The decomposition of $NH_3$ on platinum surface is zero order reaction. If rate constant (k) is $4 \times 10^{-3}$ $Ms^{-1}$, how long will it take to reduce the initial concentration of $NH_3$ from 0.1 M to 0.064 M?

The decomposition of NH₃ on platinum surface is zero order reaction. If rate constant (k) is 4 × 10⁻³ Ms⁻¹, ho

Question

NH_3

CBSECBSE Class XII Board 2019Subjective· 3mImportance★★★★★

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Zero Order Kinetics

Zero Order Kinetics: The Drug That Doesn't Care How Much You Give It

Imagine you're filling a bathtub. You turn the tap to a fixed flow rate — say, 5 litres per minute. The amount of water in the tub increases by exactly 5 litres every minute, regardless of whether the tub is empty or already half full. That's the core intuition behind zero order kinetics: a constant amount disappears per unit time, no matter how much is left.

Now contrast this with what you probably expect. Most processes in nature follow first order kinetics: the rate depends on how much is present. If you have 100 molecules, 10 might react per second; if you have 10 molecules, only 1 reacts per second. The fraction lost is constant, but the amount lost per second shrinks as the quantity shrinks. Zero order is the opposite — the amount lost per second is fixed, so the fraction lost actually increases as the quantity drops.

The Precise Statement

-\frac{d[A]}{dt} = k_0

Where $[A]$ is the concentration of the substance (or amount, depending on context), $t$ is time, and $k_0$ is the zero order rate constant with units of concentration per time (e.g., mg/L per hour, or simply mg/hour if we're talking about total amount).

The negative sign indicates the substance is being removed. The key point: the rate does not depend on $[A]$ . It's a flat, constant rate.

The Integrated Form and Half-Life

If you integrate the differential equation, you get a straight line:

[A]_t = [A]_0 - k_0 t

This is the equation of a line with slope $-k_0$ and intercept $[A]_0$ . Plot concentration vs. time, and you get a straight line sloping downward until it hits zero.

The half-life — the time for the concentration to fall to half its initial value — is:

t_{1/2} = \frac{[A]_0}{2k_0}

Notice something crucial: the half-life depends on the initial concentration. Double the starting amount, and the half-life doubles. This is completely different from first order kinetics, where half-life is constant regardless of starting concentration.

Watch out

A common mistake: students assume half-life is always constant. For zero order, it is not. The half-life changes with the starting amount. If you start with 100 mg, half-life might be 5 hours; start with 200 mg, half-life becomes 10 hours.

Where Does Zero Order Kinetics Actually Happen?

In pharmacology, zero order kinetics is most famously seen with ethanol (alcohol) and aspirin at high doses. The reason is saturation of enzymes.

Your body metabolises alcohol using an enzyme called alcohol dehydrogenase. At low alcohol levels, the enzyme works efficiently and the rate depends on how much alcohol is present (first order). But at higher concentrations — say, after a few drinks — the enzyme becomes saturated. It's working at maximum speed, like a factory running at full capacity. Adding more raw material (alcohol) doesn't make it work faster. The rate becomes constant: a fixed amount of alcohol is metabolised per hour, regardless of how much is in your blood.

This is why alcohol elimination follows a straight line when you plot blood alcohol concentration vs. time. A typical person eliminates about 0.015 g/dL per hour — a fixed amount, not a fixed fraction.

Note

The same saturation principle applies to some drug transporters in the kidneys. When the transport proteins are working at maximum capacity, drug excretion becomes zero order. This is why high doses of certain drugs (like phenytoin) can lead to unexpectedly long elimination times — the system is overwhelmed.

A Quick Comparison Table

Property	Zero Order	First Order
Rate depends on	Nothing (constant)	Concentration
Rate equation	$-\frac{d[A]}{dt} = k_0$	$-\frac{d[A]}{dt} = k_1[A]$

Why this formula?

Zero Order Kinetics: Why the Formula Holds

Let's build this from the ground up — understanding the why before the what.

The Core Idea

Zero order kinetics describes a process where the rate is constant — it does not depend on the concentration of the reactant.

This is the definition, but why would that ever happen?

Why the Rate is Constant

Imagine a reaction happening on a solid surface (like a catalyst or a tablet dissolving). The reactant molecules must first adsorb onto the surface before reacting.

If the surface is saturated with reactant molecules, adding more reactant in solution doesn't help — the surface is already full.
The reaction proceeds at a fixed speed determined by how fast the surface can process the adsorbed molecules.

Key insight: The rate is limited by the surface, not by how much reactant is floating around.

Deriving the Zero Order Rate Law

Step 1: Write the rate definition

For a reaction $A \rightarrow \text{products}$ , the rate of disappearance of $A$ is:

-\frac{d[A]}{dt} = k

where $k$ is the zero order rate constant (units: concentration/time, e.g., $\text{mol L}^{-1} \text{s}^{-1}$ ).

Notice: No $[A]$ term on the right side — that's the signature of zero order.

