Q.Using the properties of determinants, evaluate: x2−x+1x+1x−1x+1
Concept understanding — Determinant Evaluation Using Identities
Determinant Evaluation Using Identities
Expanding a 4×4 or 5×5 determinant term by term is painful and error-prone. The smarter route is to transform the determinant into an easy form using properties (the "identities") that change its value in a known, controlled way — then read the answer off a triangular matrix.
The geometric intuition
A determinant measures the signed "volume" of the box spanned by the rows in n-dimensional space. Sliding one row parallel to another doesn't change that volume; swapping two rows flips its sign; scaling a row scales the volume. The algebraic identities are just these facts translated into rules.
The three row (or column) operations
- Swap two rows: det→−det (sign flips).
- Scale a row by k: det→kdet (the factor comes out).
- Add a multiple of one row to a different row (Ri→Ri+λRj, i=j): det unchanged.
The identical rules hold for columns. There is also row-wise linearity: if a row is a sum Ri=Ri′+Ri′′, the determinant splits into the sum of two determinants with all other rows fixed.
Row-wise linearity is not det(A+B)=detA+detB — that is false. The splitting works one row at a time.
The strategy
- Use operation 3 to create zeros in a row or column (value unchanged).
- Factor out common factors with operation 2.
- Swap rows if needed to reach upper-triangular form (track the sign change).
- The determinant is then the product of the diagonal entries.
Worked example
det1472583610.
Apply R2→R2−4R1 and R3→R3−7R1 (no change), then R3→R3−2R2:
det1002−303−61=1×(−3)×1=−3.
No cofactor was ever expanded — we just slid rows around.
Aim your zeros at a row or column that already contains a 1 to keep the arithmetic clean. And remember operation 3 needs a different row: adding a multiple of a row to itself rescales it and changes the value.
Evaluating determinants using row and column operations rather than direct expansion is a core skill in the CBSE Class 12 Determinants chapter, and "properties of determinants class 12 with examples" is one of the most searched topics for board exam revision. This technique of reducing a determinant to triangular form is also a favourite approach in JEE Main and JEE Advanced problems involving higher-order determinants.
Concept: Determinant Evaluation Using Identities — we simplify the matrix entries before expanding.
Step 1: Write the determinant:
Δ=x2−x+1x+1x−1x+1
Step 2: Factor the second row: R2 has a common factor (x+1) in both entries.
Δ=(x+1)x2−x+11x−11
Step 3: Subtract C2 from C1 (or simply expand). Expanding the 2×2 determinant:
Δ=(x+1)[(x2−x+1)(1)−(x−1)(1)]=(x+1)[x2−x+1−x+1]
Step 4: Simplify inside:
x2−2x+2=(x2−2x+1)+1=(x−1)2+1
Thus:
Δ=(x+1)[(x−1)2+1]
The value is (x+1)[(x−1)2+1].
The determinant simplifies to (x+1)(x2−2x+2) by applying row operations and factoring, giving the final value as (x+1)(x2−2x+2).
The key insight here is that a 2×2 determinant is simple enough to evaluate directly, but the problem asks us to use properties of determinants — specifically, how row or column operations can simplify expressions before expansion. This approach builds algebraic intuition and often reveals factorisations that direct expansion might hide.
For a 2×2 matrix acbd, the value is ad−bc. But instead of jumping straight to that, we can manipulate rows or columns to create zeros or common factors, making the algebra cleaner.
Let’s work through it step by step.
- Write the determinant clearly. We have:
D=x2−x+1x+1x−1x+1
- Look for a common factor or simplification. Notice the second row has x+1 in both entries. That suggests we might factor something out, but first, let’s see if a row operation can simplify the first row. A classic trick: subtract one row from another to create a simpler expression. Here, try R1→R1−R2 (first row minus second row).
R1:(x2−x+1)−(x+1)=x2−2x
and
R1 second entry: (x−1)−(x+1)=−2
So the determinant becomes:
D=x2−2xx+1−2x+1
Row operations that subtract one row from another do not change the determinant’s value. This is a powerful way to simplify without altering the result.
