Q.Evaluate xx−1x+1x.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Determinant Evaluation Using Identities
Determinant Evaluation Using Identities
Expanding a 4×4 or 5×5 determinant term by term is painful and error-prone. The smarter route is to transform the determinant into an easy form using properties (the "identities") that change its value in a known, controlled way — then read the answer off a triangular matrix.
The geometric intuition
A determinant measures the signed "volume" of the box spanned by the rows in n-dimensional space. Sliding one row parallel to another doesn't change that volume; swapping two rows flips its sign; scaling a row scales the volume. The algebraic identities are just these facts translated into rules.
The three row (or column) operations
- Swap two rows: det→−det (sign flips).
- Scale a row by k: det→kdet (the factor comes out).
- Add a multiple of one row to a different row (Ri→Ri+λRj, i=j): det unchanged.
The identical rules hold for columns. There is also row-wise linearity: if a row is a sum Ri=Ri′+Ri′′, the determinant splits into the sum of two determinants with all other rows fixed.
Row-wise linearity is not det(A+B)=detA+detB — that is false. The splitting works one row at a time.
The strategy
- Use operation 3 to create zeros in a row or column (value unchanged).
- Factor out common factors with operation 2.
- Swap rows if needed to reach upper-triangular form (track the sign change).
- The determinant is then the product of the diagonal entries.
Worked example
det1472583610.
Apply R2→R2−4R1 and R3→R3−7R1 (no change), then R3→R3−2R2: …
The key idea is to evaluate a 2×2 determinant directly using the formula acbd=ad−bc.
Step 1: Identify the entries: a=x, b=x+1, c=x−1, d=x.
Step 2: Apply the formula: …
This determinant simplifies to a constant 1 by direct expansion — the x2 terms cancel, leaving only x2−(x2−1)=1.
The determinant of a 2×2 matrix (acbd) is ad−bc. That’s the only formula you need here — no row operations or factorisations required. The trick is to expand carefully and watch the signs.
-
Write down the determinant formula
For xx−1x+1x, we have a=x, b=x+1, c=x−1, d=x.
So the value is ad−bc=x⋅x−(x+1)(x−1).
-
Simplify the first term
x⋅x=x2.
-
Simplify the second term
(x+1)(x−1) is a difference of squares: (x+1)(x−1)=x2−1.
-
Subtract
x2−(x2−1)=x2−x2+1=1. …
Method: Evaluating a 2×2 Determinant with Algebraic Entries
This method evaluates a 2×2 determinant whose entries are algebraic expressions rather than plain numbers, using the same ad−bc formula but with careful expansion.
Steps
Step 1: Write down the formula with the algebraic entries substituted
acbd=ad−bc
Substitute the given expressions for a,b,c,d exactly as printed, keeping each in its own bracket.
Step 2: Expand each product separately
Expand ad and bc as separate algebraic products before subtracting — don't try to combine the subtraction and the expansion in one step, since that's where sign errors creep in.
Step 3: Recognize special product patterns
Watch for a difference-of-squares pattern like (x+1)(x−1)=x2−1 — spotting it saves a full expansion.
Step 4: Subtract and simplify …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Failing to bracket (x+1)(x−1) before subtracting, leading to a sign error
Why it's wrong: writing the determinant as x⋅x−x+1⋅x−1 without parentheses around the product (x+1)(x−1) makes it easy to subtract only the first term of the product, not the whole product — turning x2−(x2−1)=1 into an incorrect expression. Correct approach: always keep the product bc in its own bracket, i.e. write ad−(bc), before expanding anything.
Mistake 2: Not recognizing the difference-of-squares pattern in (x+1)(x−1) …
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-26-FN1 markMCQQ.If the inverse of −x0x14x1−4x7x0−2x is 20101−2701, then xx+1x+2x+1x+2x+3x+2x+3x+4= (A) 5x (B) x−5 (C) 5x−1 (D) x+5
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests recognizing a determinant with AP-rows (always zero) and pinning down x from a matrix-inverse condition; the answer is whichever option numerically equals 0 at that x.
