Q.(a) Account for the following :
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Part (a)Concept understanding — Stability of Oxidation States
Stability of Oxidation States – From Intuition to Precision
Imagine you're holding a ball on a hill. If you place it exactly at the top, it's balanced — but the slightest push sends it rolling down. That's an unstable position. If you place it in a small dip on the hillside, it stays put even if nudged — that's stable. Oxidation states work the same way: some are like the hilltop (easily changed), others like the dip (hard to change).
The Core Intuition
An oxidation state is just a number we assign to an atom to track how many electrons it has gained or lost compared to its neutral state. But atoms don't "want" to stay in arbitrary oxidation states — they want to reach a configuration that minimises their energy.
Stability here means: how reluctant is that oxidation state to change under normal conditions? A stable oxidation state resists being oxidised further or reduced further. An unstable one readily changes into something else.
The Precise Statement
Stability of an oxidation state refers to the tendency of an element to maintain that particular oxidation state under given conditions (temperature, pH, presence of other reagents). A stable oxidation state is one that does not easily undergo redox reactions — it is neither easily oxidised nor easily reduced.
This depends on three key factors:
- Electronic configuration – Half-filled and fully-filled d or f subshells confer extra stability (e.g., Fe3+ with d5 is more stable than Fe2+ with d6 in some contexts).
- Inert pair effect – Heavier p-block elements (like Tl, Pb, Bi) show lower oxidation states (e.g., +1 for Tl) as more stable than higher ones (+3 for Tl), because the s-electrons become reluctant to participate.
- Disproportionation tendency – Some oxidation states are unstable because they spontaneously convert into two other states (e.g., Cu+ in aqueous solution gives Cu2+ and Cu).
Stability is relative — it depends on the environment. Mn2+ is stable in acidic solution but easily oxidised in alkaline medium. Always specify conditions when discussing stability.
Examples That Make It Concrete
Transition metals – Cr3+ (d3) and Mn2+ (d5) are exceptionally stable because half-filled/half-filled-like configurations have low energy. Cr2+ (d4) is easily oxidised to Cr3+ — it's unstable.
p-block elements – Pb2+ is stable, Pb4+ is a strong oxidising agent (unstable). Sn2+ is a reducing agent (easily oxidised to Sn4+), so Sn4+ is more stable for tin.
Common pattern – For most elements, the most common oxidation state is the most stable one under standard conditions. But "most common" isn't always "most stable" — e.g., Fe3+ is common but Fe2+ is more stable in acidic solution.
Do not confuse "stability" with "occurrence". Mn7+ (as MnO4−) is common in the lab but is a powerful oxidising agent — it is not stable in the sense of resisting change. It readily accepts electrons.
How to Think About It in Exams …
Why this formula?
Stability of Oxidation States: Why It Works
This concept explains why certain oxidation states of an element are more stable than others — and why some states are never observed at all.
The Core Idea: Energy Minimisation
An oxidation state is stable when the total energy of the system is at a minimum. This depends on three competing factors:
- Ionisation energy (energy needed to remove electrons)
- Lattice energy (for ionic compounds) or bond energy (for covalent compounds)
- Electronic configuration (half-filled / fully-filled subshells)
There is no single formula for stability — instead, we use trends and principles that act as "formulae" for prediction.
Key Principle 1: Inert Pair Effect (for p-block elements)
Why it holds:
For heavier elements (e.g., Tl, Pb, Bi), the 6s² electrons are held very tightly due to poor shielding and relativistic effects. They resist removal.
- Result: Lower oxidation state (e.g., +1 for Tl, +2 for Pb) becomes more stable than the higher state (+3, +4).
- Example: TlX3+ is a strong oxidising agent — it readily gains two electrons to become TlX+.
Derivation logic:
The energy cost to remove the 6s² electrons is greater than the energy gained by forming additional bonds or lattice. So the system stays in the lower state.
Key Principle 2: Half-Filled / Fully-Filled Subshell Stability
Why it holds:
A half-filled (d5, f7) or fully-filled (d10, f14) subshell has extra exchange energy and symmetry — making it unusually stable.
- Example: MnX2+ (d5) is more stable than MnX3+ (d4). FeX3+ (d5) is more stable than FeX2+ (d6).
Derivation logic:
The exchange energy (Hund's rule) is maximum for half-filled configurations. Removing an electron from a half-filled shell costs extra energy — so the half-filled state is favoured.