- Now factor common terms from rows or columns. In the new first row, x2−2x=x(x−2). But more usefully, look at the second row: both entries are x+1. We can factor (x+1) out of the second row. Remember: factoring a constant from a row multiplies the determinant by that constant. So:
D=(x+1)x2−2x1−21
- Evaluate the 2×2 determinant. Now it’s straightforward:
x2−2x1−21=(x2−2x)(1)−(−2)(1)=x2−2x+2
- Multiply back the factor. So:
D=(x+1)(x2−2x+2)
A common mistake is to forget that factoring a row multiplies the whole determinant. If you factor (x+1) from the second row, you must multiply the resulting determinant by (x+1). Skipping this step gives a wrong answer.
- Check by direct expansion (optional verification). Directly: D=(x2−x+1)(x+1)−(x−1)(x+1)=(x+1)[(x2−x+1)−(x−1)]=(x+1)(x2−2x+2). Same result, confirming our row operation was correct.
The determinant evaluates to (x+1)(x2−2x+2).
Method: Row/Column Operations to Simplify Algebraic-Entry Determinants Before Expanding
This method applies whenever a determinant's entries are algebraic expressions (in x, or other variables) rather than plain numbers — the goal is to simplify using valid determinant properties before expanding, so the algebra stays manageable.
Steps
Step 1: Scan rows and columns for a shared structure
Look for two rows (or columns) that share a common factor, or where subtracting one row from another visibly cancels the messier terms (e.g. a squared term disappearing). This scan is what tells you which property to reach for.
Step 2: Apply a value-preserving row/column operation
Use one of the standard operations — Ri→Ri−Rj (does not change the value), or factoring a common term out of a row/column (changes the value by that factor, so it must be written explicitly outside the determinant) — to reach a simpler determinant.
Ri→Ri−Rj ⇒ det unchanged;factoring k from a row ⇒ det→k⋅det(simplified).
Step 3: Expand the simplified determinant algebraically
With the messier terms gone, expand the (now smaller or cleaner) determinant using ad−bc or cofactor expansion, and simplify the resulting polynomial — often into a recognisable factored or completed-square form.
Step 4: Verify by an alternate route
Since these are algebraic entries, a quick check — either direct expansion of the original determinant or substituting a specific numeric value for the variable into both the original and simplified forms — confirms no algebraic slip was made.
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Factoring a common factor from a row without multiplying it back
Why it's wrong: pulling (x+1) out of the second row correctly turns the determinant into (x+1) times a smaller determinant, but a student who evaluates only the smaller 2×2 part and forgets to re-attach the (x+1) factor loses an entire factor from the final answer. Correct approach: every time a common factor is pulled from a row or column, keep it as a multiplier outside the determinant and bring it back in the last step.
Mistake 2: Mishandling the algebra when subtracting rows
Why it's wrong: applying an operation like R1→R1−R2 to entries such as x2−x+1 and x+1 requires careful term-by-term subtraction, and forgetting to subtract both parts of x+1 produces a wrong simplified row (e.g. writing x2−x instead of x2−2x). Correct approach: expand each subtraction fully before simplifying, rather than doing it mentally in one step.
Mistake 3: Not cross-checking the row-operation route against direct expansion
Why it's wrong: because a row operation can quietly introduce a sign or arithmetic error that still looks plausible, trusting the shortcut alone risks an undetected mistake. Correct approach: for a 2×2 case like this, a quick direct expansion (ad−bc) is fast enough to serve as a check on the row-operation result.
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-23-FN1 markMCQQ.If ω is a root of the equation x+x1+1=0, then 1361+ω4+3ω9+6ω1+ω+ω25+4ω+3ω211+9ω+6ω2= (A) 1 (B) −1 (C) 0 (D) 1+ω
›Reveal solutionSolution
Using 1+ω+ω2=0 to simplify the matrix entries and row-reducing gives determinant −1.
Concept and Intuition
ω here is a complex cube root of unity (ω2+ω+1=0, ω3=1). Many determinant entries are partial sums of 1,ω,ω2 multiples, so replacing 1+ω+ω2 by 0 wherever it appears collapses the algebra dramatically.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Entry (1,3)=1+ω+ω2=0.
- Entry (2,3)=5+4ω+3ω2. Since 3ω2=3(−1−ω)=−3−3ω, this equals 5+4ω−3−3ω=2+ω.