Concept and Intuition
A square matrix whose rows form an arithmetic progression (i.e. R1−2R2+R3=0) is always singular: its rows are linearly dependent, so its determinant is identically zero, no matter what parameter sits inside it. Spotting this saves a full cofactor expansion. The matrix-inverse condition is just the defining relation AA−1=I applied to one convenient entry.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let A=−x0x14x1−4x7x0−2x and A−1=20101−2701.
- Using AA−1=I, multiply row 1 of A by column 1 of A−1: (−x)(2)+(14x)(0)+(7x)(1)=5x. This must equal the (1,1) entry of I, i.e. 1. So 5x=1⇒x=51. (Checking the other products confirms this value is consistent throughout the matrix.)
- Now look at D=xx+1x+2x+1x+2x+3x+2x+3x+4. Apply R1→R1−2R2+R3: each entry becomes x−2(x+1)+(x+2)=0, turning the first row into (0,0,0).
- A zero row forces D=0 for every value of x — this is an algebraic identity, independent of the specific x=1/5. …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-17-FN1 markMCQQ.If f(x)=1006+xx−32x−436+x23x2−278x2−32, then x→1limf(−x)f(x)= (A) 2 (B) −1 (C) 0 (D) 1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Expanding the determinant reveals f(x)=2(x−1)(x−2)(x−3), a factor that vanishes at x=1, so the ratio f(x)/f(−x) has a zero numerator and finite nonzero denominator there — limit 0.
Concept and Intuition
Determinants with a column like (1,0,0)T expand trivially (cofactor of the top-left entry only), collapsing a 3×3 determinant into a 2×2 one. Recognising the resulting expression as a product of simple linear factors (rather than grinding through raw polynomial expansion) makes the limit evaluation immediate.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Expand along column 1 (entries 1,0,0): f(x)=1⋅x−32x−43x2−278x2−32=(x−3)(8x2−32)−(3x2−27)(2x−4).
- Factor: 8x2−32=8(x−2)(x+2), 3x2−27=3(x−3)(x+3), 2x−4=2(x−2).
- f(x)=8(x−3)(x−2)(x+2)−6(x−3)(x+3)(x−2)=(x−3)(x−2)[8(x+2)−6(x+3)]=(x−3)(x−2)(2x−2)=2(x−1)(x−2)(x−3).
- f(−x)=2(−x−1)(−x−2)(−x−3)=2⋅(−1)3(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)=−2(x+1)(x+2)(x+3). …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-19-AN1 markMCQQ.The value of b+cbcac+acaba+b is (A) abc (B) (a+b)(b+c)(c+a) (C) 4abc (D) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)
›Reveal solutionSolution
This classic 3×3 determinant simplifies via row operations (adding all rows together makes every entry in one row equal to a+b+c) to the closed form 4abc, confirmed by direct numeric substitution.
Concept and Intuition
Many "nice" symmetric determinants like this one are best handled by first performing a row or column operation that reveals a common factor (here, adding all three rows makes every entry in the new row equal, exposing an (a+b+c) or similar factor), then simplifying the reduced 2×2 structure. When the algebra gets intricate, a quick numeric sanity check with simple values of a,b,c is an efficient way to confirm which answer choice matches.
Step-by-Step Solution
- The determinant is b+cbcac+acaba+b.
- Apply R1→R1+R2+R3: the new first row becomes (b+c+b+c, a+c+a+c, a+b+a+b)... more carefully, summing column-wise: column 1 sum =(b+c)+b+c=b+2c... to avoid an error-prone symbolic expansion, verify by direct numeric substitution instead (a clean, reliable check for this type of determinant).
- Numeric check: let a=1,b=2,c=3. The matrix becomes 523143123.
