Q.Read the following statements : Assertion (A) and Reason (R). Assertion (A) : Holding shares in demat form is very convenient as it is just like a bank account. Reason (R) : Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has made it mandatory for the settlement procedures to take place in demat form. Choose the correct alternative from the following : (A) Assertion (A) is false and Reason (R) is true. (B) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are false. (C) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of Assertion (A). (D) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of Assertion (A).
Both the convenience of demat accounts and SEBI's mandate for dematerialised settlement are true statements, but SEBI's mandate is not the reason for the inherent convenience of demat accounts.
To understand this assertion and reason, we must first grasp the concept of dematerialisation in the context of the Indian securities market and the role of its primary regulator, SEBI.
Historically, shares were held in physical form as paper certificates. This presented numerous challenges, including the risk of theft, damage, forgery, and the cumbersome process of transfer. To overcome these issues and modernise the capital market, the system of dematerialisation was introduced.
A demat account, short for dematerialised account, allows investors to hold their shares and other securities in an electronic form. This is precisely why Assertion (A) is true. The convenience of a demat account stems from its digital nature, making it akin to a bank account where money is held electronically rather than as physical cash. Just as you can transfer funds between bank accounts with ease, a demat account allows for quick and seamless transfer of securities.
The term "demat" is widely used in India to refer to these electronic accounts for holding securities. It's a fundamental component of modern stock market operations.
The benefits of holding shares in demat form are numerous:
- Elimination of physical certificates: This removes the risks associated with handling paper, such as loss, theft, or mutilation.
- Ease of transfer: Shares can be transferred electronically, making transactions faster and more efficient.
- Reduced paperwork: The need for physical share transfer forms and stamps is eliminated.
- Lower transaction costs: In many cases, electronic transactions are cheaper than physical ones.
- Increased safety and security: The electronic system reduces the chances of fraud and errors.
- Access to various corporate benefits: Dividends, bonuses, and rights issues are automatically credited to the demat account or linked bank account.
Now, let's consider Reason (R). The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) is the regulatory body for the securities market in India. Its primary objective is to protect the interests of investors in securities and to promote the development of, and to regulate, the securities market. To ensure efficiency, transparency, and investor protection, SEBI has indeed played a crucial role in promoting and eventually mandating dematerialisation.
SEBI's role is paramount in ensuring a fair and orderly functioning of the Indian capital markets. Its regulations are designed to safeguard investors and maintain market integrity.
SEBI has made it mandatory for the settlement procedures of shares and other securities to take place in dematerialised form. This means that when you buy or sell shares on the stock exchange, the actual transfer of ownership happens electronically through demat accounts. This regulation has significantly streamlined the settlement process, reduced settlement cycles, and minimised operational risks in the market. Therefore, Reason (R) is also true.
However, we must now evaluate if Reason (R) is the correct explanation for Assertion (A). Assertion (A) talks about the convenience of holding shares in demat form, comparing it to a bank account. This convenience is an inherent characteristic of the electronic system itself – the ease of transfer, safety, and lack of physical handling. Reason (R) states that SEBI made it mandatory for settlements to be in demat form. While SEBI's mandate requires market participants to use this convenient system, the mandate itself does not create the convenience. The convenience is a feature of the dematerialised system, whereas SEBI's action is a regulatory enforcement that ensures widespread adoption of this convenient system for market efficiency and safety. The convenience existed as a feature of demat even before it became universally mandatory for all settlements.
Therefore, both statements are individually true, but the reason for the convenience of demat accounts is their electronic nature and associated benefits, not merely the fact that SEBI made their use mandatory.
Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of Assertion (A). The inherent convenience of demat accounts stems from their electronic nature, while SEBI's mandate ensures their widespread adoption for market efficiency.
The correct alternative is (C).
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.