Skip to content
Question

Q.(a) "Virupaksha Temple was significant in Vijayanagara Empire." Substantiate the statement.

(OR)
(b) "The architecture of Vitthala temple was unique." Substantiate the statement.
CBSECBSE Class XII Board 2023Subjective· 3mImportance★★★★★
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Part (a): Virupaksha Temple was significant as Vijayanagara's chief Shiva shrine and legitimising political-religious centre, anchoring the sacred and urban core of the capital.

Part (b): Vitthala Temple's architecture was unique for its musical pillars, its three-dimensional stone chariot, and its fusion of South Indian styles into open theatrical pavilions.

The question asks you to substantiate - to give concrete evidence - for one of two statements about Vijayanagara temple architecture. I develop both.

Part (a)

The Virupaksha Temple was not merely a place of worship but the ideological nucleus of the Vijayanagara Empire.

  • Antiquity and continuity. The Virupaksha (Shiva) cult at Hampi predated the empire, with origins under the Chalukyas. When Harihara and Bukka founded Vijayanagara in 1336 they chose this established site, inheriting an ancient tradition rather than imposing a new one.
  • King as the deity's representative. The rulers positioned themselves as servants of Virupaksha; inscriptions record royal grants and victories as acts done on the god's behalf. This theocratic model made loyalty to the king a religious duty.
  • Royal patronage. Successive rulers, notably Krishnadevaraya (1509-1529), enlarged the complex with monumental gopurams (gateway towers) and elaborate pillared mandapas, and endowed it with land and revenue. …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.