- Expand along Row 1: det=5(4⋅3−2⋅3)−1(2⋅3−2⋅3)+1(2⋅3−4⋅3)=5(12−6)−1(0)+1(6−12)=30−0−6=24. …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-20-FN1 markMCQQ.What is the value of aa−bb+cbb−cc+acc−aa+b=? (A) a3+b3+c3+3abc (B) a3+b3+c3−3abc (C) a3+b3+c3−6abc (D) a3+b3+c3+6abc
›Reveal solutionSolution
Direct cofactor expansion of the determinant shows all cross terms cancel, leaving the
classical identity a3+b3+c3−3abc.
Concept and Intuition
This is a disguised version of the well-known factorisation
a3+b3+c3−3abc=(a+b+c)(a2+b2+c2−ab−bc−ca), packaged as a determinant. Expanding carefully
term by term (rather than guessing) confirms which of the four sign variants is correct.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Expand along the first row: D=a[(b−c)(a+b)−(c−a)(c+a)]−b[(a−b)(a+b)−(c−a)(b+c)]+c[(a−b)(c+a)−(b−c)(b+c)].
- Compute each bracket:
- (b−c)(a+b)−(c−a)(c+a)=ab+b2−ac−bc−c2+a2
- (a−b)(a+b)−(c−a)(b+c)=a2−b2−bc−c2+ab+ac
- (a−b)(c+a)−(b−c)(b+c)=ac+a2−bc−ab−b2+c2
- Multiply through by a, −b, c respectively and add. All the mixed quadratic-times-linear terms (a2b,ab2,a2c,ac2,b2c,bc2) cancel in pairs, leaving only a3+b3+c3 from the cubic terms and −3abc from the three abc contributions (one from each bracket). …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-23-AN1 markMCQQ.If x3+2x2+3x−2x3−x2−2x−1x2+2x+43x3−2x2+4x−2=ax6+bx5+cx4+dx3+ex2+fx+g, then a+b+c+d+e+f= (A) 23 (B) 25 (C) 21 (D) 20
›Reveal solutionSolution
Evaluating the determinant-polynomial at x=1 gives the sum of ALL coefficients (including the constant g); evaluating at x=0 isolates g alone. Subtracting removes g, leaving a+b+c+d+e+f=25.
Concept and Intuition
If P(x)=ax6+bx5+cx4+dx3+ex2+fx+g, a classic trick to get the sum of coefficients excluding the constant term is: P(1)=a+b+c+d+e+f+g gives the sum of all coefficients (since every power of 1 is 1), while P(0)=g isolates just the constant term. So P(1)−P(0)=a+b+c+d+e+f. Here P(x) is defined as the given 2×2 determinant, so we just need to evaluate that determinant at x=1 and x=0 directly — no need to expand the full degree-6 polynomial.
Step-by-Step Solution
- The determinant is x3+2x2+3x−2x3−x2−2x−1x2+2x+43x3−2x2+4x−2.
- At x=1: top-left =1+2+3−2=4; top-right =1+2+4=7; bottom-left =1−1−2−1=−3; bottom-right =3−2+4−2=3. Determinant =4(3)−7(−3)=12+21=33=P(1)=a+b+c+d+e+f+g. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-14-AN1 markMCQQ.If f(x)=2+xsinx2211+xsinx1333+xsinx, then x→0limf(x)= (A) 1 (B) 0 (C) 5 (D) 7
›Reveal solutionSolution
Writing the determinant as det(B+sI) for a rank-1 matrix B with eigenvalues 6,0,0, the limit as s=sinx/x→1 is 7.
Concept and Intuition
Each row of the matrix, after removing the s=sinx/x terms sitting only on the diagonal, is identical: (2,1,3). A matrix all of whose rows are the same vector v is rank 1, and its eigenvalues are trace=v1+v2+v3 (once) and 0 (with multiplicity n−1). Adding sI shifts every eigenvalue by s, so the determinant of the shifted matrix is just the product of the shifted eigenvalues — no need to expand a 3×3 determinant directly.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Write f(x)=det(B+sI) where s=sinx/x and B=222111333 (every row is (2,1,3), since the s only appears added to the diagonal entries).
- B has identical rows ⇒ rank 1 ⇒ two eigenvalues are 0, and the third equals trace(B)=2+1+3=6.