Step 2: Separate variables and integrate

-d[A] = k \, dt

Integrate from initial time $t=0$ (concentration $[A]_0$ ) to time $t$ (concentration $[A]_t$ ):

-\int_{[A]_0}^{[A]_t} d[A] = k \int_0^t dt

-[A]_t + [A]_0 = kt

Step 3: Rearrange to the familiar form

\boxed{[A]_t = [A]_0 - kt}

This is the integrated rate law for zero order kinetics.

What This Formula Tells Us

Linear decrease: Concentration falls linearly with time (not exponentially like first order).
Slope = $-k$ : A plot of $[A]_t$ vs. $t$ gives a straight line with slope $-k$ .
Half-life depends on initial concentration:

Set $[A]_t = \frac{[A]_0}{2}$ :

\frac{[A]_0}{2} = [A]_0 - k t_{1/2}

\boxed{t_{1/2} = \frac{[A]_0}{2k}}

Critical exam point: Unlike first order (where $t_{1/2}$ is constant), zero order half-life increases with higher initial concentration.

--- …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Zero-order kinetics means the reaction rate is constant and independent of concentration. Using the integrated rate law $[A] = [A]_0 - kt$ , the time required is 9 seconds.

Why zero-order kinetics is different

Most reactions slow down as reactants are consumed—their rate depends on concentration. But when a reaction occurs on a catalyst surface that becomes saturated with reactant molecules, every active site is occupied and working at maximum capacity. Adding more reactant to the solution doesn't speed things up because the surface is already full. The reaction proceeds at a constant rate, consuming a fixed amount of reactant per unit time regardless of how much is present in solution.

This is zero-order kinetics: the rate depends on the zeroth power of concentration, meaning it doesn't depend on concentration at all (as long as there's enough reactant to keep the surface saturated).

\text{Rate} = k

The integrated rate law is beautifully simple—it's just a straight line. The concentration decreases linearly with time.

Step-by-step solution

1. Identify what we know

We're given:

Initial concentration: $[NH_3]_0 = 0.1 \text{ M}$
Final concentration: $[NH_3] = 0.064 \text{ M}$
Rate constant: $k = 4 \times 10^{-3} \text{ M s}^{-1}$
We need to find: time $t$

2. Write the zero-order integrated rate law

For a zero-order reaction, the concentration at any time $t$ is:

[NH_3] = [NH_3]_0 - kt

This tells us that concentration drops by $k$ moles per liter every second.

3. Rearrange to solve for time

kt = [NH_3]_0 - [NH_3]

t = \frac{[NH_3]_0 - [NH_3]}{k}

4. Substitute the values …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Same / Similar Concept — real previous-year questions on the same or a closely similar concept, not this exact question.

CBSE 2025Set 56/6/11 markMCQ
$Q. The unit of rate and rate constant are same for a : (A) First order reaction (B) Second order reaction (C) Zero order reaction (D) Third order reaction$
›Reveal solutionSolution
For a zero-order reaction, the rate is independent of concentration, so the rate itself has units of concentration/time — which is exactly the same as the units of the rate constant $k$ . Hence, the correct option is (C).

The key here is to understand what "unit of rate" and "unit of rate constant" actually mean, and why they coincide only for one specific order.

For any reaction, the rate is defined as the change in concentration per unit time. So its unit is always:
$\text{mol L}^{-1} \text{s}^{-1} \quad \text{(or M s}^{-1}\text{)}$
That never changes — it's the definition of rate.

The rate constant $k$ , however, gets its units from the rate law. The rate law for an $n$ th-order reaction is:
$\text{Rate} = k [\text{reactant}]^n$
If you plug in the units:
$[\text{Rate}] = [k] \times ([\text{concentration}])^n$
So:
$\text{M s}^{-1} = [k] \times \text{M}^n$
Therefore:
$[k] = \text{M}^{1-n} \text{s}^{-1}$
Now, the question asks: when are the units of rate and rate constant the same? That means:
$\text{M s}^{-1} = \text{M}^{1-n} \text{s}^{-1}$
For this to hold, the powers of M must match:
$1 = 1 - n \quad \Rightarrow \quad n = 0$
So only for zero-order reactions does $k$ have the same units as the rate itself.

Let's check each option:

First order ( $n=1$ ): $[k] = \text{M}^{1-1} \text{s}^{-1} = \text{s}^{-1}$ . That's per time, not concentration per time — different from rate.

Second order ( $n=2$ ): $[k] = \text{M}^{1-2} \text{s}^{-1} = \text{M}^{-1} \text{s}^{-1}$ . Different again.

Zero order ( $n=0$ ): $[k] = \text{M}^{1-0} \text{s}^{-1} = \text{M s}^{-1}$ . Exactly the same as rate. …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 markMCQ
$Q. Example of a zero order reaction is:$
(a) CH3CHO → CH4 + CO
(b) 2NH3 --Pt--> N2 + 3H2
(c) NO + O3 → NO2 + O2
(d) N2O5 → 2NO2 + ½ O2.
›Reveal solutionSolution

A zero-order reaction has a rate independent of reactant concentration; the decomposition of ammonia on a hot Pt surface is the classic textbook example, because the metal surface (not the gas concentration) controls the rate once it is saturated.

