Skip to content
Question

Q.Which of the following is correct regarding Harappan script ? (A) This script was alphabetical. (B) It was written from left to right. (C) This script has not been deciphered so far. (D) This script has a few signs or symbols.

CBSECBSE Class XII Board 2025MCQ· 1mImportance★★★★★
✓ Free question

The Harappan script remains undeciphered despite numerous attempts, making (C) the correct statement about this ancient writing system.

The Harappan (or Indus) script is one of archaeology's most tantalizing puzzles. Found on seals, pottery, and other artifacts from the Indus Valley Civilization (c. 2600–1900 BCE), this writing system has resisted all efforts at decipherment for nearly a century. Understanding what we know—and crucially, what we don't—about it helps us evaluate each option.

Let me work through each statement:

  1. Statement (A): "This script was alphabetical."

    An alphabetic script represents individual sounds (phonemes) with distinct symbols, like the Roman or Devanagari alphabets. The Harappan script, however, appears to use a large number of distinct signs—estimates range from 400 to 600 symbols. This count is far too high for an alphabet (which typically has 20–40 characters) but too low for a purely logographic system like Chinese (which uses thousands). Most scholars believe it was likely logo-syllabic, combining word-signs with syllabic elements, similar to Sumerian cuneiform or Egyptian hieroglyphs. Without decipherment, we cannot be certain, but it was definitely not alphabetical.

  2. Statement (B): "It was written from left to right."

    Analysis of the inscriptions shows the script was predominantly written right to left. Evidence comes from observing how signs are crowded or compressed: scribes typically began on the right and ran out of space toward the left edge. Some inscriptions show boustrophedon writing (alternating direction), but the dominant pattern is right-to-left, the opposite of this claim.

  3. Statement (C): "This script has not been deciphered so far."

    This is the unambiguous truth. Despite dozens of proposed decipherments over the decades—linking it to Dravidian languages, Sanskrit, Proto-Austroasiatic, and others—none has gained scholarly acceptance. The main obstacles are the brevity of inscriptions (most are just 4–5 signs), the absence of bilingual texts (no "Rosetta Stone" equivalent), and uncertainty about the underlying language. The script remains one of the great unsolved problems in archaeology.

  4. Statement (D): "This script has a few signs or symbols."

    As mentioned, the script contains several hundred distinct signs—somewhere between 400 and 600 depending on how variants are counted. This is not "a few" by any reasonable definition. The large inventory itself is part of what makes decipherment so challenging.

Watch out

A common misconception is that "undeciphered" means we know nothing about the script. We actually know quite a bit about its structure, direction, sign frequency, and context of use—we just cannot read what it says or identify the language it encodes.

✓Final answer

The correct option is (C): the Harappan script has not been deciphered so far.

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.