- Adding sI shifts each eigenvalue of B by s: eigenvalues of B+sI are 6+s, s, s.
- det(B+sI)=(6+s)⋅s⋅s=s2(6+s). …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-19-AN1 markMCQQ.1a2a31b2b31c2c3= (A) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(a+b+c) (B) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a) (C) (a−b)(b−c)(a−c)(ab+bc+ca) (D) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(ab+bc+ca)
›Reveal solutionSolution
This determinant is a known generalised-Vandermonde identity that factors as (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(ab+bc+ca) — verified numerically, option (D).
Concept and Intuition
Determinants with rows 1,x,x2 (Vandermonde) factor neatly as (a−b)(b−c)(c−a). When the exponent pattern is not consecutive (here 0,2,3 instead of 0,1,2), the determinant still factors into the Vandermonde piece times an extra symmetric-polynomial factor — here that extra factor turns out to be e2=ab+bc+ca (the second elementary symmetric polynomial), since the exponent set {0,2,3} is the base set {0,1,2} shifted up by the partition (0,1,1), whose associated Schur polynomial is exactly e2.
Rather than rely purely on this identity from memory, verifying with actual numbers is the safest exam technique.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Expand the determinant along the first row (all entries 1): D=(b2c3−b3c2)−(a2c3−a3c2)+(a2b3−a3b2) =b2c2(c−b)+a2c2(a−c)+a2b2(b−a).
- Rather than fully factor symbolically, test with concrete numbers: let a=1,b=2,c=3.
- Direct determinant: rows (1,1,1), (1,4,9), (1,8,27). D=1(4⋅27−9⋅8)−1(1⋅27−9⋅1)+1(1⋅8−4⋅1)=1(108−72)−1(27−9)+1(8−4)=36−18+4=22.
- Test option (D): (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(ab+bc+ca) with these values: (1−2)(2−3)(3−1)=(−1)(−1)(2)=2; ab+bc+ca=2+6+3=11; product =2×11=22. Matches D=22. …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-25-AN1 markMCQQ.If the determinant cos2xsin2xcos2xsin2xcos2xcos2xcos2xcos2xcos2x is expanded in powers of cosx, then the constant term in the expansion is (A) 1 (B) −1 (C) 0 (D) 2
›Reveal solutionSolution
The constant term of a polynomial in cosx is exactly the value obtained by setting cosx=0. Answer: (A).
Concept and Intuition
If a determinant's entries are polynomials in c=cosx, expanding it produces a polynomial in c. Its constant term (the c0 coefficient) equals the value of the whole expression when c=0 — a shortcut that avoids expanding the full polynomial in cosx.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Write each entry in terms of c=cosx: cos2x=2c2−1, sin2x=1−c2, cos2x=c2.
- Set c=0: cos2x→−1, sin2x→1, cos2x→0.
- The matrix becomes −11−11−10−10−1. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-AN1 markMCQQ.−a2abacab−b2bcacbc−c2= (A) a2b2c2 (B) 2a2b2c2 (C) 3a2b2c2 (D) 4a2b2c2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Factoring a, b, c out of the three rows reduces the determinant to a simpler ±1-coefficient determinant that evaluates to 4abc, giving a total of 4a2b2c2. Answer: (D).
Concept and Intuition
Each row of the given determinant has a common factor: row 1 is a⋅(−a,b,c), row 2 is b⋅(a,−b,c), row 3 is c⋅(a,b,−c). Pulling a common factor out of a row simply multiplies the determinant by that factor (a standard determinant property), so we can simplify before directly expanding the messier original 3×3 determinant.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Original determinant: −a2abacab−b2bcacbc−c2.
- Factor a from row 1, b from row 2, c from row 3:
=abc−aaab−bbcc−c
- Expand this reduced determinant along the first row: −a−bbc−c−baac−c+caa−bb …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-AN1 markMCQQ.If f,g,h are differentiable functions of x, then f(xf)′f′g(xg)′g′h(xh)′h′= (A) fg′−gh′ (B) gh′+xf′ (C) 0 (D) x(f′+g′+h′)
›Reveal solutionSolution
The determinant simplifies to zero because the second row is a linear combination of the first and third rows, making the rows linearly dependent.