- Entry (3,3)=11+9ω+6ω2=11+9ω+6(−1−ω)=5+3ω.
- The matrix is now 1361+ω4+3ω9+6ω02+ω5+3ω.
- Row reduce: R2→R2−3R1=(0,1,2+ω); R3→R3−6R1=(0,3,5+3ω).
- Determinant =1⋅132+ω5+3ω=(5+3ω)−3(2+ω)=5+3ω−6−3ω=−1.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting ω2=−1−ω and trying to expand the 3×3 determinant directly with raw ω powers, which is error-prone.
- Sign errors in the row-reduction step.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — −1.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-26-FN1 markMCQQ.If the inverse of −x0x14x1−4x7x0−2x is 20101−2701, then xx+1x+2x+1x+2x+3x+2x+3x+4= (A) 5x (B) x−5 (C) 5x−1 (D) x+5
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests recognizing a determinant with AP-rows (always zero) and pinning down x from a matrix-inverse condition; the answer is whichever option numerically equals 0 at that x.
Concept and Intuition
A square matrix whose rows form an arithmetic progression (i.e. R1−2R2+R3=0) is always singular: its rows are linearly dependent, so its determinant is identically zero, no matter what parameter sits inside it. Spotting this saves a full cofactor expansion. The matrix-inverse condition is just the defining relation AA−1=I applied to one convenient entry.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let A=−x0x14x1−4x7x0−2x and A−1=20101−2701.
- Using AA−1=I, multiply row 1 of A by column 1 of A−1: (−x)(2)+(14x)(0)+(7x)(1)=5x. This must equal the (1,1) entry of I, i.e. 1. So 5x=1⇒x=51. (Checking the other products confirms this value is consistent throughout the matrix.)
- Now look at D=xx+1x+2x+1x+2x+3x+2x+3x+4. Apply R1→R1−2R2+R3: each entry becomes x−2(x+1)+(x+2)=0, turning the first row into (0,0,0).
- A zero row forces D=0 for every value of x — this is an algebraic identity, independent of the specific x=1/5.
- Since D=0 always, the matching option is the expression that equals 0 at x=51: 5x−1=5(51)−1=1−1=0. ✓ (Checking the rest: 5x=251, x−5=−524, x+5=526 — all nonzero.)
Common Mistakes
- Brute-force expanding the 3×3 determinant instead of spotting the AP-row structure, wasting time and inviting slips.
- Forgetting that "D=0 identically" means the answer must be matched numerically against x=1/5, not simplified as a formula.
- Mixing up which matrix is A and which is the given inverse when extracting x.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 5x−1.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-17-FN1 markMCQQ.If f(x)=1006+xx−32x−436+x23x2−278x2−32, then x→1limf(−x)f(x)= (A) 2 (B) −1 (C) 0 (D) 1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Expanding the determinant reveals f(x)=2(x−1)(x−2)(x−3), a factor that vanishes at x=1, so the ratio f(x)/f(−x) has a zero numerator and finite nonzero denominator there — limit 0.
Concept and Intuition
Determinants with a column like (1,0,0)T expand trivially (cofactor of the top-left entry only), collapsing a 3×3 determinant into a 2×2 one. Recognising the resulting expression as a product of simple linear factors (rather than grinding through raw polynomial expansion) makes the limit evaluation immediate.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Expand along column 1 (entries 1,0,0): f(x)=1⋅x−32x−43x2−278x2−32=(x−3)(8x2−32)−(3x2−27)(2x−4).
- Factor: 8x2−32=8(x−2)(x+2), 3x2−27=3(x−3)(x+3), 2x−4=2(x−2).
- f(x)=8(x−3)(x−2)(x+2)−6(x−3)(x+3)(x−2)=(x−3)(x−2)[8(x+2)−6(x+3)]=(x−3)(x−2)(2x−2)=2(x−1)(x−2)(x−3).
- f(−x)=2(−x−1)(−x−2)(−x−3)=2⋅(−1)3(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)=−2(x+1)(x+2)(x+3).
- f(−x)f(x)=−2(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)2(x−1)(x−2)(x−3)=(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)−(x−1)(x−2)(x−3).