Key Principle 3: Lattice Energy / Hydration Energy Compensation
For transition metals, stability of a particular oxidation state in aqueous solution depends on:
ΔG∘=ΔHhydration∘−ΔHionisation∘
Why it holds:
- Higher oxidation states have higher ionisation energy (harder to remove electrons).
- But they also have higher hydration energy (smaller, more charged ions attract water more strongly).
- The balance determines which state is stable.
Example:
- CuX+ is unstable in water because its hydration energy is too low to compensate for the loss of the second electron.
- CuX2+ is stable in water.
Key Principle 4: Disproportionation
Some oxidation states are unstable and spontaneously convert to two other states:
2CuX+Cu+CuX2+
Why it holds: …
Part (b)Concept understanding — Variable Oxidation States
Variable Oxidation States – The Intuition
Think of an atom as having a wallet with two compartments. In most elements, one compartment is much easier to open than the other — you can only take money from the shallow one, so the amount you can spend (the oxidation state) is fixed. For transition metals, both compartments are at nearly the same depth. You can reach into either, and you can take different combinations of notes from each. That is variable oxidation states in a nutshell.
Iron, for example, can lose two electrons to become Fe2+ or three to become Fe3+. Manganese can show +2, +3, +4, +6, and +7. This is not random — it follows a clear pattern rooted in energy.
The Precise Statement
Transition metals exhibit variable oxidation states because the (n−1)d and ns subshells have similar energies. Electrons can be removed from both subshells in different numbers, producing a range of stable positive oxidation states.
The key is similar energies. In main-group elements (like sodium or chlorine), the outermost ns and np electrons are far higher in energy than the inner core — you lose only the valence electrons, and the oxidation state is fixed. In transition metals, the (n−1)d orbital is not much lower than the ns orbital. Both are close enough that losing a few d electrons along with the s electrons costs comparable energy.
Why This Happens – The Energy Picture
For a transition metal like iron ([Ar]3d64s2), the 4s orbital is actually slightly lower in energy than the 3d when the atom is neutral. But once you start removing electrons, the energy ordering shifts. The first two electrons lost are from the 4s orbital (giving Fe2+). The next electron lost comes from the 3d orbital (giving Fe3+). Because the 3d and 4s are so close in energy, removing that third electron does not require a huge jump in energy — it is feasible.
The actual order of filling is 4s before 3d, but the order of removal is also 4s first. This is not a contradiction — it is a consequence of how orbital energies change as the nuclear charge increases.
The Pattern Across the Series
For the first transition series (Sc to Zn), the common oxidation states are:
| Element | Common oxidation states |
|---|---|
| Sc | +3 |
| Ti | +3, +4 |
| V | +2, +3, +4, +5 |
| Cr | +2, +3, +6 |
| Mn | +2, +3, +4, +6, +7 |
| Fe | +2, +3 |
| Co | +2, +3 |
| Ni | +2 |
| Cu | +1, +2 |
| Zn | +2 |
Notice the trend: the maximum oxidation state increases from Sc (+3) to Mn (+7), then decreases. The maximum possible oxidation state equals the total number of electrons in the (n−1)d and ns orbitals (the "group number" for many). Manganese, with 3d54s2, can lose all seven — giving MnO4− where Mn is +7. After manganese, the d orbitals become more stable (higher effective nuclear charge), and it becomes harder to remove all of them.
Stability and the Environment
Not all oxidation states are equally stable. The stability depends on:
- The medium: Cr3+ is stable in acidic solution, but Cr6+ (as chromate) is stable in alkaline medium.
- The ligand: Some oxidation states are stabilised by certain ligands (this is where coordination chemistry meets redox). …
Part (a)
(i) Mn shows the maximum number of oxidation states. With configuration [Ar]3d54s2, manganese can lose electrons progressively from both 4s and 3d, giving states +2 up to +7 — the widest range in the 3d series.
(ii) E∘(Mn3+/Mn2+)≫E∘(Cr3+/Cr2+). Reduction Mn3+(d4)→Mn2+(d5) produces the very stable half-filled d5 ion, so it is highly favourable (E∘≈+1.5 V). Cr3+(d3) is already stable (half-filled t2g), so Cr3+→Cr2+ is unfavourable (E∘≈−0.4 V).
(iii) Ti4+ colourless, V4+ coloured. Ti4+ is 3d0 (no d–d transition) → colourless; V4+ is 3d1, so a d–d transition absorbs visible light → coloured.
