Q.Anuj, after a lot of research, paid 'SS Developers' an advance of ₹ 2 crore to build a lavish house for him. They promised to deliver the property within 18 months. At the end of 18 months, Anuj asked for the delivery of the property many times but the developer did not respond. Anuj realized that 'SS Developers' was not in a position to hand over the property to him. Anuj asked for a refund of the money with interest, which 'SS Developers' refused. Anuj approached the consumer court with his complaint.
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Anuj approached the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, and is likely to receive a refund with interest, along with compensation for the loss and harassment he endured.
Consumer rights are fundamental protections granted to individuals when they purchase goods or services. These rights ensure that consumers are treated fairly, receive quality products and services, and have avenues for redressal if they face exploitation or deficiency. In India, the Consumer Protection Act provides a robust framework for safeguarding these rights, establishing a three-tier quasi-judicial system to address consumer grievances.
When a consumer faces an issue like Anuj's, where a service provider fails to deliver on their promise, they have the right to seek justice. The Act defines a 'consumer' broadly to include anyone who buys goods or hires services for a consideration, and it provides mechanisms for them to file complaints against unfair trade practices, defective goods, or deficient services.
(i) Which grievance redressal agency had Anuj approached?
The Consumer Protection Act establishes a three-tier system of consumer courts, each with specific monetary jurisdiction:
- District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission: Handles complaints where the value of the goods or services paid, or the compensation claimed, is up to ₹ 50 lakh.
- State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission: Deals with complaints where the value of the goods or services paid, or the compensation claimed, is above ₹ 50 lakh but does not exceed ₹ 2 crore.
- National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission: Addresses complaints where the value of the goods or services paid, or the compensation claimed, exceeds ₹ 2 crore.
In Anuj's case, he paid an advance of ₹ 2 crore. According to the pecuniary jurisdiction limits, a complaint involving an amount of ₹ 2 crore falls under the purview of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.
The monetary limits for consumer courts were revised under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. It is crucial to remember these updated limits when determining the appropriate redressal agency.
(ii) State any three reliefs Anuj is likely to get, if the consumer court is satisfied with the complaint.
If the consumer court is satisfied that 'SS Developers' engaged in unfair trade practices or provided deficient service, Anuj is likely to receive several reliefs. These reliefs aim to compensate the consumer for their loss and ensure justice. Three likely reliefs Anuj could get are:
- Refund of the money paid: The court can direct 'SS Developers' to refund the entire advance amount of ₹ 2 crore that Anuj paid. This is a primary relief to restore Anuj's financial position to what it was before the transaction. …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.