- As x→1: numerator →−(0)(−1)(−2)=0; denominator →(2)(3)(4)=24=0. So the limit is 0/24=0.
Common Mistakes
- Expanding the determinant the "long way" (all 6 terms) instead of noticing the trivial first-column expansion, inviting arithmetic slips.
- Forgetting to fully factor before substituting, and instead trying to plug x=1 into unfactored polynomials (masking the zero).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 0.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-19-AN1 markMCQQ.1a2a31b2b31c2c3= (A) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(a+b+c) (B) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a) (C) (a−b)(b−c)(a−c)(ab+bc+ca) (D) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(ab+bc+ca)
›Reveal solutionSolution
This determinant is a known generalised-Vandermonde identity that factors as (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(ab+bc+ca) — verified numerically, option (D).
Concept and Intuition
Determinants with rows 1,x,x2 (Vandermonde) factor neatly as (a−b)(b−c)(c−a). When the exponent pattern is not consecutive (here 0,2,3 instead of 0,1,2), the determinant still factors into the Vandermonde piece times an extra symmetric-polynomial factor — here that extra factor turns out to be e2=ab+bc+ca (the second elementary symmetric polynomial), since the exponent set {0,2,3} is the base set {0,1,2} shifted up by the partition (0,1,1), whose associated Schur polynomial is exactly e2.
Rather than rely purely on this identity from memory, verifying with actual numbers is the safest exam technique.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Expand the determinant along the first row (all entries 1): D=(b2c3−b3c2)−(a2c3−a3c2)+(a2b3−a3b2) =b2c2(c−b)+a2c2(a−c)+a2b2(b−a).
- Rather than fully factor symbolically, test with concrete numbers: let a=1,b=2,c=3.
- Direct determinant: rows (1,1,1), (1,4,9), (1,8,27). D=1(4⋅27−9⋅8)−1(1⋅27−9⋅1)+1(1⋅8−4⋅1)=1(108−72)−1(27−9)+1(8−4)=36−18+4=22.
- Test option (D): (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(ab+bc+ca) with these values: (1−2)(2−3)(3−1)=(−1)(−1)(2)=2; ab+bc+ca=2+6+3=11; product =2×11=22. Matches D=22.
- Test option (A): (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(a+b+c)=2×6=12=22 — rejected.
- Test option (C): (a−b)(b−c)(a−c)(ab+bc+ca): note (a−c)=1−3=−2 (opposite sign convention to (c−a)=2), giving (−1)(−1)(−2)(11)=−22=22 — rejected (sign mismatch).
- Option (D) is confirmed as the correct general factorisation.
Common Mistakes
- Sign confusion between (c−a) and (a−c) when comparing to option (C) — a single sign flip changes the whole product's sign.
- Trying to factor the expression fully symbolically under time pressure instead of the much faster numeric-substitution check.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(ab+bc+ca).
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-20-FN1 markMCQQ.What is the value of aa−bb+cbb−cc+acc−aa+b=? (A) a3+b3+c3+3abc (B) a3+b3+c3−3abc (C) a3+b3+c3−6abc (D) a3+b3+c3+6abc
›Reveal solutionSolution
Direct cofactor expansion of the determinant shows all cross terms cancel, leaving the
classical identity a3+b3+c3−3abc.
Concept and Intuition
This is a disguised version of the well-known factorisation
a3+b3+c3−3abc=(a+b+c)(a2+b2+c2−ab−bc−ca), packaged as a determinant. Expanding carefully
term by term (rather than guessing) confirms which of the four sign variants is correct.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Expand along the first row: D=a[(b−c)(a+b)−(c−a)(c+a)]−b[(a−b)(a+b)−(c−a)(b+c)]+c[(a−b)(c+a)−(b−c)(b+c)].
- Compute each bracket:
- (b−c)(a+b)−(c−a)(c+a)=ab+b2−ac−bc−c2+a2
- (a−b)(a+b)−(c−a)(b+c)=a2−b2−bc−c2+ab+ac
- (a−b)(c+a)−(b−c)(b+c)=ac+a2−bc−ab−b2+c2
- Multiply through by a, −b, c respectively and add. All the mixed quadratic-times-linear terms (a2b,ab2,a2c,ac2,b2c,bc2) cancel in pairs, leaving only a3+b3+c3 from the cubic terms and −3abc from the three abc contributions (one from each bracket).
