Solution
- From x+y=a, we get y=a−x, so
y=(a−x)2=a+x−2ax=a+x−2ax1/2.
- Differentiate once:
dxdy=1−2a⋅21x−1/2=1−ax−1/2=1−xa.
- Differentiate again:
dx2d2y=−a(−21)x−3/2=2ax−3/2.
- Substitute x=a: …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-21-FN1 markMCQQ.If y=γx+δαx+β, then 2y1y3= (A) 2y23 (B) 3y22 (C) y22 (D) 3y32
›Reveal solutionSolution
For a Möbius (bilinear) function, each successive derivative is proportional to the previous, letting us relate y1,y2,y3 purely algebraically.
Concept and Intuition
A function y=γx+δαx+β always simplifies so its first derivative is k(γx+δ)−2 for a constant k depending on α,β,γ,δ. Every higher derivative is then just this same power function times a numeric constant, which makes ratios like y1y3/y22 pure numbers.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Write y=γx+δαx+β=γα+γ(γx+δ)k where k=αδ−βγ (standard identity: y′=(γx+δ)2αδ−βγ).
- y1=k(γx+δ)−2.
- y2=dxdy1=−2kγ(γx+δ)−3.
- y3=dxdy2=6kγ2(γx+δ)−4. …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-18-FN1 markMCQQ.If x3+y3=3axy, then at (23a,23a) the value of 3ay′′+40 is (A) −5 (B) 0 (C) 8 (D) 1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Two rounds of implicit differentiation on the folium-type curve give y′=−1 and y′′=−3a32 at the symmetric point, so 3ay′′+40=8.
Concept and Intuition
For implicit curves like x3+y3=3axy, differentiate once to get y′ in terms of x,y, evaluate at the point, then differentiate the resulting relation (which still contains y′) once more to isolate y′′ — substituting the already-known y′ value at that stage keeps the algebra manageable.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Differentiate x3+y3=3axy: 3x2+3y2y′=3a(y+xy′), i.e. x2+y2y′=a(y+xy′) (divided by 3).
- Solve for y′: y2y′−axy′=ay−x2⇒y′=y2−axay−x2.
- At (23a,23a): numerator =a⋅23a−(23a)2=23a2−49a2=−43a2; denominator =(23a)2−a⋅23a=49a2−23a2=43a2. So y′=−1.
- From x2+y2y′=ay+axy′ (i.e. y2y′−axy′=ay−x2), differentiate again: 2y(y′)2+y2y′′−ay′−axy′′=ay′−2x.
- Rearranged: y′′(y2−ax)=2ay′−2x−2y(y′)2. …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-22-AN1 markMCQQ.If y=1+x+x2+x3+…∞ and ∣x∣<1, then y′′= (A) 2yy′ (B) y′2y (C) 2yy′ (D) 2y2y′
›Reveal solutionSolution
Sum the geometric series to y=1−x1, differentiate twice, and express the result in terms of y,y′: it is 2yy′.
Concept and Intuition
The infinite series 1+x+x2+⋯ is geometric with ratio x, converging (for ∣x∣<1) to 1−x1. Once y has this closed form, its derivatives are straightforward power-rule computations, and both y′ and y′′ turn out to be powers of (1−x)−1, so they can be re-expressed purely in terms of y and y′.
Step-by-Step Solution
- y=1+x+x2+x3+⋯=1−x1=(1−x)−1.
- y′=(1−x)−2. Notice y2=(1−x)−2=y′, i.e. y′=y2.
- y′′=2(1−x)−3.
- Write (1−x)−3=(1−x)−1⋅(1−x)−2=y⋅y′. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.