(b) Preparation of KMnO4 from MnO2:
2MnO2+4KOH+O2fuse2K2MnO4+2H2O
3MnO42−+4H+→2MnO4−+MnO2+2H2O(or electrolytic oxidation of MnO42−)
The purple MnO4− (Mn, +7) oxidises Fe2+ and is itself reduced to nearly colourless Mn2+:
MnO4−+8H++5Fe2+→Mn2++5Fe3++4H2O …
Part (a): Mn (3d54s2) shows +2 to +7; E∘(Mn3+/Mn2+) is large and positive because Mn2+ is a stable d5 ion; Ti4+(d0) is colourless while V4+(d1) is coloured; KMnO4 is made MnO2→K2MnO4→KMnO4 and its purple colour fades as MnO4−→Mn2+. Part (b): transition metals vary oxidation state by 1 (p-block by 2), have high atomization enthalpies (strong metallic bonding), Ce4+ is a strong oxidiser, lanthanoid contraction makes Zr≈Hf, and dichromate oxidises Fe2+ to Fe3+.
Part (a)
(i) Maximum oxidation states of manganese
Manganese, [Ar]3d54s2, has seven valence electrons (5d+2s). It can lose them progressively without a prohibitive energy jump, giving oxidation states from +2 (loss of 4s2) up to +7 (as in MnO4−). No other 3d metal has as many accessible states.
(ii) E∘(Mn3+/Mn2+) vs E∘(Cr3+/Cr2+)
A more positive reduction potential means the higher state is a better oxidiser. Mn3+(d4)+e−→Mn2+(d5) forms the exceptionally stable half-filled d5 ion, so the reduction is very favourable (E∘≈+1.5 V). By contrast Cr3+(d3,t2g3) is already stable, so Cr3+→Cr2+(d4) is unfavourable (E∘≈−0.4 V); indeed Cr2+ is a reducing agent.
(iii) Colour of Ti4+ and V4+
Colour in these ions comes from d–d transitions. Ti4+ is 3d0 — no d-electron, no transition, hence colourless. V4+ (as VO2+) is 3d1; the single d-electron can be excited between split d-orbitals, absorbing visible light, so it is coloured (blue).
(b) KMnO4 from MnO2 and the decolourisation
Fusion with alkali and an oxidant gives green manganate:
2MnO2+4KOH+O2fuse2K2MnO4+2H2O.
Manganate is then converted to permanganate by disproportionation (or electrolytic oxidation):
3MnO42−+4H+⟶2MnO4−+MnO2+2H2O.
Acidified permanganate (Mn in +7, intense purple) oxidises Fe2+ and is reduced to nearly colourless Mn2+:
MnO4−+8H++5Fe2+⟶Mn2++5Fe3++4H2O. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 on this concept.
- CBSE 2026Set 56/3/11 markMCQQ.In aqueous solution, Cr2O72− ion converts to which of the following in alkaline medium ? (A) Cr3+ (B) CrO42− (C) CrO (D) CrO3
›Reveal solutionSolution
In alkaline medium, dichromate (Cr2O72−) converts to chromate (CrO42−) without any change in oxidation state — it’s a simple acid-base equilibrium, not a redox reaction. The correct option is (B).
The key to this question lies in understanding that the conversion of dichromate to chromate is not a redox reaction — the oxidation state of chromium remains +6 throughout. Many students instinctively think of reduction to Cr3+ because they associate dichromate with strong oxidizing behaviour, but that only happens in acidic medium. In alkaline conditions, the chemistry is entirely different.
Let’s walk through the reasoning step by step.
-
Recall the oxidation state of chromium in dichromate.
In Cr2O72−, each oxygen is -2, so total from seven oxygens is -14. The ion has a -2 charge, so the sum of oxidation states of the two chromium atoms must be +12. Hence each Cr is in the +6 state.
-
Now consider the alkaline medium.
When you add a base (like NaOH) to a solution of K2Cr2O7, the dichromate ion reacts with hydroxide ions. The reaction is:
Cr2O72−+2OH−→2CrO42−+H2O
Notice that the oxidation state of Cr in CrO42− is also +6 (four oxygens at -2 give -8, charge -2, so Cr = +6). No electrons are transferred — this is an acid-base equilibrium, not a redox change.