- Verify with a quick numeric check (a=1,b=0,c=0): the matrix becomes 1100010−11, whose determinant is 1; and 13+0+0−0=1 — matches.
- So D=a3+b3+c3−3abc.
Common Mistakes
- Sign error on the 3abc term (getting +3abc instead of −3abc, or ±6abc) from mis-tracking how many times the abc term appears across the three bracket expansions.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — a3+b3+c3−3abc.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-23-AN1 markMCQQ.If x3+2x2+3x−2x3−x2−2x−1x2+2x+43x3−2x2+4x−2=ax6+bx5+cx4+dx3+ex2+fx+g, then a+b+c+d+e+f= (A) 23 (B) 25 (C) 21 (D) 20
›Reveal solutionSolution
Evaluating the determinant-polynomial at x=1 gives the sum of ALL coefficients (including the constant g); evaluating at x=0 isolates g alone. Subtracting removes g, leaving a+b+c+d+e+f=25.
Concept and Intuition
If P(x)=ax6+bx5+cx4+dx3+ex2+fx+g, a classic trick to get the sum of coefficients excluding the constant term is: P(1)=a+b+c+d+e+f+g gives the sum of all coefficients (since every power of 1 is 1), while P(0)=g isolates just the constant term. So P(1)−P(0)=a+b+c+d+e+f. Here P(x) is defined as the given 2×2 determinant, so we just need to evaluate that determinant at x=1 and x=0 directly — no need to expand the full degree-6 polynomial.
Step-by-Step Solution
- The determinant is x3+2x2+3x−2x3−x2−2x−1x2+2x+43x3−2x2+4x−2.
- At x=1: top-left =1+2+3−2=4; top-right =1+2+4=7; bottom-left =1−1−2−1=−3; bottom-right =3−2+4−2=3. Determinant =4(3)−7(−3)=12+21=33=P(1)=a+b+c+d+e+f+g.
- At x=0: top-left =−2; top-right =4; bottom-left =−1; bottom-right =−2. Determinant =(−2)(−2)−(4)(−1)=4+4=8=P(0)=g.
- So a+b+c+d+e+f=P(1)−P(0)=33−8=25.
Common Mistakes
- Trying to fully expand the product of the two cubic polynomials into a degree-6 polynomial to read off coefficients individually — far more error-prone than the substitution trick.
- Forgetting to subtract g (i.e. reporting 33, the sum of ALL seven coefficients, instead of the first six).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 25.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-25-AN1 markMCQQ.If the determinant cos2xsin2xcos2xsin2xcos2xcos2xcos2xcos2xcos2x is expanded in powers of cosx, then the constant term in the expansion is (A) 1 (B) −1 (C) 0 (D) 2
›Reveal solutionSolution
The constant term of a polynomial in cosx is exactly the value obtained by setting cosx=0. Answer: (A).
Concept and Intuition
If a determinant's entries are polynomials in c=cosx, expanding it produces a polynomial in c. Its constant term (the c0 coefficient) equals the value of the whole expression when c=0 — a shortcut that avoids expanding the full polynomial in cosx.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Write each entry in terms of c=cosx: cos2x=2c2−1, sin2x=1−c2, cos2x=c2.
- Set c=0: cos2x→−1, sin2x→1, cos2x→0.
- The matrix becomes −11−11−10−10−1.
- Expand: −1[(−1)(−1)−(0)(0)]−1[(1)(−1)−(0)(−1)]+(−1)[(1)(0)−(−1)(−1)] =−1(1)−1(−1)+(−1)(−1)=−1+1+1=1.
Common Mistakes
- Trying to fully expand the determinant symbolically in cosx (needlessly long) instead of using the c=0 substitution shortcut for the constant term.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 1.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-14-AN1 markMCQQ.If f(x)=2+xsinx2211+xsinx1333+xsinx, then x→0limf(x)= (A) 1 (B) 0 (C) 5 (D) 7
›Reveal solutionSolution
Writing the determinant as det(B+sI) for a rank-1 matrix B with eigenvalues 6,0,0, the limit as s=sinx/x→1 is 7.
