Q.If and , prove that .
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Using implicit differentiation on the parametric equations and , we find by eliminating via logarithms and then differentiating.
We are given two parametric equations:
and .
We need to prove that .
The direct approach — differentiating and with respect to and then using — is tempting. But notice the result involves and , which are not directly in the parametric forms. This suggests we should first eliminate the parameter by taking natural logarithms, then use implicit differentiation on the resulting relation between and .
Why implicit differentiation?
Implicit differentiation lets us find without solving for explicitly in terms of . Here, after taking logs, we get a simple relation: and . Squaring and adding gives , which is an implicit equation linking and . Differentiating this directly yields the required derivative.
Let’s work through it step by step.
-
Take natural logarithms of both parametric equations.
From , we have .
From , we have .
(Here denotes the natural logarithm, base .)
-
Eliminate by squaring and adding.
.
So the relation between and is:
-
Differentiate both sides implicitly with respect to .
Remember that is a function of . Differentiate term by term:
- Derivative of : .
- Derivative of : (by the chain rule).
- Derivative of the constant is .
So we get:
- Solve for . Divide through by :
Rearranging:
…
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.