- Why does this happen? Dichromate exists in equilibrium with chromate, and the position depends on pH. In acidic solution, the equilibrium shifts toward dichromate; in alkaline solution, it shifts toward chromate. The reaction is:
2CrO42−+2H+⇌Cr2O72−+H2O
Adding OH− removes H+, pulling the equilibrium to the left — producing chromate. …
-
- CBSE 2026Set 56/1/11 markMCQQ.Assertion (A) : Actinoids show wide range of oxidation states. Reason (R) : Actinoids are radioactive in nature. (A) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of the Assertion (A). (B) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of the Assertion (A). (C) Assertion (A) is true, but Reason (R) is false. (D) Assertion (A) is false, but Reason (R) is true.
›Reveal solutionSolution
The assertion that actinoids show a wide range of oxidation states is true, but the reason given — that they are radioactive — is not the correct explanation. The correct explanation lies in the small energy gap between 5f, 6d, and 7s orbitals, which allows many electrons to participate in bonding. So the answer is option (B).
The question tests your understanding of why actinoids (elements 90–103, from thorium to lawrencium) exhibit so many different oxidation states. Many students memorise that “actinoids show variable oxidation states” and also know they are radioactive, so they assume the second explains the first. That’s a trap.
Let’s break it down properly.
-
Is Assertion (A) true?
Yes. Actinoids display a remarkably wide range of oxidation states. For example, uranium shows +3, +4, +5, and +6; neptunium and plutonium go from +3 to +7. This is far more varied than most d-block elements. The reason is that the 5f, 6d, and 7s orbitals are very close in energy. Electrons from all three can be lost with relatively little energy cost, so many different oxidation numbers become accessible.
-
Is Reason (R) true?
Yes, actinoids are indeed radioactive. All actinoid nuclei are unstable and decay over time. So the reason statement is factually correct.
-
Does the radioactivity explain the wide range of oxidation states?
No. Radioactivity is a nuclear property — it depends on the instability of the nucleus (proton/neutron ratio, nuclear binding energy). Oxidation states are an electronic property — they depend on how easily electrons are lost from the outer orbitals. These two phenomena are completely independent.
Watch outA common mistake is to think that because both statements are true, the reason must be the explanation. But correlation is not causation. Radioactivity does not cause variable oxidation states; the orbital energy structure does.
-
What actually causes the wide range of oxidation states in actinoids? …
-
- CBSE 2026Set V11 markMCQQ.The common oxidation state shown by the element with atomic number 21 is(a) +3(b) +4(c) +5(d) Both +3 and +5
›Reveal solutionSolution
The element with Z = 21 is scandium, whose common (and essentially only stable) oxidation state is +3.
Atomic number 21 corresponds to scandium (Sc) with electronic configuration [Ar]3d14s2.
Scandium loses its two 4s electrons and its single 3d electron to attain the stable, noble-gas [Ar] configuration:
Sc→Sc3++3e− …
- CBSE 2026Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.What is the maximum oxidation state of Mn in its compounds?(a) +4(b) +5(c) +6(d) +7
›Reveal solutionSolution
Manganese shows a maximum oxidation state of +7, equal to the sum of its 4s and 3d valence electrons.
Manganese has the ground-state electronic configuration [Ar]3d^5 4s^2, giving it 7 electrons in its outermost (4s + 3d) shells. For the early-to-middle members of the 3d transition series, the maximum oxidation state shown is equal to the total number of 4s and 3d electrons, since all of them can, in principle, take part in bonding (this trend peaks around Mn and then declines as d-electrons become increasingly core-like towards the end of the series).
…
- CBSE 2026Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.Which of the following oxidation states is common for all lanthanoids?(a) +2(b) +3(c) +4(d) +5
›Reveal solutionSolution
All lanthanoids show a characteristic +3 oxidation state because it corresponds to a stable, similar electronic configuration achieved after losing the two 6s and one 4f (or 5d) electron.
Lanthanoids have the general electronic configuration [Xe] 4f^(1-14) 5d^(0-1) 6s2. Removal of the two 6s electrons and one more electron (from 4f or 5d) gives the Ln3+ ion, which is the most stable and commonly observed oxidation state across the entire series, from Ce to Lu.
…
- CBSE 2025Set 56/4/11 markMCQQ.The product of the oxidation of I− with MnO4− in alkaline medium is : (A) IO4− (B) I2 (C) IO− (D) IO3−
›Reveal solutionSolution
In alkaline medium, permanganate (MnO4−) oxidises iodide (I−) to iodate (IO3−), not to iodine or periodate. The balanced reaction shows I− loses 6 electrons to form IO3−, while MnO4− gains 3 electrons to form MnO2. The correct product is IO3−, option (D).