Concept and Intuition
Each row of the matrix, after removing the s=sinx/x terms sitting only on the diagonal, is identical: (2,1,3). A matrix all of whose rows are the same vector v is rank 1, and its eigenvalues are trace=v1+v2+v3 (once) and 0 (with multiplicity n−1). Adding sI shifts every eigenvalue by s, so the determinant of the shifted matrix is just the product of the shifted eigenvalues — no need to expand a 3×3 determinant directly.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Write f(x)=det(B+sI) where s=sinx/x and B=222111333 (every row is (2,1,3), since the s only appears added to the diagonal entries).
- B has identical rows ⇒ rank 1 ⇒ two eigenvalues are 0, and the third equals trace(B)=2+1+3=6.
- Adding sI shifts each eigenvalue of B by s: eigenvalues of B+sI are 6+s, s, s.
- det(B+sI)=(6+s)⋅s⋅s=s2(6+s).
- Sanity check at s=0: det(B)=0, matching that B's rows are identical (determinant zero). ✓.
- As x→0, sinx/x→1, so s→1 and the determinant is a continuous (polynomial) function of s.
- limx→0f(x)=12(6+1)=7.
Common Mistakes
- Trying to brute-force expand the 3×3 determinant symbolically in s (doable but error-prone) instead of using the rank-1-shift trick.
- Forgetting that limx→0sinx/x=1, not 0.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — 7.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-23-FN1 markMCQQ.2311+131/31+1/231/91+1/431/271+…∞= (A) 0 (B) 21 (C) −21 (D) −1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Expand each 2×2 determinant, recognise two independent geometric series in the result, and sum them separately. Answer: (C).
Concept and Intuition
Every term in the sum is a 2×2 determinant with a fixed bottom row (31), so a3b1=a−3b splits linearly into an a-part and a b-part. Once each part is recognised as its own geometric progression, the infinite sum is just the difference of two standard geometric series sums, 1−rfirst term.
Step-by-Step Solution
- General term: an3bn1=an⋅1−bn⋅3=an−3bn.
- First-column values across the given terms: 2,1,21,41,… — a geometric sequence with first term 2 and ratio 21: an=2(21)n−1.
- Second-column values: 1,31,91,271,… — geometric with first term 1 and ratio 31: bn=(31)n−1.
- Sum =n=1∑∞an−3n=1∑∞bn=[2⋅1−211]−3[1−311]=2⋅2−3⋅23=4−4.5=−21.
- So the infinite sum equals −21.
Common Mistakes
- Trying to expand the determinant as a whole (e.g. cross-multiplying an⋅1 and bn⋅3 inconsistently) instead of separating the two geometric parts.
- Misidentifying the common ratio of either sequence (it's easy to mix up 21 and 31 between the two columns).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C).
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-21-AN1 markMCQQ.a+b+2cccab+c+2aabbc+a+2b= (A) (a+b+c)3 (B) 2(a+b+c)3 (C) 3(a+b+c)3 (D) (a+b+c)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Writing each diagonal entry as s+(off-diagonal-like term) where s=a+b+c reveals the matrix as sI plus a rank-1 correction, whose determinant works out cleanly to 2(a+b+c)3 using the determinant lemma (or row operations).
Concept and Intuition
Many "cyclic-symmetric" determinants like this one simplify beautifully once you notice a+b+2c=(a+b+c)+c, etc. — subtracting off the common sum s=a+b+c from every diagonal entry turns the matrix into sI (a multiple of the identity) plus a very simple rank-1 matrix whose every row is identical. Determinants of sI+rank-1 matrices have a clean closed form.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let s=a+b+c. Rewrite diagonal entries: a+b+2c=s+c, b+c+2a=s+a, c+a+2b=s+b.
- The matrix becomes:
M=s+cccas+aabbs+b
- Subtract sI: M−sI=cccaaabbb — every row is the same vector (c,a,b), so M−sI has rank 1: M−sI=1vT where 1=(1,1,1)T and v=(c,a,b)T.
- So M=sI+1vT. The determinant lemma (matrix determinant lemma) gives:
det(sI+1vT)=s3+s2(vT1)
(since det(sI)=s3 and adj(sI)=s2I for a 3×3 matrix).
5. vT1=c+a+b=s. So det(M)=s3+s2⋅s=2s3.
