Worked Examples · Example 1
Q.
The advertisement expenditure (X, in Rs. lakh) and the corresponding sales (Y, in Rs. lakh) of a firm over 5 years are given below. Compute Karl Pearson's Coefficient of Correlation by the actual mean (deviation) method.
| Year | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advertisement Expenditure (X) | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| Sales (Y) | 3 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 10 |
Gujarat GsebTextbookSubjectiveImportance★★★★★
12% · 5/42 Questions
✓ Free question
Step 1 — Compute the means.
Step 2 — Compute the deviations and the required products.
| 2 | 3 | −4 | −4 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| 4 | 6 | −2 | −1 | 2 | 4 | 1 |
| 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| 10 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 12 | 16 | 9 |
| Total | 34 | 40 | 30 |
Step 3 — Apply the formula.
Verification by the direct (raw-score) method: , , , , , .
Both methods agree exactly at .
✓Final answer
— a very high degree of positive correlation between advertisement expenditure and sales.
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.