Why the medium matters
The oxidation state of iodine in its products depends heavily on the pH of the solution. Permanganate is a powerful oxidising agent, but its reduction product changes with medium:
- In acidic medium: MnO4−→Mn2+ (gains 5 electrons)
- In neutral/alkaline medium: MnO4−→MnO2 (gains 3 electrons)
This difference in electron gain per mole of permanganate directly affects how far it can oxidise iodide. In alkaline medium, permanganate is a milder oxidising agent (gains only 3 electrons) compared to acidic medium (gains 5 electrons). Yet it still oxidises I− all the way to IO3−, not stopping at I2.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Identify the half-reactions
Iodide (I−) has oxidation state −1. The possible products given are:
- IO4−: iodine in +7 state
- I2: iodine in 0 state
- IO−: iodine in +1 state (hypoiodite)
- IO3−: iodine in +5 state (iodate)
In alkaline medium, permanganate reduces to MnO2 (manganese in +4 state, from +7 in MnO4−).
-
Balance the oxidation half-reaction
Iodide going to iodate:
I−→IO3−
Balance oxygen with water (alkaline medium):
I−+3H2O→IO3−+6H+
Balance charge: left side has −1, right side has −1+6=+5. Add 6 electrons to right:
I−+3H2O→IO3−+6H++6e−
In alkaline medium, add OH− to neutralise H+:
I−+6OH−→IO3−+3H2O+6e−
So each I− loses 6 electrons to become IO3−.
-
Balance the reduction half-reaction
Permanganate to manganese dioxide in alkaline medium:
MnO4−→MnO2
Balance oxygen with water:
MnO4−+2H2O→MnO2+4OH−
Balance charge: left −1, right −4. Add 3 electrons to left:
MnO4−+2H2O+3e−→MnO2+4OH−
So each MnO4− gains 3 electrons.
-
Combine the half-reactions
To equalise electrons: multiply reduction half by 2 (gives 6 electrons gained) and oxidation half by 1 (gives 6 electrons lost):
2MnO4−+4H2O+6e−→2MnO2+8OH−
I−+6OH−→IO3−+3H2O+6e−
Adding:
2MnO4−+I−+4H2O+6OH−→2MnO2+IO3−+3H2O+8OH−
Cancel 3H2O from both sides and 6OH− from both sides: …
- CBSE 2025Set 56/6/11 markMCQQ.For the following question, two statements are given — one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labelled as Reason (R). Select the correct answer from the codes (A), (B), (C) and (D) as given below. (A) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of the Assertion (A). (B) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of the Assertion (A). (C) Assertion (A) is true, but Reason (R) is false. (D) Assertion (A) is false, but Reason (R) is true. Assertion (A) : Actinoids show wide range of oxidation states. Reason (R) : Actinoids are radioactive in nature.
›Reveal solutionSolution
The assertion that actinoids show a wide range of oxidation states is true, but the reason given — that they are radioactive — does not explain this property. The correct answer is (B).
The question tests your understanding of why actinoids exhibit variable oxidation states. The key is to separate two distinct facts: actinoids are radioactive, and they do show many oxidation states — but the radioactivity is not the cause of the oxidation state variability.
Let’s break this down.
-
Why do actinoids show a wide range of oxidation states?
The 5f, 6d, and 7s orbitals in actinoids are very close in energy. This means electrons can be removed from any of these orbitals with relatively little energy cost. As you move across the actinoid series, the 5f orbitals gradually become more stable, but early actinoids (like Th, Pa, U, Np, Pu) can lose anywhere from 3 to 7 electrons. For example, uranium shows +3, +4, +5, and +6; plutonium shows +3, +4, +5, +6, and +7. This is the real reason for the wide range — it’s an electronic structure effect, not a nuclear one.
-
What about radioactivity?
Yes, all actinoids are radioactive — their nuclei are unstable and decay over time. But radioactivity is a nuclear property, while oxidation states depend on electron configuration. A nucleus decaying does not directly change how many electrons an atom can lose or gain in a chemical reaction. So while both statements are factually true, the reason does not explain the assertion. …
-
- CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 markQ.What is the common oxidation state of Lanthanoids?
›Reveal solutionSolution
All lanthanoids overwhelmingly favour the +3 oxidation state, since their poorly-bonding 4f electrons are not readily involved, leaving the same outer 5d/6s electrons available across the series.