In a zero-order reaction, rate $= k[A]^0 = k$ — the rate does not depend on the concentration of the reactant at all. This typically happens in heterogeneous catalytic reactions where the reaction occurs only on the catalyst's surface, and once the surface is fully covered (saturated) with reactant molecules, adding more gas-phase reactant cannot speed up the reaction any further — the rate is then limited only by the fixed number of active surface sites.

The decomposition of ammonia on a hot platinum surface,

$2NH_3 \xrightarrow{Pt \text{ surface}} N_2 + 3H_2$ …

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2024Set ANNUAL1 markMCQ
$Q. The units of reaction rate constant are mol L-1 s-1, what is the order of this reaction?$
(a) 2
(b) 0
(c) 1
(d) 4
›Reveal solutionSolution

The units of a rate constant reveal the reaction order; mol L⁻¹ s⁻¹ (same units as rate itself) means order = 0.

For a reaction of order n, the rate law is rate = k[conc]ⁿ, so k has units of mol^(1-n) L^(n-1) s⁻¹ (concentration in mol/L, time in s). Setting this general formula equal to the given units mol L⁻¹ s⁻¹ requires (1-n) = 1 and (n-1) = -1, both giving n = 0. Physically, k having the SAME un …

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2023Set 56/3/11 markMCQ
$Q. The unit of the rate of reaction is the same as that of the rate constant for a: (A) first order reaction (B) second order reaction (C) zero order reaction (D) it cannot be same$
›Reveal solutionSolution
For a zero order reaction, the rate is independent of concentration and equals the rate constant itself, so both have the same units (e.g., mol L⁻¹ s⁻¹). The correct option is (C).

Why This Question Tests Your Understanding of Order

The trick here is not about memorising formulas — it's about what "order" actually means for the units. The rate of a reaction always has units of concentration per time (like $\text{mol L}^{-1} \text{s}^{-1}$ ). But the rate constant's units change depending on the order, because the rate law includes concentration terms raised to different powers.

For a general reaction of order $n$ , the rate law is:
$\text{Rate} = k [\text{reactant}]^n$
If you rearrange for $k$ :
$k = \frac{\text{Rate}}{[\text{reactant}]^n}$
So the units of $k$ are:
$\text{Units of } k = \frac{\text{concentration} \cdot \text{time}^{-1}}{(\text{concentration})^n} = (\text{concentration})^{1-n} \cdot \text{time}^{-1}$
Now, the question asks: when are the units of the rate and the rate constant the same? That happens when the rate law has no concentration dependence — meaning $n = 0$ .

Step-by-Step Reasoning

Write the general relationship.

For any reaction of order $n$ , the rate is $r = k [A]^n$ . The rate $r$ always has units of $\text{concentration} \cdot \text{time}^{-1}$ (e.g., $\text{mol L}^{-1} \text{s}^{-1}$ ).

Find when $k$ has the same units as $r$ .

For $k$ to have the same units as $r$ , the factor $[A]^n$ must be dimensionless — i.e., $n = 0$ . Then $r = k [A]^0 = k$ , so the rate literally equals the rate constant.

Check each option.

(A) First order ( $n=1$ ): $k$ has units of $\text{time}^{-1}$ (e.g., $\text{s}^{-1}$ ), different from rate.

(B) Second order ( $n=2$ ): $k$ has units of $\text{concentration}^{-1} \cdot \text{time}^{-1}$ (e.g., $\text{L mol}^{-1} \text{s}^{-1}$ ), different. …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2023Set TERM21 mark
$Q. The units of rate constant for zero order reaction are \dots\dots\dots\dots\dots$
›Reveal solutionSolution

For a zero order reaction, rate = k, so k carries the same units as rate: mol L⁻¹ time⁻¹.

For a general reaction of order $n$ , the rate law is $Rate = k[A]^n$ , and by dimensional analysis:

$k = \dfrac{Rate}{[A]^n} \;\Rightarrow\; \text{units of } k = (mol\,L^{-1})^{1-n} time^{-1}$

For a zero order reaction, $n = 0$ , so:

$Rate = k[A]^0 = k$

…

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →

Q.The decomposition of NH3NH_3NH3​ on platinum surface is zero order reaction. If rate constant (k) is 4×10−34 \times 10^{-3}4×10−3 Ms−1Ms^{-1}Ms−1, how long will it take to reduce the initial concentration of NH3NH_3NH3​ from 0.1 M to 0.064 M?

Why zero-order kinetics is different

Step-by-step solution

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Q.The decomposition of $NH_3$ on platinum surface is zero order reaction. If rate constant (k) is $4 \times 10^{-3}$ $Ms^{-1}$ , how long will it take to reduce the initial concentration of $NH_3$ from 0.1 M to 0.064 M?

Unlock everything free for 14 days