We are asked to evaluate
Δ=f(xf)′f′g(xg)′g′h(xh)′h′
where f,g,h are differentiable functions of x.
Concept and Intuition
The key idea is to use row operations that do not change the value of a determinant, or to notice linear dependence among rows.
Here, the second row contains derivatives of products xf,xg,xh. Using the product rule,
(xf)′=f+xf′,(xg)′=g+xg′,(xh)′=h+xh′.
So the second row is actually:
(f+xf′g+xg′h+xh′).
Notice that this is exactly Row 1 plus x times Row 3:
Row 2=Row 1+x⋅Row 3.
When one row is a linear combination of the others, the determinant is zero.
Step-by-step reasoning
- Expand the second row entries using the product rule:
(xf)′=f+xf′,(xg)′=g+xg′,(xh)′=h+xh′.
- Rewrite the determinant with this expanded form:
Δ=ff+xf′f′gg+xg′g′hh+xh′h′.
- Perform a row operation that does not change the determinant: subtract Row 1 from Row 2.
New Row 2=Row 2−Row 1=(xf′xg′xh′).
So
Δ=fxf′f′gxg′g′hxh′h′. …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-21-AN1 markMCQQ.a+b+2cccab+c+2aabbc+a+2b= (A) (a+b+c)3 (B) 2(a+b+c)3 (C) 3(a+b+c)3 (D) (a+b+c)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Writing each diagonal entry as s+(off-diagonal-like term) where s=a+b+c reveals the matrix as sI plus a rank-1 correction, whose determinant works out cleanly to 2(a+b+c)3 using the determinant lemma (or row operations).
Concept and Intuition
Many "cyclic-symmetric" determinants like this one simplify beautifully once you notice a+b+2c=(a+b+c)+c, etc. — subtracting off the common sum s=a+b+c from every diagonal entry turns the matrix into sI (a multiple of the identity) plus a very simple rank-1 matrix whose every row is identical. Determinants of sI+rank-1 matrices have a clean closed form.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let s=a+b+c. Rewrite diagonal entries: a+b+2c=s+c, b+c+2a=s+a, c+a+2b=s+b.
- The matrix becomes:
M=s+cccas+aabbs+b
- Subtract sI: M−sI=cccaaabbb — every row is the same vector (c,a,b), so M−sI has rank 1: M−sI=1vT where 1=(1,1,1)T and v=(c,a,b)T.
- So M=sI+1vT. The determinant lemma (matrix determinant lemma) gives: det(sI+1vT)=s3+s2(vT1) …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-23-FN1 markMCQQ.If ω is a root of the equation x+x1+1=0, then 1361+ω4+3ω9+6ω1+ω+ω25+4ω+3ω211+9ω+6ω2= (A) 1 (B) −1 (C) 0 (D) 1+ω
›Reveal solutionSolution
Using 1+ω+ω2=0 to simplify the matrix entries and row-reducing gives determinant −1.
Concept and Intuition
ω here is a complex cube root of unity (ω2+ω+1=0, ω3=1). Many determinant entries are partial sums of 1,ω,ω2 multiples, so replacing 1+ω+ω2 by 0 wherever it appears collapses the algebra dramatically.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Entry (1,3)=1+ω+ω2=0.
- Entry (2,3)=5+4ω+3ω2. Since 3ω2=3(−1−ω)=−3−3ω, this equals 5+4ω−3−3ω=2+ω.
- Entry (3,3)=11+9ω+6ω2=11+9ω+6(−1−ω)=5+3ω.
- The matrix is now 1361+ω4+3ω9+6ω02+ω5+3ω.
- Row reduce: R2→R2−3R1=(0,1,2+ω); R3→R3−6R1=(0,3,5+3ω). …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.