6. Substituting back s=a+b+c: det=2(a+b+c)3.
Common Mistakes
- Trying to expand the 3×3 determinant directly by cofactors without the s-substitution — it's algebraically messy and error-prone; the "subtract the common sum" trick is much cleaner and standard for this whole family of problems.
- Forgetting the factor of s2 multiplying (vT1) and just adding s3+vT1.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 2(a+b+c)3.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-23-AN1 markMCQQ.The value of the determinant a+ba+2ba+4ba+2ba+3ba+5ba+3ba+4ba+6b is ____ (A) a (B) b (C) 0 (D) a+b
›Reveal solutionSolution
The rows of this determinant are in arithmetic progression (each row's entries increase by a constant step, and consecutive rows shift by a constant amount too); row-reducing shows two rows become proportional, forcing the determinant to 0.
Concept and Intuition
A determinant is zero whenever any two rows (or columns) are linearly dependent (e.g. one is a scalar multiple of another, or a linear combination of others). Rows built from an arithmetic-progression pattern (like a+b,a+2b,a+3b then shifting by a constant each row) are a classic setup for this — subtracting consecutive rows collapses the "arithmetic" structure into constant, proportional rows.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Original matrix:
a+ba+2ba+4ba+2ba+3ba+5ba+3ba+4ba+6b
- Perform R2→R2−R1: new R2=(a+2b−(a+b), a+3b−(a+2b), a+4b−(a+3b))=(b, b, b).
- Perform R3→R3−R2(original): new R3=(a+4b−(a+2b), a+5b−(a+3b), a+6b−(a+4b))=(2b, 2b, 2b).
- The matrix now has rows (a+b,a+2b,a+3b), (b,b,b), (2b,2b,2b) — and row 3 is exactly 2× row 2, i.e. the rows are linearly dependent.
- A determinant with two proportional rows is always 0.
Common Mistakes
- Trying to expand the 3×3 determinant directly by cofactors without first noticing the arithmetic-progression row structure — far more error-prone than the row-operation shortcut.
- Forgetting that row operations of the type Ri→Ri−Rj don't change the determinant's value, only simplify it.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 0.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-AN1 markMCQQ.If f,g,h are differentiable functions of x, then f(xf)′f′g(xg)′g′h(xh)′h′= (A) fg′−gh′ (B) gh′+xf′ (C) 0 (D) x(f′+g′+h′)
›Reveal solutionSolution
The determinant simplifies to zero because the second row is a linear combination of the first and third rows, making the rows linearly dependent.
We are asked to evaluate
Δ=f(xf)′f′g(xg)′g′h(xh)′h′
where f,g,h are differentiable functions of x.
Concept and Intuition
The key idea is to use row operations that do not change the value of a determinant, or to notice linear dependence among rows.
Here, the second row contains derivatives of products xf,xg,xh. Using the product rule,
(xf)′=f+xf′,(xg)′=g+xg′,(xh)′=h+xh′.
So the second row is actually:
(f+xf′g+xg′h+xh′).
Notice that this is exactly Row 1 plus x times Row 3:
Row 2=Row 1+x⋅Row 3.
When one row is a linear combination of the others, the determinant is zero.
Step-by-step reasoning
- Expand the second row entries using the product rule:
(xf)′=f+xf′,(xg)′=g+xg′,(xh)′=h+xh′.
- Rewrite the determinant with this expanded form:
Δ=ff+xf′f′gg+xg′g′hh+xh′h′.
- Perform a row operation that does not change the determinant: subtract Row 1 from Row 2.
New Row 2=Row 2−Row 1=(xf′xg′xh′).
So
Δ=fxf′f′gxg′g′hxh′h′.
- Factor x from Row 2:
Δ=xff′f′gg′g′hh′h′.
- Observe that Row 2 and Row 3 are now identical. A determinant with two equal rows is zero. Hence
Δ=x⋅0=0.
Watch outA common mistake is to forget that the product rule gives (xf)′=f+xf′, not just xf′. If you miss the f term, you won't see the linear dependence.
TipWhenever you see derivatives of products inside a determinant, expand them first. Often the structure reveals that rows are linear combinations, making the determinant vanish.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C).
ANSWER: C
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.