Q.“In India, National Education Policy 2020 has stressed a lot on in-service training of the teachers.”
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →The statement points to in-service training of teachers as a source of Human Capital Formation — specifically, on-the-job training. This investment raises teacher quality, which in turn improves student learning outcomes, labour productivity, and long-run economic growth.
(i) Identifying the Source of Human Capital Formation
The source of Human Capital Formation (HCF) indicated in the statement is on-the-job training — more precisely, in-service training of teachers.
Human Capital Formation refers to the process of increasing the knowledge, skills, and productive capacities of a country’s population through deliberate investments. NCERT classifies the main sources of HCF into: (a) expenditure on education,
(b) expenditure on health,
(c) on-the-job training,
(d) migration, and (e) information. Here, the government’s emphasis on training teachers after they have already joined the profession is a classic example of on-the-job training. Unlike initial teacher education (which is part of formal schooling expenditure), in-service training is a continuous, work-based investment that upgrades the human capital of existing workers.
On-the-job training is distinct from formal education because it is specific to the workplace and often more practical. It can be imparted by the employer (government/school) or through external agencies, and it directly enhances the productivity of the current workforce.
(ii) Likely Impacts on India’s Economic Development
Investing in in-service teacher training can have several powerful, cascading effects on India’s economic development. Let’s trace the chain of causation.
First, it directly improves the quality of teaching. A well-trained teacher uses better pedagogy, adapts to new curricula (like NEP 2020’s focus on experiential learning), and can identify and address learning gaps more effectively. This raises the quality of human capital being formed in schools — students emerge not just with more years of schooling, but with better skills, critical thinking, and problem-solving abilities.
Second, this higher-quality human capital boosts labour productivity. When these students enter the workforce, they are more adaptable, innovative, and efficient. A more productive labour force increases the economy’s output per worker, which is a fundamental driver of economic growth. Over time, this can shift India’s production possibility frontier outward.
Third, there are positive externalities. Education has spillover effects: educated individuals contribute to better health outcomes, lower crime rates, and more informed civic participation. Better-trained teachers amplify these spillovers because they reach thousands of students over a career.
Fourth, it addresses the problem of “educated unemployment.” NEP 2020 stresses skill development and vocational training. In-service training helps teachers guide students toward more employable skills, reducing the mismatch between what schools produce and what the labour market demands.
A common mistake is to think that any training automatically yields these benefits. The impact depends on the quality and relevance of the training itself. If in-service programmes are poorly designed, irregular, or not linked to classroom needs, the gains may be minimal. Also, the effect takes time — it is a long-term investment, not an immediate stimulus. …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.