Across the entire lanthanide series, the +3 oxidation state is by far the most common and stable one, shown by essentially every lanthanoid. This is because the 4f electrons are deeply buried and well-shielded, taking little part in bonding, while the outer 5d0−16s2 electrons are readily lost to give the stable Ln3+ ion. Occasional +2 or +4 states occur only for a few elements whe …
- CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.Which of the following transition metals does not show variable oxidation state?(a) Ti(b) Cr(c) Cu(d) Sc
›Reveal solutionSolution
Sc has only one electron beyond the noble-gas+d0 core to lose (3d1 4s2 -> Sc3+ is d0), so there is no intermediate oxidation state available; Ti, Cr and Cu all show at least two.
Scandium's configuration is [Ar]3d¹4s²; losing all three of these electrons gives the very stable, empty-d-subshell Sc³⁺ (3d⁰) ion, which is the only oxidation state scandium is practically found in — it has no partly-filled-d intermediate oxidation state to show v …
- CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.Which element does not show variable oxidation state ?(i) Vanadium(ii) Iron(iii) Mercury(iv) Scandium
›Reveal solutionSolution
Scandium has only one stable, common oxidation state (+3) because losing all three electrons outside its noble-gas-like [Ar] core empties the 3d subshell completely — there is no other accessible, stable configuration.
Most transition metals show variable oxidation states because both the (n-1)d and ns electrons are close in energy and can be lost in different numbers.
- Vanadium: shows +2, +3, +4, +5 — clearly variable.
- Iron: shows +2 and +3 (and rarely +6) — variable.
- Mercury: shows +1 (as Hg₂²⁺) and +2 — variable. …
- CBSE 2024Set 56/3/11 markMCQQ.Which of the following does not show variable oxidation states ? (A) Fe (B) Cu (C) Mn (D) Sc
›Reveal solutionSolution
Transition metals show variable oxidation states when they can lose different numbers of d-electrons along with their s-electrons. Scandium has only one d-electron, giving it essentially one stable oxidation state (+3), while Fe, Cu, and Mn have multiple d-electrons that can be removed in different combinations. The answer is (D) Sc.
Why transition metals show variable oxidation states
Transition metals are famous for their ability to exist in multiple oxidation states. This happens because their (n−1)d and ns orbitals are close in energy, so electrons from both can participate in bonding. The more d-electrons available, the more combinations of electron loss are possible, leading to a richer variety of oxidation states.
The key is to look at the electronic configuration and see how many electrons can realistically be removed to form stable ions.
Analyzing each element
Let's examine the electronic configurations and common oxidation states:
1. Iron (Fe): [Ar] 3d⁶ 4s²
Iron can lose its two 4s electrons to give Fe²⁺ ([Ar] 3d⁶). It can also lose one more 3d electron to give Fe³⁺ ([Ar] 3d⁵), which is particularly stable due to the half-filled d-subshell. Higher oxidation states like +4, +5, and +6 exist in certain compounds, though they're less common.
Common oxidation states: +2, +3 (and higher in special cases)
2. Copper (Cu): [Ar] 3d¹⁰ 4s¹
Copper readily loses its single 4s electron to form Cu⁺ ([Ar] 3d¹⁰), which has a stable filled d-subshell. It can also lose one 3d electron to give Cu²⁺ ([Ar] 3d⁹), which is actually more common in aqueous chemistry due to higher hydration energy.
Common oxidation states: +1, +2
3. Manganese (Mn): [Ar] 3d⁵ 4s²
Manganese is the champion of variable oxidation states among first-row transition metals. With five d-electrons and two s-electrons, it can lose anywhere from two to all seven electrons, giving oxidation states from +2 all the way to +7 (as in permanganate, MnO₄⁻).
Common oxidation states: +2, +3, +4, +6, +7
4. Scandium (Sc): [Ar] 3d¹ 4s²
Here's the critical case. Scandium has only one d-electron. When it forms compounds, it loses both 4s electrons and its single 3d electron to achieve the stable [Ar] configuration, giving Sc³⁺. …
- CBSE 2024Set A11 markMCQQ.Which of the following pair of metal oxides are amphoteric?(a) V2O5, Cr2O3(b) Mn2O7, CrO3(c) V2O5, V2O4(d) CrO, V2O5
›Reveal solutionSolution
V2O5 and Cr2O3 are the amphoteric pair — option (a).
For transition-metal oxides, the character changes from basic (low oxidation state) through amphoteric to acidic (high oxidation state). Cr2O3 (Cr in +3) is amphoteric — it dissolves in acids to give Cr3+ salts and in alkali to give chromite. V2O5 (V in +5) is chiefly acidic but is genuinely amphoteric, dissolving in both acids and alka …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.