Skip to content
Question

Q.The lack of punctuation at the end of line 3 in the extract is to: (A) create a sense of continuity and flow that connects it with the fourth line. (B) encourage the reader to understand grammar. (C) forewarn the reader of gloomy days ahead. (D) keep us connected to this earth. (A Thing of Beauty)

CBSECBSE Class XII Board 2024MCQ· 1mImportance★★★★★
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The question tests the poetic purpose behind the missing punctuation at the end of line 3 in John Keats’s A Thing of Beauty. The lack of a full stop creates enjambment, carrying the thought seamlessly into line 4. The correct answer is (A).

The relevant concept here is enjambment — a poetic device where a sentence or clause runs over from one line to the next without a terminal punctuation mark. Poets use enjambment to maintain rhythm, build momentum, or link ideas across line breaks. In this extract from A Thing of Beauty, Keats deliberately omits punctuation at the end of line 3 to make the reader move fluidly into line 4, as if the thought itself cannot be contained by a single line.

Let’s examine the extract closely:

A thing of beauty is a joy for ever:

Its loveliness increases; it will never

Pass into nothingness; but still will keep

A bower quiet for us, and a sleep

Full of sweet dreams, and health, and quiet breathing.

Notice that line 3 ends with “keep” — no comma, no full stop. The sentence continues without pause into line 4: “A bower quiet for us…”. This is classic enjambment.

Now evaluate each option:

  1. Option (A): “create a sense of continuity and flow that connects it with the fourth line.”

    This is exactly what enjambment does. The lack of punctuation forces the reader to glide from “keep” to “A bower quiet for us” without a break, mirroring the unbroken, enduring nature of beauty itself. The flow reinforces the idea that beauty’s gift (the bower) is continuous, not fragmented.

  2. Option (B): “encourage the reader to understand grammar.”

    This is irrelevant. Keats is not writing a grammar lesson; he is crafting a poetic effect. The missing punctuation is a stylistic choice, not a pedagogical one.

  3. Option (C): “forewarn the reader of gloomy days ahead.”

    The poem is about the enduring joy of beauty, not gloom. The enjambment here leads to a positive image — a bower of quiet and sweet dreams. No forewarning is intended. …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.