Skip to content
Additional Exercises · 11.20

Q.(a) Estimate the speed with which electrons emitted from a heated emitter of an evacuated tube impinge on the collector maintained at a potential difference of 500 V500\ \text{V} with respect to the emitter. Ignore the small initial speeds of the electrons. The specific charge of the electron, i.e., its e/m is given to be 1.76×1011 C kg−11.76 \times 10^{11}\ \text{C kg}^{-1}.

(b) Use the same formula you employ in
(a) to obtain electron speed for an collector potential of 10 MV10\ \text{MV}. Do you see what is wrong? In what way is the formula to be modified?
CBSENCERTSubjective· 3mImportance★★★★★
28% · 23/83 Questions
✓ Free question

Equate work done by the field to kinetic energy, eV=12mv2eV=\tfrac12mv^2, giving v=2V(e/m)v=\sqrt{2V(e/m)}. At 500 V this gives a sensible ≈1.33×10^7 m/s, but at 10 MV it gives ≈1.88×10^9 m/s — faster than light, which is impossible, showing the classical formula must be replaced by relativistic energy-momentum relations at very high energies.

Step 1 — Set up the non-relativistic speed formula.

The work done by the field equals the kinetic energy gained (ignoring the small initial speed):

eV=12mv2⇒v=2V⋅emeV = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 \quad\Rightarrow\quad v = \sqrt{2V\cdot\frac{e}{m}}

(a) At V=500 VV = 500\ \text{V}:

v=2(500)(1.76×1011)=1.76×1014v = \sqrt{2(500)(1.76\times10^{11})} = \sqrt{1.76\times10^{14}}

v≈1.33×107 m/sv \approx 1.33\times10^{7}\ \text{m/s}

This is about 4.4% of the speed of light — small enough that the non-relativistic formula is a reasonable approximation here.

(b) At V=10 MV=1×107 VV = 10\ \text{MV} = 1\times10^{7}\ \text{V}, applying the same formula blindly:

v=2(1×107)(1.76×1011)=3.52×1018v = \sqrt{2(1\times10^{7})(1.76\times10^{11})} = \sqrt{3.52\times10^{18}}

v≈1.88×109 m/sv \approx 1.88\times10^{9}\ \text{m/s}

What's wrong: this exceeds the speed of light (c=3×108 m/sc=3\times10^{8}\ \text{m/s}) by more than a factor of 6 — a physical impossibility. The formula v=2eV/mv=\sqrt{2eV/m} was derived assuming the classical (Newtonian) kinetic energy expression KE=12mv2KE=\tfrac12mv^2, which is only valid when v≪cv \ll c. At 10 MV the kinetic energy gained (10 MeV) is more than 19 times the electron's rest mass energy (mec2=0.511 MeVm_ec^2 = 0.511\ \text{MeV}), so the electron is highly relativistic.

The correct (relativistic) approach: replace the classical kinetic energy formula with the relativistic one,

KE=eV=(γ−1)mec2,γ=11−v2/c2KE = eV = (\gamma - 1)m_ec^2, \qquad \gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}

Solving this for vv always yields v<cv < c, however large VV is made — the speed approaches, but never reaches, cc.

✓Final answer

(a) v≈1.33×107 m/s;(b) the non-relativistic formula predicts v≈1.88×109 m/s>c, which is unphysical — relativistic kinetic energy KE=(γ−1)mec2 must be used instead\boxed{\text{(a) } v \approx 1.33\times10^{7}\ \text{m/s}; \qquad \text{(b) the non-relativistic formula predicts } v \approx 1.88\times10^{9}\ \text{m/s} > c\text{, which is unphysical — relativistic kinetic energy } KE=(\gamma-1)m_ec^2 \text{ must be used instead}}

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.